Author

Topic: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN) - page 119. (Read 1170617 times)

full member
Activity: 251
Merit: 100
Official

Today also saw it, went to Beatrix after the news got RVN in the wallet, but after a while trying again I already saw nothing there... removed....
I think just ahead of time made the announcement and now lost everything...

Photoshop. The 'N' looks different
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
http://priscree.ru/img/b8c1a037ee3727.jpg
Today also saw it, went to Beatrix after the news got RVN in the wallet, but after a while trying again I already saw nothing there... removed....
I think just ahead of time made the announcement and now lost everything...
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
Hi 2 all, not long ago saw the twit about that bitrex added RVN, so i looked their twitter to see the whole news about that, then i refreshed and that news disappeared. On the second  tab that new was still there, so i made the screenshot. Do you have any ideas what was that?? Or bitrex shouted their news 2 early?? On the crypto-market during last days i can see high buying ov RVN coin, so if it’s true we can wait a good pump
https://b.radikal.ru/b23/1807/dd/0f5a737741db.jpg
newbie
Activity: 69
Merit: 0
Silent Miner v1.1.0

Windows and Linux

Updated kernels
Increases to stability
Increased power efficiency

Windows:
https://mega.nz/#!2K5z1TyD!cmsFagv_lmVyBy_2KO8iQSI9vNoRpZ92etAFjFoz9FQ

Linux:
https://mega.nz/#!CXAXmbDD!jX1GhHdvgM8rqELZGgPZgGzy2CoAJ0tknXtte2wMyoo

Very strange, my antivirus finds potentially unwanted code in your miner. I downloaded this same version on another link with github and so there is no problem. What could be the problem?) The creation date and file size are the same.

My miner has never been uploaded to GitHub by me, anything found on GitHub and not from my direct links should be considered suspicious as it is a re-upload of my miner with potentially unwanted additions.

If you trust your anti-virus software to be able to determine that a mining application is safe or not you might want to get out of the crypto community.
jr. member
Activity: 154
Merit: 4
Silent Miner v1.1.0

Windows and Linux

Updated kernels
Increases to stability
Increased power efficiency

Windows:
https://mega.nz/#!2K5z1TyD!cmsFagv_lmVyBy_2KO8iQSI9vNoRpZ92etAFjFoz9FQ

Linux:
https://mega.nz/#!CXAXmbDD!jX1GhHdvgM8rqELZGgPZgGzy2CoAJ0tknXtte2wMyoo

Very strange, my antivirus finds potentially unwanted code in your miner. I downloaded this same version on another link with github and so there is no problem. What could be the problem?) The creation date and file size are the same.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
Patrick Byrne's short video of few days ago shows how deeply he is interested and believe in the blockchain technology. Ravencoin is backed by him as his name is also among donators who wants this project to move and grow healthier. He didn't directly mentioned RVN which is understandable as this will be too early. By the way price are once again in very good range.
newbie
Activity: 67
Merit: 0
Which is the best performing Nvidia miner right now? It's been a while since I last checked in on that stuff.  Tongue

Z-ENEMY VER 1.12a with latest drivers.

Cuda 9.2 : https://mega.nz/#!kf5kmIoS!_9qkCUuZmUEAzFc5GuYuTpADcG8jtkd3fBY9sWyKmGo
Cuda 9.1 : https://mega.nz/#!AOgSGILQ!wJPJxKLaPoAtxnjSNMamKMFZwaYkhDWUrdoQzazucu4
full member
Activity: 392
Merit: 101
Which is the best performing Nvidia miner right now? It's been a while since I last checked in on that stuff.  Tongue

Last I heard it was still one of the enemy versions
member
Activity: 104
Merit: 44
Hashrate increased from ~1200 GH/s to 2400 GH/s. Nicehash?
For today RVN is the most profitable coin. See what happened if the Diff goes back over 20k.

Furthermore: Only one exchange is a little questionable. I understand, the Devs are not big HODLers of her own coin (because of no premine etc - which is very good!), but wouldn't it be better to have a redundant marketsystem for the coin? What if there are any problems with crypto-bridge?
Please add RVN to a bigger exchange.
newbie
Activity: 68
Merit: 0
Ravencoin Miner: an optimized open source miner created specifically for Ravencoin.

https://github.com/Ravencoin-Miner/Ravencoin/releases
legendary
Activity: 1164
Merit: 1010
Which is the best performing Nvidia miner right now? It's been a while since I last checked in on that stuff.  Tongue
newbie
Activity: 79
Merit: 0
Question regarding Virtopia, I've been mining there with a 6 x 1060 rig, getting an average of 80 raven p/day with hash rates on the site on average 20 Mhps.

Has anyone got stats then can enlighten me with, or is Virtopia not paying correctly? Superminer is outputting on average 40 Mhps.

Its to low..  i think 150-180 with 6x1060.
So you are earning 1 $ a day with 6 gpu.. lol thats crazy. Electricity is more than 1$ a day ,so you are losing money every day?

It is normal for virtopia and other small pools. One day you hit 80 ravens the other day 200. This is a problem of smaller pools. When they don't hit a block, you'll not get paid. When a block is hit, you get paid after a block confirmation. When virtopia hits a difficult block, there is a longer period until you get paid, when it hits less difficult block, payments are more often.

I will try to calculate it for you, but those numbers are only rough estimates. Let's say the actual total hashrate on network is 1,200Th/s. Difficulty is adjusted so, that a block should be hit every minute. Meaning that all the pools get their share of blocks from the network according to their hashpower.  Let's say virtopia has hashrate 6.5 GH/s (last time i checked yesterday). 1200 / 6.5 ~ 185 So a block should be hit every 185 minutes on virtopia. When you get a block with difficulty 200% you have to multiply this number by 2 * 185 = 370 minutes and so on. If you hit a block with difficulty of 500% you won't get paid for almost 16 hours. However if you hit easy blocks with difficulty less then 100% you will get paid more then what you should be paid on average. Your hashrate is 20 MH/s, from the pools hashrate 6.5MH/s it is 1/325.  Virtopias pool fee is 1% So when a block is hit, 4950 ravens are distributed to the miners. With your hashrate of 20MH/s you should get 4950/325 = 15.23 Ravens per block, so only about 5 blocks have been hit during the last 24 hours that takes it to the 80 mentioned ravens per day. Those calculations might be a bit off, but you should be able to calculate the average from actual hashrate on network, pool and your rig.


Thanks for the in depth reply mate, yeah this is why I let it run for a few weeks. They have the loyalty reward system, which I was allowing to kick in also. But this seems to be ridiculous never was the pool paying out more then 100 raven a day, I've now switched to Minepool to give them a run and already they are paying out 200 raven a day, nothing changed except the pool.

Minepools average hash rate is matching my miners hash rate and my miner has consistent shares with only .05% rejected. It would seem to me that Virtopia either is being dodgy or the miner and Virtopia are not communicating correctly.

Virtopia stats reporting is a bit different, for most it works out well but for w/e reason a few people see consistently low reported hash. Keep that in mind that is graphical and if in doubt take the miners reported hashrate.

The pool has went from 4GH up to 30GH recently so it is more stable on blocks and paying out very well. it is also now a top 10 pool

https://exp.virtopia.ca/pools

Whoa, there is one address mining @28.45719 GH/s So this is where the hash is comming from. Must be some kind of a large farm or something. That is a hashpower of ~1400 x 1080TI's

No doubt this is a huge farm or are there even Asics for Ravencoin which work fine? That much hash power comes from a professional guy.

I think the creation of ASIC for ravencoin will destroy the coin. In addition to the stability to ASIC due to the change of algorithms, it no longer has any advantages. If this happens before the fork - the result will be catastrophic for theprice and miners. Even if after that, the command will announce a change in the algorithm or any other actions with the source code.

Is the One address Mineority?  It also crashed out of virtopia for several hours.  How many Titan V's do they have?

edit: Regardless ASICs would be good news for Ravencoin.  It would bring tons of attention with crypto media videos and articles written about the issue.  Tron Black already has changes set up to void the ASICs off the network.  It would legitimize the whole project and price would go up due to professional action.
jr. member
Activity: 98
Merit: 1
which pool have more hashrate?
newbie
Activity: 69
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
Yes.  The binaries for the asset layer will be available on July 30th so that people can begin testing it on testnet.  There is not an explanation or walk-through yet because some things could possibly change during testing, but there will likely be educational resources by the time assets are released on mainnet, which is set now for October 31st.

that makes sense, thanks! Looking forward to seeing it.
jr. member
Activity: 154
Merit: 4
Question regarding Virtopia, I've been mining there with a 6 x 1060 rig, getting an average of 80 raven p/day with hash rates on the site on average 20 Mhps.

Has anyone got stats then can enlighten me with, or is Virtopia not paying correctly? Superminer is outputting on average 40 Mhps.

Its to low..  i think 150-180 with 6x1060.
So you are earning 1 $ a day with 6 gpu.. lol thats crazy. Electricity is more than 1$ a day ,so you are losing money every day?

It is normal for virtopia and other small pools. One day you hit 80 ravens the other day 200. This is a problem of smaller pools. When they don't hit a block, you'll not get paid. When a block is hit, you get paid after a block confirmation. When virtopia hits a difficult block, there is a longer period until you get paid, when it hits less difficult block, payments are more often.

I will try to calculate it for you, but those numbers are only rough estimates. Let's say the actual total hashrate on network is 1,200Th/s. Difficulty is adjusted so, that a block should be hit every minute. Meaning that all the pools get their share of blocks from the network according to their hashpower.  Let's say virtopia has hashrate 6.5 GH/s (last time i checked yesterday). 1200 / 6.5 ~ 185 So a block should be hit every 185 minutes on virtopia. When you get a block with difficulty 200% you have to multiply this number by 2 * 185 = 370 minutes and so on. If you hit a block with difficulty of 500% you won't get paid for almost 16 hours. However if you hit easy blocks with difficulty less then 100% you will get paid more then what you should be paid on average. Your hashrate is 20 MH/s, from the pools hashrate 6.5MH/s it is 1/325.  Virtopias pool fee is 1% So when a block is hit, 4950 ravens are distributed to the miners. With your hashrate of 20MH/s you should get 4950/325 = 15.23 Ravens per block, so only about 5 blocks have been hit during the last 24 hours that takes it to the 80 mentioned ravens per day. Those calculations might be a bit off, but you should be able to calculate the average from actual hashrate on network, pool and your rig.


Thanks for the in depth reply mate, yeah this is why I let it run for a few weeks. They have the loyalty reward system, which I was allowing to kick in also. But this seems to be ridiculous never was the pool paying out more then 100 raven a day, I've now switched to Minepool to give them a run and already they are paying out 200 raven a day, nothing changed except the pool.

Minepools average hash rate is matching my miners hash rate and my miner has consistent shares with only .05% rejected. It would seem to me that Virtopia either is being dodgy or the miner and Virtopia are not communicating correctly.

Virtopia stats reporting is a bit different, for most it works out well but for w/e reason a few people see consistently low reported hash. Keep that in mind that is graphical and if in doubt take the miners reported hashrate.

The pool has went from 4GH up to 30GH recently so it is more stable on blocks and paying out very well. it is also now a top 10 pool

https://exp.virtopia.ca/pools

Whoa, there is one address mining @28.45719 GH/s So this is where the hash is comming from. Must be some kind of a large farm or something. That is a hashpower of ~1400 x 1080TI's

No doubt this is a huge farm or are there even Asics for Ravencoin which work fine? That much hash power comes from a professional guy.

I think the creation of ASIC for ravencoin will destroy the coin. In addition to the stability to ASIC due to the change of algorithms, it no longer has any advantages. If this happens before the fork - the result will be catastrophic for theprice and miners. Even if after that, the command will announce a change in the algorithm or any other actions with the source code.
jr. member
Activity: 50
Merit: 1
Yes.  The binaries for the asset layer will be available on July 30th so that people can begin testing it on testnet.  There is not an explanation or walk-through yet because some things could possibly change during testing, but there will likely be educational resources by the time assets are released on mainnet, which is set now for October 31st.
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
sorry I keep repeating this - are there any news on the asset layer and is there an explanation somewhere how it works / can be used that is not code?
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
Anyone having trouble with withdraws on CryptoBridge? I purchased and withdrawn 90K RVN last night and coins still not in my wallet.

Made multiple purchased before and withdraws usually take 5-10 minutes to show in my my wallet. Grin

Disregard post...
Coins arrived after 16 hours. Thanks!

90k okok
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
Anyone having trouble with withdraws on CryptoBridge? I purchased and withdrawn 90K RVN last night and coins still not in my wallet.

Made multiple purchased before and withdraws usually take 5-10 minutes to show in my my wallet.

Disregard post...
Coins arrived after 16 hours. Thanks!
Jump to: