Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] Potential Markets de-listed from Bittrex - page 5. (Read 63915 times)

sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
i can see why bittrex made this thread.

its fun to see people beg  Grin
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
Don't delist Pesetacoin from Bittrex!
https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-PTC

Look at the last volume on your exchange, as well community is strong and discussing on their spanish thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annptc-pesetacoin-espana-bittrex-cryptopia-southxchange-403437

+1

PLEASE Don't delist PTC . In a few days something great will happen.
Please wait . A great project will start and PTC is ver y important
full member
Activity: 193
Merit: 100
In very short time we launched the online store that supports pesetacoin.

The prediction was for tomorrow, Friday, July 25. We decided to delay the launch and doing completely fine for next Tuesday.
We are finishing up a payment gateway that is looking great in PTC

www.coomercia.com
www.lamegashop.es

and more... Wink
full member
Activity: 207
Merit: 100
Wahoo for the Bitcoin revolution!
OK,
So can we start a New Discussion Thread for what features would make a good exchange. What qualifications would make a worthwhile crypto development?
What are known scams? What are good working cryptos and communities? Things like this. Richie has always responded to me, about what is going on with some problem I had with Bittrex. So, let's start having constructive conversations about more "mature markets and cryptos" ...
thanks,
Rick
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
i think this 'free market' argument doesnt wash.

we arent dealing with a free market. this is a private company exchange and the markets are highly manipulated.

this 'lofty' type of language is used to justify all the horseshit thats happening on a daily basis.

corny devs keep stealing money from newbs and it has to stop.
full member
Activity: 207
Merit: 100
Wahoo for the Bitcoin revolution!
I agree with most of what's been said here, but also think there needs to be a much wider discussion on the topic. I think that your criticisms are well founded but could be about almost any exchanges not just about Bittrex. I know that there are unscrupulous people developing crypto as well. So what is a solution to bring all these diverse parties to discuss these important issues?

thanks,
Rick
legendary
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1130
Truth will out!
Don't delist Pesetacoin from Bittrex!
https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-PTC

Look at the last volume on your exchange, as well community is strong and discussing on their spanish thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annptc-pesetacoin-espana-bittrex-cryptopia-southxchange-403437
sr. member
Activity: 258
Merit: 250
I have gotten a reply about what happened to digital commerce from one of the developers and i asked them to come here and speak up about it. Please do not delist Digital Commerce.
legendary
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
If we look at CNL as an example, how is Bittrex supposed to curtail that sort of thing happening? What really happened there? The dev promised pie in the sky tech, people bought it, and he never came back. How was Bittrex supposed to know that would happen? I think Bittrex is doing fine. Obviously they don't want to get attacked so they'll scan for hidden premines, viruses, exploits, etc. but beyond that it's the market's job to determine if a coin is a "scam" or not. Who knows, maybe the CNL dev really meant to follow through but he got hit by a bus when he stepped off the curb.


"sure" it's the investors job to get his info on a coin but as it is right now I know quite a few people who haven't bought a bittrex launch for a while as there is literally not regulation to avoid these situation. Nothing to protect our money. I believe all the centralized exchange around the world aren't simply launching stock market w/o knowing what's up with the company and owners. I for one, I'm done with this shit and will only invest in coins that I have a "proof of dev".

I'm sure this trend is already started and the alt volume is going to drop until it's resolved. Bittrex would be better to protect their customer over protecting the scammers/dev. Otherwise their business plan to add every coin that promise the moon will back fire in their face and soon they will find themselves to be the new polo or cryptsy.

What you are talking about is totally reasonable. If you aren't sure about a coin, don't buy it! And the price will reflect that. As long as the coin is not a virus or actively trying to literally scam you by stealing your Bitcoin wallet or something, then it doesn't matter one ounce what the dev promises to do. Almost every single alt coin today rose because the dev promised things in the future. It is up to investors to decide whether it is worth it to trust that particular developer and to invest in their coin. That is the whole point of a market and an exchange. It is not Bittrex's job to decide whether a coin is a good investment, and whether the dev will deliver or not. Bittrex is a great exchange.

Sounds like the market is slowly maturing. And that's good news. The blurring-to-blinding proliferation of new alts has gotten to the point where it's almost futile to keep up unless you have a real talent for "artful dodging."

And, as I sad, that's good news! It means that the real winners will select a good coin, buy it when it's quiet, and HODL. I'm doing that with NFD because (for reputational reasons) I pretty much have to...but I was planning to do exactly the same thing with Reddcoin when it was languishing at 5 satoshis. I actually had more than 30 million Redd, but I sold what I had at six satoshis in order to shift into NFD. I know, I missed the big move up to >= 20...but I had plans. Smiley

I think, now most especially, that it's the time for us to remember that anyone who bought Bitcoin in the middle of 2011 was riding a loss for at least six months...a near-eternity here in the wild frontier...
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
the grandpa of cryptos
adding coisn and deleting - sucks. cryptsy after adding always keeps coins ie the ydo LTC market.

but bittrex added to many on start ie shitty and scammy CGB. those need to die, but others that dont fork all the time should stay
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
I posted this topic recently
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bittrex-killing-the-altcoin-market-687852

Its sadly becoming more true as Bittrex becomes the top exchange.

It would be nice if users simply didn't buy in to new coins they add, this would send a message to them that we are sick and tired of them letting scamcoins thrive and hurting the average joe user as they have been doing for a while now.
sr. member
Activity: 324
Merit: 250
What I would like to see from a leading exchange like yours is to implement some proof of dev.

- How hard would it be to get the leading dev of interesting coins to chat with one of you in a video call explaining what his coin is, what he intends to do and what not.  

I am sure some of them will still be scam, as a competent person can fool you into accepting his coin but after he fooled the community once, this guy will be barred from your exchange forever with his photo published and what not.,. For their next scam they will need an other competent dev to give the speech and answer your technical guy. A method like this is a bit intrusive but for the sake of crypto, I believe this is almost mandatory at this point.

Bittrex is hurting more than helping the community at this point with all the scams. This is unbelievable how much money has been stolen past few weeks with all this stuff. What might happen at this point is people are going to avoid your site and go back to mintpal and invest in established new coins.

I personally was trading quite a bit 3 weeks ago and barely bought any coins on your exchange since then, and intend to do so until this situation is resolved.

Investing in the dev > investing in a coin right now.

Why can't we the investor demand this from the dev on their announcement page before we invest in their coinHuh Maybe on their website? Why does bittrex have to take the time out of their day, and put more responsiblility on their shoulders for "proof of dev" because when those devs start ripping people off it brings a whole new level of responsibility. I am personally done spending money on scamcoins. Even if i get proof of dev that doesn't mean I will trust that dev or the coin. Personal responsibility people please. I will not blame anyone else for the scams I walked in to.

They will at some point if this trend keeps up.

What I am saying is bittrex should be more vigilant and might want to implement a "proof of dev" type of thing.

1. Scam hurts the crypto community in general
2. People getting scammed are less likely to come back dumping money on the exchange
3. The longer the people keeps their money, the better bittrex is doing on fees, scammer runs with the money while trader trades and pay fees.
4. Bittrex is a CENTRALIZED exchange so get lost with your free market shit. They as a company should maximize their EV and having 4/5 coin scam their base user is definitively not good for them
5. The market auto regulating will take longer than if bittrex added some "proof of dev" methodology by gathering info and outing the scammers.
6. While the market auto regulate, bittrex is going to lose money due to less fee being raked and all these scams ultimately will hit their pocket.


So it's +++++Ev for bittrex to avoid these scams by adopting preemptive measures. Just my 2c.

As for me I really don't care what they do. I'm done trading on bittrex as 4/5 of their launches lately have been scam of some sort and when they are not the brand new 6 hours coin are launched with 1M+ market cap. Not worth my time to trade there.

I'm 33% liquid right now and the good coins that will sky rocket (Like LTC/FTC/PPC did) when BTC moon are all at their 3-6 months low so I'm buying these instead.


P.S. If you want my action back please let people short your coins. I'd pay 20k a year to have this option lol
sr. member
Activity: 713
Merit: 252
What I would like to see from a leading exchange like yours is to implement some proof of dev.

- How hard would it be to get the leading dev of interesting coins to chat with one of you in a video call explaining what his coin is, what he intends to do and what not.  

I am sure some of them will still be scam, as a competent person can fool you into accepting his coin but after he fooled the community once, this guy will be barred from your exchange forever with his photo published and what not.,. For their next scam they will need an other competent dev to give the speech and answer your technical guy. A method like this is a bit intrusive but for the sake of crypto, I believe this is almost mandatory at this point.

Bittrex is hurting more than helping the community at this point with all the scams. This is unbelievable how much money has been stolen past few weeks with all this stuff. What might happen at this point is people are going to avoid your site and go back to mintpal and invest in established new coins.

I personally was trading quite a bit 3 weeks ago and barely bought any coins on your exchange since then, and intend to do so until this situation is resolved.

Investing in the dev > investing in a coin right now.

Why can't we the investor demand this from the dev on their announcement page before we invest in their coin??? Maybe on their website? Why does bittrex have to take the time out of their day, and put more responsiblility on their shoulders for "proof of dev" because when those devs start ripping people off it brings a whole new level of responsibility. I am personally done spending money on scamcoins. Even if i get proof of dev that doesn't mean I will trust that dev or the coin. Personal responsibility people please. I will not blame anyone else for the scams I walked in to.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
If we look at CNL as an example, how is Bittrex supposed to curtail that sort of thing happening? What really happened there? The dev promised pie in the sky tech, people bought it, and he never came back. How was Bittrex supposed to know that would happen? I think Bittrex is doing fine. Obviously they don't want to get attacked so they'll scan for hidden premines, viruses, exploits, etc. but beyond that it's the market's job to determine if a coin is a "scam" or not. Who knows, maybe the CNL dev really meant to follow through but he got hit by a bus when he stepped off the curb.


"sure" it's the investors job to get his info on a coin but as it is right now I know quite a few people who haven't bought a bittrex launch for a while as there is literally not regulation to avoid these situation. Nothing to protect our money. I believe all the centralized exchange around the world aren't simply launching stock market w/o knowing what's up with the company and owners. I for one, I'm done with this shit and will only invest in coins that I have a "proof of dev".

I'm sure this trend is already started and the alt volume is going to drop until it's resolved. Bittrex would be better to protect their customer over protecting the scammers/dev. Otherwise their business plan to add every coin that promise the moon will back fire in their face and soon they will find themselves to be the new polo or cryptsy.

What you are talking about is totally reasonable. If you aren't sure about a coin, don't buy it! And the price will reflect that. As long as the coin is not a virus or actively trying to literally scam you by stealing your Bitcoin wallet or something, then it doesn't matter one ounce what the dev promises to do. Almost every single alt coin today rose because the dev promised things in the future. It is up to investors to decide whether it is worth it to trust that particular developer and to invest in their coin. That is the whole point of a market and an exchange. It is not Bittrex's job to decide whether a coin is a good investment, and whether the dev will deliver or not. Bittrex is a great exchange.
sr. member
Activity: 713
Merit: 252
I find it interesting the past month scams have been increasing dramatically at an ever increasing rate. A new coin came out with a plan a well known dev and it blew up. What did people do? They dumped and bought conceal and incognito and shit and got ripped. You know what? I stopped buying that garbage I might but HODLing the majority $VIA but I know the dev isn't going anywhere. I am also not crying to bittrex because I got scammed. STOP BUYING THAT GARBAGE AND IT WILL DISAPPEAR. They are taking a free market approach its what got them where they are. Bittrex loves listening to their users and I am sure they will come of with something maybe to make you feel better about it, but in the end its always up to you. No more 24 hour POW garbage STOP BUYING IT NOW.

sr. member
Activity: 324
Merit: 250
If we look at CNL as an example, how is Bittrex supposed to curtail that sort of thing happening? What really happened there? The dev promised pie in the sky tech, people bought it, and he never came back. How was Bittrex supposed to know that would happen? I think Bittrex is doing fine. Obviously they don't want to get attacked so they'll scan for hidden premines, viruses, exploits, etc. but beyond that it's the market's job to determine if a coin is a "scam" or not. Who knows, maybe the CNL dev really meant to follow through but he got hit by a bus when he stepped off the curb.


"sure" it's the investors job to get his info on a coin but as it is right now I know quite a few people who haven't bought a bittrex launch for a while as there is literally not regulation to avoid these situation. Nothing to protect our money. I believe all the centralized exchange around the world aren't simply launching stock market w/o knowing what's up with the company and owners. I for one, I'm done with this shit and will only invest in coins that I have a "proof of dev".

I'm sure this trend is already started and the alt volume is going to drop until it's resolved. Bittrex would be better to protect their customer over protecting the scammers/dev. Otherwise their business plan to add every coin that promise the moon will back fire in their face and soon they will find themselves to be the new polo or cryptsy.
sr. member
Activity: 324
Merit: 250
What I would like to see from a leading exchange like yours is to implement some proof of dev.

- How hard would it be to get the leading dev of interesting coins to chat with one of you in a video call explaining what his coin is, what he intends to do and what not.  

I am sure some of them will still be scam, as a competent person can fool you into accepting his coin but after he fooled the community once, this guy will be barred from your exchange forever with his photo published and what not.,. For their next scam they will need an other competent dev to give the speech and answer your technical guy. A method like this is a bit intrusive but for the sake of crypto, I believe this is almost mandatory at this point.

Bittrex is hurting more than helping the community at this point with all the scams. This is unbelievable how much money has been stolen past few weeks with all this stuff. What might happen at this point is people are going to avoid your site and go back to mintpal and invest in established new coins.

I personally was trading quite a bit 3 weeks ago and barely bought any coins on your exchange since then, and intend to do so until this situation is resolved.

Investing in the dev > investing in a coin right now.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
If we look at CNL as an example, how is Bittrex supposed to curtail that sort of thing happening? What really happened there? The dev promised pie in the sky tech, people bought it, and he never came back. How was Bittrex supposed to know that would happen? I think Bittrex is doing fine. Obviously they don't want to get attacked so they'll scan for hidden premines, viruses, exploits, etc. but beyond that it's the market's job to determine if a coin is a "scam" or not. Who knows, maybe the CNL dev really meant to follow through but he got hit by a bus when he stepped off the curb.
sr. member
Activity: 276
Merit: 250
can we have any infos on the XHC Wallets please?
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114

sorry dudes but u have jumped the shark in july.  Grin


+1

I'm done with Bittrex. Its become a mockery of itself.
Pages:
Jump to: