What benefit would gamers and card holders have for BCY to go "to the moon"? Aren't the cards' prices based on fiat currency? Or is there an expectation that existing BCY holders would decide to buy more cards (lower price in BCY term) if BCY went to the moon? But with moon price they might instead cash out into BTC, don't you think? For me it looks like it is best for BCY price to remain stable.
Also I was wondering if there is any reason why Crystals or gems are being used in the game instead of Bitcrystals? Is it due to app store limitation or game economics? In other words, would it be a bad idea to use a game currency as an in-game currency? I guess the same question could be asked to Beyond the Void.
Higher the price of BCY is more are worth BCYs owned by EDS and more they can spend for developing game so on log term higher price of BCY is best.
Cards that are put on sale are always put at price considering value of BCY, so BCY can be x100 or fall 100 times and new cards will still get sold at normal price.
Crystals and Gemz have different options. so as BitCrystals that cant be used in game directly, yes because of appstore limitations. There is also Gold you forgot to mention.
So, the only reason why Bitcrystals can't be used in game is due to appstore limitations only, not because of game economics. Now I got an idea to circumvent the appstore rule. How about creating an in-game non-blockchan token and distribute according to player's ownership of bitcrystals. The player already provides a link to view his blockchain cards. Just extend this to acknowledge the bitcrystals owned and have it represented by lets say non-blockchain "crystals". Do you think this would work?