[ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade - page 54.

quarkfx

sr. member

Activity: 396

Merit: 250

Quote from: digitalindustry on November 12, 2014, 09:48:56 AM

Quote from: reRaise on November 12, 2014, 09:20:49 AM

12 btc sell wall again at cryptsy

only 900k it must be frustration not being able to push it down?

Hey Kolin, what about the floor predictions you promised for Quark? How much was it? Won´t fall below 5ct/Quark, right?

And hey, next step was Frozenbit? I just checked http://frozenb.it/ and it seems that the Bitcoin Mafia killed the project because it was too dangerous for them....or it was simply another shady project that you tried to sell as the great game changer.

Also desperately waiting for the Communist-Bloc to become reality, and hardware wallets, and and and. You know...all the big project that you promised for Quark but never happened, oh great master of shady announcements and false floor calling.

It´s also good to see that your main attention passes from Quark to classic pump´n dump currencies like Hobonickles and Caps. Well done!

P.S.: Seriously, what is Quarks floor? There is no buy support at all, but a massive sell wall of 12,27 BTC. So if it is that "tasty", how come that noone eats it? I guess you expect cheaper prices to come? Enlight us, oracle.

digitalindustry

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

‘Try to be nice’

Quote from: reRaise on November 12, 2014, 09:20:49 AM

12 btc sell wall again at cryptsy

only 900k it must be frustration not being able to push it down?

digitalindustry

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

‘Try to be nice’

Quote from: reRaise on November 12, 2014, 06:10:30 AM

Quote from: digitalindustry on November 12, 2014, 06:01:39 AM

Quote from: quarkfx on November 12, 2014, 05:14:09 AM

Quote from: silvermetal on November 11, 2014, 05:58:56 PM

OMG you give away your sockpuppets with your article:

"bluemelanie"
"Cristian Macauley"
"Not Kolin's Sockpuppet" (was your fantasy gone?)

You must be desperate Wink

http://www.coinspeaker.com/2014/11/06/cryptocurrency-fraud-part-1-identifying-ways-in-which-fraudsters-operate/

(see comments)

I don´t think bluemeanie is a sockpuppet, silvermetal. In case of the other ones it is pretty obvious, though.

Btw. if you wonder why Kolin was gone for some days: I reported some of his posts who clearly violated Board Regulations. Some of his posts were deleted and since he didn´t stop spamming they eventually banned him. No big currency, only a person who isn´t capable to respect basic agreements on a board.

indeed at a point you guys are going to have to start saying " Are the Quark guys paying this silvermetal retard"

as he has again brought much more attention to the Coinspeaker article, with real people not on a backwater dev forum reading it and as a result the case for the PoW+ index is building..

a lot of this is thanks to out friends "silvermetal" and other "trolls"

as for the forum i'm just racking my mind so see if i give a flying fuck about you or this forum?

just a moment.... just a moment...

pow+? whats that and what advantage gives it to quark?

I raises the bar on all non fraud crypto and Quark is a non fraud Crypto.

It will give traditional economists the ability to apply more stable metrics to find price and valuation.

It will inevitably be the only index that matters in the future, one of the only looked at. (for investment purposes)

however as we are still in kindergarten, that will be maybe a little time. but not that long.

reRaise

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

12 btc sell wall again at cryptsy

reRaise

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

Quote from: digitalindustry on November 12, 2014, 06:01:39 AM

Quote from: quarkfx on November 12, 2014, 05:14:09 AM

Quote from: silvermetal on November 11, 2014, 05:58:56 PM

OMG you give away your sockpuppets with your article:

"bluemelanie"
"Cristian Macauley"
"Not Kolin's Sockpuppet" (was your fantasy gone?)

You must be desperate Wink

http://www.coinspeaker.com/2014/11/06/cryptocurrency-fraud-part-1-identifying-ways-in-which-fraudsters-operate/

(see comments)

I don´t think bluemeanie is a sockpuppet, silvermetal. In case of the other ones it is pretty obvious, though.

Btw. if you wonder why Kolin was gone for some days: I reported some of his posts who clearly violated Board Regulations. Some of his posts were deleted and since he didn´t stop spamming they eventually banned him. No big currency, only a person who isn´t capable to respect basic agreements on a board.

indeed at a point you guys are going to have to start saying " Are the Quark guys paying this silvermetal retard"

as he has again brought much more attention to the Coinspeaker article, with real people not on a backwater dev forum reading it and as a result the case for the PoW+ index is building..

a lot of this is thanks to out friends "silvermetal" and other "trolls"

as for the forum i'm just racking my mind so see if i give a flying fuck about you or this forum?

just a moment.... just a moment...

pow+? whats that and what advantage gives it to quark?

digitalindustry

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

‘Try to be nice’

Quote from: quarkfx on November 12, 2014, 05:14:09 AM

Quote from: silvermetal on November 11, 2014, 05:58:56 PM

OMG you give away your sockpuppets with your article:

"bluemelanie"
"Cristian Macauley"
"Not Kolin's Sockpuppet" (was your fantasy gone?)

You must be desperate Wink

http://www.coinspeaker.com/2014/11/06/cryptocurrency-fraud-part-1-identifying-ways-in-which-fraudsters-operate/

(see comments)

I don´t think bluemeanie is a sockpuppet, silvermetal. In case of the other ones it is pretty obvious, though.

Btw. if you wonder why Kolin was gone for some days: I reported some of his posts who clearly violated Board Regulations. Some of his posts were deleted and since he didn´t stop spamming they eventually banned him. No big currency, only a person who isn´t capable to respect basic agreements on a board.

indeed at a point you guys are going to have to start saying " Are the Quark guys paying this silvermetal retard"

as he has again brought much more attention to the Coinspeaker article, with real people not on a backwater dev forum reading it and as a result the case for the PoW+ index is building..

a lot of this is thanks to out friends "silvermetal" and other "trolls"

as for the forum i'm just racking my mind so see if i give a flying fuck about you or this forum?

just a moment.... just a moment...

quarkfx

sr. member

Activity: 396

Merit: 250

Quote from: silvermetal on November 11, 2014, 05:58:56 PM

OMG you give away your sockpuppets with your article:

"bluemelanie"
"Cristian Macauley"
"Not Kolin's Sockpuppet" (was your fantasy gone?)

You must be desperate Wink

http://www.coinspeaker.com/2014/11/06/cryptocurrency-fraud-part-1-identifying-ways-in-which-fraudsters-operate/

(see comments)

I don´t think bluemeanie is a sockpuppet, silvermetal. In case of the other ones it is pretty obvious, though.

Btw. if you wonder why Kolin was gone for some days: I reported some of his posts who clearly violated Board Regulations. Some of his posts were deleted and since he didn´t stop spamming they eventually banned him. No big currency, only a person who isn´t capable to respect basic agreements on a board.

silvermetal

hero member

Activity: 487

Merit: 500

Quote from: digitalindustry on November 11, 2014, 10:12:42 AM

For the few Quark supporters still on here thanks for the great response re the coin-speaker article - :

i'm trying to gauge the support from the PoW+ groups of communities to see if they want to reference a PoW+ index

the 2nd part of the article will be out soon :

we helped Coinspeaker become the 2nd largest crypto news outlet, a problem for those that want to spread ignorance and keep a lid on education, no doubt.

; D

OMG you give away your sockpuppets with your article:

"bluemelanie"
"Cristian Macauley"
"Not Kolin's Sockpuppet" (was your fantasy gone?)

You must be desperate Wink

http://www.coinspeaker.com/2014/11/06/cryptocurrency-fraud-part-1-identifying-ways-in-which-fraudsters-operate/

(see comments)

digitalindustry

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

‘Try to be nice’

For the few Quark supporters still on here thanks for the great response re the coin-speaker article - :

i'm trying to gauge the support from the PoW+ groups of communities to see if they want to reference a PoW+ index

the 2nd part of the article will be out soon :

we helped Coinspeaker become the 2nd largest crypto news outlet, a problem for those that want to spread ignorance and keep a lid on education, no doubt.

; D

reRaise

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Hilux74 on November 10, 2014, 05:46:13 PM

Quote from: reRaise on November 10, 2014, 03:35:50 PM

Anyone wanting cheap quark? there is a nice wall up to 12 btc available

https://www.cryptsy.com/markets/view/QRK_BTC

Wall like that means someone trying to push price down to buy more cheap. For only ~$5000 I'm thinking of buying that entire wall...pretty tempting.

12 btc is not much, around 1m at this price is a bargain to me

nixon99

sr. member

Activity: 637

Merit: 250

With the Shaq game coming out next year can't more be done to make Quark the difinitive in-game coin?

coinerer

hero member

Activity: 1470

Merit: 608

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

Quote from: silvermetal on November 11, 2014, 12:53:21 AM

Quote from: Hilux74 on November 10, 2014, 11:35:47 PM

Darkcoin goes from scam to scam to scam and people still keep coming back to eat more. Funny that once again their heralded anonymity once again has been shown to be anything but. What a long list of lies...i mean technical mishaps.

Why even compare it to Quark if you have any social conscience?

Strange there has been a number of proDRK comments immediately after my comment about DRK X11 asics in the wild.

"Strange" that there appears sockpuppets of Kolin to confuse people here as soon as something bad about Quark is written in this thread Roll Eyes

I wrote much better for Quark than for Dark

silvermetal

hero member

Activity: 487

Merit: 500

Quote from: Hilux74 on November 10, 2014, 11:35:47 PM

Darkcoin goes from scam to scam to scam and people still keep coming back to eat more. Funny that once again their heralded anonymity once again has been shown to be anything but. What a long list of lies...i mean technical mishaps.

Why even compare it to Quark if you have any social conscience?

Strange there has been a number of proDRK comments immediately after my comment about DRK X11 asics in the wild.

"Strange" that there appears sockpuppets of Kolin to confuse people here as soon as something bad about Quark is written in this thread Roll Eyes

Hilux74

legendary

Activity: 912

Merit: 1000

Darkcoin goes from scam to scam to scam and people still keep coming back to eat more. Funny that once again their heralded anonymity once again has been shown to be anything but. What a long list of lies...i mean technical mishaps.

Why even compare it to Quark if you have any social conscience?

Strange there has been a number of proDRK comments immediately after my comment about DRK X11 asics in the wild.

coinerer

hero member

Activity: 1470

Merit: 608

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

Darkcoin has this merchant directory:

https://darkcointalk.org/forums/merchant-directory.46/

What is there so good, so much better than at quark market http://www.qrk.cc/merchants/ ?

How big are whales at dark? How big are preminers?

Why did I choose darkcoin? Because of this http://mapofcoins.com/ .

coinerer

hero member

Activity: 1470

Merit: 608

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

Quote from: KJO on November 10, 2014, 08:37:51 PM

Quote from: reRaise on November 09, 2014, 07:37:45 PM

I really feel ashamed as a quark holder when i look at other coins dev activity like darkcoin, max guevera you fcking failed, i know you don't give a shit about quark and sold out long time ago. I'm sorry for those who have done their best for this coin, but max should be ashamed of himself. fuck him and fuck digitalindustry

Max Guevara doesn't exist. Max Guevara is the name of Jessica Alba's character in an old fox tv show.

Do you guys now see what I told you months ago? There is literally nothing holding quark together except bagholders, a few angry and disgruntled whales, and large exchange wallets. The community is getting smaller and smaller. If quark drops below 1 million marketcap, which is a real possibility, expect quark to continue to plummet down the coinmarketcap list. There is no technical support for quark below .00001. NONE.

Countdown to emotard spewing more BS about quark's "resilience" and "stable" marketcap. Quark is much worse off now than when I sold everything months ago. So glad I got out when I did. I even recovered most of my lost BTC. I hope the rest of u are smart enough to see that you are being given the current gift of undervaluation in other altcoins. Take what little value is left and transfer them to an altcoin with momentum and a real future. By doing so, you are proactively taking control over a longterm mistake and gain a real chance to recover your lost funds.

Quark is theoretically a very unique coin but the management of it's value is absolutely dreadful and cannot be trusted whatsoever.

So, you suggest to sell with 95% loss against btc and another 66% against usd?

Should buyers at the top price really try to recover loss of 97-98% buying another coins with momentum?

What is momentum?

What do you think who will buy this coin at further possible fall?

KJO

full member

Activity: 173

Merit: 100

Quote from: reRaise on November 09, 2014, 07:37:45 PM

I really feel ashamed as a quark holder when i look at other coins dev activity like darkcoin, max guevera you fcking failed, i know you don't give a shit about quark and sold out long time ago. I'm sorry for those who have done their best for this coin, but max should be ashamed of himself. fuck him and fuck digitalindustry

Max Guevara doesn't exist. Max Guevara is the name of Jessica Alba's character in an old fox tv show.

Do you guys now see what I told you months ago? There is literally nothing holding quark together except bagholders, a few angry and disgruntled whales, and large exchange wallets. The community is getting smaller and smaller. If quark drops below 1 million marketcap, which is a real possibility, expect quark to continue to plummet down the coinmarketcap list. There is no technical support for quark below .00001. NONE.

Countdown to emotard spewing more BS about quark's "resilience" and "stable" marketcap. Quark is much worse off now than when I sold everything months ago. So glad I got out when I did. I even recovered most of my lost BTC. I hope the rest of u are smart enough to see that you are being given the current gift of undervaluation in other altcoins. Take what little value is left and transfer them to an altcoin with momentum and a real future. By doing so, you are proactively taking control over a longterm mistake and gain a real chance to recover your lost funds.

Quark is theoretically a very unique coin but the management of it's value is absolutely dreadful and cannot be trusted whatsoever.

nuttynoah

full member

Activity: 229

Merit: 100

Quote from: BitcoinNational on November 10, 2014, 01:37:25 AM

max/Q/start

care to enlighten?

Hilux74

legendary

Activity: 912

Merit: 1000

Quote from: reRaise on November 10, 2014, 03:35:50 PM

Anyone wanting cheap quark? there is a nice wall up to 12 btc available

https://www.cryptsy.com/markets/view/QRK_BTC

Wall like that means someone trying to push price down to buy more cheap. For only ~$5000 I'm thinking of buying that entire wall...pretty tempting.

silvermetal

hero member

Activity: 487

Merit: 500

Quote from: BitcoinNational on November 10, 2014, 01:37:25 AM

max/Q/start

Well well, a new project of digitalindustry?

Scamming here and in my private Roll Eyes

Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade - page 54. (Read 1031025 times)