[ANN] sgminer v5 - optimized X11/X13/NeoScrypt/Lyra2RE/etc. kernel-switch miner - page 214.

platinum4

sr. member

Activity: 547

Merit: 250

Quote from: coda on June 25, 2014, 04:58:24 PM

Quote from: bullus on June 25, 2014, 04:37:00 PM

Quote from: platinum4 on June 25, 2014, 03:48:45 PM

Quote from: bullus on June 25, 2014, 01:04:01 PM

Quote from: platinum4 on June 25, 2014, 12:54:11 PM

No "shaders" specified; interesting. I'll check this out.

EDIT: Also, it should be explained right here that you aren't using the newest "form" of config files, with profiles and pools. Shouldn't matter though.

xI:320 just blew my card into SICK in about 15 minutes.

maybe u should try hamsi expand big 7, like his config.

bullus you don't have 290/Xs do you? Yours are 280s and you run expand-big 4 right?

no I have 7950's and using expand big 4 also

what is hamsi expand big ? my value is 1 ... i've got some 7950 too, should i use 4 or 7 ?

so far I have this to offer on expand-big

At I:19 expand-big 1 you get 4M on a 290X
At I:19 expand-big 4 you get 3.4-3.6M on a 290X
Have not tried xI:32 (extremely low thread count) and expand-big 7 (extremely aggressive hamsi-expand)

So for Hawaii's I would recommend trying expand-big 1, for Tahitis/Pitcairn, expand-big 4

coda

full member

Activity: 212

Merit: 100

Quote from: bullus on June 25, 2014, 04:37:00 PM

Quote from: platinum4 on June 25, 2014, 03:48:45 PM

Quote from: bullus on June 25, 2014, 01:04:01 PM

Quote from: platinum4 on June 25, 2014, 12:54:11 PM

No "shaders" specified; interesting. I'll check this out.

EDIT: Also, it should be explained right here that you aren't using the newest "form" of config files, with profiles and pools. Shouldn't matter though.

xI:320 just blew my card into SICK in about 15 minutes.

maybe u should try hamsi expand big 7, like his config.

bullus you don't have 290/Xs do you? Yours are 280s and you run expand-big 4 right?

no I have 7950's and using expand big 4 also

what is hamsi expand big ? my value is 1 ... i've got some 7950 too, should i use 4 or 7 ?

badman74

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: platinum4 on June 25, 2014, 03:54:05 PM

Quote from: morfey911 on June 25, 2014, 01:05:10 PM

Quote from: bullus on June 25, 2014, 01:04:01 PM

maybe u should try hamsi expand big 7, like his config.

its only for x13 algo, so doesn't matter.

Quote from: platinum4 on June 25, 2014, 12:54:11 PM

Also, it should be explained right here that you aren't using the newest "form" of config files, with profiles and pools. Shouldn't matter though.

yes, i'm tried a new build of sgminer few days ago, but he is crashed after 60 sec, for now, if i'm not wrong should be everything fine.

Newest one fixed this in last 2 days. Try getting the newest build from kenshirothefist's link or badman74

ok i am gonna start putting my builds for v5_0 here
https://github.com/badman74/Binaries/archive/V5_0.zip

bullus

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: platinum4 on June 25, 2014, 03:48:45 PM

Quote from: bullus on June 25, 2014, 01:04:01 PM

Quote from: platinum4 on June 25, 2014, 12:54:11 PM

No "shaders" specified; interesting. I'll check this out.

EDIT: Also, it should be explained right here that you aren't using the newest "form" of config files, with profiles and pools. Shouldn't matter though.

xI:320 just blew my card into SICK in about 15 minutes.

maybe u should try hamsi expand big 7, like his config.

bullus you don't have 290/Xs do you? Yours are 280s and you run expand-big 4 right?

no I have 7950's and using expand big 4 also

cgladue

member

Activity: 97

Merit: 10

if your running 270x's should you use expand big at all or leave it out ?

platinum4

sr. member

Activity: 547

Merit: 250

Quote from: morfey911 on June 25, 2014, 01:05:10 PM

Quote from: bullus on June 25, 2014, 01:04:01 PM

maybe u should try hamsi expand big 7, like his config.

its only for x13 algo, so doesn't matter.

Quote from: platinum4 on June 25, 2014, 12:54:11 PM

Also, it should be explained right here that you aren't using the newest "form" of config files, with profiles and pools. Shouldn't matter though.

yes, i'm tried a new build of sgminer few days ago, but he is crashed after 60 sec, for now, if i'm not wrong should be everything fine.

Newest one fixed this in last 2 days. Try getting the newest build from kenshirothefist's link or badman74

platinum4

sr. member

Activity: 547

Merit: 250

Quote from: bullus on June 25, 2014, 01:04:01 PM

Quote from: platinum4 on June 25, 2014, 12:54:11 PM

No "shaders" specified; interesting. I'll check this out.

EDIT: Also, it should be explained right here that you aren't using the newest "form" of config files, with profiles and pools. Shouldn't matter though.

xI:320 just blew my card into SICK in about 15 minutes.

maybe u should try hamsi expand big 7, like his config.

bullus you don't have 290/Xs do you? Yours are 280s and you run expand-big 4 right?

morfey911

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: bullus on June 25, 2014, 01:04:01 PM

maybe u should try hamsi expand big 7, like his config.

its only for x13 algo, so doesn't matter.

Quote from: platinum4 on June 25, 2014, 12:54:11 PM

Also, it should be explained right here that you aren't using the newest "form" of config files, with profiles and pools. Shouldn't matter though.

yes, i'm tried a new build of sgminer few days ago, but he is crashed after 60 sec, for now, if i'm not wrong should be everything fine.

bullus

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: platinum4 on June 25, 2014, 12:54:11 PM

No "shaders" specified; interesting. I'll check this out.

EDIT: Also, it should be explained right here that you aren't using the newest "form" of config files, with profiles and pools. Shouldn't matter though.

xI:320 just blew my card into SICK in about 15 minutes.

maybe u should try hamsi expand big 7, like his config.

platinum4

sr. member

Activity: 547

Merit: 250

No "shaders" specified; interesting. I'll check this out.

EDIT: Also, it should be explained right here that you aren't using the newest "form" of config files, with profiles and pools. Shouldn't matter though.

xI:320 just blew my card into SICK in about 15 minutes.

morfey911

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: platinum4 on June 25, 2014, 12:44:41 PM

Quote from: morfey911 on June 25, 2014, 12:31:49 PM

Try lower xi, i had the same with my 290x, but after i reduced xi from 144 to 32 (hashrate not hurt) - i have not seen any SEEK or DEAD.
sry for my bad english.

xI: 32 is WAY below I:19 how do you have good hashrates with that?

i dont know, but after i found that, i changed xi on my other rigs and this works perfect. Look at screenshot below:
http://cdn.joxi.ru/uploads/prod/2014/06/25/f59/3f5/cb2999442afe029945797c02a0e3ceb00be59ede.jpg
GPU 0,1,2 - R9 290x at 1040 gpu mhz
GPU 3 - r9 290 at 950 gpu mhz
[/quote]

I just tried this and it hard crashed my rig after 2 minutes 20 seconds. I'll pass for now. xI: of 320 works a bit better for tweaking. Do you have shaders : 2816 specified?
[/quote]

screenshot from my other rig.
3 x 290 reference at 1010mhz.
http://cdn.joxi.ru/uploads/prod/2014/06/25/925/431/5bfffa37c4373505a7f8ec80f9a441cca4432cdc.jpg

config:

Code:

{
"pools" : [
        {
                "name" : "NiceHash_X11",
                "url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4336",
                "user" : "",
                "pass" : "f0=0;f2=0;f3=4;f4=3;f5=0",
                "pool-algorithm" : "darkcoin-mod",
                "pool-nfactor" : "10",
                "pool-gpu-engine" : "1010",
                "pool-gpu-memclock" : "1500",
		"pool-xintensity" : "32"
        },
        {
                "name" : "NiceHash_X13",
                "url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4337",
                "user" : "",
                "pass" : "f0=0;f2=0;f3=4;f4=3;f5=0",
                "pool-algorithm" : "marucoin-mod",
                "pool-nfactor" : "10",
                "pool-gpu-engine" : "1010",
		"pool-xintensity" : "144"
        },
        {
                "name" : "Trademybit_X11",
                "url" : "stratum+tcp://am01.eu.trademybit.com:4440",
                "user" : "",
                "pass" : "",
                "pool-algorithm" : "darkcoin-mod",
                "pool-nfactor" : "10",
                "pool-gpu-engine" : "1010",
                "pool-gpu-memclock" : "1500",
		"pool-xintensity" : "32"
        },
        {
                "name" : "Trademybit_X13",
                "url" : "stratum+tcp://am01.eu.trademybit.com:5550",
                "user" : "",
                "pass" : "",
                "pool-algorithm" : "marucoin-mod",
                "pool-nfactor" : "10",
                "pool-gpu-engine" : "1010",
		"pool-xintensity" : "144"
        }
],
"hamsi-expand-big" : "7",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize" : "256",
"vectors" : "1",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-fan" : "50-100",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"temp-cutoff" : "90",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-target" : "80",
"auto-fan" : true,
"auto-gpu" : true,
"log" : "1",
"failover-only" : true,
"failover-switch-delay" : "30",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"scrypt" : true,
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "10",
"expiry" : "28",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-port" : "4028"
}

morfey911

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: coda on June 25, 2014, 12:42:09 PM

ok this miner goes 30% faster ... but it also draws 30% more watts @ the wall Wink

Yeah, a little more and x11/x13 will draw like script.

kenshirothefist

sr. member

Activity: 457

Merit: 273

We have published new sgminer_v5 binaries (linux, windows), build today (60 sec quit fix, high speed fan fix, etc.): https://www.nicehash.com/software/#sgminer

platinum4

sr. member

Activity: 547

Merit: 250

Quote from: morfey911 on June 25, 2014, 12:31:49 PM

Try lower xi, i had the same with my 290x, but after i reduced xi from 144 to 32 (hashrate not hurt) - i have not seen any SEEK or DEAD.
sry for my bad english.

xI: 32 is WAY below I:19 how do you have good hashrates with that?
[/quote]

i dont know, but after i found that, i changed xi on my other rigs and this works perfect. Look at screenshot below:

GPU 0,1,2 - R9 290x at 1040 gpu mhz
GPU 3 - r9 290 at 950 gpu mhz
[/quote]

I just tried this and it hard crashed my rig after 2 minutes 20 seconds. I'll pass for now. xI: of 320 works a bit better for tweaking. Do you have shaders : 2816 specified?

coda

full member

Activity: 212

Merit: 100

ok this miner goes 30% faster ... well done guys !!
but it also draws 30% more watts @ the wall Wink

(and the cards are hotter also)

morfey911

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: platinum4 on June 25, 2014, 12:19:53 PM

Quote from: morfey911 on June 25, 2014, 11:47:09 AM

Quote from: mannyg on June 25, 2014, 11:40:51 AM

Quote from: platinum4 on June 25, 2014, 10:30:10 AM

Quote from: mannyg on June 25, 2014, 08:27:21 AM

I've mined Scrypt, Scrypt-N, and X13 for extended periods of time without errors. (2days or more)... so far the only algorithm that has given me SICK > DEAD cards is X11. Keccak im not even sure if I have configured right, i get a pretty good hash rate but an unusually high amount of rejects.

I get SICK -> DEAD on x13 usually after having done x11 for an extended time, then flipping. It doesn't require a hard boot, just a restart of the mining instance.

Flipping from X13 to X11 just made one GPU go SICK -> DEAD , and if i restart only the mining instance, the hashrate does not build up to its normal speed, it only goes to about 50-60% speed. I have to reboot the OS and restart mining for it to work at full speed. Sometimes just mining X11 does this too without any switching.

Try lower xi, i had the same with my 290x, but after i reduced xi from 144 to 32 (hashrate not hurt) - i have not seen any SEEK or DEAD.
sry for my bad english.

xI: 32 is WAY below I:19 how do you have good hashrates with that?

i dont know, but after i found that, i changed xi on my other rigs and this works perfect. Look at screenshot below:
http://cdn.joxi.ru/uploads/prod/2014/06/25/f59/3f5/cb2999442afe029945797c02a0e3ceb00be59ede.jpg
GPU 0,1,2 - R9 290x at 1040 gpu mhz
GPU 3 - r9 290 at 950 gpu mhz

platinum4

sr. member

Activity: 547

Merit: 250

Quote from: morfey911 on June 25, 2014, 11:47:09 AM

Quote from: mannyg on June 25, 2014, 11:40:51 AM

Quote from: platinum4 on June 25, 2014, 10:30:10 AM

Quote from: mannyg on June 25, 2014, 08:27:21 AM

I've mined Scrypt, Scrypt-N, and X13 for extended periods of time without errors. (2days or more)... so far the only algorithm that has given me SICK > DEAD cards is X11. Keccak im not even sure if I have configured right, i get a pretty good hash rate but an unusually high amount of rejects.

I get SICK -> DEAD on x13 usually after having done x11 for an extended time, then flipping. It doesn't require a hard boot, just a restart of the mining instance.

Flipping from X13 to X11 just made one GPU go SICK -> DEAD , and if i restart only the mining instance, the hashrate does not build up to its normal speed, it only goes to about 50-60% speed. I have to reboot the OS and restart mining for it to work at full speed. Sometimes just mining X11 does this too without any switching.

Try lower xi, i had the same with my 290x, but after i reduced xi from 144 to 32 (hashrate not hurt) - i have not seen any SEEK or DEAD.
sry for my bad english.

xI: 32 is WAY below I:19 how do you have good hashrates with that?

morfey911

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: mannyg on June 25, 2014, 11:40:51 AM

Quote from: platinum4 on June 25, 2014, 10:30:10 AM

Quote from: mannyg on June 25, 2014, 08:27:21 AM

I've mined Scrypt, Scrypt-N, and X13 for extended periods of time without errors. (2days or more)... so far the only algorithm that has given me SICK > DEAD cards is X11. Keccak im not even sure if I have configured right, i get a pretty good hash rate but an unusually high amount of rejects.

I get SICK -> DEAD on x13 usually after having done x11 for an extended time, then flipping. It doesn't require a hard boot, just a restart of the mining instance.

Flipping from X13 to X11 just made one GPU go SICK -> DEAD , and if i restart only the mining instance, the hashrate does not build up to its normal speed, it only goes to about 50-60% speed. I have to reboot the OS and restart mining for it to work at full speed. Sometimes just mining X11 does this too without any switching.

Try lower xi, i had the same with my 290x, but after i reduced xi from 144 to 32 (hashrate not hurt) - i have not seen any SEEK or DEAD.
sry for my bad english.

mannyg

full member

Activity: 142

Merit: 101

Quote from: platinum4 on June 25, 2014, 10:30:10 AM

Quote from: mannyg on June 25, 2014, 08:27:21 AM

I've mined Scrypt, Scrypt-N, and X13 for extended periods of time without errors. (2days or more)... so far the only algorithm that has given me SICK > DEAD cards is X11. Keccak im not even sure if I have configured right, i get a pretty good hash rate but an unusually high amount of rejects.

I get SICK -> DEAD on x13 usually after having done x11 for an extended time, then flipping. It doesn't require a hard boot, just a restart of the mining instance.

Flipping from X13 to X11 just made one GPU go SICK -> DEAD , and if i restart only the mining instance, the hashrate does not build up to its normal speed, it only goes to about 50-60% speed. I have to reboot the OS and restart mining for it to work at full speed. Sometimes just mining X11 does this too without any switching.

platinum4

sr. member

Activity: 547

Merit: 250

Quote from: mannyg on June 25, 2014, 08:27:21 AM

I've mined Scrypt, Scrypt-N, and X13 for extended periods of time without errors. (2days or more)... so far the only algorithm that has given me SICK > DEAD cards is X11. Keccak im not even sure if I have configured right, i get a pretty good hash rate but an unusually high amount of rejects.

I get SICK -> DEAD on x13 usually after having done x11 for an extended time, then flipping. It doesn't require a hard boot, just a restart of the mining instance.

Topic: [ANN] sgminer v5 - optimized X11/X13/NeoScrypt/Lyra2RE/etc. kernel-switch miner - page 214. (Read 877859 times)