Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade - page 101. (Read 1031025 times)

Those short period mining coins switch to pos so they don't have quarks issue and ipo's i don't like them much are scammy.

I have a question about the quark brand:

http://www.qrk.cc/quarkbrand/

The font is ubuntu, right?
Or what is the exact name of this font we are using?

Last months there are so many coins with 1day-1week-1month mining. What do you think about it? 

And what do you think about big premining or big IPOs at most of the newest coins?

Some of them has very big marketcap. I think they will fall soon too.

And one example. In the code of one of the most attractive coins there are one not evan beginners mistake. Pointer to the for loop I don't know how nobody did not notice that. Or it was prevention for compiling with QT 5.3.1     CloakCoin Such attractive coin should be better.

See this is what i mean with i can't follow what you are saying, you talk puzzles and come up with these conspiracies like "destruction of fiat" and calling me an "A group miner" what are you talking about, i haven't mined quark.

Also the second part nobody will make donations to help the network, won't work like maok said as well. You guys made a mistake on the fast block halving model and are now stuck in this clusterfuck of issues.

well then this is just a matter of the A B group tiers you are a Group A miner that still liked Quark because  you are in for the original mining profit then the "quick" profit - where as Group B tier see a slow accumulation and an eventual hedge against possible (probable) Fiat destruction.

see its simple - you are looking at the 15 min chart they are looking at the month by month chart -

inflation is bad because:

1. it devalues both the trust and investment of the original investors -

2. It won't work, it won't lift hash, i'm sorry for saying "retarded" but  i thought that was obvious - because if inflation hurts trust and confidence and erodes the price,  hash will drop not rise.

Quark does not exist solely for mindless profit miners, it si a balance of Mining; investment; use and hedge.

3. The EQ reward is a 0.4~ % that drops in % over time its essentially a fixed system it needs no adjustment.

Summary

it won't work.

that's so obvious that I misunderstood you for trolling sorry about that - this is a group A forum so that makes sense.

C Bloc

1. Does everything that the above does but with no inflation.

2. lets people have control and see a result - (in other words it's engaging)  

example let say in a 30 day period - people donate say 10,000 Quark and then this get advertised around and becomes known then if this lifts hash, the people that  donated can see the result of their donation they know that they helped the network.

3. there is no risk if it doesn't work, nothing changes as it does not affect the core parameters in any way.

Sounds legit..

Some would argue that his solution of merge mining with a fresh new coin is retarded. Why would someone want to mine a new coin to help Quark instead of mining Quark directly. If the merge mining would happen for a coin with an already established strong community then yes that would be fantastic but for a fresh new coin its clearly meant to undermine Quark position. Same goes for his C block solution in which he relies on voluntarism !! You hear that ? In a financial and brutal economic environment in which we live he relies on voluntarism 

No i was a long time believer and backer of quark against trolls actually, see my post history. Unfortunately irresponsible lowlife trolls like you who went on a provoking and ranting rally have ruined quarks name. Majority of the community agrees with me and decided to leave because they couldn't work with an immature moron. I don't know how this troll showed up and started to steer quark back then, maxguevera should have known who he is dealing with before working with this guy. Halve the time i can't get my head around what he is talking about.

Guess what, Quark is already inflationary, adding 0.05-0.1% inflation for incentivising regular people to keep their wallet open is a proposed solution to increase the health of Quark. Stop insulting other quarkers with your constant trolling on this subject. You don't like the lotto reward solution fine, argue with it from the economic perspective, tell us why adding 0.1% inflation p.a. would be a wrong solution and lets move on.

you are a legend Max and we certainly recognize your work - i think you may have become more weary of our troll friends (but cant speak for you certainly) that attached themselves to us all those months ago (as soon as they recognized the Quark superior fundamentals ) - which are largely of course attributed to yourself.

I will work in future to hope that we can make your continued work have much more return. 

we are grateful.

these are our resident trolls for them everything is always bad - and we need "superblocz" inflation to "fix" quark -

you can look at their constant presences as bullish.

Thanks for recognising this.

The Bitcoin 0.9.x code base is much cleaner and easier to work with as a developer than for example 0.6.x.

A lot of changes has gone into "the insides" for Bitcoin 0.9.x and this is not always apparent to end users.

This is why my current priority is to upgrade the code base to Bitcoin 0.9.x. Few people seem to recognise that this is a big undertaking, especially with a coin like Quark that has many deviations from the Bitcoin code base.

The current code is here: http://github.com/MaxGuevara/quark092

It is close to being ready for merging into the main Quark code base.

Sad to hear that.  I would think with the huge run quark had last year the devs would have plenty of funds to pay for a lot of top notch updates.  Well, I'll be watching just in case.

Won't ever happen, the main dev said he has no time for it. It's basically just kolin atm with his wishful thinking

At this price and anything lower this is an easy choice for me.  Looking forward to this fall when the fun should be in full swing.

Very stable price below 1500.

But we have nice good source code.

Given the sheer number of alts this time around I think we will see some strong upward trending as well.  But after the Bitcoin ETF goes live, later this year - the sheer number of billions of dollars which will rush into Bitcoin will create the mother of all bubbles in Bitcoin and in alts as well due to a spillover & crowding out effect.

It is that ETF which will drive the madness more than anything else later this and especially next year.

cheers !

I think the next "boom" will be trending we will start to see the quality trend, there could be a boom , but i think we will see rising trends.

As always digital, great to have your insight.  Here's to an even bigger crypto boom this fall.

Cheers, brother!

yeah i think he's still supporting it - i think the issue was around the algo and education - the involvement of the "usual suspects" of shady characters post genisis was rather cringe worthy, but i just keep my mouth shut as it doesn't involve me or effect Quark in any way. 

Quark doesn't rely on pumping , the only useful parameters that a "public figure"  hold are to help further the proliferation of education (information).

and this is only a {time + quality} equation parameter so for example:

if there is a lot of information that goes out quickly from say TV CNN etc and its low quality , as compared to decentralized info which is high quality and proliferates slower.

so decentralized consensus moves forward regardless, people will come and go.