Spread Hashrate
I updated pool software on http://qcn.hashinvest.net, share validation speed improved.
Topic: [ANN] [QCN] QuazarCoin | Full privacy&data protection | Egalitarian PoW - page 49. (Read 186566 times)
June 20, 2014, 12:01:59 AM
Guys, what you are doing? http://minin.gs/qcn hashrate is 70% of the network.
Spread Hashrate
I updated pool software on http://qcn.hashinvest.net, share validation speed improved.
Spread Hashrate
I updated pool software on http://qcn.hashinvest.net, share validation speed improved.
June 19, 2014, 11:09:07 PM
QuazarCoin is great, and what's the difference from the XMR. They look like the same thing.
We like the new coin, and I think QCN will be hot!
when the price is low, i'll buy some and wait!
good luck!
1.XMR has a bit more hypeWe like the new coin, and I think QCN will be hot!
when the price is low, i'll buy some and wait!
good luck!
2.XMR has several developers, and this has been seen as a positive.
3.XMR has a different emission curve.
That said, the developer of this coin has said he hopes to announce a development team too at some point, so that should be positive. This developer has done many things right but it's a lot to do without help.
It's good to see him coming up with his own ideas to improve things in the XMR code too.
June 19, 2014, 09:47:38 PM
QuazarCoin is great, and what's the difference from the XMR. They look like the same thing.
We like the new coin, and I think QCN will be hot!
when the price is low, i'll buy some and wait!
good luck!
We like the new coin, and I think QCN will be hot!
when the price is low, i'll buy some and wait!
good luck!
June 19, 2014, 03:59:40 PM
Mining for pools where you are more than 1% can be rather difficult, and despite all the talk of decentralization it's actually provably less profitable to mine at a small pool than at a large pool. If it's not, then why doesn't everyone just stick with solo mining forever? Because you'll likely never find a single block that way, just like a small pool will only find blocks infrequently. A pool with 3% of the hash rate for example is likely to find about 2.7% of blocks in my experience, while a pool with 1% might only find 0.5% of the blocks. And a pool with 35% of the hash rate might find 37% of blocks. But that's a topic for discussion elsewhere.
I don't doubt that is correct. I also have found that the pools not generating dust for my hashrate are not at all reliable. It seems to be a problem with all the Bytecoin code derived coins. Other coins I have mined in pools (litecoin and vertcoin) do not seem to have these problems.
June 19, 2014, 03:53:10 PM
Mining for pools where you are more than 1% can be rather difficult, and despite all the talk of decentralization it's actually provably less profitable to mine at a small pool than at a large pool. If it's not, then why doesn't everyone just stick with solo mining forever? Because you'll likely never find a single block that way, just like a small pool will only find blocks infrequently. A pool with 3% of the hash rate for example is likely to find about 2.7% of blocks in my experience, while a pool with 1% might only find 0.5% of the blocks. And a pool with 35% of the hash rate might find 37% of blocks. But that's a topic for discussion elsewhere.
I'm mining a decent amount of coins right now, which is of course generating tons of small payouts over time. What's the best way to consolidate those so I can do one or two larger transfers to an exchange? Do I just run:
transfer 0 [My Address] [Amount] [My Address]
And do that multiple times until I can send larger transactions of 10 to 100 coins without having the wallet balk about having too many inputs? I guess I'd have to wait for confirmation on the transfers as well, but better than than ending up with vaporized coins. LOL
Yes that will work. I send as much as will fit (approximately) in a single payment, and keep sending that payment again and again until there is little left. Then wait for it to return as consolidated inputs.
N.B. you only need to do:
Quote
transfer 0 [My Address] [Amount]
The repeated address in your command is payment id, but does no harm: transfer 0 [My Address] [Amount] [My Address=Payment Id] June 19, 2014, 03:46:08 PM
I sent about 10.4 QCN to Poloniex yesterday as a test -- so verify I could transfer the coins properly, basically. Unfortunately, all has not gone well and while their support apparently looked into things and credited one of the deposits, the other six are still missing. Wait, seven deposits? Oh, yeah... I couldn't send one bigger transaction due to the old "too many inputs" problem. So I split it up into seven transactions (I just pressed the up arrow to repeat the last command, though I did generate a new payment ID after the first transfer). Here's the list of commands I used in the wallet:
I think it is risky to change the payment id while payments are still to be processed, are you sure Poloniex can handle that? They may only store one payment id per account/coin. Also, I wouldn't use an exchange transfer to cleanup dust, those transfers take longer and it just makes everything harder to track. Such a large transaction for such a small amount could sit around for a while before being included in a block, and may eventually be rejected and returned to your wallet.I clean up small inputs by sending the coins back to the same wallet first, or a second wallet used for spending (the first used only for mining). Don't mine for pools where you are a tiny fraction of the pool hash (<1%), find a pool more suitable for your hash rate, until the pools have sorted out a solution for the dust problem.
I'm mining a decent amount of coins right now, which is of course generating tons of small payouts over time. What's the best way to consolidate those so I can do one or two larger transfers to an exchange? Do I just run:
transfer 0 [My Address] [Amount]
And do that multiple times until I can send larger transactions of 10 to 100 coins without having the wallet balk about having too many inputs? I guess I'd have to wait for confirmation on the transfers as well, but better than than ending up with vaporized coins. LOL
June 19, 2014, 03:36:25 PM
I clean up small inputs by sending the coins back to the same wallet first, or a second wallet used for spending (the first used only for mining). Don't mine for pools where you are a tiny fraction of the pool hash (<1%), find a pool more suitable for your hash rate, until the pools have sorted out a solution for the dust problem.
June 19, 2014, 03:02:18 PM
I sent about 10.4 QCN to Poloniex yesterday as a test -- so verify I could transfer the coins properly, basically. Unfortunately, all has not gone well and while their support apparently looked into things and credited one of the deposits, the other six are still missing. Wait, seven deposits? Oh, yeah... I couldn't send one bigger transaction due to the old "too many inputs" problem. So I split it up into seven transactions (I just pressed the up arrow to repeat the last command, though I did generate a new payment ID after the first transfer). Here's the list of commands I used in the wallet:
I think it is risky to change the payment id while payments are still to be processed, are you sure Poloniex can handle that? They may only store one payment id per account/coin. Also, I wouldn't use an exchange transfer to cleanup dust, those transfers take longer and it just makes everything harder to track. Such a large transaction for such a small amount could sit around for a while before being included in a block, and may eventually be rejected and returned to your wallet.
I clean up small inputs by sending the coins back to the same wallet first, or a second wallet used for spending (the first used only for mining). Don't mine for pools where you are a tiny fraction of the pool hash (<1%), find a pool more suitable for your hash rate, until the pools have sorted out a solution for the dust problem.
June 19, 2014, 02:02:31 PM
>>> Join QuazarCoin Pool http://qcn.hashinvest.net / EU <<<
minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://qcn.hashinvest.net:13333 -u YOUR_ADDRESS -p x
QCN Getting Started for Linux, Windows and Mac users.
Now with instant support! / UTC+6
June 19, 2014, 01:20:10 PM
I sent about 10.4 QCN to Poloniex yesterday as a test -- so verify I could transfer the coins properly, basically. Unfortunately, all has not gone well and while their support apparently looked into things and credited one of the deposits, the other six are still missing. Wait, seven deposits? Oh, yeah... I couldn't send one bigger transaction due to the old "too many inputs" problem. So I split it up into seven transactions (I just pressed the up arrow to repeat the last command, though I did generate a new payment ID after the first transfer). Here's the list of commands I used in the wallet:
That's a bit of a mell-of-a-hess as my mom liked to say, so let me just focus on the transactions:
So here's where I get confused: all of those transactions were sent between blocks 28452 and 28455 as far as I can tell (I'm looking at the simplewallet.log and quasarcoind.log files). None of those transfer amounts shows up in the block explorer around those blocks, but I believes that's the point of the whole anonymous transactions thing, right? After a few hours and no QCN on my Poloniex account, I opened a ticket with most of the above information. This morning I now see a balance of 1.43444524 QCN in my account, and in my wallet when I refreshed I saw the following:
So what's going on? That block 29142 has one of the seven transaction codes from above, but it came about 685 blocks after I sent the transaction. Prior to that block, I can't find any record of the payment ID or transaction code. Sure, I feel like the seven transactions are quite anonymous, but they're also anonymously lost right now. Does Poloniex need to somehow manually receive those other six transactions for them to show up? (That seems unlikely.) Or what exactly has happened that things are not working as I would expect? Any input/suggestions would be welcome -- heck, donations are welcome as well! Maybe I can recover my lost 9 QCN. Hahaha....
1VmHEJ8TDcx4wQ9DTUgiogVDejzPrUJ6VT7FKeQZCNoThYsM5TC6Md2U58W6NgBeTKGsVWitGX16mZy RR6SwtbG5JKUQxoB
Edit: PS, I also notice that when I type balance in my wallet now, I get the following:
balance: 0.793321787690, unlocked balance: 0.652022415308
There's a difference of 0.14 QCN, give or take, and it has been like that since I sent the seven transactions. Again, confusing would be an appropriate term for what's going on. It seems like each transaction included some "dust" coins, and when the transaction is processed by the receiver I got that dust back. I can see that prior to the above my "unlocked balance" was 0.647195415308, and if I add the four "receieved" lines to that I end up with the current 0.652022415308.
Code:
[wallet 1VmHEJ]: transfer 0 1VQpANF1pcKHPRAsZpeyG4jLDd1kbPn32YMeXkr9n8jNFvf8aaJdecB3FyAvo7X1DWJDQt3nii9eUTP5kJSfRpL5AwT72FM 1.434445242462 6fa3b62aaee7d3cbe881f52305273383030e4b06ad2bfb687d94712b80392ae9
Money successfully sent, transaction <0bef9c21aa0532c90969a669b9557f810b315d1088924d1e1c7205a637003c5d>
[wallet 1VmHEJ]: transfer 0 1VQpANF1pcKHPRAsZpeyG4jLDd1kbPn32YMeXkr9n8jNFvf8aaJdecB3FyAvo7X1DWJDQt3nii9eUTP5kJSfRpL5AwT72FM 1.434445242462 818e395099f31d65e4166ee167511ffb812fc849df175b54b0c86e56aba29f52
Money successfully sent, transaction <30b865d16e7944965273e1d66ac112dfd49fb06068b7061e7b7299ca9879cbc3>
[wallet 1VmHEJ]: transfer 0 1VQpANF1pcKHPRAsZpeyG4jLDd1kbPn32YMeXkr9n8jNFvf8aaJdecB3FyAvo7X1DWJDQt3nii9eUTP5kJSfRpL5AwT72FM 1.434445242462 818e395099f31d65e4166ee167511ffb812fc849df175b54b0c86e56aba29f52
Money successfully sent, transaction <0f91c5fe9109dae34608cc6160800917627d7f27b501986211df41bfb5b23c64>
[wallet 1VmHEJ]: transfer 0 1VQpANF1pcKHPRAsZpeyG4jLDd1kbPn32YMeXkr9n8jNFvf8aaJdecB3FyAvo7X1DWJDQt3nii9eUTP5kJSfRpL5AwT72FM 1.434445242462 818e395099f31d65e4166ee167511ffb812fc849df175b54b0c86e56aba29f52
Money successfully sent, transaction <4c974596b3670b88ee9cf54712e248312a6a772b1873cf89a35697fc3cb4d25d>
[wallet 1VmHEJ]: transfer 0 1VQpANF1pcKHPRAsZpeyG4jLDd1kbPn32YMeXkr9n8jNFvf8aaJdecB3FyAvo7X1DWJDQt3nii9eUTP5kJSfRpL5AwT72FM 1.434445242462 818e395099f31d65e4166ee167511ffb812fc849df175b54b0c86e56aba29f52
Money successfully sent, transaction
[wallet 1VmHEJ]: transfer 0 1VQpANF1pcKHPRAsZpeyG4jLDd1kbPn32YMeXkr9n8jNFvf8aaJdecB3FyAvo7X1DWJDQt3nii9eUTP5kJSfRpL5AwT72FM 1.434445242462 818e395099f31d65e4166ee167511ffb812fc849df175b54b0c86e56aba29f52
Money successfully sent, transaction
[wallet 1VmHEJ]: transfer 0 1VQpANF1pcKHPRAsZpeyG4jLDd1kbPn32YMeXkr9n8jNFvf8aaJdecB3FyAvo7X1DWJDQt3nii9eUTP5kJSfRpL5AwT72FM 1.434445242462 818e395099f31d65e4166ee167511ffb812fc849df175b54b0c86e56aba29f52
Money successfully sent, transaction
That's a bit of a mell-of-a-hess as my mom liked to say, so let me just focus on the transactions:
Code:
0bef9c21aa0532c90969a669b9557f810b315d1088924d1e1c7205a637003c5d
30b865d16e7944965273e1d66ac112dfd49fb06068b7061e7b7299ca9879cbc3
0f91c5fe9109dae34608cc6160800917627d7f27b501986211df41bfb5b23c64
4c974596b3670b88ee9cf54712e248312a6a772b1873cf89a35697fc3cb4d25d
a442d51602c693c73536dd6b8cb04c7d036b93a4a71a160bb9575cf9338836b0
e69144a25ba7c7ed73eff9980c1529851369c2048427a8aa2c166bc13904ffdf
a017a05da2bb9317c07bef8db4becd1c1547d120f511a422b5af571720503c3f
So here's where I get confused: all of those transactions were sent between blocks 28452 and 28455 as far as I can tell (I'm looking at the simplewallet.log and quasarcoind.log files). None of those transfer amounts shows up in the block explorer around those blocks, but I believes that's the point of the whole anonymous transactions thing, right? After a few hours and no QCN on my Poloniex account, I opened a ticket with most of the above information. This morning I now see a balance of 1.43444524 QCN in my account, and in my wallet when I refreshed I saw the following:
Code:
Height 29142, transaction <0f91c5fe9109dae34608cc6160800917627d7f27b501986211df41bfb5b23c64>, received 0.000007000000
Height 29142, transaction <0f91c5fe9109dae34608cc6160800917627d7f27b501986211df41bfb5b23c64>, received 0.000020000000
Height 29142, transaction <0f91c5fe9109dae34608cc6160800917627d7f27b501986211df41bfb5b23c64>, received 0.000800000000
Height 29142, transaction <0f91c5fe9109dae34608cc6160800917627d7f27b501986211df41bfb5b23c64>, received 0.004000000000
Height 29142, transaction <0f91c5fe9109dae34608cc6160800917627d7f27b501986211df41bfb5b23c64>, spent 0.000001000000
..... (There are 245 lines of magenta text for the spents, four lines for the receives, all on block 29142 and with the same transaction.)
So what's going on? That block 29142 has one of the seven transaction codes from above, but it came about 685 blocks after I sent the transaction. Prior to that block, I can't find any record of the payment ID or transaction code. Sure, I feel like the seven transactions are quite anonymous, but they're also anonymously lost right now. Does Poloniex need to somehow manually receive those other six transactions for them to show up? (That seems unlikely.) Or what exactly has happened that things are not working as I would expect? Any input/suggestions would be welcome -- heck, donations are welcome as well! Maybe I can recover my lost 9 QCN. Hahaha....
1VmHEJ8TDcx4wQ9DTUgiogVDejzPrUJ6VT7FKeQZCNoThYsM5TC6Md2U58W6NgBeTKGsVWitGX16mZy RR6SwtbG5JKUQxoB
Edit: PS, I also notice that when I type balance in my wallet now, I get the following:
balance: 0.793321787690, unlocked balance: 0.652022415308
There's a difference of 0.14 QCN, give or take, and it has been like that since I sent the seven transactions. Again, confusing would be an appropriate term for what's going on. It seems like each transaction included some "dust" coins, and when the transaction is processed by the receiver I got that dust back. I can see that prior to the above my "unlocked balance" was 0.647195415308, and if I add the four "receieved" lines to that I end up with the current 0.652022415308.
June 19, 2014, 11:18:28 AM
Quote from: quazarcoind
2014-Jun-19 19:09:42.293300 [P2P2]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [222.82.65.207:23080 OUT]Failed to do
_send()
2014-Jun-19 19:10:23.823675 [P2P5][sock 700] Some problems at write: An existing
connection was forcibly closed by the remote host:10054
2014-Jun-19 19:10:30.210040 [P2P6]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:10:30.219041 [P2P6]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:515 [115.210.177.178:23080 OUT]Failed to
do_send
2014-Jun-19 19:10:36.837419 [P2P7]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:15:15.961384 [P2P4]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:15:15.973385 [P2P4]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:515 [115.210.177.178:23080 OUT]Failed to
do_send
2014-Jun-19 19:15:41.527847 [P2P2]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:15:41.540847 [P2P2]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [115.210.177.178:23080 OUT]Failed to
do_send()
2014-Jun-19 19:15:41.550848 [P2P2]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:15:41.563849 [P2P2]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [115.210.177.178:23080 OUT]Failed to
do_send()
2014-Jun-19 19:15:56.299692 [P2P7]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:15:56.311692 [P2P7]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [115.210.177.178:23080 OUT]Failed to
do_send()
2014-Jun-19 19:15:58.739831 [P2P3]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:15:58.751832 [P2P3]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [115.210.177.178:23080 OUT]Failed to
do_send()
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [222.82.65.207:23080 OUT]Failed to do
_send()
2014-Jun-19 19:10:23.823675 [P2P5][sock 700] Some problems at write: An existing
connection was forcibly closed by the remote host:10054
2014-Jun-19 19:10:30.210040 [P2P6]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:10:30.219041 [P2P6]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:515 [115.210.177.178:23080 OUT]Failed to
do_send
2014-Jun-19 19:10:36.837419 [P2P7]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:15:15.961384 [P2P4]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:15:15.973385 [P2P4]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:515 [115.210.177.178:23080 OUT]Failed to
do_send
2014-Jun-19 19:15:41.527847 [P2P2]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:15:41.540847 [P2P2]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [115.210.177.178:23080 OUT]Failed to
do_send()
2014-Jun-19 19:15:41.550848 [P2P2]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:15:41.563849 [P2P2]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [115.210.177.178:23080 OUT]Failed to
do_send()
2014-Jun-19 19:15:56.299692 [P2P7]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:15:56.311692 [P2P7]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [115.210.177.178:23080 OUT]Failed to
do_send()
2014-Jun-19 19:15:58.739831 [P2P3]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_
SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection
2014-Jun-19 19:15:58.751832 [P2P3]ERROR c:\projects\quazarcoin\contrib\epee\incl
ude\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [115.210.177.178:23080 OUT]Failed to
do_send()
After the update.
And I'm still missing 50 coins
June 19, 2014, 10:49:41 AM
June 19, 2014, 09:02:29 AM
I've done the update..
but the lost money where are?
but the lost money where are?
June 19, 2014, 08:44:56 AM
can someone suggest me a good reliable pool for qcn... im mining so far with 3.5khs @http://qcnpool.org/ but on 3 block foundd all 3 orphan.... is there something more stable ?
I installed the latest Quazarcoin software on http://qcnpool.org and unleashed some hash power on it. It looks much better now, but I think that the problem really is that any CryptoNote pool will only work well if it has enough miners / hash power. One of the most stable pools for QCN is currently http://minin.gs/qcn, at one point their Pool Hash Rate was higher than the Network Hash Rate (no clue how that can happen).
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #XVikHGuO7c6JTZWU
June 19, 2014, 07:49:21 AM
I've been mining at http://qcn.cryptity.com/ since yesterday and paid less then 1/10 what I expect based on hashrate and blocks discovered.
Same here - Still they got msg in the header "On June 17th some payments failed! Working on a solution. Thanks for your patience."
June 19, 2014, 07:01:06 AM
I've been mining at http://qcn.cryptity.com/ since yesterday and paid less then 1/10 what I expect based on hashrate and blocks discovered.
EDIT: coins turned up late, better late than never.
EDIT: coins turned up late, better late than never
. June 19, 2014, 03:59:40 AM
Anyone can tell me how to find transaction information and transaction id (TxID)?
simplewallet.log
June 19, 2014, 03:21:19 AM
Anyone can tell me how to find transaction information and transaction id (TxID)?
June 19, 2014, 02:50:56 AM
Is there a way to "unlock" coins stuck in a wallet because they were achived in small amounts?
In one of my wallets atm I have 4 coins, and max amount i'm able to send with ~ 10 attempts is 0.1...
If i keep retrying and sending small amounts is there hope that dust will be sent, or it will continue accumulating and I'll be better simply closing this wallet?
In one of my wallets atm I have 4 coins, and max amount i'm able to send with ~ 10 attempts is 0.1...
If i keep retrying and sending small amounts is there hope that dust will be sent, or it will continue accumulating and I'll be better simply closing this wallet?
June 18, 2014, 08:25:31 PM
MRO has a solution which I disliked worse then the bug fix. If your transaction isn't transferred within 24h it's returned to your wallet. But it's impossible to trace it since you're not notified. This is harmful for businesses that work with MRO (and potentially QCN).
I'm working on the reward bug and problem with transactions.
Good work. I'm working on the reward bug and problem with transactions.
Jump to: