Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] Signatum 2.0 - page 54. (Read 102089 times)

jr. member
Activity: 98
Merit: 1
October 23, 2017, 03:41:56 AM
Signatum
Signatum 2
Signatum Classic

Is this complete list? How many Signatums are there now? Confused as fuck right now Sad
full member
Activity: 192
Merit: 100
October 23, 2017, 03:32:05 AM
I want to enjoy but i need more information than just this.
Look forward to it
full member
Activity: 616
Merit: 167
October 23, 2017, 03:30:26 AM
Windows Wallet: https[Suspicious link removed] antivirus detects Trojan.Win32.IRCbot.awhw! This is normal?


Some wallets or mining programs come up as a virus (even if they're not). But I don't remember getting this kind of warning when I downloaded the wallet so might be worth double checking you have the right link. Maybe the developers can confirm?
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
October 23, 2017, 03:28:23 AM
Windows Wallet: github.com/signatumd/releases/blob/master/signatum-qt-ldb.exe antivirus detects Trojan.Win32.IRCbot.awhw! This is normal?
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 118
October 23, 2017, 03:09:39 AM
I think we need an official vote about which ratio should be chosen for the upcoming swap? Do you agree with me guys?

I disagree. But i also see your point.
hero member
Activity: 676
Merit: 500
October 23, 2017, 03:07:03 AM
So what should i do with my staking wallet , I should stop it now or it will continue to work? Should i download a new wallet , what is going on here?
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 118
October 23, 2017, 02:47:42 AM
As i read it, the pre mine allocated to dev and funds is 28% of initial pre mined supply. So after swap we who hold sigt 1.0 will get 72% of the new coins. But it is not 28% of total supply as many probably think. Please clarify this as it makes a major difference. Put in the actual numbers, pre mine is xxxxx. Of that xxxx will go to swap, the coins not swapped will be burned for example. And then xxx (20% of ??) will go to dev team and xxx to fund for exchanges etc.

If it is 28% of the pre mine i think you have done the right thing. There will be cash for good exchanges, there will be incentive for devs. And the actual pre mine for devs is way lower than 20/28 %.
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
October 23, 2017, 02:29:25 AM
#99
What has happened with first version?
How can i swap ?
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
October 23, 2017, 02:21:36 AM
#98
Is this some kind of joke or what?!

I've invested really allot of money in Signatum, and hoped it will become something.
I really hope that those of us investing signatum will get a chance to exchange them for the 2.0

you can end of november swap you sigt to sigt 2.0 in ratio of 4:1 because total supply change to 34,375,000.
so if you have 100,000 sigt you get 25,000 sigt 2.0.


Well, that hurts. I hope it will reach a nice price soon. With all of the belief I had in Signatum, really don't want to go out as a loser out of it.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
October 23, 2017, 01:07:52 AM
#97
Quote
Squbs – Developer

Cryptovore/Dan – Business Development & Marketing

Eikcam – Developer

SonnyDaytona – Developer

Eskodhi – Developer

Ned Stark – Web Developer

John Smith – Public Relations Manager

Kasper – Community Manager & Developer

The team members shouldn't hide behind aliases and instead publish their true names and qualifications if they really want to promote transparency.

Transparency is not about the identity but the work. Does anyone know who is Satoshi Nakamoto? There are many coins out there with aliases for devs. They are still respected and transparent. They reserve the right to differentiate their personal and professional life imho.

With Signatum's previous trackrecord this isn't an option. The team should be identifiable and held accountable if they fuck up investors' money.
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
October 23, 2017, 01:01:00 AM
#96
Will it be PoW/S hybrid again. I didn't read anything on more mining on this launch or did I miss it? You changed the algo too? Wasn't it skunkhash or something on 1.0 ? Good work new devs Are you all based EU/US ? Cheers.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 101
October 23, 2017, 12:28:16 AM
#95
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
October 23, 2017, 12:03:57 AM
#94
Why is there a new ANN thread on this ?
full member
Activity: 798
Merit: 116
October 22, 2017, 11:51:11 PM
#93
maybe you can make better .. thant that scam of signatum...
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
October 22, 2017, 11:41:54 PM
#92

Let's see what happens. 2 months of mining and not selling, there may be a second chance.
Google translator
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
October 22, 2017, 11:39:21 PM
#91
its better if we got lower swap ratio than 4:1. it might be 2:1. thanks
full member
Activity: 142
Merit: 100
October 22, 2017, 11:35:57 PM
#90

Haha . . A wrong thing form DOC is he ever used real name.When somebody find the truth, then he is gone. This is DOC 2.0. So they never let you know their true real name and background .They just a ass kid to cheat the develop fees 28% and dumping all.Then keep anonymous to find the next one. They can't develop any thing .They just copy all from github.
God bless you.
You need to read the content of the announcement in the website thoroughly before posting anything. The current dev team is formed from community. They were not part of the DOC team. Doc was a single entity and the current team has more than just two with a flat hierarchy. Why did you believe in bitcoin while you were not sure what the dev's real name and identity was!
full member
Activity: 142
Merit: 100
October 22, 2017, 11:19:31 PM
#89
Good luck Signatum. Coin swap Ratio is so good. 4:1

Would you mind giving me link to the Swap ratio (4:1), please. Thank you.
Everything is clearly explained in https://signatum.org
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
October 22, 2017, 11:14:19 PM
#88
Congratulations!
Really best step!
Need to kick all that shitty Devs and Co! They sold their child(project) and their supporters and community!
Need to clean up now....
New Life for Sign, New POW etc...
Waiting for!
full member
Activity: 142
Merit: 100
October 22, 2017, 11:08:21 PM
#87
Quote
Squbs – Developer

Cryptovore/Dan – Business Development & Marketing

Eikcam – Developer

SonnyDaytona – Developer

Eskodhi – Developer

Ned Stark – Web Developer

John Smith – Public Relations Manager

Kasper – Community Manager & Developer

The team members shouldn't hide behind aliases and instead publish their true names and qualifications if they really want to promote transparency.

Transparency is not about the identity but the work. Does anyone know who is Satoshi Nakamoto? There are many coins out there with aliases for devs. They are still respected and transparent. They reserve the right to differentiate their personal and professional life imho.
Pages:
Jump to: