Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade - page 104. (Read 1031025 times)

If you like this GIF, please donate any amount of QRK you like and I will create more:
http://qrk.blockr.io/address/info/QSWH2gfjBhvKiasJXxudHLR2JDD8Y1zTPw

i'm convinced!

One of the reason which makes this interesting.

+1

Wouldn't it be more suitable to have customised % to the slow maturing coins to the amount someone is burning? If someone would burn only like 1000 tokens then he can't really shake the market with dumping and his coins are not much anyway so it would be more fair the lower the amount you burn, the less % initial phase will be or like the faster your coin will mature?

@ georgem

I think first you should read the whole concept.

Also these players are killing a crypto with their pump and dumps. It will give the coin a bad reputation where people will say it's another pump and dump, this coin is limiting the ability of these guys to ruin a coin with their scheme and it's actually the first that i've seen which has come up with a model to do this and instead aims for a steady rise with less hardcore dumping. This give the coin much more credibility imo.

If you want to dump all your coins whenever you want there are enough cryptos and i think with all these pump and dump schemes there should be space for new models like these who is adapted to these schemes.

Your reason for "not being sympathetic to the whole premise"?

Let's start getting specific. Explain in detail exactly how this could be negative for qrk.  It seems like it could with a bit of tweaking solve a lot of qrks current issues.

QRK is regarded as a dying/dead project by most of the board.

Let's examine the POB proposal and hear from those being negative. Exactly what parts of the proposal do you not like and describe exactly how will have a negative impact.

Let's run through the entire process.


QRK as it is going now .........

QRK and the companion coin going forward........


actually just give me one good reason as a new investor here to look at qrk over the other alts with active commmunities and active development teams?

Hoping qrk will just get adopted by some big mainstream companies or some whale investor wading in for no apparent reason is not good enough. All coins are dreaming of such things.

Also how much qrk do each of you own.

To enter into discussions people should really have a reasonable steak in the coin. Who knows if half these people simply making comments even have any qrk. Some have probably sold out and want the prices driven lower to buy back in or else could be from other coin communities. We really need to establish who is really motivated to see qrk move up from here.

Either that or people need to start getting specific.

If you don't like a part of the proposal explain fully your reasoning on it so it can be fully examined.


I don't really care about the slowly maturing coins part. I see it as pointless.  You have a decent development/markerting/project managment teams showing some reason to retain you coins and you will retain them.

I do however see that we need to limit burn rate from qrk whales that give nothing back to the community.

I VERY much like the idea of taxing those that don't stake the coin.

Very interesting. With a good dev team behind it i think it will be a great coin.

Are VIC and coinmama on board?

Noone forces you into agreeing with the premise and if the concept is carried out then still noone forces you to burn tokens. This is not a fork proposal. Whoever wants to participate participates, whoever prefers to stay stays. However, if you complain about the concept you should ar least know what it is about, otherwise it makes your whole point look quite ridiculous.  

Btw. Georgem what serious business have YOU built for Quark? Instead of asking others to not waste their time with utter nonsense you should maybe do something for Quark on your own. Or have I overseen your rich contributions? Haven't seen any.

is past its prime? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgowBLb4sKw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDBzQkWeQ5g :-)

and Quark related: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atG3H3rTTsI skip to 1:15 

onion is past its prime  - now they joke about "social media" i guess operating from a police state doesn't help?

they duly oblige, I would give them the idea of bitcoin created by the aliens and put that guy from history channel as witness on their report, that would beat this CIA satire article by miles

True, you know it is called "The Onion" since it's meant to make you laugh (or cry) tears?  

nice but when it comes to satire no one beats The Onion!

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/bitcoin-suspected-be-nsa-cia-project-1460439

sucks all this infighting and its a huge international joke the whole thing, its just been a big social experiment.

we'll pack it up soon and put everyone on camps !

it was just for a laugh

: D

I read the reddit, and glanced over the document.

I am not sympathetic to the whole premise, so I am probably not going to read the document in all detail when I am not even agreeing with the premise (the description of the "supposed" problem).
Therefor any proposed "solutions" don't really make sense to me.

I asked cause I have read the document. I am against rewarding big investors!

It's interesting to see how people cry that they are against and ask question that proof that they actually haven't read the document

See this    http://ripoffcoin.com/

Two biggest players from last community chat with Max has so much Quarks and so no time to look at your animations.

Just wrote this and price is already at 1300. They are so fast!

I'll hypnotize everybody with my GIFs to buy more quarks.
Brain programming thru the visual cortex.

Second animation is like hypnotizing by heartbeats Sound is missing.

Don't force me to buy Quarks.