Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [POW] [XHV] Haven Protocol - untraceable payments x stable value storage - page 53. (Read 71459 times)

newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
Anyone else having pool issues?  Using the new miner, but no matter what pool i use its only submitting shares maybe once every 1-2 minutes.  xmr-stak is showing at 2500 h/s but pools are showing like 19 h/s.  


Yes, same
has no balance



Have you tried the updated miner?

yap I've updated the link you give
newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
What miner supports rx550 . help
jr. member
Activity: 88
Merit: 3

hi dev
I transacted to tradeogre.com
why pending?
already from last night




http://i65.tinypic.com/2m2gkjt.jpg


Hi, is your daemon synced with the network?
jr. member
Activity: 88
Merit: 3
Anyone else having pool issues?  Using the new miner, but no matter what pool i use its only submitting shares maybe once every 1-2 minutes.  xmr-stak is showing at 2500 h/s but pools are showing like 19 h/s. 


Yes, same
has no balance



Have you tried the updated miner?
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0

hi dev
I transacted to tradeogre.com
why pending?
already from last night




http://i65.tinypic.com/2m2gkjt.jpg
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
Anyone else having pool issues?  Using the new miner, but no matter what pool i use its only submitting shares maybe once every 1-2 minutes.  xmr-stak is showing at 2500 h/s but pools are showing like 19 h/s. 


Yes, same
has no balance
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Anyone else getting the following?

Fast-connecting to xhv-us.luckypool.io:7777 pool ...
[2018-04-04 20:12:05] : Pool xhv-us.luckypool.io:7777 connected. Logging in...
[2018-04-04 20:12:15] : SOCKET ERROR - [xhv-us.luckypool.io:7777] CALL error: Timeout while waiting for a reply
jr. member
Activity: 88
Merit: 3
jr. member
Activity: 88
Merit: 3
New miner is being compiled with bug fixes. Stay tuned!
full member
Activity: 1179
Merit: 131
Anyone else having pool issues?  Using the new miner, but no matter what pool i use its only submitting shares maybe once every 1-2 minutes.  xmr-stak is showing at 2500 h/s but pools are showing like 19 h/s. 
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
Pool shouldn't matter.  I have only used the xmr-stak-haven and I've compiled it myself under linux.

windows &%^^(* me, windows defender turned on some settings after a forced update, 1 setting turned on in windows defender prevented the config, pool and miner files from being created from console Sad

all that being said though, ive got the miner working, wow thanks windows! good job haven
jr. member
Activity: 176
Merit: 1
Pool shouldn't matter.  I have only used the xmr-stak-haven and I've compiled it myself under linux.
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
ya nothing working here, what pool are you on, claymore cryptonote miner works amazing on all these other forked crptonight algos, however not this one, and this xmr stak haven keeps giving me :

[2018-04-04 16:04:06] : File is empty or too short - config.txt.
[2018-04-04 16:04:38] : Failed to open config file config.txt.

Couple hours messing with it so far, going back to stellite lol
jr. member
Activity: 176
Merit: 1
Working for me.

I've been able to optimize my quad Opterons.  Hit is JUST over 50%.  2120H/s down to 1045H/s.

Heavy is basically 2x memory over CN so now L2/L3 is divisible by FOUR for max efficiency. 
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
anyone able to get any of these miners working, this xmr stak haven miner were being told to download and use, isn't working for me at all... wont create its own config file.
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
why is this fork not working with the new claymore cryptonote miner, I have it running great on stellite which also forked..? have any of the pools switched over yet?
hero member
Activity: 980
Merit: 502
FYI: I just read it
i think you all should read this article. Vitalik Buterin is writing about DPOS and hits the nail.
https://vitalik.ca/general/2018/03/28/plutocracy.html
if you don't want to read the hole text read the just the quote
newbie
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
getting shares rejected on AMD as well
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
Anyone getting invalid result on the NVIDIA cards?
jr. member
Activity: 176
Merit: 1
There is a reason it's called cryptonight heavy.  If you are only losing 33% be glad.  MY quad Opteron servers went from over 2100H/s to under 900!  Almost a 60% loss!


It's not "losing" as its a different algorithim and everyone on the network is using the same one Smiley Just because an algorithim gives you 1 million hashes is irrelevant since everyone else would have 1 million too if you get my point.

In saying that CPUs were hit harder than GPUs due to the increase of memory usage in the algorithim.

It's "losing" when device A got B and device X got Y.  When the ratio between B and Y is not equal, it's a loss is it not?  CPUs have become less efficient and have LOST to GPUs even more so than they already had with the new algo in place.

Also, the auto config for CPU is no longer optimal in xmr-stak, at least not for quad Opterons.  It will get me 500H/s and my old config does ~900H/s.  I will try to hand tune to see if there is any other gains to me made.
Pages:
Jump to: