Topic: [ANN] (QTUM) - A Scalable Smart Contract Platform w/ Proof of Stake - page 187. (Read 525459 times)

Definitive proof that Qtum is nothing but a motherfuckin scam.

The following is the comment count (view count if available) for all the articles that Qtum links to from its official website: https://qtum.org/en/press

Chinese:

12/13/2016: 8BTC: Qtum公布首个社区项目“春邮”和BiSMTP协议：让每个Email成为虚拟货币钱包 (author: Meng big / 萌大大; Qtum Announces First Community Project "Spring Mail" and BiSMTP Agreement: Let Each Email Become a Virtual Currency Wallet)
Comments: 2; Views: 5,522; Thumbs Up: 1
1/12/2017: Chainb.com: 量子链：区块链生态系统的精华版再现！ (author: Lydia; Quantum chain: the essence of the block chain ecosystem reproduction!)
Comments: 0; Views: 955

1/17/2017: 8BTC: Qtum量子链：选择比特币UTXO模型的原因及其优势 (author: Block chain information / 区块链资讯; Qtum Quantum Chain: The Reason and Advantages of Choosing Bitmember UTXO Model)
Comments: 0; Views: 3,233; Thumbs Up: 0
1/17/2017: Chainb.com: Qtum是如何让以太坊虚拟机运行在比特币模型上 (author: Chainb; [Recommended] Qtum is how to make the ether square virtual machine running on the bit currency model)
Comments: 0; Views: 513
02/07/2017: leiphone.com: 面对智能合约商业应用的局限，量子链平台做了哪些实践？ (author: Wen Xiaohua / 温晓桦; rehashed Forbes article - Faced with the limitations of business contracts for smart contracts, what are the practices of quantum chain platforms?)
Comments: 0; Views: 312

English:

1/11/2017: NASDAQ: QTUM - CONNECTING BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY WITH THE COMMERCIAL WORLD (author: John Riggins [Bitcoin Magazine] -> 3 articles, 2 of which are directly related to Qtum, all three enjoying a grand total of 0 comments)
Comments: 0

1/24/2017: NEWS.BITCOIN.COM: THE QTUM PROJECT CREATES A MIXTURE OF BITCOIN AND ETHEREUM (author: Jamie Redman -> 904 Posts with ... wait for it ... 0 Comments)
Comments: 0; Views: 9,940

2/6/2017: FORBES: QTUM MIXING BITCOIN & ETHEREUM LAUNCHING 'PROOF-OF-STAKE' SMART CONTRACTS PLATFORM (author: Roger Aitken)
Comments: 0; Views: 7.901

2/09/2017: FINANCE MAGNATES: MAJOR BITCOIN INVESTORS BACK NEW BLOCKCHAIN PLATFORM QTUM (author: Avi Mizrahi)
Comments: 0 -> Be the First to Comment!; Ratings: 0
2/9/2017: YAHOO FINANCE: QTUM IS BUILDING BRIDGES BETWEEN BITCOIN, ETHEREUM, HYPERLEDGER, R3 CORDA (author: Ian Allison)
Comments: 0 -> Start the conversation

2/10/2017: ALLCOINSNEWS.COM: ECONOMY WHITEPAPER RELEASED BY QTUM PROJECT (author: Matthew Warner -> interesting URL Matthew has there: http://allcoinsnews.com/author/justin_bieber/  )
Aside: The last time I spoke with Matthew Neal Wright he was residing in ... wait for it ... Windsor, England.
Comments: 0 (the original article was at http://blockchain-finance.com/2017/02/10/qtum-project-releases-economy-whitepaper/ penned by the same Matthew Warner having his bio et al. at URL http://blockchain-finance.com/author/matthew_warner/)

2/10/2017: THE HUFFINGTON POST: THE BLOCKCHAIN’S RISING IN THE EAST - MEET THE CHINESE PROJECT DETRIMENT (author: Daniyal Sheikh)
Comments: 0

2/10/2017: ECONOTIMES: QTUM BLOCKCHAIN PROJECT RELEASES ECONOMY WHITEPAPER (author: UNKNOWN)
Comments: 0 -> Be the First to Comment!

03/07/17: COINSPEAKER: BLOCKCHAIN PROJECT QTUM ANNOUNCES SUPPORT FROM PWC, RELEASES SMART-CONTRACT WHITEPAPER (author: TATSIANA YABLONSKAYA)
Comments: 0; Likes: 4; G+: 3; LinkedIn: 3; Points: 1
Qtum incorrectly linked the above to the following ...

03/06/17: FINANCE MAGNATES: Big Four auditor PwC is supporting Qtum’s efforts to fuel blockchain adoption across the global business world. (author: Avi Mizrahi)
Comments: 0 -> Be the First to Comment!; Ratings: 0
03/07/17: IBTIMES: QTUM BLOCKCHAIN RELEASES NEW WHITE PAPER FOR MOBILE APPS AND TIES UP WITH PWC IN ASIA (author: Ian Allison)
Comments: 0

03/08/17: COINGECKO: ASIA’S QTUM PROJECT AIMS TO REVAMP SMART CONTRACTS (author: CoinGecko)
Comments: 0 -> Be the first to comment.; G+: 0

To recap:

Total Comments: 2
Total Thumbs Up: 1
Points: 1
Ratings: 0
Facebook Likes: 4
G+: 3
LinkedIn: 3
Hashtag tweets for #Qtum since last December: <200 (last count was 57, discounting Official Qtum's usage since amassing $15M)

That's pretty fuckin amazing that articles linked from Qtum would have such an über-low comment count et al. stemming from its backers-cum-Investards in spite of this space priding itself on having a voicetress community, eh? Yet, supposedly hard-cock Investards came outta the woodwork at the 11th hour to wait in line to virtually snatch up all the Qtum tokens within hours after being made available, doling out $15,000,000 on rarely used cryptocurrency exchanges, all of which are literally connected to the Qtum endeavor, with them very same hard-cock Investards having no qualms with tying up their moneys till September in a non-profit that IS NOT AN INVESTMENT VEHICLE because that's how they roll.

Full Disclosure: I post at the risk of destroying my cred even further according to cocksuceroverflow.  

Damn! I do like your style!

It is funny to talk about future, profit and top X with a group of cheaters.

Qtum can be large project in top 10, but when can we see the addresses for funds raised during the ICO? Qtum can replace Litecoin as a top 10 giant.

The main network will be released in September, allowing participants to withdraw their tokens from the exchanges.

@olympicwinner. With the kind of backers they have this will surely be at the top 5. QTUM will be carefully planned like Ethereum as far as when and where to list the coin is concerned. Let us face it, the cryptomarkets are easily manipulated. Whether this cryptocoin is a scam or not, it will reach a 1 billion dollar market capitalization minimum.

A 100x return on investment is now the goal of ICO's such as this one.

Qtum can be large project in top 10, but when can we trade it? Qtum can replace Litecoin as a top 10 giant.

No he doesn't find it strange, probably because he is paid to label us trolls not to think and speak for himself. Like a dog. On the internet nobody knows you are a dog, until you show everybody how much of an obedient little bitch you are.

It's a simple question, but there is an obvious reason why they might choose to ignore it. The fact we even have to ask says something, as it is a standard practice to provide some transparency. Every other project of this scale does it. Then again, this isn't the first time they have shown they might be playing above their level.

Also the fact this thead is so devoid of activity outside of the back-and-forth between us and stackoverflow and the press-releases from qtum's account is a sign of how "successful" the ICO was here on BCT. If it was a success here, there would be a lot more investors demanding the info I am asking for- just like they do, would do, and have done for other projects when the transparency is not provided.

Roger ver is scammer BTU 

Yahoo! Finance picked up our Newswire today:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/qtum-shatters-records-raising-15-143500253.html

In case you missed the Mobile Wallet & iMessage Demo:

Don't you at least find it a little bit strange that they haven't even answered the question to post the ICO addresses?

Even if they still have to collect the funds from the exchanges and it takes time till it will be showable, they could at least tell us when this would be or what the current situation is?

I'm afraid you are the one who have been trolling this, look at your post history here, you have won the silver medal in trolling this, of course the gold medal goes to glebby 

You are right, there is no point trolling. There never was. And I'm not trolling. I am asking legitimate questions and you just keep trying to deflect them and bury them from being responded to in a legitimate fashion from the team. You are the troll here.

I don't see the point of trolling this now.

Before the ICO the trolls did their best, yet it was a big success, now the trolls are still trying to call it a scam without any proof.

Better wait and see what comes out of it, the trolls failed, and calling this a scam at this point is completely useless 

I have asked this many times and every time I am ignored. Why has the team not posted addresses to show the funds raised in the ICO? This is a standard thing to do after an ICO to provide some transparency for the investors.

Why are you ignoring this question and why is it not possible for the funds to be viewed and verified independently? There is absolutely no reason not to reveal them unless you have something to hide.

So, when do you plan on sharing the addresses for the funds?

Stackoverflow these questions are not directed at you, unless you are a part of the team? You have already responded to me multiple times with useless answers meant to deflect my question, only helping to bury my question and making me have to repost it again and again in hopes of a legitimate answer, so any response from you will be taken as admittance that you are indeed a part of the team. Kind of sad if you aren't a team member and really are just an investor and you are the one stuck here defending the project because the team is not competent enough or willing to do that themselves and provide answers to simple questions. And yet you are so confident in them lol.

It's a simple question and if it can't be answered it is pretty evident why.

Have they posted addresses showing the funds they raised yet? Because otherwise there is no proof whatsoever the ICO was a success, they can say whatever numbers they want. We've seen this in the past with scams many times, which is why every legit project these days has no qualms with revealing the funds for independent verification. It is really, really, beyond super easy to post proof of the funds if they have them, so the only reason not to is to hide something.

so roger ver is scammer ?

also why you call a project is scam ?

based on what?

TRUTH , QTUM IS TOTAL SCAM
NO DOUBT ROGER VER IS ALSO A SCAMMER

yes. seems you did not read any news.

success? Are qtum ico already done and reach the target?