Topic: [ANN] Review.Network (REW) - A Decentralized Market Feedback Platform - page 5. (Read 2401 times)

#Reservation For Russian Translation
Native Language: Russian
Profile: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/nuka-1827060
Email: [email protected]
Telegram: @nukakz
ETH address: 0x8321c61f6Ca4018B7a5350c6Ef0E97ce623D722a
If you interested, please send me PM on my bitcointalk profile.
Thank you!

Thanks cryprourlbull! That's right, we have team members who are experts in statistics and data analytics. We are working on designing the models for this. Review.Network platform will be global and decentralized - we don't have any plans for country discrimination

Hi! The project is interesting to me because it provides good statistics. That means it can reduce the ways of making a bad decision and also the risk of loss. But in what country will be implemented?

Yes, correct - users will have a reputation score that's based on their activity on the network - having reviews pass validation, upvoted, answering surveys without disputes... The score will also be used in other parts of the system, like protecting newly added products that have no reviews yet, so that only users above a certain reputation threshold are able to leave a review. The review sorting will take all kinds of metrics into account, and reputation is one of them.

Hi D1jay! Thanks for the feedback - that is a great question. Incentivized systems can be very efficient in increasing engagement, but if you don't combine positive incentives with negative ones, than the system won't be stable. If you are only rewarding people, they will naturally try to use the system to their advantage. So what you need is a way of either making "cheating" behaviour very expensive or punishing those who don't play by the rules. The design of such a system is challenging, but also very exciting - it combines the knowledge of token models, mechanism design, blockchain technology and economy.

Here's a few words about how Review.Network's token economy works in that regard:

- Review are not validated based on sentiment. This means that a positive and negative reviews are treated the same.
- To write a review, the user must stake a certain amount of tokens, as a way to show guarantees that what he's writing is correct. If a review is approved by the process of community validation, the writer (as well as the validators) get his stake back, plus a reward. If it's rejected, the writer loses his stake and it goes back into the platform's Review Rewards Pool (a token pool from which the rewards are distributed).
- Also, to reach a decision weather or not a review should pass validation, a consensus among the validators must be formed. This means that those who are in the majority get a token reward, while those who are in minority lose their stake. The process of voting is blind, meaning that validators don't know how other validators voted until all of them have voted.
- The validators will also be "validated", by the system automatically generating reviews that it knows if they should pass the validation or not, and then punishing the validators who are clearly cheating.
- On the side of market research surveys, companies will get an automatic risk assessment for each completed one. The risk assessment is generated based on statistical models, and includes things like answering differently formulated question asking the same thing inconsistently, or detecting common non-attention patterns like straight line or zig-zag answers, as well as other well known psychometry methods.

In short - token rewards make users want to use the system, but the risk of losing their staked tokens if they cheat keeps them honest.

I guess there will also be some rating system for the users themselves. If it turns out that someone spams reviews maybe those reviews lose weight in comparison to other reviews.

Hi iwasneverhere! Yes, we do have multiple checks in place to prevent abuse. We are seeing a lot of bot activity and people trying to game the system ever since the beginning of the campaign, and we are handling them

Review.Network project appears like another good project that can connect to a large number of users when the platform is functional, but from my own observation, i think some how this feedback will be indirectly influenced because of the reward system, i mean, most people would like to give a good review or feedback just to be rewarded, am just trying to understand our effective this would be 100% without any influence whatsoever.

What about the users who abuse the bonus & the referral system? Do you check 1 on 1 the participants or you just let them go and receive your rewards for nothing?

The Review.Network offers companies the ability to conduct targeted market research campaigns with the assurance of receiving accurate and authentic information

The Review.Network creates opportunities for participants to be rewarded with our tokens for providing genuine and quality feedback, and for validating another participants’ feedback

Using blockchain technology, machine learning and data analytics, the Review.Network will revolutionize the market research and review industry

The platform operates through a validation mechanism with each additional review from existing and new participants reinforcing the authenticity and value of the platform.

Hey Rtalk! We have a bonus (plus a referral system) for our Beta signups. Over 70,000 people already registered, and after 100,000 we decrease the bonuses a bit, so if you haven't already, join now! Here is the link - https://beta.review.network/preregister

re you planning to create a bounty campaign for your product ?

Hey ivsem! Thanks for your support we have a lot of exciting things planned so stay tuned!

Thank you for your suggestion! Absolutely, we are planning to add that soon

Just like users signed up area has progress bar if pre-sale also is has this kind of statistics bar with real times updates that will be amazing. Large majority of investors specially smaller ones make sure of raised funds before pouring their money into any. I will suggest to add counter to get best results.

I like the concept of incorporating AI in the platform to allow feedback and market research.

Well... if you thought about this problems, it leaves me to believe that this project is for real.

That being said, I feel safe to say that I want to spend my time helping you with Romanian translation and I would like to participate in a facebook bounty campaign (if it will be one for facebook, obviously) since this project definitely IS NOT a waste of time!

Also, it seems like a pretty safe investment considering the super low caps you have. I will keep an eye on this, even if you don't need my help