I have no idea with Reddit, but if someone makes a good ad I will donate 150 QRK to them.
(It'll have to be sent this evening, I don't have access to my wallet atm)
Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade - page 362. (Read 1031025 times)
If there was someone who had the funds buying some Reddit ad space on /r/bitcoin for quark would get the name out there to tons of people looking for a cryptocurrency that they could still afford.
This is the viewer data for the subreddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/about/traffic
Ads cost $5 for 6,666 views. So if you just want to do a trial run of a Quark ad it will only cost you $5.
If someone does this my biggest suggestion would be KEEP THE COMMENTS OFF. /r/bitcoin is full of people who sound exactly like people who hold onto gold and shit on the idea of anything else having value. Also as for the title of the ad make it as informative and as close to max size as possible. With past ads I have run on Reddit this increases click ratios tremendously. Also don't forget to fill in the picture section!
Even if most people don't click the link getting the word Quark in their mind from seeing it at the top of the subreddit will make them really take notice when it is mentioned in news articles like the Guardian one.
If this idea ends up bearing fruit you can always throw a few Quark my way
.
QWZtu6GfPsfMNvv7Q8cuoTqFVgosi9AeRZ
This is the viewer data for the subreddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/about/traffic
Ads cost $5 for 6,666 views. So if you just want to do a trial run of a Quark ad it will only cost you $5.
If someone does this my biggest suggestion would be KEEP THE COMMENTS OFF. /r/bitcoin is full of people who sound exactly like people who hold onto gold and shit on the idea of anything else having value. Also as for the title of the ad make it as informative and as close to max size as possible. With past ads I have run on Reddit this increases click ratios tremendously. Also don't forget to fill in the picture section!
Even if most people don't click the link getting the word Quark in their mind from seeing it at the top of the subreddit will make them really take notice when it is mentioned in news articles like the Guardian one.
If this idea ends up bearing fruit you can always throw a few Quark my way
. QWZtu6GfPsfMNvv7Q8cuoTqFVgosi9AeRZ
I cannot register in the forum.
In the 'enter your display name' page, when I click continue, the page reloads to the same page.
I cannot login using the name I tried to register suggesting a failed registration.
In the 'enter your display name' page, when I click continue, the page reloads to the same page.
I cannot login using the name I tried to register suggesting a failed registration.
Worldcoin is getting a Fiat exchange in a month or so, which is nice to have.
I don't know much about Megacoin, but having Chinese translations and the "how does Megacoin work" slide at the top is a nice touch.
Did anyone see this:
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/nov/28/bitcoin-alternatives-future-currency-investments
Major world newspaper talking about Alts and Quark is on the list!
I don't know much about Megacoin, but having Chinese translations and the "how does Megacoin work" slide at the top is a nice touch.
Did anyone see this:
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/nov/28/bitcoin-alternatives-future-currency-investments
Major world newspaper talking about Alts and Quark is on the list!
Quark coin
Another altcoin in its infancy, launched in 2013, Quark coin takes the security elements of the cryptocurrency very seriously employing nine separate rounds of encryption using six different algorithms.
Very cool to see m8
Worldcoin is getting a Fiat exchange in a month or so, which is nice to have.
I don't know much about Megacoin, but having Chinese translations and the "how does Megacoin work" slide at the top is a nice touch.
Did anyone see this:
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/nov/28/bitcoin-alternatives-future-currency-investments
Major world newspaper talking about Alts and Quark is on the list!
I don't know much about Megacoin, but having Chinese translations and the "how does Megacoin work" slide at the top is a nice touch.
Did anyone see this:
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/nov/28/bitcoin-alternatives-future-currency-investments
Major world newspaper talking about Alts and Quark is on the list!
Exciting to see it mentioned.
To the moon!!! ┗(°0°)┛
Megacoin has nothing special in it. It's just a generic spin off with bit different block times, rewards/block, difficult change etc... like 100s other available.
Worldcoin is getting a Fiat exchange in a month or so, which is nice to have.
I don't know much about Megacoin, but having Chinese translations and the "how does Megacoin work" slide at the top is a nice touch.
Did anyone see this:
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/nov/28/bitcoin-alternatives-future-currency-investments
Major world newspaper talking about Alts and Quark is on the list!
I don't know much about Megacoin, but having Chinese translations and the "how does Megacoin work" slide at the top is a nice touch.
Did anyone see this:
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/nov/28/bitcoin-alternatives-future-currency-investments
Major world newspaper talking about Alts and Quark is on the list!
I dont understand what makes MegaCoin and WorldCoin better than Quarks.
To all those wondering what happened.
It was not marketing nor anything QRK related. That's just FUD.
Almost all alt-coins were pumped 100-300% in the last few days. Also lots and lots of new hashing all of sudden (which caused the problems yesterday).
Just look at the charts at http://coinmarketcap.com/
If you're big player, pump, mine & dump (maybe?) new coins with low diff sounds like a plan.
All of this started when BTC hovered between 900-980, as if big players we're laying preparations on the alts for when BTC goes above 1k.
Now in hindsight it seems kind of logical that alts will try to somehow (as best as they can) follow BTC's growth, but at the same time, this was clearly an all around orchestrated pump.
If BTC were to really skyrocket and go to >2-3k I highly doubt alts can follow.
Be careful during these following days.
I already offloaded the 1.5m or so coins I hadIt was not marketing nor anything QRK related. That's just FUD.
Almost all alt-coins were pumped 100-300% in the last few days. Also lots and lots of new hashing all of sudden (which caused the problems yesterday).
Just look at the charts at http://coinmarketcap.com/
If you're big player, pump, mine & dump (maybe?) new coins with low diff sounds like a plan.
All of this started when BTC hovered between 900-980, as if big players we're laying preparations on the alts for when BTC goes above 1k.
Now in hindsight it seems kind of logical that alts will try to somehow (as best as they can) follow BTC's growth, but at the same time, this was clearly an all around orchestrated pump.
If BTC were to really skyrocket and go to >2-3k I highly doubt alts can follow.
Be careful during these following days.
I started mining again for kicks, too
ed: aha, here we go, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg3311965#msg3311965
i did have like 4 or 5m at one point, though.
this recent price increase is artificial, some person w/ no clue got on crypsty and bought every single alt coin. i dumped as soon as i saw it
There was no single large order; there were a lot of large single sellers (like you).
By design, I think initially quark is supposed to be owned by a handful early adapters, and it's distribution should be done by their selling it.
well, my distribution is done. i sold the first few millions for around .00000150, so i was happy to take .00003500, which I think was artificially high due to a single buyer & then you have the bandwagon jumpers
i would consider buying back in at .00000250 or so
and my pool got its first block in about 35 days! woot
^
awesome to hear about the pool
but i really doubt that Quark will ever see z6 again . ever -
you can come here and throw it in my face if it does -
What amazes me is that people still don't realize what is happening.
What's your take on it?
i will explain -
and no it's not the some fool brought all the alts theory -
we can do better than that hey ?
Trade Volume Back to 4th.
LTC/BTC LiteCoin 1222 BTC 0.04099998 0.06950000 0.03600000
MEC/BTC MegaCoin 351 BTC 0.00094960 0.00094970 0.00033511
WDC/BTC WorldCoin 310 BTC 0.00030934 0.00033587 0.00015199
QRK/BTC Quark 228 BTC 0.00003304 0.00005009 0.00001695
LTC/BTC LiteCoin 1222 BTC 0.04099998 0.06950000 0.03600000
MEC/BTC MegaCoin 351 BTC 0.00094960 0.00094970 0.00033511
WDC/BTC WorldCoin 310 BTC 0.00030934 0.00033587 0.00015199
QRK/BTC Quark 228 BTC 0.00003304 0.00005009 0.00001695
is Quark fever over ? ha ha ha
; D
; D
The only reasons one would scream to sell is so he can buy low or so that crypto sinks and others (that he holds) raise. And I'm sure it works pretty well.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3756130
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3756130
yes thats disingenuous - i'm sorry i'm a big promoter so i shouldn't say this - i'm not selling that was a joke i hope you know how i feel anyhow .
we will see a nice slow trend upwards - - i don't look at D1 i look at M 1
The only reasons one would scream to sell is so he can buy low or so that crypto sinks and others (that he holds) raise. And I'm sure it works pretty well.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3756130
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3756130
Game over !
Sell guys ! sell !
Sell guys ! sell !
To all those wondering what happened.
It was not marketing nor anything QRK related. That's just FUD.
Almost all alt-coins were pumped 100-300% in the last few days. Also lots and lots of new hashing all of sudden (which caused the problems yesterday).
Just look at the charts at http://coinmarketcap.com/
If you're big player, pump, mine & dump (maybe?) new coins with low diff sounds like a plan.
All of this started when BTC hovered between 900-980, as if big players we're laying preparations on the alts for when BTC goes above 1k.
Now in hindsight it seems kind of logical that alts will try to somehow (as best as they can) follow BTC's growth, but at the same time, this was clearly an all around orchestrated pump.
If BTC were to really skyrocket and go to >2-3k I highly doubt alts can follow.
Be careful during these following days.
I already offloaded the 1.5m or so coins I hadIt was not marketing nor anything QRK related. That's just FUD.
Almost all alt-coins were pumped 100-300% in the last few days. Also lots and lots of new hashing all of sudden (which caused the problems yesterday).
Just look at the charts at http://coinmarketcap.com/
If you're big player, pump, mine & dump (maybe?) new coins with low diff sounds like a plan.
All of this started when BTC hovered between 900-980, as if big players we're laying preparations on the alts for when BTC goes above 1k.
Now in hindsight it seems kind of logical that alts will try to somehow (as best as they can) follow BTC's growth, but at the same time, this was clearly an all around orchestrated pump.
If BTC were to really skyrocket and go to >2-3k I highly doubt alts can follow.
Be careful during these following days.
I started mining again for kicks, too
ed: aha, here we go, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg3311965#msg3311965
i did have like 4 or 5m at one point, though.
this recent price increase is artificial, some person w/ no clue got on crypsty and bought every single alt coin. i dumped as soon as i saw it
There was no single large order; there were a lot of large single sellers (like you).
By design, I think initially quark is supposed to be owned by a handful early adapters, and it's distribution should be done by their selling it.
well, my distribution is done. i sold the first few millions for around .00000150, so i was happy to take .00003500, which I think was artificially high due to a single buyer & then you have the bandwagon jumpers
i would consider buying back in at .00000250 or so
and my pool got its first block in about 35 days! woot
Oh no it'll never get that low again. I was planning to buy but I had payment issues to buy bitcoins (Oh, you know, Visa, master card, bank transfer etc... etc... etc...). You see, I'm not in the US.
Now Quarks have the popularity and the technicals; and this's all what's needed to drive a cryptocurrency.
To all those wondering what happened.
It was not marketing nor anything QRK related. That's just FUD.
Almost all alt-coins were pumped 100-300% in the last few days. Also lots and lots of new hashing all of sudden (which caused the problems yesterday).
Just look at the charts at http://coinmarketcap.com/
If you're big player, pump, mine & dump (maybe?) new coins with low diff sounds like a plan.
All of this started when BTC hovered between 900-980, as if big players we're laying preparations on the alts for when BTC goes above 1k.
Now in hindsight it seems kind of logical that alts will try to somehow (as best as they can) follow BTC's growth, but at the same time, this was clearly an all around orchestrated pump.
If BTC were to really skyrocket and go to >2-3k I highly doubt alts can follow.
Be careful during these following days.
I already offloaded the 1.5m or so coins I hadIt was not marketing nor anything QRK related. That's just FUD.
Almost all alt-coins were pumped 100-300% in the last few days. Also lots and lots of new hashing all of sudden (which caused the problems yesterday).
Just look at the charts at http://coinmarketcap.com/
If you're big player, pump, mine & dump (maybe?) new coins with low diff sounds like a plan.
All of this started when BTC hovered between 900-980, as if big players we're laying preparations on the alts for when BTC goes above 1k.
Now in hindsight it seems kind of logical that alts will try to somehow (as best as they can) follow BTC's growth, but at the same time, this was clearly an all around orchestrated pump.
If BTC were to really skyrocket and go to >2-3k I highly doubt alts can follow.
Be careful during these following days.
I started mining again for kicks, too
ed: aha, here we go, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg3311965#msg3311965
i did have like 4 or 5m at one point, though.
this recent price increase is artificial, some person w/ no clue got on crypsty and bought every single alt coin. i dumped as soon as i saw it
There was no single large order; there were a lot of large single sellers (like you).
By design, I think initially quark is supposed to be owned by a handful early adapters, and it's distribution should be done by their selling it.
well, my distribution is done. i sold the first few millions for around .00000150, so i was happy to take .00003500, which I think was artificially high due to a single buyer & then you have the bandwagon jumpers
i would consider buying back in at .00000250 or so
and my pool got its first block in about 35 days! woot
To all those wondering what happened.
It was not marketing nor anything QRK related. That's just FUD.
Almost all alt-coins were pumped 100-300% in the last few days. Also lots and lots of new hashing all of sudden (which caused the problems yesterday).
Just look at the charts at http://coinmarketcap.com/
If you're big player, pump, mine & dump (maybe?) new coins with low diff sounds like a plan.
All of this started when BTC hovered between 900-980, as if big players we're laying preparations on the alts for when BTC goes above 1k.
Now in hindsight it seems kind of logical that alts will try to somehow (as best as they can) follow BTC's growth, but at the same time, this was clearly an all around orchestrated pump.
If BTC were to really skyrocket and go to >2-3k I highly doubt alts can follow.
Be careful during these following days.
I already offloaded the 1.5m or so coins I hadIt was not marketing nor anything QRK related. That's just FUD.
Almost all alt-coins were pumped 100-300% in the last few days. Also lots and lots of new hashing all of sudden (which caused the problems yesterday).
Just look at the charts at http://coinmarketcap.com/
If you're big player, pump, mine & dump (maybe?) new coins with low diff sounds like a plan.
All of this started when BTC hovered between 900-980, as if big players we're laying preparations on the alts for when BTC goes above 1k.
Now in hindsight it seems kind of logical that alts will try to somehow (as best as they can) follow BTC's growth, but at the same time, this was clearly an all around orchestrated pump.
If BTC were to really skyrocket and go to >2-3k I highly doubt alts can follow.
Be careful during these following days.
I started mining again for kicks, too
ed: aha, here we go, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3311965
i did have like 4 or 5m at one point, though.
this recent price increase is artificial, some person w/ no clue got on crypsty and bought every single alt coin. i dumped as soon as i saw it
There was no single large order; there were a lot of large single sellers (like you).
By design, I think initially quark is supposed to be owned by a handful early adapters, and it's distribution should be done by their selling it.
To all those wondering what happened.
It was not marketing nor anything QRK related. That's just FUD.
Almost all alt-coins were pumped 100-300% in the last few days. Also lots and lots of new hashing all of sudden (which caused the problems yesterday).
Just look at the charts at http://coinmarketcap.com/
If you're big player, pump, mine & dump (maybe?) new coins with low diff sounds like a plan.
All of this started when BTC hovered between 900-980, as if big players we're laying preparations on the alts for when BTC goes above 1k.
Now in hindsight it seems kind of logical that alts will try to somehow (as best as they can) follow BTC's growth, but at the same time, this was clearly an all around orchestrated pump.
If BTC were to really skyrocket and go to >2-3k I highly doubt alts can follow.
Be careful during these following days.
It was not marketing nor anything QRK related. That's just FUD.
Almost all alt-coins were pumped 100-300% in the last few days. Also lots and lots of new hashing all of sudden (which caused the problems yesterday).
Just look at the charts at http://coinmarketcap.com/
If you're big player, pump, mine & dump (maybe?) new coins with low diff sounds like a plan.
All of this started when BTC hovered between 900-980, as if big players we're laying preparations on the alts for when BTC goes above 1k.
Now in hindsight it seems kind of logical that alts will try to somehow (as best as they can) follow BTC's growth, but at the same time, this was clearly an all around orchestrated pump.
If BTC were to really skyrocket and go to >2-3k I highly doubt alts can follow.
Be careful during these following days.
No coin got pumped that much, quark's value rose times higher suddenly, higher than anything else at the same time.
There is a lot happening for Quarks, and 2014 seems like a promising year with many new sites accepting QRKS coming out. When all of these sites are out QRK prices will soar. Besides, when a coin has a strong community like Quarks, the only way is up. Don't trust me, do your own research.
The fact is that anyone selling now is selling their Quarks to "smart money" investors. If you don't know what smart money means, then buy a couple of thousand now for almost nothing, and sit on it, by the end of 2014 you will know what "smart money" means.
The fact is that anyone selling now is selling their Quarks to "smart money" investors. If you don't know what smart money means, then buy a couple of thousand now for almost nothing, and sit on it, by the end of 2014 you will know what "smart money" means.
What do you consider smart money. You suggesting qrk will be like ltc in 14?
I'd be very surprised if it reaches $2 in 5 years.
See, first off 100s of cryptocurrencies available, Quark technicals is in the top 5 (minimum).
Second, it's designed to be a true cryptocurrency -- no mining @ speed of light; only the existing is circulated.
Third -- No premining by devs, it's completely fair.
Any reason besides popularity that quark will not succeed? Besides in this age 5 years is like a century. It's impossible to predict that far.
Jump to: