Topic: [ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com - page 243. (Read 829908 times)

If you read through that reddit link, it seems the scrypt/LTC USB sticks are fake or a scam anyway.

Is it just me or would a scrypt asic not look like this at all?  It would either be a big, big die with lots of expensive as hell eDRAM and a memory controller, or go external and put some expensive GDDR5 chips on the PCB. Basically, it would wind up looking like a GPU, no. So... this is bullshit?

My payout has been exactly the same for the past 3 days. About .01/MH, that's pretty much on par with the difficulty increases.

I don't see the issue. This isn't mid December anymore when everyone was pumping and dumping DOGE. It's back to normal.

I'm getting around 5-7% rejects or so on the main server - what are you getting?

My rejects are high than others probably because it goes Rig --> switch --> EOP --> switch --> modem, which unfortunately adds a bit of latency

As for the lower reported hash rate, how do your Worker Units compare to your reported hashrate?

My Accepted + Rejected is within 2% of what is should be, so unfortunately I can't help you much there.

You could always create another address and point your rig(s) to that instead and see what happens.

It doesn't matter what server he's on. H2o already said that all servers are mining the same coins, running the same algorithm.


Also, I STILL haven't gotten an answer to my question. I keep getting higher rejects + lower hash rates, going on 4 days now. I've tried switching servers and that doesn't help. I've been mining here for a month now, and my settings never changed. I tried PMing H2o, but no answer there, and no answer here.

Yeah he is the second guy.

he didn't say he was running the big server did he? I thought he was the SECOND big account.

Yes, however, the rejected shares shouldn't matter that much, as "Bob" still had a consistently higher accepted hashrate, yet was making less.

My payout tonight was very very close to 0.01 BTC per MH/s, which puts me in line with "bob"

I've also been around a while, and I'm on the main server, not one of the newer "beta" ones

I think the best explanation is the one already proposed - the smaller servers can more effectively "coin hop" for increased profitability while the older "main" server can pretty much only do LTC, DOGE, and a few others

Of course, others will say that H2O starts siphoning payout for himself after you've been around a while :-P

In order to test the server theory, you should switch all miners to a different address for a day (on same server), then add up the total made in 24 hrs (exchanged + unexchanged + immature) and compare it to what another person (who has been on the server for a while) with a very similar hashrate / rejects made during that same 24 hr period (remember to check the difference in the unexchanged balance as well as the payout)

As long as there's no "leeching" going on, the payouts should be identical...

Now take your miners and point them at one of the beta servers for 24 hours and again record what you made... compare this to the payout of the equal hashpower address and see if they still match.

Could be.

So, help me understand what happens with "inactive" accounts. I've decided to switch from one wallet to another on 01/08, got last payment to my old wallet on that date and now it shows 0.00598752 balance. If I understand it correctly today is the day this account was supposed to get paid the remainder of the balance (7 days not being paid + today is Wednesday), right? The daily payout went through for all accounts with > 0.01 balance, but I haven't received mine. Am I missing something obvious? I know, it's about $5, but still ...

The chart (http://www.middlecoin.com/reports/1vgf8yeEpr3BtqiFzjMRjaD1eS8DD6Vsj.html) doesn't reflect the latest balance, but the list does.

They have not so different rejected rates and looking closely to the graph I missed earlier I see more orange for Frank : so no it's not rejected shares

I know this will annoy some people. But to finally put to bed the rumour that MiMiMiner is running some sparkly fandangled ASIC miner....   read his post in this thread here:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4371557

Where he says:
Hi,

Can somebody please PM me that has contacts with these people. We are very interested. Currently we have a pilot running with 80 GPU servers. We want to expand bigtime.

Thanks.


Now how one goes about getting over 900 MH/s from just 80 servers is another question - that's > 11MH/s per server.

Judging from here: https://litecoin.info/Mining_hardware_comparison#AMD_.28ATI.29 the best achieved is around 1.5MH/s per watercooled 7990, so with 80 servers would require 7 or 8 cards per server.

There are motherboards available with 7 PCI-E slots (e.g. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131971) - probably more if I bothered to look harder

Quite a feat of juggling enough power supplies, dissipating heat and keeping 7 or 8 cards per board running in a stable manner.

bal3wolf are you running this? if so are you using windows?

i give this a try tomorow, thanks 

You're right, I just had a quick look at the payouts

In fact I noticed these payout differences between users with similar hashrate a few days ago.
Having decent payouts for my hashrate (0.0012-0.0015/Mh/s) I didn't investigate too much on that.

A little something I made for TamperMonkey (Greasemonkey for Chrome) that hides everybody elses' info after the page loads...I also had it replace the footer with the server update time converted to your system's timezone.

^{// ==UserScript==
// @name Middlecoin
// @version 0.1
// @description Hides all but my addresses
// @match http://middlecoin.com/allusers.html
// @match http://www.middlecoin.com/allusers.html
// @match http://middlecoin2.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/allusers.html
// @require http://code.jquery.com/jquery-latest.js
// ==/UserScript==
$("tbody tr").hide();
$("#1M166oeEGrM5QJQh3Uo3fmaHnbP73mcroq").parent().show();
$("#1G6tnSENDTd5cofsWhiQh5Tscbf1K9mCxo").parent().show();
var servertime = new Date($.trim($('#footer p').text().split('|')[0].replace('Page last updated ','')));
var localtime = 'Page last updated ' + servertime.toString();
$('#footer p').text(localtime);}

someone asked for the new cgminer from veox so i got looking and he just made a new one called sgminer i compiled it for the person asking for it and figure i will post it for you guys sence this is the pool i mine on and been helping when somthing needs to be compiled.

https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=13190.15
http://bal3wolf.centelia.net/MINING/sgminer%204.0.zip

Bob has a lot more rejected shares

If I'd have to guess, I'd say they are mining on different servers. Bob is probably mining on the uswest server and Frank on one of the beta servers. uswest being the biggest and having the most hashrate means it can't mine the smaller coins. The beta servers which are smaller, don't have this problem and can mine the smaller coins without problem.

This is just me guessing though that the servers work independently from each other and are basically their own pools.

Uhm, really? If you click those links you get hashrate graphs going back 7 days... not just payouts and last hour.

day wasn't complete until now.  thanks.  

oh shi


(didn't know about the fluoride, thx)