Topic: [ANN] (QTUM) - A Scalable Smart Contract Platform w/ Proof of Stake - page 186. (Read 525459 times)

HA HA HA Roger ver is also a scammer interesting
So scammer supports the scammer(qtum)
so qtum is scam case solve
something like this

The only risk is them revealing something they don't want to reveal.

I found this to help you with your newbie misunderstandings about crypto security: https://community.coinbase.com/t/can-i-share-my-bitcoin-address-publicly-where-can-i-find-it/7824

"Bitcoin Address can safely be shared with anyone, anytime without presenting any risk to the security of your funds.

You should be aware though, that once someone knows that an address belongs to you, they can view the full history of send and receive transactions to that address."

There is only one reason to not share it, and that is to hide something.

Unless you know something the rest of the world doesn't know: that ECDSA has already been broken by quantum super computers?!? In which case the team and crypto as a whole have got much bigger problems to worry about. http://pqcrypto.org/

And here's a better question than your first one: Why are you not asking about the funds when you say you did invest??? Hmm. You say me asking this question is making you start to think I did invest and you act as thought only an investor should be asking this question, which indicates you think my question is normal for an investor, and yet you and the few other people here who claim to have invested aren't asking it! Lol!!!

And it's pretty simple why I am here: overall I am here because I want to see where this goes (will be entertaining no matter what), right now I am here specifically to seek the super easy proof of the funds they claim to have raised in the ICO because the fact they haven't shown proof and so resistant to addressing inquires about it is a HUGE red flag (and as we all know, not the first one) and I don't believe them when they say they raised $10 mil in 90 minutes. I mean, shit, now is the chance for them to prove themselves against us "trolls" in an indisputable fashion and it would take no time or effort at all. All they'd have to do is share the addresses, a practice standard to every ICO that isn't a scam. Now is a chance to show the world we are wrong in our assumptions and accusations (or at least this one, which you could try to leverage to mean we must be wrong in all of our assumptions and accusations )!

Yes they will. Now quit bothering me. I'm trying to do the math now.

Unfortunately you are already discredited glebby, no one will fall for your scam 

I'm now in the process of penning the OP of a new thread designed to garner $200,000,000 ($200M) via an ICO for a real venture where the bitcoin wallet address(es) WILL BE fully transparent. If these clowns can amass $15M while not being transparent, imagine what I can do being fully transparent. Hell, I'll even get PwC to manage the funds.

For those playing at home that think I'm kidding, just watch me. Here's the great part. It'll get massive publicity on being the largest cryptocurrency ICO to date only, and I'll pay people to comment on the articles (I just thought about doing the paying part, and even figured out how it could legitimately be accomplished).

Stay tuned.

Bruno (Chinese name: Luŏ Xióng; 裸熊)

Glad I piss you off!

On a more serious note, publishing the ICO address did not help many projects which did not deliver anything!

An expected response from the QTUM team
We are so dumb to counter, we reply trolls.
idiotic shills like these pisses me.

Oh another troll here, good, the more the merrier  

Hey, stupid idiotic shill is this your first time to see an ICO?.
There were alot of coins released a public address were all the bitcoins are collected during the ICO.
unless you and your QTUM team publicly announce the private keys.

So fuck off with your lame excuse about risk

I can't argue with stupid glebby, you need to go back to school, just make sure you don't sleep in science class  this time

Reads to me like shit for brains needs another science lesson:

---

Definitive proof that Qtum is nothing but a motherfuckin scam.

The following is the comment count (view count if available) for all the articles that Qtum links to from its official website: https://qtum.org/en/press

Chinese:

12/13/2016: 8BTC: Qtum公布首个社区项目“春邮”和BiSMTP协议：让每个Email成为虚拟货币钱包 (author: Meng big / 萌大大; Qtum Announces First Community Project "Spring Mail" and BiSMTP Agreement: Let Each Email Become a Virtual Currency Wallet)
Comments: 2; Views: 5,522; Thumbs Up: 1
1/12/2017: Chainb.com: 量子链：区块链生态系统的精华版再现！ (author: Lydia; Quantum chain: the essence of the block chain ecosystem reproduction!)
Comments: 0; Views: 955

1/17/2017: 8BTC: Qtum量子链：选择比特币UTXO模型的原因及其优势 (author: Block chain information / 区块链资讯; Qtum Quantum Chain: The Reason and Advantages of Choosing Bitmember UTXO Model)
Comments: 0; Views: 3,233; Thumbs Up: 0
1/17/2017: Chainb.com: Qtum是如何让以太坊虚拟机运行在比特币模型上 (author: Chainb; [Recommended] Qtum is how to make the ether square virtual machine running on the bit currency model)
Comments: 0; Views: 513
02/07/2017: leiphone.com: 面对智能合约商业应用的局限，量子链平台做了哪些实践？ (author: Wen Xiaohua / 温晓桦; rehashed Forbes article - Faced with the limitations of business contracts for smart contracts, what are the practices of quantum chain platforms?)
Comments: 0; Views: 312

English:

1/11/2017: NASDAQ: QTUM - CONNECTING BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY WITH THE COMMERCIAL WORLD (author: John Riggins [Bitcoin Magazine] -> 3 articles, 2 of which are directly related to Qtum, all three enjoying a grand total of 0 comments)
Comments: 0

1/24/2017: NEWS.BITCOIN.COM: THE QTUM PROJECT CREATES A MIXTURE OF BITCOIN AND ETHEREUM (author: Jamie Redman -> 904 Posts with ... wait for it ... 0 Comments)
Comments: 0; Views: 9,940

2/6/2017: FORBES: QTUM MIXING BITCOIN & ETHEREUM LAUNCHING 'PROOF-OF-STAKE' SMART CONTRACTS PLATFORM (author: Roger Aitken)
Comments: 0; Views: 7.901

2/09/2017: FINANCE MAGNATES: MAJOR BITCOIN INVESTORS BACK NEW BLOCKCHAIN PLATFORM QTUM (author: Avi Mizrahi)
Comments: 0 -> Be the First to Comment!; Ratings: 0
2/9/2017: YAHOO FINANCE: QTUM IS BUILDING BRIDGES BETWEEN BITCOIN, ETHEREUM, HYPERLEDGER, R3 CORDA (author: Ian Allison)
Comments: 0 -> Start the conversation

2/10/2017: ALLCOINSNEWS.COM: ECONOMY WHITEPAPER RELEASED BY QTUM PROJECT (author: Matthew Warner -> interesting URL Matthew has there: http://allcoinsnews.com/author/justin_bieber/  )
Aside: The last time I spoke with Matthew Neal Wright he was residing in ... wait for it ... Windsor, England.
Comments: 0 (the original article was at http://blockchain-finance.com/2017/02/10/qtum-project-releases-economy-whitepaper/ penned by the same Matthew Warner having his bio et al. at URL http://blockchain-finance.com/author/matthew_warner/)

2/10/2017: THE HUFFINGTON POST: THE BLOCKCHAIN’S RISING IN THE EAST - MEET THE CHINESE PROJECT DETRIMENT (author: Daniyal Sheikh)
Comments: 0

2/10/2017: ECONOTIMES: QTUM BLOCKCHAIN PROJECT RELEASES ECONOMY WHITEPAPER (author: UNKNOWN)
Comments: 0 -> Be the First to Comment!

03/07/17: COINSPEAKER: BLOCKCHAIN PROJECT QTUM ANNOUNCES SUPPORT FROM PWC, RELEASES SMART-CONTRACT WHITEPAPER (author: TATSIANA YABLONSKAYA)
Comments: 0; Likes: 4; G+: 3; LinkedIn: 3; Points: 1
Qtum incorrectly linked the above to the following ...

03/06/17: FINANCE MAGNATES: Big Four auditor PwC is supporting Qtum’s efforts to fuel blockchain adoption across the global business world. (author: Avi Mizrahi)
Comments: 0 -> Be the First to Comment!; Ratings: 0
03/07/17: IBTIMES: QTUM BLOCKCHAIN RELEASES NEW WHITE PAPER FOR MOBILE APPS AND TIES UP WITH PWC IN ASIA (author: Ian Allison)
Comments: 0

03/08/17: COINGECKO: ASIA’S QTUM PROJECT AIMS TO REVAMP SMART CONTRACTS (author: CoinGecko)
Comments: 0 -> Be the first to comment.; G+: 0

To recap:

Total Comments: 2
Total Thumbs Up: 1
Points: 1
Ratings: 0
Facebook Likes: 4
G+: 3
LinkedIn: 3
Hashtag tweets for #Qtum since last December: <200 (last count was 57, discounting Official Qtum's usage since amassing $15M)

That's pretty fuckin amazing that articles linked from Qtum would have such an über-low comment count et al. stemming from its backers-cum-Investards in spite of this space priding itself on having a voicetress community, eh? Yet, supposedly hard-cock Investards came outta the woodwork at the 11th hour to wait in line to virtually snatch up all the Qtum tokens within hours after being made available, doling out $15,000,000 on rarely used cryptocurrency exchanges, all of which are literally connected to the Qtum endeavor, with them very same hard-cock Investards having no qualms with tying up their moneys till September in a non-profit that IS NOT AN INVESTMENT VEHICLE because that's how they roll.

Full Disclosure: I post at the risk of destroying my cred even further according to cocksuceroverflow.  

Why are you asking about the funds when you clearly did not invest in this (starting to think you did  )

I'm sure the team will release reports about it later, and I understand the fact that it's not the best to put all the coins in some public address considering the risk.

So you discard Google trends data in favor of you two cents subjective opinion?

You sure don't know what science is glebby 

Then can we see there are real funds, plz? Super easy and standard thing to do. Yet this question keeps getting ignored by the team. I can think of only one reason not to be transparent when it is this simple, and that is to hide something.

How to raise $15M in just a couple easy steps:

First, create a YouTube channel and upload some videos: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCa4iVp5iMC8gijxBvzZI3UA/videos


Second, tell the world that your brand receives tremendous support in spite of your YouTube channel dictating otherwise: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCa4iVp5iMC8gijxBvzZI3UA/about


Finally, count the money, making sure you don't provide proof that $15,000,000 was truly collectly, but continue to promise a September access to tokens of the non-profit entity that's NOT AN INVESTMENT VEHICLE because that's why Investards participate in trading securities on Chinese exchanges, of which Chinese authorities don't bother themselves with what happens on exchanges whose CEOs reside in China.

Time for some scientific data:


You can see there is real interest in Qtum 

Drugs are bad glebby, mmmkay 

cocksuckeroverflow, if that's your only takeaway, than I suggest you blow your fuckin brains out, for fuckin LIKES have nothing to do with my epic post.

Let me explain it to your fuckin pee brain, mmmkay? Qtum was on record in stating countless times that they had tremendous support mostly in China/Asia, with overflow support in abroad, including the US. Yet ... and this is where it gets too complicated for you ... in spite of all the media attention, there's barely a fuckin bleep on the radar that they exist if you go by comment counts alone, for other entities in this space garner more comments, Likes, etc., for many times just one article than what Qtum did combined. Hell, even the scammers behind The Legend Room got more comments on articles espousing their brand, and even Leroy Fodor of StakeMiners garnered more combined comments than Qtum, albeit mostly from their core base, of which Qtum didn't have/employ the common practice.


2017: My name is , and I'll be the person in charge of liquidating all known assets of Qtum, currently at just under a quarter of a million dollars. Our hope is that we'll be able to glean more assists from their bleached servers, projected to be completed within two years. Meanwhile, if you have a claim against Qtum, please fill out the form at the following landing page .

Quote

If history repeats itself, and the unexpected always happens, how incapable must Man be of learning from experience.

~George Bernard Shaw

Quote

History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce.

~Karl Marx

Quote

No event in cryptocurrency history is more misunderstood than the $15,000,000 Qtum ICO funding drive. It was misreported then, and it's still being misreported now.

~Richard M. Nixon

So according to you, this is a scam because there is not enough likes?

I guess it's time for you to get a new medication, the old one does not seem to be working anymore 

Frozen for six months what? I don't think anyone here put in money and if you did you should have listed to us all

Qtum got a nice mention on Valuewalk.com, in an article discussing the ETF ruling, Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Qtum

It should be noted that Ethereum is not alone anymore in its pursuit of the holy grail of decentralized networking. Since Ethereum’s conception in 2013, a long list of so called “turing-complete blockchains” have entered the race towards decentralized application platforms. One recent example is a Singapore-based startup called “The Qtum Foundation”, proposing a sort of hybrid between Bitcoin and Ethereum, exploiting the technological advantages of both systems and combining them.











Blockchain Marches On: SEC’s Bitcoin ruling won’t stop the 2017 crypto blitz
By Tanvir Zafar on March 23, 2017 9:24 am in Technology


The price of one Bitcoin plummeted last Friday by 8%, following an announcement by the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission, rejecting a proposed Bitcoin-backed Exchange Traded Fund (ETF). Prior the SEC’s ruling, the anticipation surrounding the probable “institutionalization” of the once semi-anarchic cryptocurrency, drove its price to the slightly unbelievable all time high of about $1280 per unit.

The regulator’s Nay did indeed administer a felt blow to the Bitcoin market, but not one out of the ordinary for the crypto asset, which grew to be notorious for both – its local volatility and steady macro trend. If anything, recent developments serve as a testimony for the un-patriated currency’s unyielding drive for survival.  With China’s central bank raising heavy restrictions on BTC trade, and US SEC officers reluctant to allow the cryptocurrency’s expansion, Bitcoin is still traded close to the price of an ounce of Gold, aggregating a market capitalization of about 19.4 Billion USD.

Bitcoin blockchain technology
geralt / Pixabay
Despite the occasional alarmist headline, Bitcoin’s success story is undoubtedly carved out of the stuff movies are made of. Starting as a rebellious open source Cyberpunk project in the aftermath of the ‘08 financial crash, the “Peer to Peer Digital Cash System”, described in a seven page short whitepaper by an anonymous figure named Satoshi Nakamoto, managed to create waves that have reached even the highest windows of the established financial institutions.

The somewhat agitated interest Bitcoin has been enjoying since then among the tech, financial and business sectors and their respective regulatory watchdogs, originates mainly from the technology underlying it, called the “Blockchain”. Hailed in late 2015 as The Trust Machine by The Economist, said Machine holds the potential to eliminate functions, held very dear to the Banking sector and financial institutions, namely those of intermediaries, middleman and trusted third parties. Accordingly, the initial suspicion legacy organizations and government bodies have expressed towards blockchain is not only natural, it probably is well advised.

Albeit, this suspicion has long made way to a very wide spread if-you-can’t-beat-them-join-them attitude, with almost every major financial institution being involved in some sort of blockchain experiment. Moreover, governments around the globe are embracing blockchain more outspokenly than ever. The People’s Republic of China, not very well known as big decentralization fan, has recently included blockchain technology in its upcoming five year plan, while the European Parliament has published several reports, with extravagant titles like “How blockchain technology could change our lives”.


 
blockchain bitcoin

One of the most recent developments in that respect doesn’t involve Bitcoin itself, but one of its most promising progeny, Ethereum. 30 tech and finance giants, including Microsoft, J. P. Morgan and Intel recently announced the so called “Enterprise Ethereum Alliance”, aiming to drive Ethereum’s blockchain technology to the mainstream business market.

The Ethereum project, in contrast to the inherently ownerless and uncontrolled Bitcoin movement, is a well funded foundation with a clear and charismatic leadership with long term goals, one of which is a decentralized, uncensorable “World Computer”. This “World Computer” uses blockchain technology to  connect a multitude of personal devices, spread around the globe, and makes them perform as one giant global computer. This computer can then execute applications, host websites, validate complex financial transactions, sign off agreements and do basically anything one could possibly think of without requiring central servers or any other kind of standard infrastructure a government could censor or a corporation could eavesdrop on.

If this sounds like a pie in the sky, it’s because it sort of is. For now, at least. The Ethereum network already exists, and does a lot of what it promises, however very slowly and rather inelegantly. However, since the project still describes itself as in alpha state, these problems are by all means tolerable. The team behind the project makes continuous efforts to improve its platform, and with the recent legacy backing, which has almost doubled the price of “Ether” (ETH), Ethereum’s native cryptocurrency, these efforts will probably increase significantly this year and bear some surprising fruit.

It should be noted that Ethereum is not alone anymore in its pursuit of the holy grail of decentralized networking. Since Ethereum’s conception in 2013, a long list of so called “turing-complete blockchains” have entered the race towards decentralized application platforms. One recent example is a Singapore-based startup called “The Qtum Foundation”, proposing a sort of hybrid between Bitcoin and Ethereum, exploiting the technological advantages of both systems and combining them.

One of the more interesting capabilities such chimera would have is the ability to access an Ethereum-styled World Computer from smartphones and tablets, a feature Ethereum itself couldn’t manage to whip into existence. With about half of all internet traffic being generated by mobile devices, and with many blockchain applications targeting emerging markets with “mobile only” internet access, this development has been crucial enough to enroll the support of legacy consultant giants like PwC, demonstrating once again what the leaders of the world economy really think about the future of blockchain and Bitcoin-like initiatives.

In light of all of this, 2017 begins as an exceptionally promising year in the short history of blockchains. So exceptionally in fact that the SEC’s rejection of a Bitcoin backed investment fund will hardly be recorded in future reviews.