Topic: [ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine - page 457. (Read 823878 times)

Quote from: polylogic on July 26, 2017, 08:32:11 AM

Is there something wrong with Suprnova?
They're pool efficiency keeps dropping.

There's someone mining with the wrong algo and even though he gets banned and banned over again he tries it again after a few minutes..

Hopefully he understands it soon..

It's no problem, he just uglifies the stats a bit

Just out of curiosity, how is nomp module accepting shares if its created and submitted using a different algo? Or is the shares getting rejected constantly from that person?

Exactly, they're all rejected but inserted as "invalid share" into the database, thats what makes the efficiency of the pool drop (because there are lots of invalid shares in the DB).

When thinking about it, those shares maybe shouldn't be inserted into the DB at all because they're not paid either.. only valid shares are paid, so maybe it's a good idea to change that soon at my side..

Sounds right - only invalid shares due to stale job has to go to the DB to calculate the pool efficiency. No point bringing the stats down due to a client side error. Who would be running the miner without even looking at the output (with some many reds)

Yep right, i'll change that.

Renegade1979

full member

Activity: 280

Merit: 105

but what you are saying is sell your SIGT as soon as you can?

I didn't predict the peak well enough so I sold most of that for 730 sat or so, and then I've made some good Ke$h the next day BUT I guess no point selling it atm as the price is really low. Yesterday it was damn good. Twice the profitability HUSH ever had for mining. I even skipped me ZEC and ETH mining for the sake of HUSH and SIGT was even better. As for now I will HODL for the possible pump. There should be one as you say.

Neon~

sr. member

Activity: 275

Merit: 250

Quote from: ocminer on July 26, 2017, 10:24:32 AM

Quote from: ocminer on July 26, 2017, 10:24:32 AM

Is there something wrong with Suprnova?
They're pool efficiency keeps dropping.

There's someone mining with the wrong algo and even though he gets banned and banned over again he tries it again after a few minutes..

Hopefully he understands it soon..

It's no problem, he just uglifies the stats a bit

Just out of curiosity, how is nomp module accepting shares if its created and submitted using a different algo? Or is the shares getting rejected constantly from that person?

Exactly, they're all rejected but inserted as "invalid share" into the database, thats what makes the efficiency of the pool drop (because there are lots of invalid shares in the DB).

When thinking about it, those shares maybe shouldn't be inserted into the DB at all because they're not paid either.. only valid shares are paid, so maybe it's a good idea to change that soon at my side..

Sounds right - only invalid shares due to stale job has to go to the DB to calculate the pool efficiency. No point bringing the stats down due to a client side error. Who would be running the miner without even looking at the output (with so many reds)

enkayz

full member

Activity: 298

Merit: 100

hashbag.cc

Is there something wrong with Suprnova?
They're pool efficiency keeps dropping.

There's someone mining with the wrong algo and even though he gets banned and banned over again he tries it again after a few minutes..

Hopefully he understands it soon..

It's no problem, he just uglifies the stats a bit

Just out of curiosity, how is nomp module accepting shares if its created and submitted using a different algo? Or is the shares getting rejected constantly from that person?

Exactly, they're all rejected but inserted as "invalid share" into the database, thats what makes the efficiency of the pool drop (because there are lots of invalid shares in the DB).

When thinking about it, those shares maybe shouldn't be inserted into the DB at all because they're not paid either.. only valid shares are paid, so maybe it's a good idea to change that soon at my side..

moreover you could create a column in your share table to tag it as valid/invalid (boolean would do) and then filter the queries for efficiency to valid only so you can create a report on invalid shares still

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Is there something wrong with Suprnova?
They're pool efficiency keeps dropping.

There's someone mining with the wrong algo and even though he gets banned and banned over again he tries it again after a few minutes..

Hopefully he understands it soon..

It's no problem, he just uglifies the stats a bit

Just out of curiosity, how is nomp module accepting shares if its created and submitted using a different algo? Or is the shares getting rejected constantly from that person?

Exactly, they're all rejected but inserted as "invalid share" into the database, thats what makes the efficiency of the pool drop (because there are lots of invalid shares in the DB).

When thinking about it, those shares maybe shouldn't be inserted into the DB at all because they're not paid either.. only valid shares are paid, so maybe it's a good idea to change that soon at my side..

Neon~

sr. member

Activity: 275

Merit: 250

Is there something wrong with Suprnova?
They're pool efficiency keeps dropping.

There's someone mining with the wrong algo and even though he gets banned and banned over again he tries it again after a few minutes..

Hopefully he understands it soon..

It's no problem, he just uglifies the stats a bit

Just out of curiosity, how is nomp module accepting shares if its created and submitted using a different algo? Or is the shares getting rejected constantly from that person?

D8V1D

full member

Activity: 163

Merit: 100