After Voting many members where really angry, that many other unexperienced people, wich after even voting asked us what masternodes are.
that showed that they didnt know for what they voted.
And to keep the economy healthy and dont have 1000s of masternodes, wich even dont earn anything, because there are many of them, we decided to make the price higher.
Thats not only my decision.
But the voting idea, was not a good idea. I didnt think that there where so many people wich didnt know what masternodes are, for what used, how the reward process works and so on.
But again, it was the right decision in my mind, and in mind of others too.
Maybe there are better coins like scorecoin, but thats only for NOW.
We have the mosts active devs, we will improove with most active developments, after the technical stuff has finished.
Our Team grows.
But thats not fair to start a voting, community decide 150k and you choose 300k because a little other group think it is better. Such a move is calling centralization.
I think if you are a good dev you listen to the community and put 150k as masternode. In a political Democrazy also noobs are voting. For example Trump was voted by noobs, but
he is president because it is democratical to say ok that was the voting.
I hope you think about it.
This is that little group.
Other than those, no one will buy coins for a masternode. So dont hope to see this coin at 1$ soon.