I wonder if it's possible to find out the network hashespersec.
I don't know how, but the difficulty should correlate to network hash right?
If some bright spark here could enlighten us
K.
Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade - page 418. (Read 1031025 times)
I don't know how, but the difficulty should correlate to network hash right?
If some bright spark here could enlighten us
K.
Full day on my i5-3570K @ 4.4Ghz and not a single block, ouch.
yep, same here. the vps have taken over again. never mind probably like xpm its far cheaper to just buy .5 btc worth of it right now and hold and see.
I'm also going to buy some and hold. It's definitely going to appreciate. Especially once reward halves at block 60000
It could happen like that, I wouldn't bank on that but i have a bit of this now so will just hold and see.
Full day on my i5-3570K @ 4.4Ghz and not a single block, ouch.
yep, same here. the vps have taken over again. never mind probably like xpm its far cheaper to just buy .5 btc worth of it right now and hold and see.
I'm also going to buy some and hold. It's definitely going to appreciate. Especially once reward halves at block 60000
Full day on my i5-3570K @ 4.4Ghz and not a single block, ouch.
yep, same here. the vps have taken over again. never mind probably like xpm its far cheaper to just buy .5 btc worth of it right now and hold and see.
Dear owner of QuarkCoin.Org
Please update the logos and graphics on the website to the ones from the previous post.
Please update the logos and graphics on the website to the ones from the previous post.
Does QRK have a website yet?
QuarkCoin.Org
site only launched yesterday, so much to come
playing with logo ideas and speaking to developer
we ran a logo competition here yesterday so that is temp. may stay
forum be up in day or two
moving fast...
It's a good start, but the logos are not very good. You should seriously consider using one of these.
What about something like this?
Does QRK have a website yet?
QuarkCoin.Org
site only launched yesterday, so much to come
playing with logo ideas and speaking to developer
we ran a logo competition here yesterday so that is temp. may stay
forum be up in day or two
moving fast...
Full day on my i5-3570K @ 4.4Ghz and not a single block, ouch.
Does QRK have a website yet?
Another day of qrking 
Github sources updated with hash meter.
gethashespersec and getmininginfo now return hashing rate.
gethashespersec and getmininginfo now return hashing rate.
I saw the source update, were there new windows binaries as well?
Sweet! Running at 500k - 600k HPS right now. Time to go get more servers. 
wow I only get 300k - how'd you get 500k?
... and all of a sudden the room goes very quiet
Sweet! Running at 500k - 600k HPS right now. Time to go get more servers.
wow I only get 300k - how'd you get 500k?
is there a block explorer for QRK?
Not yet. Any big-time miners want to offer a reward for a block explorer?
is there a block explorer for QRK?
Github sources updated with hash meter.
gethashespersec and getmininginfo now return hashing rate.
Good, requested and delievered gethashespersec and getmininginfo now return hashing rate.
Github sources updated with hash meter.
gethashespersec and getmininginfo now return hashing rate.
gethashespersec and getmininginfo now return hashing rate.
Awesome
Any info on the hashespersec?
I'll have a look at implementing hashespersec this weekend. You are welcome to submit a patch if you get it going before then
I'll try my best. I'm trying to look through cloudcoin's code because it has the hashespersec implemented. I'm thinking it should be as simple as changing a few bools from false to true so that will enable hashespersec command. Tried that in bitcoinrpc.cpp and it didn't seem to work.
Question: what file(s) contain the code that does the mining itself?
The mining is done in src/main.cpp in:
void static BitcoinMiner(CWallet *pwallet)
Okay, thanks. What I was imagining was copying the files from cloudcoin to quarkcoind minus the file that does the mining. Reason being is because to my knowledge the way QRK mines is a tad different.
Would copying the files from CDC to QRK minus the mining file enable the hashespersec do you think?
Essentially code similar to this (taken from Cloudcoin) will have to be added to quark's void static BitcoinMiner(CWallet *pwallet) function:
Quote
// Meter hashes/sec
static int64 nHashCounter;
if (nHPSTimerStart == 0)
{
nHPSTimerStart = GetTimeMillis();
nHashCounter = 0;
}
else
nHashCounter += nHashesDone;
if (GetTimeMillis() - nHPSTimerStart > 4000)
{
static CCriticalSection cs;
{
LOCK(cs);
if (GetTimeMillis() - nHPSTimerStart > 4000)
{
dHashesPerSec = 1000.0 * nHashCounter / (GetTimeMillis() - nHPSTimerStart);
nHPSTimerStart = GetTimeMillis();
nHashCounter = 0;
static int64 nLogTime;
if (GetTime() - nLogTime > 30 * 60)
{
nLogTime = GetTime();
printf("hashmeter %6.0f khash/s\n", dHashesPerSec/1000.0);
}
}
}
}
static int64 nHashCounter;
if (nHPSTimerStart == 0)
{
nHPSTimerStart = GetTimeMillis();
nHashCounter = 0;
}
else
nHashCounter += nHashesDone;
if (GetTimeMillis() - nHPSTimerStart > 4000)
{
static CCriticalSection cs;
{
LOCK(cs);
if (GetTimeMillis() - nHPSTimerStart > 4000)
{
dHashesPerSec = 1000.0 * nHashCounter / (GetTimeMillis() - nHPSTimerStart);
nHPSTimerStart = GetTimeMillis();
nHashCounter = 0;
static int64 nLogTime;
if (GetTime() - nLogTime > 30 * 60)
{
nLogTime = GetTime();
printf("hashmeter %6.0f khash/s\n", dHashesPerSec/1000.0);
}
}
}
}
Awesome
Any info on the hashespersec?
I'll have a look at implementing hashespersec this weekend. You are welcome to submit a patch if you get it going before then
I'll try my best. I'm trying to look through cloudcoin's code because it has the hashespersec implemented. I'm thinking it should be as simple as changing a few bools from false to true so that will enable hashespersec command. Tried that in bitcoinrpc.cpp and it didn't seem to work.
Question: what file(s) contain the code that does the mining itself?
The mining is done in src/main.cpp in:
void static BitcoinMiner(CWallet *pwallet)
Awesome
Any info on the hashespersec?
I'll have a look at implementing hashespersec this weekend. You are welcome to submit a patch if you get it going before then
Jump to: