Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade - page 68. (Read 1031025 times)

COULD YOU PLEASE CONTINUE YOUR CAMPAIGN VIA PM AND STOP SPAMMING THIS THREAD

I think another question is more important:
What can be learned from this conversation about you and Quark?

You constant want the Quark community to believe that
A) Quark is solely created by Max
B) you heard about Quark not earlier than october 2013.

I have shown that A+B are not true.

The next question is, why do you try so hard to let the community believe that?

Straw grabbing at it's very trolley pushing best.

So shake commented on an old topic of mine and he played some part in Quark.

So this means i can see the future ?

And i controlled the future ?

For 2a to be more specific:

Quote from the IRC chat July 2014 (the first IRC meeting between core members James, Shake, Digitalindustry, Vic, Max and coinmama):

[22:15] so Max and Shake developed Quark then? I didn't know!

[22:16] Max gives me more credit than is due, he's the genius

[22:16] yes, shake played an important role behind the scenes while i developed the initial code

None of those "predictions" are dated as you suggested. Do you know the meaning of "dated"? No? Then look it up.

And for lovely QuarkFX -

here is a list of dated predictions on Bitcoin first -


1.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-oracle-of-crypto-digitalindustry-trading-investing-fundamentals-advice-760879

Bitcoin
August 29, 2014, 05:04:06 AM  price 508~

"Summary -:
If you get a selling opportunity higher than here take it, long term this entity relies on a questionable monopoly, and with China's economic production growing and the rest of the worlds shrinking they will soon own the mining production on Bitcoin, The total cap is irrelevant as a 60 or 70% miner can Bitcoin QE or "bring Bitcoin down" in favor of a competitor.

if you see signals like this, its time to bail.

Price targets -: If Bitcoin survives a crash and hard-fork i think the market will value it between $10 and $50, without a hard fork maybe $1 high risk brand awareness."

And for the ultimate troll survival a good user actually quoted it - you see ?


--------------------------------------


2. Calling more adoption will not equal higher price - (this was seen by lots of people)

http://kolinevans.wordpress.com/2014/07/25/why-the-bitcoin-price-really-needs-bad-news/

Posted in Uncategorized on July 25, 2014.

This was before - Paypal etc - and then CITI released their analysis, which basically said the same thing but did not focus on the the mining monopoly -


---------------------------------------


3. Calling the CPoW takeover of Crypto - :

http://kolinevans.wordpress.com/2014/03/02/why-there-could-be-a-mini-revolution-occuring-in-crypto-currency/

Posted in Uncategorized on March 2, 2014. 5 Comments

check out the ANN'S Annie:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=159.0


---------------------------------------



i've got more want me to keep posting?

Gee guize that volume is getting real thin on that $40 bump - we need more buyers...

any of you guys looking at buying Bitcoin here?

here's laughing at you!

cheers.

: D

Nice pictures Netnox! Beautiful country! Should mix well with a useful crypto currency like Quark!

oh no not again.. don't quote that scammer entire post.. you might get on ignore list as well..

A lot of questions under 1. I split them in a, b, c

a). Just read the first page of the thread (in the link I post above), and there is "shakezula" already.

b). Shake =  Shakezula = Adam = the developer of Cthulhu (wonder why that was never brought up as merge mine coin, but has probably to do that it has a huge pre-mine what you dislike??Then the Ctuhulu is under control of Adam instead of you? ). That adam is the developer of Ctuhulu is not a big secret (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4602585). Adam is also together with Max involved with Quark. You didn't bring together Max and Adam. Max and Adam know each other before. For me (as a outstander) it seemed that Max needed some help from Adam for coding Quark.

c). Moderators here don't care about altcoins. It is a bitcoin forum. You know that as much as I do. That's why you feel so comfortable here, with your multiple accounts and scamming. Therefore no help from any moderator here.

d). In my cryptocurrency life I am a freelancer. Unfortunately nobody wants to hire me, so it is all for free what I post here.


Again a, b,c
a): Yes I know
b): I protect my sources, sorry for that.
c): See 1c. Working on it. I do this besides my full time job, so it is progressing slowely.

For 3 and 4 I didn't see any questions for me...

you are trying hard i give you that - you are earning your pennies tonight.

1. Where is "Shake" mentioned in there? ( you fools give away how you have been "briefed") how can you know who is who on this forum?  what moderator told you who was who? - who do you exactly work for?  : D

2. I'm not aware that "Shake" was involved in Quark from the start, I certainly asked Shake to work with Max on some stuff, do you know he was involved at the start? who briefed you on that? who gives you information about IP addresses on this site?

3. as Quark is not ASIC mined if i was secretly mining it i suppose QuarkFX is wrong, I REALLY CAN see the future, because i knew that it was going to drop to nothing then raise up out of nowhere on the flimsy possibility that a core of supporters who believe in monetary reform etc, would put faith in something they little understand.

I AM a time traveler.

4. Caps was my idea, taken from my monitored PC (which i never tried to hide.) it was ScRYPT all i own i purchased.. never mined it, ask the guys sitting on 400k 500k etc. i own a tiny amount

you will never understand this

i don't believe in "early mining" if I can't start from 0 and buy it then its not worth the investment, this is not complex math here but you won't understand.

but its no "fun" and it also proves its flawed if i can't start with anyone else, at zero and buy in and still see the wealth transfer potential , then i can't say its a "good investment"

Let me guess, you open a topic and say that you were fooled and was not aware what hazzard was doing...
And after reading that thread we all say "Poor poor Kolin we believe you" (not!)

It is pretty easy to read deleted posts at bitcointalk, so you don't have to make it. We have read it already:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2395353

(btw also notice in that link the fact that Kolin and Shakazula (aka as Adam, one of the developers of Quark) know each other in June 2013, while Quark was not even born yet).
Therefore it is pretty obvious that Kolin was aware of Quark from the beginning while Kolin can't be seen in the Quark thread earlier than October/November 2013.
In this way (showing up in October / november) Kolin wants us to believe he is not one of the early miners lol.

To explain a little bit more. When Kolin ("digitalindustry") is not visible in a thread, it doesn't mean he is not present in that thread. Huh? Yes, he has many many different accounts and posts almost 24hrs a day. That story is for later.

Did I mention CAPS already?

you are inspiring me again FX - this is great !

oh poor you, that was a distraction for "you guys" - and the dev (hazard) wrote 900,000,000 (or something)  and the market abandoned it - it doesn't exist.

except your problem is, you don't have any history of this - your pages didn't go that far so you don't know this.

good idea but - someone should make it.

yep certainly do - i cast the net very wide to include merge mined crypto my simple friend, (also i did not discriminate against algo)

basically all the stuff you can't apparently understand...?

i know this stuff is hard to grasp but notice that the word "monopoly" is not in the topic or the post?

well there you go, now you have an answer - it is simply a market cap of continuing "PoW~" issuance.

(learn something new everyday)

also i'll post here some dated analysis i did - look forward to it.

don't know what you are rambling about 300 at 500 i said if yo get a opportunity to sell higher take it - (its all there on the journal in black an white) (don't you have to read that?)

Oops, i did it again. (click for more insane posts of Digitalindustry)

oh you poor thing, you give yourself away every time.... {sigh}

Myriad - no continuing PoW (that i'm aware of)
Kopimi (doesn't exist except in your imagination perhaps?)
MMXIV < what is that?
mimic < yes that would apply eventually perhaps-
nibble ( nope hard cap)

Quark has lot of attention from traders , and growing, we just don't fake our volume its quite simple, but as you are a simple uneducated (monkey like) upward walking creature, this is hard for you to grasp.

don't let that get you down though.

Sure, in your mind everything drives interest, even a ddos attack turns out to be good in your brain (btw. i wasn´t talking about ddos, but you won´t understand it anyway)

Oh and "predictions"... You never made any prediction since you carefully avoided linking any of your fortune telling to a timeframe. You actually staged yourself as excactly that: a fortune teller in this thread. People who are engaged in pumping&dumping do the same: attempting to place a self-fulfilling prophecy (of course they bought the junk before to sell to people who fall for them).

I recently saw you predicting Bitcoin to be at 30$, at 50$, at 100$ at 150$ (never saw 300 though) - obviously you never called a date, so I guess you refer to them whenever you like - sharlatan style as usual. You predicted Quarks bottom at 50K, now it is at 2K. You predicted Quark to slowly rise in December, the opposite happened. You claimed huge numbers of investors to buy into Quark and since then daily volume has been low as 4000$-400$ with few exceptions, one of them a pump on September 13 - since then Quarks value declined and today it reached a new low. So even though you never called a specific date which would allow to easily prove you a sharlatan (or a real genius) you were wrong, wrong and wrong again.

So: put your money were your mouth is and give your "predictions" a time frame that allows to track them. Everything else is baloney.

P.S.: Yeah, funny you name Quark as number 1 of the non monopoly crypto and then place it on #5. Oops. I am sure you will another fishy excuse for that inconsistency.

Lol

Myriadcoin, Kopimicoin, MMXIV coin, mimiccoin, twittercoin (Nibbles?)  and some other re-branded coins where you involved in (and scamming) are knocking at the door of this capmarket of course?

And also interesting that a coin which is so high in this market cap (Quark at 5) has zero attention from traders. The volume is already for weeks one of the lowest at exchanges (while 247 Million Quarks are mined and don't seem to move in any direction).

You did a pretty good job, to kill the merge mine project.

@Quarkfx, Nice analysis about how Kolin has different views on the hashing rate problems at Quark and bitcoin.

In fact Quarkfx thanks for the inspiration -

you have inspired me to put out the idea of a Market cap site of :


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9105298


https://twitter.com/Kolin_Quark/status/519169308568461312



- Education is spreading about the fundamentals of Crypto Currency, we all know that, but we still need to keep it simple.

- One thing i think that people can understand is the "Hard Cap" idea that there will never be more than a certain number, basically from a pure economics standpoint anything with a hard cap is very flawed or basically doomed, I think most developers would agree (if they were being honest publicly)

- any real Dev or economist (fiat or Crypto) knows the Hard Cap is a deal breaker, it's childish, embarrassing and immature (in many respects), especially in a system of ever growing competition.

- It drives the "pyramid" meme also it does in reality give an unprecedented advantage to early adopters. ( an unacceptable one, which won't function)

- So here is the proposal, A market Cap website with very simple basic rules, anything without the "Hard Cap", second rule; The new currency has to be Proof of Work issued. that is the requirement (as stated in the original "Satoishi" white paper: 

A. The Crypto has to have a continuing PoW issuance> - I like the idea to symbolize it as "PoW~"

B. The PoW can be any algo (totally agnostic on that) -

C. This includes yes PoW/PoS hybrids -

D. Merge mines will not be discriminated against but notes with an * and a filter option (possibly)

The list might surprise you Doge is coming in number 1 so far.

Please give help and add your crypto to the list by commenting below -
remember it only has to have a continuing PoW issuance of any type -  POW/POS hybrids are welcome ! : D
This is what I've got so far errors will be made so correct me if you either see something that is wrong or needs to be added.
May start a bounty for this to be developed into a site - we could help drive people to the Market cap site - we could have a "BTC filter" for reference.
This will help education so we know the "insiders" won't want it to happen, but it will probably happen anyhow, so lets make the list..




~~~~~~~~~~~~~so on
----------------------

add comments.

looks like Doge gets it so far !

HBN at 10 is impressive - * forgot Devcoin I think it has a continuing PoW