Author

Topic: [ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine - page 470. (Read 823878 times)

full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Hi I want to ask you do you have mining calculator? Thank you in advance.


This project needs one. Someone should build one. Good idea!
full member
Activity: 180
Merit: 100
Hi I want to ask you do you have mining calculator? Thank you in advance.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Actually, it's totally the same, so that "Gabriel" is plagiarist of Carsens work

It's plagiarism when it's not allowed. In open source, copying IS the whole point.

Signatum project released its own explorer and charts https://github.com/signatumd/signatum-explorer and made it opensource for anyone to use. Someone uses it, its free. People should know what GPL stands for.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Any idea what is the fair value on cryptopia for the coin?
It's getting hard to mine it, at least for me...

We wish we knew :/
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
Actually, it's totally the same, so that "Gabriel" is plagiarist of Carsens work

It's plagiarism when it's not allowed. In open source, copying IS the whole point.
member
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
Any idea what is the fair value on cryptopia for the coin?
It's getting hard to mine it, at least for me...
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
need bittrex or polo.

Its part of roadmap. Check the Op.
sr. member
Activity: 379
Merit: 250
need bittrex or polo.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Dear developer
I have some doubts about you
who are you ?
Why are all your accounts new like Twitter and Github?
Especially this algorithm I think it's a Denarius "Tribus"

yes the algo is almost identical.. when I wrote the hashing module for hashbag (prior to their release of a hashing module) I noticed that it's technically the same thing with different algo names (and another algo added). i've never seen 80 bytes of an algo and 64 bytes of the others before Denarius, and then this week all the sudden comes 'SkunkHash + Raptor' where it is 80 bytes of one algo + 64 bytes of 3 other algos, and i have been wondering what Raptor is as I never added it to any hashing module however the blocks are accepted by the network just using the 4 algos: 80b skein, 64b cubehash fugue gost, no need for anything else

thats why i went to look in his own hashing module once he released it but it looks like a pretty close copy of ex_mac's hashing modules.. eg
https://github.com/signatumd/hashing-module/blob/master/skunkhashmodule.c
https://github.com/exmac/tribus-hash/blob/master/tribusmodule.c
only difference is where it says 'tribus' in the skunkhash it says 'skunkhash'

in the skunkhash.c hashing module:
https://github.com/signatumd/hashing-module/blob/master/skunkhash.c
https://github.com/exmac/tribus-hash/blob/master/tribus.c
only difference is that the hash functions used are different (however the first hash is still 80 bytes) and also the init calls are removed (they dont really do anything other than create the variables but you are supposed to use them for some fussy compilers) and they don't use constants for the hashes (again a thing you are supposed to do for max compiler support) and there is a fourth algo added at the end there, otherwise the functionality is identical to the tribus hashing module

and nowhere does it say raptor anywhere, so thats why I wonder what the hell this raptor algo is? searched on the net and didn't find anything about raptor algo

Totally different people. DNR is done by Carsen and Signatum is done by Gabriel.

Actually, it's totally the same, so that "Gabriel" is plagiarist of Carsens work

Best answer: Both are Bitocin plagiarist . Second part, if you know the base source analysis you will see its not the same. DNR has different specs and this one different. DNR has premine and had dumps while this one does not even have any hidden dev fund or premine. look at tribus.c. You will find it 100% like few other on couple of git repos. So if you are an investor of DNR and not in SIGT then that is your choice. You can come up with couple of more criticizing points but the end of the day, it all comes down to fairness and legitimacy .
full member
Activity: 137
Merit: 100
Dear developer
I have some doubts about you
who are you ?
Why are all your accounts new like Twitter and Github?
Especially this algorithm I think it's a Denarius "Tribus"

yes the algo is almost identical.. when I wrote the hashing module for hashbag (prior to their release of a hashing module) I noticed that it's technically the same thing with different algo names (and another algo added). i've never seen 80 bytes of an algo and 64 bytes of the others before Denarius, and then this week all the sudden comes 'SkunkHash + Raptor' where it is 80 bytes of one algo + 64 bytes of 3 other algos, and i have been wondering what Raptor is as I never added it to any hashing module however the blocks are accepted by the network just using the 4 algos: 80b skein, 64b cubehash fugue gost, no need for anything else

thats why i went to look in his own hashing module once he released it but it looks like a pretty close copy of ex_mac's hashing modules.. eg
https://github.com/signatumd/hashing-module/blob/master/skunkhashmodule.c
https://github.com/exmac/tribus-hash/blob/master/tribusmodule.c
only difference is where it says 'tribus' in the skunkhash it says 'skunkhash'

in the skunkhash.c hashing module:
https://github.com/signatumd/hashing-module/blob/master/skunkhash.c
https://github.com/exmac/tribus-hash/blob/master/tribus.c
only difference is that the hash functions used are different (however the first hash is still 80 bytes) and also the init calls are removed (they dont really do anything other than create the variables but you are supposed to use them for some fussy compilers) and they don't use constants for the hashes (again a thing you are supposed to do for max compiler support) and there is a fourth algo added at the end there, otherwise the functionality is identical to the tribus hashing module

and nowhere does it say raptor anywhere, so thats why I wonder what the hell this raptor algo is? searched on the net and didn't find anything about raptor algo

Totally different people. DNR is done by Carsen and Signatum is done by Gabriel.

Actually, it's totally the same, so that "Gabriel" is plagiarist of Carsens work



You missed a key difference:  denarius is a premine scam =) SIGT has no premine. It could be a 1:1 carbon copy of denarius and be superior due to no premine.

SIGT only has about 2 500 000 instamine
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
^are you scammer?

knock it off please
member
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
On the official Signatum Explorer getnetworkhashps returns

Quote
There was an error. Check your console.

Is there any other public API where I can get the current network hashrate?

Look at the explorer API call section

That is the exact place where I get the error

The iquidus explorer issue perhaps. When you do "getmininginfo" it shows the hashrate there. In this view, you can see it is 1.1 Terahash

Code:


{
"blocks" : 10066,
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 10923.41672961,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.00024414,
"search-interval" : 0
},
"blockvalue" : 250000000000,
"netmhashps" : 1117040.89557794,
"netstakeweight" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 19,
"stakeweight" : {
"minimum" : 201450203685701,
"maximum" : 0,
"combined" : 201450203685701
},
"stakeinterest" : 5000000,
"testnet" : false
}


It works. Thank you! Smiley
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
On the official Signatum Explorer getnetworkhashps returns

Quote
There was an error. Check your console.

Is there any other public API where I can get the current network hashrate?

Look at the explorer API call section

That is the exact place where I get the error

The iquidus explorer issue perhaps. When you do "getmininginfo" it shows the hashrate there. In this view, you can see it is 1.1 Terahash

Code:


{
"blocks" : 10066,
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 10923.41672961,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.00024414,
"search-interval" : 0
},
"blockvalue" : 250000000000,
"netmhashps" : 1117040.89557794,
"netstakeweight" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 19,
"stakeweight" : {
"minimum" : 201450203685701,
"maximum" : 0,
"combined" : 201450203685701
},
"stakeinterest" : 5000000,
"testnet" : false
}

full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Totally different people. DNR is done by Carsen and Signatum is done by Gabriel.

That wasn't the point I was trying to make =p

You will see clones everywhere. If you look at it generally and from a technical point of view as you said, all are clones of bitcoin. SIGT has also been forked in other git repos so maybe you will expect similar projects originating from this after all.
member
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
On the official Signatum Explorer getnetworkhashps returns

Quote
There was an error. Check your console.

Is there any other public API where I can get the current network hashrate?

Look at the explorer API call section

That is the exact place where I get the error
full member
Activity: 298
Merit: 100
hashbag.cc
Totally different people. DNR is done by Carsen and Signatum is done by Gabriel.

That wasn't the point I was trying to make =p
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
Can any one help me with those errors?
[12:36:57] Started sgminer 5.3.3
[12:36:57] * using Jansson 2.10
[12:36:57] WARNING: GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT is not specified!
[12:36:57] WARNING: GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS is not specified!

this is my bat file:
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
sgminer.exe -k skunkhash -o stratum+tcp://sigt.pool.mn:8732 -u gogik.gogi -p 566 -I 20
pause

I'm using single RX 480 GPU

I've tried to change:
 GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT and -I but it didn't work
And also I've tried to use --gpu-platform 0,1,2 but it didn't work either

https://github.com/signatumd/releases/blob/master/sigt-miner.zip
 download
rename config file called signatum.conf to sgminer.conf ,edit .... copy & past the following below & save dbl click sgminer.exe...restart pc before start.... I am mining 3 480's & 3 1050ti using win 8.1 and works fine.
 you may want to play around with the intensity ...480s take a min or two to fire up on I 22

{
  "pools": [
    {
      "url": "stratum+tcp://yiimp.ccminer.org:8433", (USE YOUR OWN)
      "user": "BEDKzQwi7xqpNz1bmLXCtuNFJbwSJKNYvd",(USEYOURowN)
      "pass": "x"
    }
  ],
  "profiles": [],
  "failover-only": true,
  "algorithm": "skunkhash",
  "device": "all",
  "intensity": "22",
  "temp-cutoff": "95",
  "temp-overheat": "85",
  "temp-target": "75",
  "gpu-memdiff": "0",
  "shares": "0",
  "kernel-path": "/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin",
  "api-mcast-port": "4028",
  "api-port": "4028",
  "debug-log": true,
  "expiry": "1",
  "failover-switch-delay": "60",
  "gpu-dyninterval": "7",
  "gpu-platform": "-1",
  "hamsi-expand-big": "4",
  "keccak-unroll": "0",
  "no-pool-disable": true,
  "no-client-reconnect": true,
  "queue": "0",
  "scan-time": "1",
  "tcp-keepalive": "30",
  "temp-hysteresis": "3",
  "vote": "0",
  "watchpool-refresh": "30"
}
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Best is not to pump and let it rise by authentic value.
newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
Prepare for the next pump. Probably higher than 5000 sats. There is a huge buy-support coming. Already back at 3100 sats

4 BTC worth a single buy order

not that sure, see the sell order up to 4k satoshi there are more than 10 btc there, and the buy orders look very tiny now, i think we are going to see a little stagnation phase first, the reward is still too high now, maybe after POW end

If the masses want to pump a coin, they'll do it. Regardless of POW etc.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Can any one help me with those errors?
[12:36:57] Started sgminer 5.3.3
[12:36:57] * using Jansson 2.10
[12:36:57] WARNING: GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT is not specified!
[12:36:57] WARNING: GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS is not specified!

this is my bat file:
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
sgminer.exe -k skunkhash -o stratum+tcp://sigt.pool.mn:8732 -u gogik.gogi -p 566 -I 20
pause

I'm using single RX 480 GPU

I've tried to change:
 GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT and -I but it didn't work
And also I've tried to use --gpu-platform 0,1,2 but it didn't work either
Jump to: