Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [R3D] NEW UPDATES COMING SOON - page 20. (Read 66797 times)

legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
August 27, 2015, 09:26:44 PM
Can you not do what this coin is doing on something like Ethereum within one script?

The entire system itself is more than just a script but there's also the economics of it involved,  as well as the fact it's not attached to or dependent on any project such as Ethereum.

     Best regards,

syntaks
You will have a support nightmare doing the coloured coin implementation.. Hence my original question.. Anything you are doing is possible with AT or ethereum smart contracts unless you prove otherwise (hence my question)

Coloured coin implementation?  Would you care to elaborate a bit?  I think perhaps some wires are crossed and you're under the impression we're trying to do what Ethereum is doing or several other projects but that's not the case.

     Best regards,

syntaks


Which coin did you fork from.. Syscoin? You know what coloured coins are? Anyways anytime you are decorating transactions to create services you are colouring your coins.. Long term it's not a good approach.. I would know more ir you posted your source code but I assume you would be doing it like I said otherwise it would be something like AT or ethereum.. I'm not sure you understand what I'm saying though.

I've never heard of anyone referring to colouring coins or coloured coins in that manner before now and several others hadn't either.  No worries though.  As I explained in the interview with lootz and I thought I had stated it publicly that we started off with various bases to determine which would provide the best methods for what we were trying to accomplish and the end result is a combined effort with several thousand lines of custom code (written from scratch) and growing.  Namecoin, DGC, Florin and syscoin were what we used to model our approach.  As I've explained to sigwo - when the code is public, he'll be relieved to find out we didn't just fork sys (as he's been under the impression) and change function names.  Sys is a great project, one that I had even bought into the ICO for at the time.  However, for our needs it's not really that simple to just fork it and call it something new.

     Best regards,

syntaks
model yourself on syscoin..its going to crash then Cheesy Cheesy always excuses from syscoin from start
530 sats i payed at 600 dollars a bitcoin Shocked Shocked
alex green what ever blah blah blah
 i think syscoin went through every Vs possible v.1  v.2   v.3 turbo booster Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy and still we never got escrow Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy JOKE COIN
plus they took alex green to court moaning they got scammed  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
SCAMMERS TAKING THE SCAMMER TO COURT Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

you can say what you like but no future for syscoin BROKEN PROMISES BROKEN EVERYTHING Cheesy Cheesy
R.I.P SYSCOIN
I have been in this game 3 years and i know which coins have a chance and what coins got no chance Grin
and sys has no chance as syscoin knows Wink
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 27, 2015, 09:10:56 PM
Links from ANN

First demo can be viewed here: https://vimeo.com/getr3d/r3dblog. Rundown of account creation, posting, replies, and r3d's core application to a blog-type platform

Second demo can be viewed here: https://vimeo.com/getr3d/r3dbin. We outline how you can create your own code/paste bin site written to the blockchain

Interview with Lootz from SuperNET Radio can be found here: https://soundcloud.com/supernetradio/r3d

Article discussing r3d on fuk.io: http://fuk.io/august-2015-report-best-altcoins-and-cryptocurrency-to-mine-and-invest-in-to-profit/
yak
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
August 27, 2015, 09:07:54 PM
Which coin did you fork from.. Syscoin? You know what coloured coins are? Anyways anytime you are decorating transactions to create services you are colouring your coins.. Long term it's not a good approach.. I would know more ir you posted your source code but I assume you would be doing it like I said otherwise it would be something like AT or ethereum.. I'm not sure you understand what I'm saying though.

you didn't read anything they have said or watched any of the videos they have made clearly... i suggest you read everything twoturtles has said in this thread and watch the videos they have posted

here is some information on what colored coins are so you are a little clearer about what you are talking about https://bitcoil.co.il/BitcoinX.pdf i suggest you give that a read as well
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
August 27, 2015, 08:27:05 PM
Can you not do what this coin is doing on something like Ethereum within one script?

The entire system itself is more than just a script but there's also the economics of it involved,  as well as the fact it's not attached to or dependent on any project such as Ethereum.

     Best regards,

syntaks
You will have a support nightmare doing the coloured coin implementation.. Hence my original question.. Anything you are doing is possible with AT or ethereum smart contracts unless you prove otherwise (hence my question)

Coloured coin implementation?  Would you care to elaborate a bit?  I think perhaps some wires are crossed and you're under the impression we're trying to do what Ethereum is doing or several other projects but that's not the case.

     Best regards,

syntaks


Which coin did you fork from.. Syscoin? You know what coloured coins are? Anyways anytime you are decorating transactions to create services you are colouring your coins.. Long term it's not a good approach.. I would know more ir you posted your source code but I assume you would be doing it like I said otherwise it would be something like AT or ethereum.. I'm not sure you understand what I'm saying though.

I've never heard of anyone referring to colouring coins or coloured coins in that manner before now and several others hadn't either.  No worries though.  As I explained in the interview with lootz and I thought I had stated it publicly that we started off with various bases to determine which would provide the best methods for what we were trying to accomplish and the end result is a combined effort with several thousand lines of custom code (written from scratch) and growing.  Namecoin, DGC, Florin and syscoin were what we used to model our approach.  As I've explained to sigwo - when the code is public, he'll be relieved to find out we didn't just fork sys (as he's been under the impression) and change function names.  Sys is a great project, one that I had even bought into the ICO for at the time.  However, for our needs it's not really that simple to just fork it and call it something new.

     Best regards,

syntaks
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1005
August 27, 2015, 08:06:04 PM
Can you not do what this coin is doing on something like Ethereum within one script?

The entire system itself is more than just a script but there's also the economics of it involved,  as well as the fact it's not attached to or dependent on any project such as Ethereum.

     Best regards,

syntaks
You will have a support nightmare doing the coloured coin implementation.. Hence my original question.. Anything you are doing is possible with AT or ethereum smart contracts unless you prove otherwise (hence my question)

Coloured coin implementation?  Would you care to elaborate a bit?  I think perhaps some wires are crossed and you're under the impression we're trying to do what Ethereum is doing or several other projects but that's not the case.

     Best regards,

syntaks


Which coin did you fork from.. Syscoin? You know what coloured coins are? Anyways anytime you are decorating transactions to create services you are colouring your coins.. Long term it's not a good approach.. I would know more ir you posted your source code but I assume you would be doing it like I said otherwise it would be something like AT or ethereum.. I'm not sure you understand what I'm saying though.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1027
August 27, 2015, 08:00:13 PM
This seems like a very nice project Smiley

The next big thing within the ecosystem will have to offer entirely new anonymous solutions and this might be it!

sr. member
Activity: 435
Merit: 250
August 27, 2015, 07:29:45 PM
Good coin, very good. I like this idea of network outside official stream
sr. member
Activity: 334
Merit: 251
Designer and CryptoCurrency Enthusiast.
August 27, 2015, 06:49:55 PM
How much has been sold to this date?
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
August 27, 2015, 06:47:19 PM
Would be awesome to be domain name independent. also some alias instead of the wallet/coin adress.

Did you watch the demo's? It doesn't appear to be dependent on the wallet or a domain name.

Just watched the demos. Got to say this is awesome indeed. Still relies on ip address which needs domain names for people to remember.
And domain names can be seized by governments and corporations. Sure there are ways around that using multiple domain names.

Maybe r3d can host domain names in future.

r3d doesn't rely on IPs or hosting, but does provide the option to have everything that's viewable in the r3d client presented via website for your visitors and those who may not be running the r3d client.  The upcoming client demo will definitely shed some light and provide clarity on this.  Keep an eye out here as the demo is approaching and this will all make much more sense.

     Best regards,

syntaks
very exciting news
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
August 27, 2015, 06:16:47 PM
Would be awesome to be domain name independent. also some alias instead of the wallet/coin adress.

Did you watch the demo's? It doesn't appear to be dependent on the wallet or a domain name.

Just watched the demos. Got to say this is awesome indeed. Still relies on ip address which needs domain names for people to remember.
And domain names can be seized by governments and corporations. Sure there are ways around that using multiple domain names.

Maybe r3d can host domain names in future.

r3d doesn't rely on IPs or hosting, but does provide the option to have everything that's viewable in the r3d client presented via website for your visitors and those who may not be running the r3d client.  The upcoming client demo will definitely shed some light and provide clarity on this.  Keep an eye out here as the demo is approaching and this will all make much more sense.

     Best regards,

syntaks
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
August 27, 2015, 06:13:44 PM
Would be awesome to be domain name independent. also some alias instead of the wallet/coin adress.

Did you watch the demo's? It doesn't appear to be dependent on the wallet or a domain name.

Just watched the demos. Got to say this is awesome indeed. Still relies on ip address which needs domain names for people to remember.
And domain names can be seized by governments and corporations. Sure there are ways around that using multiple domain names.

Maybe r3d can host domain names in future.
hero member
Activity: 752
Merit: 500
August 27, 2015, 05:57:50 PM

I do have a tech question about the blockchain.  I run search engine indexes on several hundred thousand websites, and I'm in the terabytes of compressed, deduplicated data already. 

How will the blockchain handle the sheer volume of data needed to host websites?  Whats the plan for scale?

I edited this question into an earlier post, so it may have been missed.  Reposting here.

Hi garaux, sorry if it got skipped earlier. I think we address the question you have here in this post: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12258796
sr. member
Activity: 367
Merit: 250
I'm a miner not a minor.
August 27, 2015, 05:42:14 PM
Would be awesome to be domain name independent. also some alias instead of the wallet/coin adress.

Did you watch the demo's? It doesn't appear to be dependent on the wallet or a domain name.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
August 27, 2015, 04:41:00 PM
Would be awesome to be domain name independent. also some alias instead of the wallet/coin adress.
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
August 27, 2015, 04:34:28 PM

I do have a tech question about the blockchain.  I run search engine indexes on several hundred thousand websites, and I'm in the terabytes of compressed, deduplicated data already. 

How will the blockchain handle the sheer volume of data needed to host websites?  Whats the plan for scale?

I edited this question into an earlier post, so it may have been missed.  Reposting here.
hero member
Activity: 752
Merit: 500
August 27, 2015, 01:04:37 PM
Somebody explain to me just how the fuck could bittrex hold a buywall near at 100sat after the ico? There are potentially 800btc worth of R3d investors eager to get their money worth, some even panic selling from the start for sure... The WHOLE volume in bittrex is now 640 BTC. Do you except investors just appear from thin air after the ico to buy at the ico price or higher? Wtf? But i like what you're doing guys, keep up the good coding   Smiley

most people with any sense whatsoever will see that holding r3d and fostering the growth in r3d's network is way smarter... do you really think that if it reaches 800btc or more 800btc or more of it will be selling instantly?

is this a joke?


Nope, of course not, there have always been and will always be a big ratio of bagholders with EVERY coin who will say holding long term will be much smarter. As well as there will be big ratio of high frequency traders... Maybe you guys just don't sell then, that would be cool... I am just thinking where should i put my buy order.

cant really have a big ratio of both right
as far as where you should put your buy order i would have no idea, however many coins it launches with are how many coins total that will ever be made... no stupid pos interest rate.. no insanely high block reward driving the miners to dump... if you aren't in the ico buying r3d, once r3d comes and you want to use it the only way to get it is to buy it from an exchange or to mine it... if you mine it the ONLY way you earn r3d is if someone is to do something on the r3d network (register an account or post or comment or vote or whatever)... so that turns to the only way someone will have dumped r3d is if someone will have bought it previously (via the ico or afterwards)... its pretty much coin recycling


Ideally the more r3d we have in circulation the better for everyone, as our intent here it to create a vast spectrum of usability. The more r3d in circulation the easier it will be for more people to get involved.
yak
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
August 27, 2015, 12:51:36 PM
Somebody explain to me just how the fuck could bittrex hold a buywall near at 100sat after the ico? There are potentially 800btc worth of R3d investors eager to get their money worth, some even panic selling from the start for sure... The WHOLE volume in bittrex is now 640 BTC. Do you except investors just appear from thin air after the ico to buy at the ico price or higher? Wtf? But i like what you're doing guys, keep up the good coding   Smiley

most people with any sense whatsoever will see that holding r3d and fostering the growth in r3d's network is way smarter... do you really think that if it reaches 800btc or more 800btc or more of it will be selling instantly?

is this a joke?


Nope, of course not, there have always been and will always be a big ratio of bagholders with EVERY coin who will say holding long term will be much smarter. As well as there will be big ratio of high frequency traders... Maybe you guys just don't sell then, that would be cool... I am just thinking where should i put my buy order.

cant really have a big ratio of both right
as far as where you should put your buy order i would have no idea, however many coins it launches with are how many coins total that will ever be made... no stupid pos interest rate.. no insanely high block reward driving the miners to dump... if you aren't in the ico buying r3d, once r3d comes and you want to use it the only way to get it is to buy it from an exchange or to mine it... if you mine it the ONLY way you earn r3d is if someone is to do something on the r3d network (register an account or post or comment or vote or whatever)... so that turns to the only way someone will have dumped r3d is if someone will have bought it previously (via the ico or afterwards)... its pretty much coin recycling
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1178
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
August 27, 2015, 12:51:06 PM
Somebody explain to me just how the fuck could bittrex hold a buywall near at 100sat after the ico? There are potentially 800btc worth of R3d investors eager to get their money worth, some even panic selling from the start for sure... The WHOLE volume in bittrex is now 640 BTC. Do you except investors just appear from thin air after the ico to buy at the ico price or higher? Wtf? But i like what you're doing guys, keep up the good coding   Smiley

most people with any sense whatsoever will see that holding r3d and fostering the growth in r3d's network is way smarter... do you really think that if it reaches 800btc or more 800btc or more of it will be selling instantly?

is this a joke?


Nope, of course not, there have always been and will always be a big ratio of bagholders with EVERY coin who will say holding long term will be much smarter. As well as there will be big ratio of high frequency traders... Maybe you guys just don't sell then, that would be cool... I am just thinking where should i put my buy order.

I would put a few bitcoin in to help get this project to even launch, then stick some more btc in at like 50 satoshis,  I bought 2.5btc, I'll be putting 2.5btc more in buy orders around there Smiley

Yep, got to get some to support launch as well Smiley
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
August 27, 2015, 12:50:04 PM
If you are a content creator, you are crazy not to pay attention to this project.  This is going to make blog owners and independent media websites tons of bitcoins worth of R3D for just letting others speak their mind on any subject.
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
August 27, 2015, 12:49:12 PM
Knowing how a typical blockchain works and then seeing the demos, one question comes to mind... I'm pretty sure I have the answer already but I will ask the question anyway.
Will users be able to edit posts and comments?

That was brought up earlier and the consensus was that it was desired but with a revision history.  It's definitely something we could include.

     Best regards,

syntaks

That's fine. But in the event that something is published that someone didn't want published or changed their mind about...it wouldn't matter and could never go away. Correct?

That's correct - but the latest revision would be the one displayed.  Access to earlier ones could be provided and/or referenced.  The details aren't all planned out yet as this request just came in no sooner than a few days ago.

     Best regards,

syntaks

I believe it's absolutely critical that all published content be stored in the Write Once, Read Many / WORM fashion to stay true to the spirit of the project.  Allowing edits allows censorship. 

Revisions are absolutely a great idea, working off a snapshot from the original post and applying changes since preventing edits entirely would make the technology too unwieldily for publishing.   

Agreed. Revisions are a good idea and should probably be in the first release.

I also think it's important for people to know that what they put on the r3d network will never go away. There should be warnings to the average user. "What happens on the blockchain stays on the blockchain... and can never be deleted....ever...not even by your lawyer."

This is basically what's been planned exactly in the client.  Everyone will see a clear disclaimer/warning.  We're stepping into a new arena here and the proper steps all need to be taken.

     Best regards,

syntaks
Pages:
Jump to: