Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | POW/POS | 0.10.6.3 - New Self Moderated Thread - page 58. (Read 64190 times)

At these prices if you point some known devs in the right direction im sure some will find their way here. I mean with coin like quark at 50-100 sats if I was a dev I would be all over this project.

Bootstrap coming shortly. Previous post of the bootstrap had to be removed, the cloud server was buggy corrupting the upload. I am uploading a new bootstrap now for windows on a temporary server until a reliable service is chosen.

I agree. This coin has so much potential but so far no real progress is being made. If we can get even one good dev to start things off and who can actually make some good progress, that would be great.

Thanks for the update on this vic. Keep on to them to get this fixed or return the funding.

Failing either or those we will start a dedicated thread to pacatum and sadly that will cause vast damage to their company if they were serious about building a name for themselves in the crypto arena.

Thats the beauty of dealing with internet based companies when you have forums ..google loves forum threads

Perhaps max himself should communicate directly with them to point out these specific issues and help them replicate them. Seems perfectly sensible solution to me.

I would really like to see a more transparent community driven leadership for quark develop I mean we have quite a few motivated people here we need to work together and keep the community involved and keep this thread near page 1.

Be good if we have some positive developments in the next week.

Why are we reinventing the wheel I see a few projects forking off of other stable projects? is it because we do not want to perform a coins swap? or were we trying for something new that has not been done already in an opensource project here? excuse my lack of technical knowledge if this is a ridiculous question.

What has pacatum coded for us if it did work?

I personally am not against anon and think an option of anon transactions is a benefit so i would have no issue having quark become a copy of a great project like pivx. I mean pivx loved quark algo we  love what they how they have come on since then. We can give them full credits on the OP ... why can we not fork this project? or are things not quite this simple?

Quark is a famous and aged project seeing it at 60 sats is a ludicrous.

Although now if anyone wants back it this is the time to make sure you get back in.

I will buy all any quark you don't want for 60 sats lol  PM me and you will be sending first.

I agree - their official stance is that they had tried to solve it before but were unable to replicate the issues - Max however was able to himself replicate them when he looked into the community member's reported issues. However they did not communicate this and then were apparently in China the last several weeks without access to easy communication and didn't realize that we still had issues... They have told me they are looking into it currently however I have not heard anything solid back yet.

no word yet, just a continuance of total non professionalism or they are scooping up the cheap coins and it suits them to not have it fixed yet.

So many people emulating quark

first the algo so many coins adopted

now the name

I'm hoping that company is looking into fixing their broken code already. What the latest word with that?

Pacatum need to get this sorted asap.

Hello Here is a new mining pool for mining Quark.
It's based on YiiMP, no registration is needed :

• Stratum  : lycheebit.com:4033
• User     : YOUR_QRK_ADDRESS
• Password : c=QRK

• Website  : http://www.lycheebit.com/
• Payout   : Every hour
• Fee      : 1.00 %

Exemple of CCMiner command line :

Happy mining

You made a mistake. They called like. That's what you were looking for https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/qwark/

If I'm not mistaken this coin was on the UBQ platform, what has changed?

Quark will not stay cheap much longer, It is going ahead, that is a fact.

For sure!

It looks like there is more than one dev working on this.  What if one of the others is happy to put their name to it?

All things take time. First comes the upgrades then comes the exchanges. How a coin like qrk is not on bittrex is very strange.

I would suggest just forking a coin that has already got most of these features already and doing a coin swap.

Then since that will save a lot of work and effort next get listed on the new decentralised exchanges which are about to kick off.

And proportional distribution absolutely fair for all.

agreed, that is a priority

After BTC38 closure,nothing of that will help if Quark does not list on major alt exchanges Poloniex and Bittrex or at least on one of them.For it survival,Quark needs more investors and money and on small exchanges it cant get it.

first upgrading to latest bitcoin core, then pow pos hybrid, and finally masternode governance.

Will it be a hardfork or just a new version?
I haven't seen much GitHub activity, it looks pretty dead project to me.
I'm thinking of sell off.

that's at least some good news... why they are just forking a well known working project with the features we want is what i want to know.