Topic: [ANN] sph-sgminer: multi-coin multi-algorithm GPU miner | added MaruCoin - page 53. (Read 515718 times)

Quote from: ocminer on March 13, 2014, 08:03:41 AM

I saw some guys started to test it - any results?

Hi! Just registered especially for this theme because of its significance.
So, only one of many kernels are working, the quarkcoin one.
But it's working well!
On my test 7950 it shows 1.500 M avg hashrate with 5.000 M WU.
On the site side I see increasing value of my hashrate aiming to WU. After 25 min its amount reached 3.5 M.
All diffs are acceptable with no rejects and HW errors.
Amount of diffs are 0.5 and 1.0.
Good work, Feeleep!
But this coin is not profitable even with this results for me.

does miner hashrate equals what pool was saying?

Hmm.. So to understand correctly:

The miner which gets rejected on for example suprnova works well on coinmine now and reports the correct hashrate ? no more fake shares ? and it is fixed by a tweak at stratum on coinmine only Huh

i can confirm that exactly yes - i did not download a new compile, i used the same miner, i used it on a windows machine (only one i have) and its the first download from the topic:

works on Feeleeps SRC pool which is the Quark algo as i left it exactly and only changed the pool address .

did not work on any other Quark (or clone) pool, and gave back {share target error} ~ < the error

Thanks guys for testing. There is still something not correct between cpuminer-gpuminer-stratum so my solution if following:
- GPU miners: diff1 = 0x000000ffff000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
- CPU miners: diff1 = 0x00000000ffff0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

but GPU miner share is 256 time less valuable than CPU share - dont ask me why but it works. If there is anyone who have an idea let me know please.

I will set up GPU stratum port for all my quark-based coins (Quarks, Securecoin, Particle, Frozen) later today

feeleep

digitalindustry

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

‘Try to be nice’

I saw some guys started to test it - any results?

Hi! Just registered especially for this theme because of its significance.
So, only one of many kernels are working, the quarkcoin one.
But it's working well!
On my test 7950 it shows 1.500 M avg hashrate with 5.000 M WU.
On the site side I see increasing value of my hashrate aiming to WU. After 25 min its amount reached 3.5 M.
All diffs are acceptable with no rejects and HW errors.
Amount of diffs are 0.5 and 1.0.
Good work, Feeleep!
But this coin is not profitable even with this results for me.

does miner hashrate equals what pool was saying?

Hmm.. So to understand correctly:

The miner which gets rejected on for example suprnova works well on coinmine now and reports the correct hashrate ? no more fake shares ? and it is fixed by a tweak at stratum on coinmine only Huh

i can confirm that exactly yes - i did not download a new compile, i used the same miner, i used it on a windows machine (only one i have) and its the first download from the topic:

works on Feeleeps SRC pool which is the Quark algo as i left it exactly and only changed the pool address .

did not work on any other Quark (or clone) pool, and gave back {share target error} ~ < the error

darius08

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

I understand this but there is one problem - in original CPU miner from Neisklar (https://github.com/Neisklar/quarkcoin-cpuminer) I am pretty sure diff1 is set the same as sha256 and it is used by thousands of users...

However I set up a separate stratum port (once again) for GPU users on Securecoin pool. As I dont have any GPU rig now could anyone test it for a while and post results?

mine1.coinmine.pl:6021

feeleep

I saw some guys started to test it - any results?

Looks good!

paulnsk

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Quote from: ocminer on March 13, 2014, 08:03:41 AM

does miner hashrate equals what pool was saying?

As I said the avg hashrate for session sgminer is showing is 1.5 MH/s.
Because of using 4 threads the theoretical hashrate must be 6 MH/s but Work Utility that is efficiency of a card is now showing 5.2 MH/s.
The site hashrate showing 3.5 MH/s and I think will not rise anymore. That was results one of my 7950 cards with some overclocking.
The pure qubit and groestl algo much more effective on video, have you any idea to put up pools with some corresponding coins?

paulnsk

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Hmm.. So to understand correctly:

The miner which gets rejected on for example suprnova works well on coinmine now and reports the correct hashrate ? no more fake shares ? and it is fixed by a tweak at stratum on coinmine only Huh

Yes, unfortunately the one and only pool is correct

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

I saw some guys started to test it - any results?

Hi! Just registered especially for this theme because of its significance.
So, only one of many kernels are working, the quarkcoin one.
But it's working well!
On my test 7950 it shows 1.500 M avg hashrate with 5.000 M WU.
On the site side I see increasing value of my hashrate aiming to WU. After 25 min its amount reached 3.5 M.
All diffs are acceptable with no rejects and HW errors.
Amount of diffs are 0.5 and 1.0.
Good work, Feeleep!
But this coin is not profitable even with this results for me.

does miner hashrate equals what pool was saying?

Hmm.. So to understand correctly:

The miner which gets rejected on for example suprnova works well on coinmine now and reports the correct hashrate ? no more fake shares ? and it is fixed by a tweak at stratum on coinmine only Huh

feeleep

legendary

Activity: 1197

Merit: 1000

I saw some guys started to test it - any results?

Hi! Just registered especially for this theme because of its significance.
So, only one of many kernels are working, the quarkcoin one.
But it's working well!
On my test 7950 it shows 1.500 M avg hashrate with 5.000 M WU.
On the site side I see increasing value of my hashrate aiming to WU. After 25 min its amount reached 3.5 M.
All diffs are acceptable with no rejects and HW errors.
Amount of diffs are 0.5 and 1.0.
Good work, Feeleep!
But this coin is not profitable even with this results for me.

does miner hashrate equals what pool was saying?

paulnsk

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

I saw some guys started to test it - any results?

Hi! Just registered especially for this theme because of its significance.
So, only one of many kernels are working, the quarkcoin one.
But it's working well!
On my test 7950 it shows 1.500 M avg hashrate with 5.000 M WU.
On the site side I see increasing value of my hashrate aiming to WU. After 25 min its amount reached 3.5 M.
All diffs are acceptable with no rejects and HW errors.
Amount of diffs are 0.5 and 1.0.
Good work, Feeleep!
But this coin is not profitable even with this results for me.

digitalindustry

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

‘Try to be nice’

yes everything appears to be functioning i'm mining src (which i don't even know what is ) looks like DGC dev made this yes ?

hash as represented is about 3x but no probs i assume.

**edit hash stabilized everything functions, we have lift off. feeleep does it again : )

digitalindustry

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

‘Try to be nice’

Quote from: feeleep on March 13, 2014, 02:27:48 AM

I understand this but there is one problem - in original CPU miner from Neisklar (https://github.com/Neisklar/quarkcoin-cpuminer) I am pretty sure diff1 is set the same as sha256 and it is used by thousands of users...

However I set up a separate stratum port (once again) for GPU users on Securecoin pool. As I dont have any GPU rig now could anyone test it for a while and post results?

mine1.coinmine.pl:6021

feeleep

I saw some guys started to test it - any results?

results :

i used the original QRK miner compile for win .

so i can confirm i can mine with this and get {share above target} on Quark or say other clones (other pools)

i then created a worker on your pool and i have accepts the dash shows the correct Mh# and i will check the blocks.

digitalindustry

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

‘Try to be nice’

Quote from: digitalindustry on March 13, 2014, 12:50:48 AM

I can do this for you, is securecoin a Quark fork, I've barely even heard of it?

where is the miner ? or do you want me to compile a source, i have access to a windows option and Linux.

i.e where is the GPU miner i should use to test GPU for securcoin ?

yes - this is quark clone and just download miner from this thread

dam feeleep , legend you fixed it, can i ask what you did ?

feeleep

legendary

Activity: 1197

Merit: 1000

I understand this but there is one problem - in original CPU miner from Neisklar (https://github.com/Neisklar/quarkcoin-cpuminer) I am pretty sure diff1 is set the same as sha256 and it is used by thousands of users...

However I set up a separate stratum port (once again) for GPU users on Securecoin pool. As I dont have any GPU rig now could anyone test it for a while and post results?

mine1.coinmine.pl:6021

feeleep

I saw some guys started to test it - any results?

murraypaul

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250