How much of you bought quarks last 3 months?
Bot bought and traded with itself and against you constantly.
And who controlled the bot?
Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade - page 55. (Read 1031025 times)
How much of you bought quarks last 3 months?
Bot bought and traded with itself and against you constantly.
And who controlled the bot?
Anyone wanting cheap quark? there is a nice wall up to 12 btc available
https://www.cryptsy.com/markets/view/QRK_BTC
https://www.cryptsy.com/markets/view/QRK_BTC
Is quark still the best option for levelling the playing field in terms of mining capacity in hardware? (most resistant to big industries monopolizing the mining capacity)
I really feel ashamed as a quark holder when i look at other coins dev activity like darkcoin, max guevera you fcking failed, i know you don't give a shit about quark and sold out long time ago. I'm sorry for those who have done their best for this coin, but max should be ashamed of himself. fuck him and fuck digitalindustry
Actually max guevera did more than average crypto dev - at least he is updating the code. Quark simply didn't get enough steam in highly competitive crypto environment and is slowly fading into oblivion. This was nice try though. digitalindustry is an epic dude that pretends to be some sort of crypto\economics expert(lol
), its sometimes funny to read his ravings. 
How much of you bought quarks last 3 months?
Bot bought and traded with itself and against you constantly.
max/Q/start
I really feel ashamed as a quark holder when i look at other coins dev activity like darkcoin, max guevera you fcking failed, i know you don't give a shit about quark and sold out long time ago. I'm sorry for those who have done their best for this coin, but max should be ashamed of himself. fuck him and fuck digitalindustry
How much time this robot want to trade with itself?
I was wondering if it's possible to add a feature to Quark that runs on top of Counterparty?
Perhaps Clearinghouse would be more appropriate, to better match the speed of QRK.
Please explain the concept....
Do you mean a trading platform ?
Even if there was a good idea, there is no dev activity, i know max is still here maintaining the code but he pretty much left the community in the dust and screwed everyone.
yet every day a little anus opens and releases another little turd nugget and it floats to the top of this forum, but never floats to the top of the BNC index??
http://bravenewcoin.com/price/price-index/
because these little turds need to be funded by the mother-ship Turd which is of course Bitcoin.
but if Bitcoin doesn't keep rising we can't keep funding the little turds?
yet Quark stays where it is?
and what of the turds that are already floating out there?
: D
Little turds aplenty, paid in trollcoin probably, floating to the top like meringue on a sweet potatoe pie. Don't worry. Nothing lasts. Even toilet bowls need a rinse once in a while
I'm noticing increased talk of X11 ASICs in existence.
I they are real I think this will be great for Quark since it brings back attention to the fact that the Quark algo with its RANDOM hashing rounds is super secure and still ASIC resistant after more than a year (a long time in crypto).
I they are real I think this will be great for Quark since it brings back attention to the fact that the Quark algo with its RANDOM hashing rounds is super secure and still ASIC resistant after more than a year (a long time in crypto).
Indeed good news for quark, but i think quark maybe is not that popular yet to build an asic for it or maybe it's not worth it to build an asic for it because of the low price and 1 quark per block maybe?
Yeah for sure for mining Quark at present, even if it was possible, it would not make financial sense to develop ASICs. But ASIC is more difficult for Quark than X11 because Quark has random elements whereas X11/X13/X15 are a stepwise linear process. Dealing with random choices is tough for the ASICs. Not very many poplular algos have remained ASIC free for a long time so that is an accomplishement...Quark and Scrypt-Jane are what come to my mind (XPM prime and PTS momentum etc not included since they are relatively unique not widely cloned).
X11 has long been advertised as ASIC resisant but from day1 it was just another obvious mistruth in the long list of DRK bullshit. Problem is many/most people believed in it and believe that it is superior to Quark algo. It will be nice to see the question put to rest.
I'll bet if X11/X13/X15 ASICs hit the market we will see another surge of Quark algo based coins being released. Will that have any positive benefit? Who knows but at least Quark is back in the spotlight where it belongs.
I agree, well said i mentioned it in this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9462816
I'm noticing increased talk of X11 ASICs in existence.
I they are real I think this will be great for Quark since it brings back attention to the fact that the Quark algo with its RANDOM hashing rounds is super secure and still ASIC resistant after more than a year (a long time in crypto).
I they are real I think this will be great for Quark since it brings back attention to the fact that the Quark algo with its RANDOM hashing rounds is super secure and still ASIC resistant after more than a year (a long time in crypto).
Indeed good news for quark, but i think quark maybe is not that popular yet to build an asic for it or maybe it's not worth it to build an asic for it because of the low price and 1 quark per block maybe?
Yeah for sure for mining Quark at present, even if it was possible, it would not make financial sense to develop ASICs. But ASIC is more difficult for Quark than X11 because Quark has random elements whereas X11/X13/X15 are a stepwise linear process. Dealing with random choices is tough for the ASICs. Not very many poplular algos have remained ASIC free for a long time so that is an accomplishement...Quark and Scrypt-Jane are what come to my mind (XPM prime and PTS momentum etc not included since they are relatively unique not widely cloned).
X11 has long been advertised as ASIC resisant but from day1 it was just another obvious mistruth in the long list of DRK bullshit. Problem is many/most people believed in it and believe that it is superior to Quark algo. It will be nice to see the question put to rest.
I'll bet if X11/X13/X15 ASICs hit the market we will see another surge of Quark algo based coins being released. Will that have any positive benefit? Who knows but at least Quark is back in the spotlight where it belongs.
I'm noticing increased talk of X11 ASICs in existence.
I they are real I think this will be great for Quark since it brings back attention to the fact that the Quark algo with its RANDOM hashing rounds is super secure and still ASIC resistant after more than a year (a long time in crypto).
I they are real I think this will be great for Quark since it brings back attention to the fact that the Quark algo with its RANDOM hashing rounds is super secure and still ASIC resistant after more than a year (a long time in crypto).
Indeed good news for quark, but i think quark maybe is not that popular yet to build an asic for it or maybe it's not worth it to build an asic for it because of the low price and 1 quark per block maybe?
I'm noticing increased talk of X11 ASICs in existence.
I they are real I think this will be great for Quark since it brings back attention to the fact that the Quark algo with its RANDOM hashing rounds is super secure and still ASIC resistant after more than a year (a long time in crypto).
I they are real I think this will be great for Quark since it brings back attention to the fact that the Quark algo with its RANDOM hashing rounds is super secure and still ASIC resistant after more than a year (a long time in crypto).
My article on the front page of http://www.coinspeaker.com/
http://www.coinspeaker.com/2014/11/06/cryptocurrency-fraud-part-1-identifying-ways-in-which-fraudsters-operate/
Cryptocurrency Fraud (Part 1): Identifying Ways in Which Fraudsters Operate
Part 2 will involve the new index which is called PoW+
: D
http://www.coinspeaker.com/2014/11/06/cryptocurrency-fraud-part-1-identifying-ways-in-which-fraudsters-operate/
Cryptocurrency Fraud (Part 1): Identifying Ways in Which Fraudsters Operate
Part 2 will involve the new index which is called PoW+
: D
I do still think adding quark to Blocknet will be a good idea
Quark Core 0.9.2.1
Quark 0.9.2.1 has been merged into the main Quark branch on github:
https://github.com/MaxGuevara/quark
This updates the code base from the 0.8 core to the 0.9 core.
Cool!Quark 0.9.2.1 has been merged into the main Quark branch on github:
https://github.com/MaxGuevara/quark
This updates the code base from the 0.8 core to the 0.9 core.
Old ugly getwork2 hack is gone, unfortunately, new getblocktemplate with longpoll support isn't yet here...
I was wondering if it's possible to add a feature to Quark that runs on top of Counterparty?
Perhaps Clearinghouse would be more appropriate, to better match the speed of QRK.
Please explain the concept....
Do you mean a trading platform ?
Even if there was a good idea, there is no dev activity, i know max is still here maintaining the code but he pretty much left the community in the dust and screwed everyone.
yet every day a little anus opens and releases another little turd nugget and it floats to the top of this forum, but never floats to the top of the BNC index??
http://bravenewcoin.com/price/price-index/
because these little turds need to be funded by the mother-ship Turd which is of course Bitcoin.
but if Bitcoin doesn't keep rising we can't keep funding the little turds?
yet Quark stays where it is?
and what of the turds that are already floating out there?
: D
I was wondering if it's possible to add a feature to Quark that runs on top of Counterparty?
Perhaps Clearinghouse would be more appropriate, to better match the speed of QRK.
Please explain the concept....
Do you mean a trading platform ?
Even if there was a good idea, there is no dev activity, i know max is still here maintaining the code but he pretty much left the community in the dust and screwed everyone.
What dev should do?
I was wondering if it's possible to add a feature to Quark that runs on top of Counterparty?
Perhaps Clearinghouse would be more appropriate, to better match the speed of QRK.
Please explain the concept....
Do you mean a trading platform ?
Even if there was a good idea, there is no dev activity, i know max is still here maintaining the code but he pretty much left the community in the dust and screwed everyone.
I was wondering if it's possible to add a feature to Quark that runs on top of Counterparty?
Perhaps Clearinghouse would be more appropriate, to better match the speed of QRK.
Please explain the concept....
Do you mean a trading platform ?
Jump to: