[ANN] rhminer - an optimized CPU+GPU miner for PascalCoin - page 6.

tlaskows

full member

Activity: 564

Merit: 100

Join GANTECH’s team of game changers

Quote from: polyminer1 on January 11, 2019, 06:00:39 PM

Quote from: tlaskows on January 11, 2019, 05:56:53 PM

Quote from: polyminer1 on January 11, 2019, 01:54:11 PM

yep.

I ran the miner for few hours. It's somehow better than nanopool miner. Same hashrate, but it doesn't kill the CPU and make it run as hot.

The displayed hashrate is lower only on one CPU, but my guess is the dev fee with the other miner has a lot to do with it.

4770k x 2 - same as the *other* miner.
Xeon ES v3 - same.
2700x is a bit slower, but it doesn't boil the chip.

POS core i3 mobile gets 320 H/s.

I have no idea what nanominer does, but it renders the system completely unusable. With rhminer, I can still use the computers for normal tasks.

Cheers.

Great. I'm happy it it work for you.
Fox xeon, you can try -sseboost 1, most of the time it add something.

I get a steady 3400 H/s from that old Xeon w 24 threads (quad channel DDR4). That's faster than the 2700x.

sseboost 1 forces sse2 from what I read in the help file?
I tried it on few CPUs. It slowed down the miner.
My oldest CPU is from 2012.
memboost does make a pretty big difference - hyper-threading enabled.

Either way, it's better and faster in most cases than nanos**t closed source. I'll run it for few weeks.

I even have it running on an Intel Atom x7 for the kicks.

Cheers.

polyminer1

newbie

Activity: 60

Merit: 0

Quote from: tlaskows on January 11, 2019, 05:56:53 PM

Quote from: polyminer1 on January 11, 2019, 01:54:11 PM

yep.

I ran the miner for few hours. It's somehow better than nanopool miner. Same hashrate, but it doesn't kill the CPU and make it run as hot.

The displayed hashrate is lower only on one CPU, but my guess is the dev fee with the other miner has a lot to do with it.

4770k x 2 - same as the *other* miner.
Xeon ES v3 - same.
2700x is a bit slower, but it doesn't boil the chip.

POS core i3 mobile gets 320 H/s.

I have no idea what nanominer does, but it renders the system completely unusable. With rhminer, I can still use the computers for normal tasks.

Cheers.

Great. I'm happy it it work for you.
Fox xeon, you can try -sseboost 1, most of the time it add something.

tlaskows

full member

Activity: 564

Merit: 100

Join GANTECH’s team of game changers

Quote from: polyminer1 on January 11, 2019, 01:54:11 PM

yep.

I ran the miner for few hours. It's somehow better than nanopool miner. Same hashrate, but it doesn't kill the CPU and make it run as hot.

The displayed hashrate is lower only on one CPU, but my guess is the dev fee with the other miner has a lot to do with it.

4770k x 2 - same as the *other* miner.
Xeon ES v3 - same.
2700x is a bit slower, but it doesn't boil the chip.

POS core i3 mobile gets 320 H/s.

I have no idea what nanominer does, but it renders the system completely unusable. With rhminer, I can still use the computers for normal tasks.

Cheers.

polyminer1

newbie

Activity: 60

Merit: 0

yep.

tlaskows

full member

Activity: 564

Merit: 100

Join GANTECH’s team of game changers

Quote from: polyminer1 on January 11, 2019, 12:10:31 PM

@all
rhminer V1.3 is out with major speed improvement (up to 260%).
If you want to enjoy competitive mining speed at low fee, with trusted and safe binaries, please download the latest rhminer on my github(or mega).
https://github.com/polyminer1/rhminer/releases/tag/1.3
https://mega.nz/fm/O24kAAbT

Cheers
Polyminer1

For real? I was on your discord and you promised a surprise for next week.

Will check it out. Cool

Cheers.

polyminer1

newbie

Activity: 60

Merit: 0

@all
rhminer V1.3 is out with major speed improvement (up to 260%).
If you want to enjoy competitive mining speed at low fee, with trusted and safe binaries, please download the latest rhminer on my github(or mega).
https://github.com/polyminer1/rhminer/releases/tag/1.3
https://mega.nz/fm/O24kAAbT

Cheers
Polyminer1

polyminer1

newbie

Activity: 60

Merit: 0

Quote from: percy_tc on December 20, 2018, 12:27:47 AM

I have 450 hs/s on a Ryzen 1700x

any tips?

I would invite you on the PascalCoin's rhminer channel, there is plenty of peoples that can guide you specifically for the ryzen processors.

join here : https://discord.gg/RVcEpF9

Polyminer1

percy_tc

full member

Activity: 584

Merit: 106

I have 450 hs/s on a Ryzen 1700x

any tips?

polyminer1

newbie

Activity: 60

Merit: 0

Quote from: tlaskows on December 07, 2018, 02:50:36 PM

I sound like an asshole in my posts, but I am trying to defend your work here.
I imagine they took out the dev fee and "added their own".
You should be able to tell by looking at the global HR of randomhash.
That sort of shit should be illegal. Nice looking website too with fake reviews (finminer).

Cheers.

I know, tnx. And yes it it is illegal, it's just not really enforced. You need to mount a good case, then contact GPL foundation or CC0 foundation and they may appoint a lawyer to go further...

tlaskows

full member

Activity: 564

Merit: 100

Join GANTECH’s team of game changers

Quote from: polyminer1 on December 07, 2018, 09:11:03 AM

Quote from: tlaskows on December 06, 2018, 05:06:22 PM

Yes, I have had the pleasure to try out finminer.

On Linux.

Amazing how quickly the devs developed exact same SPEED as open source version of polyminer1's.

You know that they took his code without credit, right?

It's a virus. And it's slow. And it only supports dagger hashimo and randomhash few days later the fastest randomhash implementation was released.

Amazing coders or...

I looked to their "Company" and yeah their business model is to take opensource code, optimize it and charge for it. Explicitly preventing rightful owners of retributions or/and representation.
They wont stop until someone have the time to mount a case against them.

I sound like an asshole in my posts, but I am trying to defend your work here.
I imagine they took out the dev fee and "added their own".
You should be able to tell by looking at the global HR of randomhash.
That sort of shit should be illegal. Nice looking website too with fake reviews (finminer).

Cheers.

polyminer1

newbie

Activity: 60

Merit: 0

Quote from: biospb on December 07, 2018, 10:21:59 AM

on i3 linux version is 25% slower than finminer... only 370HS vs 500HS ( 522HS 24h avg on pool )
I dont know how. Huh

Some cpu are faster with rhminer, some slower. You have to experiment. But one thing reported so far, rhminer is generally faster on cpu with hyperthreads.

biospb

newbie

Activity: 64

Merit: 0

on i3 linux version is 25% slower than finminer... only 370HS vs 500HS ( 522HS 24h avg on pool )
I dont know how. Huh

polyminer1

newbie

Activity: 60

Merit: 0

@everyone
For Linux users : A critical fix has been released for Linux, please update.

https://github.com/polyminer1/rhminer/releases/tag/V1.1.1

polyminer1

newbie

Activity: 60

Merit: 0

Quote from: tlaskows on December 06, 2018, 05:06:22 PM

Yes, I have had the pleasure to try out finminer.

On Linux.

Amazing how quickly the devs developed exact same SPEED as open source version of polyminer1's.

You know that they took his code without credit, right?

It's a virus. And it's slow. And it only supports dagger hashimo and randomhash few days later the fastest randomhash implementation was released.

Amazing coders or...

I looked to their "Company" and yeah their business model is to take opensource code, optimize it and charge for it. Explicitly preventing rightful owners of retributions or/and representation.
They wont stop until someone have the time to mount a case against them.

tlaskows

full member

Activity: 564

Merit: 100

Join GANTECH’s team of game changers

Quote from: biospb on December 06, 2018, 05:19:37 PM

900HS on i7 3770 without K on both linux and windows with finminer
800HS with rhminercpu 1.1 (windows) Undecided

Hashrate bug was fixed by polyminer1.

His miner displayed ~13% higher than actual rate on the pool.

With an older version I was apparently getting 1500 H/s, but after polyminer1 fixed it, the real HR was 1340.
12 core Xeon E5 v3.

I am not making this shit up, alright.

Take a hint yet?

biospb

newbie

Activity: 64

Merit: 0

900HS on i7 3770 without K on both linux and windows with finminer
800HS with rhminercpu 1.1 (windows) Undecided

tlaskows

full member

Activity: 564

Merit: 100

Join GANTECH’s team of game changers

Quote from: biospb on December 06, 2018, 04:43:17 PM

tlaskows
sorry, but on linux finminer is far faster. on windows only on some cpus. so I am using rhminer mostly on windows.
and for 6c/12t finminer is slower. only 1000. while rhminer 1380. 1420 with version 1.1. ~3% as advertised.

polyminer1
btw, I tried to build it with latest MSVS (15.9.3). I did it. but it is slow as hell - 20% less comparing to your build.
I want to play with different algo implementations. but with 20% loose it looks pointless.

Yes, I have had the pleasure to try out finminer.

On Linux.

Amazing how quickly the devs developed exact same SPEED as open source version of polyminer1's.

You know that they took his code without credit, right?

It's a virus. And it's slow. And it only supports dagger hashimo and randomhash few days later the fastest randomhash implementation was released.

Amazing coders or...

BTW. I'm getting close to 1000 H/s on Linux on an Core i7 4770k. That's quad core CPU from 2011.

Also, I compared rhminer on Windows and on Linux (dual boot) on exact same hardware. It's the same speed.

Quote

all rigs have the same software & hardware except cards.

rigs of 13 GPUs each? Let me guess, you get free electricity and have a free warehouse worth of free heat to heat up your house for the winter.

biospb

newbie

Activity: 64

Merit: 0

tlaskows
sorry, but on linux finminer is far faster. on windows only on some cpus. so I am using rhminer mostly on windows.
and for 6c/12t finminer is slower. only 1000. while rhminer 1380. 1420 with version 1.1. ~3% as advertised.

polyminer1
btw, I tried to build it with latest MSVS (15.9.3). I did it. but it is slow as hell - 20% less comparing to your build.
I want to play with different algo implementations. but with 20% loose it looks pointless.

tlaskows

full member

Activity: 564

Merit: 100

Join GANTECH’s team of game changers

Quote from: biospb on December 06, 2018, 01:26:46 PM

hm... aligned_malloc

did you try LARGE PAGES? on windows especially?

What is Windows?

By definition:

Win·dows
/ˈwindōz/Submit
nounTRADEMARK
a computer operating system with a graphical user interface.

Runs fine on Kali Linux without any messing around.

Old Xeon up to 1400 H/s from 1340 H/s.

I used to code for Windows. Wrote a tonne of code for many VERSIONS of Windows.

You do realize it's a complete fuckery to get anything working properly on Windows?

polyminer1

newbie

Activity: 60

Merit: 0

Quote from: biospb on December 06, 2018, 01:26:46 PM

hm... aligned_malloc

did you try LARGE PAGES? on windows especially?

Yes and it's slower. Large page gives out advantages if you access memory with great locality. RandomHash breaks all memory locality. Cant explain why it's slower toh. Should be non-affecting.

Topic: [ANN] rhminer - an optimized CPU+GPU miner for PascalCoin - page 6. (Read 24517 times)