It's idiotic that you heard it because you can only read it.
wow. just wow.
i LITERALLY shook my head at how sad, stupid and pointless you just came off
Topic: [ANN] [R3D] NEW UPDATES COMING SOON - page 16. (Read 66782 times)
wow. just wow.
i LITERALLY shook my head at how sad, stupid and pointless you just came off
Not trying to Fud but there's very little chance this will pump after ICO ends, starting market cap will be very high and will need a lot to justify it. Remember Bitbay? I do 
I would guess most investors in R3D aren't looking for a "pump" when ICO ends. I believe in the project and the technology used with it. Others can speak for themselves.
Good job not "trying" to FUD.
I believe in the project too but I don't like throwing away BTC either, so i'm just going to wait for the dump after ICO ends
That's the most idiotic thing I've heard all week. If you believe in it then why would it be throwing away BTC? Maybe no faith because you're a professional crypto bag collector?
It's idiotic that you heard it because you can only read it. I don't consider this a charity fundraiser to throw some BTC at it and expect nothing in return, but that's just me I guess.
I again read the OP and the more I read the more I like it, will keep a close eye on progress.
Not trying to Fud but there's very little chance this will pump after ICO ends, starting market cap will be very high and will need a lot to justify it. Remember Bitbay? I do
I would guess most investors in R3D aren't looking for a "pump" when ICO ends. I believe in the project and the technology used with it. Others can speak for themselves.
Good job not "trying" to FUD.
I believe in the project too but I don't like throwing away BTC either, so i'm just going to wait for the dump after ICO ends
That's the most idiotic thing I've heard all week. If you believe in it then why would it be throwing away BTC? Maybe no faith because you're a professional crypto bag collector?
Not trying to Fud but there's very little chance this will pump after ICO ends, starting market cap will be very high and will need a lot to justify it. Remember Bitbay? I do
I would guess most investors in R3D aren't looking for a "pump" when ICO ends. I believe in the project and the technology used with it. Others can speak for themselves.
Good job not "trying" to FUD.
I believe in the project too but I don't like throwing away BTC either, so i'm just going to wait for the dump after ICO ends
Not trying to Fud but there's very little chance this will pump after ICO ends, starting market cap will be very high and will need a lot to justify it. Remember Bitbay? I do
If this project can start I'm pretty sure there will be fast progress and a lot to show. I don't expect and I don't wish a "pump" after the CFC, but I would expect a rising price, because many aren't aware of it now. The lack of attention is the only weakness I see at the moment, and maybe a lack of understanding. It's complex and people should read the Ann and Stoners and Syntaks Posts. It's one of those projects that would need real investors who like it to inform themselves before investing instead of gambling. And it needs more support of those who already understand the potential and would like to see it started.
And what I really like about this project, out of investor-perspective: The inherent economy and the potential to grow out of itself, to grow beyond Crypto because it could have instantly real use. Think about countries with really hard censorship, like China and many others. Most of all Chinese even couldn't read this thread if they would want to, because:
GREAT FIREWALL OF CHINA BLOCKS BITCOINTALK.ORG
Hours ago, Bitcoin Forum and Bitcoin Subreddit moderator, Theymos, posted to inform everyone that Bitcointalk.org had been blocked by the Great Firewall of China. From all over China, with the exception of Shanghai, Bitcoiners are reporting that Bitcointalk.org is now blocked. No official explanation for the block has been given, though speculation will fly.
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/great-firewall-of-china-blocks-bitcointalk-org/
What I want to say with that: There is already a big potential for it, all over the world. And that's a great difference to most of all other projects out there.
Regarding Bitbay I can't say anything, because I don't know it. But at the moment I don't know any project that's comparable to this one.
Not trying to Fud but there's very little chance this will pump after ICO ends, starting market cap will be very high and will need a lot to justify it. Remember Bitbay? I do
Nope don't remember it because I didn't get scammed by it.
Not trying to Fud but there's very little chance this will pump after ICO ends, starting market cap will be very high and will need a lot to justify it. Remember Bitbay? I do
I would guess most investors in R3D aren't looking for a "pump" when ICO ends. I believe in the project and the technology used with it. Others can speak for themselves.
Good job not "trying" to FUD.
Not trying to Fud but there's very little chance this will pump after ICO ends, starting market cap will be very high and will need a lot to justify it. Remember Bitbay? I do
Been trying to spread the word over twitter. Please scope my tweets and RT and FAV. Couple below to get started.
https://twitter.com/wigitgetit/status/638009880368934914
https://twitter.com/wigitgetit/status/638006458269831168
https://twitter.com/wigitgetit/status/638009880368934914
https://twitter.com/wigitgetit/status/638006458269831168
Qora has all these features and the devs can implement new services using Qoras platform. IMHO it would be better for the community and cryptoworld as a whole if funds were raised for pushing tech forward, instead of trying to reimplement the same things.
@twoturtles: care to elaborate on the lack of security in qora? I think it is pretty secure, I would appreciate some examples.
Also qora as a platform never said its last words. Developers constantly enhance it.
Please don't think that I made this post for promoting qora, I just want to understand what you said regarding security, differences, since features are the same. Qora could be used by R3D devs to create new services on top, with no need to spend resources for implementing the same features.
This is the direction we are headed in however how do you do a revenu model on open source scripts? If you extend onto qora or another coin doing something like AT then how do investors profit other than buying qora in this example? A key driver is money and if it cant be made the same way by extending then it wont happen. There needs to be an asset or something to create a hidden service layer fee ontop of native fees and then provide dividends of asset holders. That is just one idea I am tinkering with to solve this problem.@twoturtles: care to elaborate on the lack of security in qora? I think it is pretty secure, I would appreciate some examples.
Also qora as a platform never said its last words. Developers constantly enhance it.
Please don't think that I made this post for promoting qora, I just want to understand what you said regarding security, differences, since features are the same. Qora could be used by R3D devs to create new services on top, with no need to spend resources for implementing the same features.
Anyone that says qora isnt secure probably doest understand the mechanics of the underlying script implementation for AT. A hash of the program is prefixed to the script holding the program by the miner and evaluated and checked by all nodes to matchthe hash. In this way it is as secure as any other tx.
Note i dont hold any qora infact im not a fan of pos myself. So id prefer if a pow bitcoin clone implement AT (i will probaby do this) which will probably have a better chance of surviving the altcoin syndrome.
How do we construct a revenue model? The system itself doesn't promote some unrealistic APR or hoarding. If 10 million r3d were to be held back for example by any one person or group of people, that would instantly decrease the supply available for use. When supply is down and demand is up - that affects the price. When the person(s) holding decide to sell at the price they're comfortable with, those wanting to actually use it buy and the cycle repeats. The statement "anyone that says qora isn't secure" and the follow-up by commenting on just the hash and network - shows that the other areas aren't recognized nor considered. I won't disclose exact details publicly just as I explained above.
Oh but we are onto newer and better things soon to replace coloured coin mess to a real flexible architecture 
We will set the trend again for new clones.
We will set the trend again for new clones.
As far as "probably doing this" - I thought it was already being done for sys 2.0?
Best regards,
syntaks
You've gone from subtle jabs which I've humored, to complete nonsense. Perhaps it's not lack of experience in programming, but deciphering what you've been ultimately trying to say in your circle talk and promotion of your own. However, I'm not one to speak without reference so when we talk about programming experience or lack thereof here's a couple of fun ones (don't worry, I have the page saved in case you try to remove it like you did your other spaghetti repos - yes I know about those as well):
https://github.com/IXCoin-Dev/IXCoin/commits/master?author=sidhujag
https://github.com/coinzen/devcoin0.9.2MM/commits/master
Also, I have been involved in this space for quite some time and do not think for a moment I do not have the resources and associates who have made it clear to me you are completely talk and this is a bitter dig. Good luck on your journey into programming, you're going to need it.
Sincerely,
syntaks
Perhaps I didnt explain well to make my points clear but no problem I hope you do well with the coin we have different ideals I will come check out what youve released sometime.. cya
Qora has all these features and the devs can implement new services using Qoras platform. IMHO it would be better for the community and cryptoworld as a whole if funds were raised for pushing tech forward, instead of trying to reimplement the same things.
@twoturtles: care to elaborate on the lack of security in qora? I think it is pretty secure, I would appreciate some examples.
Also qora as a platform never said its last words. Developers constantly enhance it.
Please don't think that I made this post for promoting qora, I just want to understand what you said regarding security, differences, since features are the same. Qora could be used by R3D devs to create new services on top, with no need to spend resources for implementing the same features.
This is the direction we are headed in however how do you do a revenu model on open source scripts? If you extend onto qora or another coin doing something like AT then how do investors profit other than buying qora in this example? A key driver is money and if it cant be made the same way by extending then it wont happen. There needs to be an asset or something to create a hidden service layer fee ontop of native fees and then provide dividends of asset holders. That is just one idea I am tinkering with to solve this problem.@twoturtles: care to elaborate on the lack of security in qora? I think it is pretty secure, I would appreciate some examples.
Also qora as a platform never said its last words. Developers constantly enhance it.
Please don't think that I made this post for promoting qora, I just want to understand what you said regarding security, differences, since features are the same. Qora could be used by R3D devs to create new services on top, with no need to spend resources for implementing the same features.
Anyone that says qora isnt secure probably doest understand the mechanics of the underlying script implementation for AT. A hash of the program is prefixed to the script holding the program by the miner and evaluated and checked by all nodes to matchthe hash. In this way it is as secure as any other tx.
Note i dont hold any qora infact im not a fan of pos myself. So id prefer if a pow bitcoin clone implement AT (i will probaby do this) which will probably have a better chance of surviving the altcoin syndrome.
How do we construct a revenue model? The system itself doesn't promote some unrealistic APR or hoarding. If 10 million r3d were to be held back for example by any one person or group of people, that would instantly decrease the supply available for use. When supply is down and demand is up - that affects the price. When the person(s) holding decide to sell at the price they're comfortable with, those wanting to actually use it buy and the cycle repeats. The statement "anyone that says qora isn't secure" and the follow-up by commenting on just the hash and network - shows that the other areas aren't recognized nor considered. I won't disclose exact details publicly just as I explained above.
Oh but we are onto newer and better things soon to replace coloured coin mess to a real flexible architecture
We will set the trend again for new clones.
We will set the trend again for new clones.
As far as "probably doing this" - I thought it was already being done for sys 2.0?
Best regards,
syntaks
You've gone from subtle jabs which I've humored, to complete nonsense. Perhaps it's not lack of experience in programming, but deciphering what you've been ultimately trying to say in your circle talk and promotion of your own. However, I'm not one to speak without reference so when we talk about programming experience or lack thereof here's a couple of fun ones (don't worry, I have the page saved in case you try to remove it like you did your other spaghetti repos - yes I know about those as well):
https://github.com/IXCoin-Dev/IXCoin/commits/master?author=sidhujag
https://github.com/coinzen/devcoin0.9.2MM/commits/master
Also, I have been involved in this space for quite some time and do not think for a moment I do not have the resources and associates who have made it clear to me you are completely talk and this is a bitter dig. Good luck on your journey into programming, you're going to need it.
Sincerely,
syntaks
thats what people say when they know they can't win an argument... but we could all see that it was unable to win when it started resorting to ad hominem attacks and then backpeddling... next stage.. meltdown
Qora has all these features and the devs can implement new services using Qoras platform. IMHO it would be better for the community and cryptoworld as a whole if funds were raised for pushing tech forward, instead of trying to reimplement the same things.
@twoturtles: care to elaborate on the lack of security in qora? I think it is pretty secure, I would appreciate some examples.
Also qora as a platform never said its last words. Developers constantly enhance it.
Please don't think that I made this post for promoting qora, I just want to understand what you said regarding security, differences, since features are the same. Qora could be used by R3D devs to create new services on top, with no need to spend resources for implementing the same features.
This is the direction we are headed in however how do you do a revenu model on open source scripts? If you extend onto qora or another coin doing something like AT then how do investors profit other than buying qora in this example? A key driver is money and if it cant be made the same way by extending then it wont happen. There needs to be an asset or something to create a hidden service layer fee ontop of native fees and then provide dividends of asset holders. That is just one idea I am tinkering with to solve this problem.@twoturtles: care to elaborate on the lack of security in qora? I think it is pretty secure, I would appreciate some examples.
Also qora as a platform never said its last words. Developers constantly enhance it.
Please don't think that I made this post for promoting qora, I just want to understand what you said regarding security, differences, since features are the same. Qora could be used by R3D devs to create new services on top, with no need to spend resources for implementing the same features.
Anyone that says qora isnt secure probably doest understand the mechanics of the underlying script implementation for AT. A hash of the program is prefixed to the script holding the program by the miner and evaluated and checked by all nodes to matchthe hash. In this way it is as secure as any other tx.
Note i dont hold any qora infact im not a fan of pos myself. So id prefer if a pow bitcoin clone implement AT (i will probaby do this) which will probably have a better chance of surviving the altcoin syndrome.
How do we construct a revenue model? The system itself doesn't promote some unrealistic APR or hoarding. If 10 million r3d were to be held back for example by any one person or group of people, that would instantly decrease the supply available for use. When supply is down and demand is up - that affects the price. When the person(s) holding decide to sell at the price they're comfortable with, those wanting to actually use it buy and the cycle repeats. The statement "anyone that says qora isn't secure" and the follow-up by commenting on just the hash and network - shows that the other areas aren't recognized nor considered. I won't disclose exact details publicly just as I explained above.
Oh but we are onto newer and better things soon to replace coloured coin mess to a real flexible architecture
We will set the trend again for new clones.
We will set the trend again for new clones.
As far as "probably doing this" - I thought it was already being done for sys 2.0?
Best regards,
syntaks
"I've heard enough" plus some wrong assumptions and zero arguments. Interesting... ;-)
Qora has all these features and the devs can implement new services using Qoras platform. IMHO it would be better for the community and cryptoworld as a whole if funds were raised for pushing tech forward, instead of trying to reimplement the same things.
@twoturtles: care to elaborate on the lack of security in qora? I think it is pretty secure, I would appreciate some examples.
Also qora as a platform never said its last words. Developers constantly enhance it.
Please don't think that I made this post for promoting qora, I just want to understand what you said regarding security, differences, since features are the same. Qora could be used by R3D devs to create new services on top, with no need to spend resources for implementing the same features.
This is the direction we are headed in however how do you do a revenu model on open source scripts? If you extend onto qora or another coin doing something like AT then how do investors profit other than buying qora in this example? A key driver is money and if it cant be made the same way by extending then it wont happen. There needs to be an asset or something to create a hidden service layer fee ontop of native fees and then provide dividends of asset holders. That is just one idea I am tinkering with to solve this problem.@twoturtles: care to elaborate on the lack of security in qora? I think it is pretty secure, I would appreciate some examples.
Also qora as a platform never said its last words. Developers constantly enhance it.
Please don't think that I made this post for promoting qora, I just want to understand what you said regarding security, differences, since features are the same. Qora could be used by R3D devs to create new services on top, with no need to spend resources for implementing the same features.
Anyone that says qora isnt secure probably doest understand the mechanics of the underlying script implementation for AT. A hash of the program is prefixed to the script holding the program by the miner and evaluated and checked by all nodes to matchthe hash. In this way it is as secure as any other tx.
Note i dont hold any qora infact im not a fan of pos myself. So id prefer if a pow bitcoin clone implement AT (i will probaby do this) which will probably have a better chance of surviving the altcoin syndrome.
How do we construct a revenue model? The system itself doesn't promote some unrealistic APR or hoarding. If 10 million r3d were to be held back for example by any one person or group of people, that would instantly decrease the supply available for use. When supply is down and demand is up - that affects the price. When the person(s) holding decide to sell at the price they're comfortable with, those wanting to actually use it buy and the cycle repeats. The statement "anyone that says qora isn't secure" and the follow-up by commenting on just the hash and network - shows that the other areas aren't recognized nor considered. I won't disclose exact details publicly just as I explained above.
Oh but we are onto newer and better things soon to replace coloured coin mess to a real flexible architecture
We will set the trend again for new clones.
We will set the trend again for new clones.
As far as "probably doing this" - I thought it was already being done for sys 2.0?
Best regards,
syntaks
27 pages for the objections, fud, critsizm, explinations and things you name it. guys they are not forcing anyone to partake in their CFC. should you want to invest or not its your own choice. im not a programmer neither i know anything about source code but their are alot of reasons that i dont want to miss notification from this thread and whenever i come back to this thread i get only explanations from syntak, stoner, jared and other team members. i wonder if we all are crtisiing folks work than who is still investing in CFC
apology if this post offend someone usually i dont write such things but today i couldnt stop myself
cheers
apology if this post offend someone usually i dont write such things but today i couldnt stop myself
cheers
with 5 1/2 days until the close of the CFC, funding is not looking well. Any plans you would like to share for if this CFC fails to launch?
We have a couple of folks we've spoken to privately waiting for the demo. I wholeheartedly believe that once the demo is revealed it will clear up a lot of the confusion created by a couple of demos showing just some of the options/features. However, with that said as a fail-over we're looking into possibly startjoin, and open to other suggestions for financial backing. Another option, the one we least want to explore is taking the demo to private organizations that could make use of the system. I'd personally rather keep my code within crypto, though.
Best regards,
syntaks
Cool, I'm sure you guys are working hard on it. Hopefully this project can stay in the public space instead of in the hands of a few companies.
some NEWS you might find it interesting
World’s First Blockchain-Based Startup Marketplace Set to Launch by Funderbeam http://cointelegraph.com/news/115187/worlds-first-blockchain-based-startup-marketplace-set-to-launch-by-funderbeam … #fintech #blockchain
World’s First Blockchain-Based Startup Marketplace Set to Launch by Funderbeam http://cointelegraph.com/news/115187/worlds-first-blockchain-based-startup-marketplace-set-to-launch-by-funderbeam … #fintech #blockchain
R3d > quora
I will buy r3d on last day for sure
I will buy r3d on last day for sure
I appreciate the support, but honestly we're all in this together and the fact that they've gone ahead and put in the effort and time out of sheer will and voluntarily - I give them a lot of credit for that.
Best regards,
syntaks
with 5 1/2 days until the close of the CFC, funding is not looking well. Any plans you would like to share for if this CFC fails to launch?
We have a couple of folks we've spoken to privately waiting for the demo. I wholeheartedly believe that once the demo is revealed it will clear up a lot of the confusion created by a couple of demos showing just some of the options/features. However, with that said as a fail-over we're looking into possibly startjoin, and open to other suggestions for financial backing. Another option, the one we least want to explore is taking the demo to private organizations that could make use of the system. I'd personally rather keep my code within crypto, though.
Best regards,
syntaks
Jump to: