[ANN] rhminer - an optimized CPU+GPU miner for PascalCoin - page 5.

tlaskows

full member

Activity: 564

Merit: 100

Join GANTECH’s team of game changers

Quote from: redmonski on January 25, 2019, 12:28:59 PM

my mini pc running with rhminer 1.3 (no sseboost)

CPU OS Threads Speed (h/s)
i7-8750h @ 3.3 GHz Ubuntu 18.04 12 2,200

That sounds about right. It's a high frequency 6 core CPU. My mini PC has a low frequency dual core.

I use this command to watch how bad the CPU throttles or if it's speed stepping properly.

It will jump around a lot. It's normal.

Code:

root@mac-mini:~# watch -n .1 "lscpu | grep MHz"

To monitor the temps

Code:

root@mac-mini:~# watch -n .1 sensors

redmonski

full member

Activity: 201

Merit: 100

my mini pc running with rhminer 1.3 (no sseboost)

CPU OS Threads Speed (h/s)
i7-8750h @ 3.3 GHz Ubuntu 18.04 12 2,200

tlaskows

full member

Activity: 564

Merit: 100

Join GANTECH’s team of game changers

Quote from: redmonski on January 22, 2019, 11:50:50 AM

Here is a comparison of an intel cpu with nvidia gpu.

CPU OS Threads Speed (h/s)
i5-2400 CPU @ 3.1 GHz Win10 4 791
Gtx 1080 11gb Ubuntu 400 400

Source: https://github.com/polyminer1/rhminer

That GPU HR is likely from me.

It's a 1080ti (there is no 1080 with 11GB of GDDR5) with ~ 400 threads. Max Hr was 300 not 400 but a cheap CPU principle is true.

My i3-4030U CPU @ 1.90GHz does:

Code:

Miner 17:07:07 Shares: Accepted 923 Rejected 1 Failed 0 Up for 07:32:22
Miner 17:07:07 Speed : 325 H/S (CPU 309 H/S).
Miner 17:07:17 Shares: Accepted 923 Rejected 1 Failed 0 Up for 07:32:32

Kali/Ubuntu. Almost the same. I use the first one.

polyminer1

newbie

Activity: 60

Merit: 0

Quote from: redmonski on January 22, 2019, 11:50:50 AM

Here is a comparison of an intel cpu with nvidia gpu.

CPU OS Threads Speed (h/s)
i5-2400 CPU @ 3.1 GHz Win10 4 791
Gtx 1080 11gb Ubuntu 400 400

Source: https://github.com/polyminer1/rhminer

RandomHash was design to be much slower on GPU.
There is alot of rooms for optimizations toh, but it will never beat a cpu in term of $/hash.

redmonski

full member

Activity: 201

Merit: 100

Here is a comparison of an intel cpu with nvidia gpu.

CPU OS Threads Speed (h/s)
i5-2400 CPU @ 3.1 GHz Win10 4 791
Gtx 1080 11gb Ubuntu 400 400

Source: https://github.com/polyminer1/rhminer

redmonski

full member

Activity: 201

Merit: 100

Quote from: NCarter84 on January 21, 2019, 09:13:04 PM

What coins is this miner for? Just Pascal?

Yes, the rhminer is just for the RandomHash algo used by PascalCoin.

No other coin is using the RandomHash algo - it was invented by one of the devs. It’s a cpu friendly algo, a mid range intel cpu can beat a gtx 1080ti.

You can give it a shot and mine here - pool.pascalpool.org

NCarter84

jr. member

Activity: 195

Merit: 4

What coins is this miner for? Just Pascal?

tlaskows

full member

Activity: 564

Merit: 100

Join GANTECH’s team of game changers

Quote from: redmonski on January 21, 2019, 09:08:46 AM

@tlaskows

There are believers of PascalCoin, who will support the coin in any way they can. : )

I never said I'm not a believer.

Maybe I am a hypocrite and have 100 AMD Epyc 7601. It's only a 5000$ CPU Wink

Why settle for 16 real cores when you can have 32? More is usually always better.

redmonski

full member

Activity: 201

Merit: 100

@tlaskows

There are believers of PascalCoin, who will support the coin in any way they can. : )

redmonski

full member

Activity: 201

Merit: 100

Here are some results for Intel and some old gen AMDs - credit to tclarke from discord.

CPU Hashrate Threads OS RAM
I7-7700K @ 4.7 GHz 2107 h/s 8 Ubuntu dual ddr4 3200
I7-6700K @ 4.6 GHz 1755 h/S 8 Ubuntu dual ddr4 3200
Intel Pentium 4400 @3.3Ghz 504 h/s 2 Win10 dual ddr4 2400
Intel Celeron 3930 @2.9GHz 447 h/s 2 Win10 mono ddr4 2400
AMD PHENOM-II-X6 @ 3.25Ghz 564 h/s 6 Win10 ddr3
AMD PHENOM-II-X4 @ 3.6 GHz 460 h/s 4 Ubuntu ddr3
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4 GHz 393 h/d 4 Win10 ddr3

tlaskows

full member

Activity: 564

Merit: 100

Join GANTECH’s team of game changers

Quote from: redmonski on January 20, 2019, 10:08:37 PM

Here are some performance posted in discord - credit to tclarke. =================
CPU:ryzen threadripper 1950X @ 3.4 Ghz
Threads:32
OS: Ubuntu
Memory: Quad DDR4 3200
Option: sseboost 1
Hashrate:5378 h/s

CPU:ryzen 2700 @ 3.4 GHz
Threads: 16
OS: Ubuntu
Memory: Dual DDR4 3200
Option: sseboost 1
Hashrate: 2856 h/s

The 16 real cores threadripper is a 1000$ CPU + the cost of the rest of the PC. You would have to be out of your mind to buy it just for mining.
It's complete AMD garbage. I have a Ryzen 7 2700x and it's complete garbage compared to any old Intel I have. It will not post at advertised ram speeds of 3200. I have 3200 DDR4. AMD will only post at 2866 unless I pay for special AMD RAM.

Xeon E5 v3 ES cost me 400$ few years ago and it does:

3400 H/s. Memory Dual/Quad/Single (DDR4 2133) - no difference. sseboost 1 slows it down.

AMD CPUs are extremely dependent on the RAM type and speed. DDR4 is not meant to run at 3200. That's OC speeds which will boil it.

Socket WTF that's the biggest CPU I have seen in my life (4 glued together dies on one CPU). The threadripper requires special cooling. Big ass plate. Needs water at that TDP to run it 24/7 at 100% load.

redmonski

full member

Activity: 201

Merit: 100

PascalCoin has 2 new open source mining pools.

https://pool.pascalpool.org/
https://pasc.c3pool.com/

Please consider supporting these two open source pools, 0% fee.

For update, PascalCoin is now using a new algo RandomHash - cpu friendly algo.

Happy mining!

redmonski

full member

Activity: 201

Merit: 100

Here are some performance posted in discord - credit to tclarke. =================
CPU:ryzen threadripper 1950X @ 3.4 Ghz
Threads:32
OS: Ubuntu
Memory: Quad DDR4 3200
Option: sseboost 1
Hashrate:5378 h/s

CPU:ryzen 2700 @ 3.4 GHz
Threads: 16
OS: Ubuntu
Memory: Dual DDR4 3200
Option: sseboost 1
Hashrate: 2856 h/s

tlaskows

full member

Activity: 564

Merit: 100

Join GANTECH’s team of game changers

Quote from: eBit on January 19, 2019, 12:00:26 AM

Never mind. I just noticed a GPU can't match a cpu on this algorithm.

Yes it can, but a lower end CPU.

300 H/s. That's the same speed as a newer mobile almost anything dual core. core i3 for example.

You need CUDA v 9.2 I believe. I used it on Linux and the

Code:

root@mac-mini:~# apt install nvidia-cuda-toolkit

was required.

Hashcat uses CUDA/OpenCL. The miner failed to start until I got hashcat to work.

eBit

member

Activity: 91

Merit: 10

Never mind. I just noticed a GPU can't match a cpu on this algorithm.

eBit

member

Activity: 91

Merit: 10

polyminer1,

CUDA call error in cudaSetDevice(m_deviceID) : CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version

Do I need to install the Cuda Toolkit for this on Windows 7? Does it matter if it's v9.2 or v10?

biospb

newbie

Activity: 64

Merit: 0

yes, I know. but win 10 is rarely used.
some devs build win binaries on ubuntu with cross compile - example

btw, there are simd asm implementations for some algos (sha2* from Intel! and etc).

and one more thing. in RandomHashCPUMiner.cpp there is check for diff

Code:

if (RH_swap_u32(*work) <= packageData->m_target)
and so on with a lot of swaps

maybe it is better to swap target once and compare to non swapped work?

polyminer1

newbie

Activity: 60

Merit: 0

Quote from: tlaskows on January 12, 2019, 08:53:23 PM

Quote from: biospb on January 12, 2019, 07:19:08 PM

polyminer1

first of all, Happy new year! Grin

second, you did it! on linux your faster 30% than *other* miner. on windows - about the same. (was 50% slower).
so something is wrong with windows binary. it can be much better. can you try to build it not with MSVC?

The *other* miner was slower on Windows too. It's not the miner. Use Linux.
Windows is a disaster of an OS. Bloated and uses your PC's resources in the background.

Look at the geekbench scores for any given CPU. Linux is always on top of the list. I compared it many times. Same hardware, dual boot.

https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/multicore?dir=desc&page=1

I only use Linux now. Windows pissed me off few too many times.

Cheers.

Happy new year to you to mate !

I'll look into it. VS compiler is somehow limited with regards of sse intrinsic optimizations.
I've been told you can install Windows Subsystem for Linux so you can run rhminer linux binaries on win10. It's said to be much faster.
I did not tried yet toh.

Cheers.

tlaskows

full member

Activity: 564

Merit: 100

Join GANTECH’s team of game changers

Quote from: biospb on January 12, 2019, 07:19:08 PM

polyminer1

first of all, Happy new year! Grin

second, you did it! on linux your faster 30% than *other* miner. on windows - about the same. (was 50% slower).
so something is wrong with windows binary. it can be much better. can you try to build it not with MSVC?

The *other* miner was slower on Windows too. It's not the miner. Use Linux.
Windows is a disaster of an OS. Bloated and uses your PC's resources in the background.

Look at the geekbench scores for any given CPU. Linux is always on top of the list. I compared it many times. Same hardware, dual boot.

https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/multicore?dir=desc&page=1

I only use Linux now. Windows pissed me off few too many times.

Cheers.

biospb

newbie

Activity: 64

Merit: 0

polyminer1

first of all, Happy new year! Grin

second, you did it! on linux your faster 30% than *other* miner. on windows - about the same. (was 50% slower).
so something is wrong with windows binary. it can be much better. can you try to build it not with MSVC?

Topic: [ANN] rhminer - an optimized CPU+GPU miner for PascalCoin - page 5. (Read 24485 times)