Topic: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs - page 54. (Read 1260223 times)

Good to hear you got it all worked out, Searing.  I plan on doing a bit better with the new rigs I have on the way.  I came out ahead on all of my previous rigs.  Not much... but ahead.  I'm itching to get my S7's in my mining closet.  Have 9 on the way and 14 more in December depending on difficulty.

yep were i'm at ...I made more in equip depreciation applied to taxes then I paid in revenue on btc and ltc mined...it 'coincidentally' was a draw (really no tricks got a cpa and everything)
so no issues at all i'm squeaky clean with IRS according to CPA (had to file had bank issues when btc was evil ....big boo boo by bank a error called sec...so if after all this it is a break
even with what I get for equip depreciation (or better) on what I mined I'll take that as a win ..but yeah home biz get a cpa it all works out (if you wish .....or just wait till 2018
when all this stuff gets straightened out and 'viola' you had a good year should you want to report 'ahem' your virtual coin to IRS or whomever..me I was stuck ...so this is the best outcome I can pull off.

You can't pay people when you don't have money. When you have a knife hanging over your head you prioritize. Most bitcoin mining manufacturers couldn't make it through 2014, so the fact that spondoolies is still among us is impressive in itself. The SP50 looks like a killer product, plus they've already got a large bulk customer that more or less guarantees sales. Just let things cool down on one front and heat up on another (SP50 sales).

Tried to do so for over a year, either I accepted a huge cut of what was owed or it was nothing. They then went through the 'lets discredit him so no one will believe him phase' and kicked me out the affiliate scheme even as their largest affiliate. I'll leave it like that for now and let the current activities play out, its not really fair when Guy can't easily discuss or counter what I'm saying due to now soon being part of a publicly listed company.

It's the exhibition of the symptom - but the cause thereof leads to that layout as it is.  Laziness/not having to deal with intricacies also makes life easier

No, not at all.  I was referring to some of Intel's chips that actually have different BGA pitches on the same package as an example of some of the really oddball BGA designs some companies throw out there as a comparison point for alternating+side of I/O not being the worst, albeit not ideal either.

This checkerboard pattern is not "making life easier at the silicon level". It is a symptom of using completely invalid approximate model of parasitic components and then using those approximated, but not really existing, parasitics as an additional power decoupling filter.

It seems like despite the claims of "full custom" Spondoolies is still using only a very approximate all-digital low-power models. They are essentially invalid because they are used outside of their range of validity (in terms of self-induced noise and dissipated power).

I'm not sure if I understood your 2nd paragraph. It seems like you think I proposed using two different pad pitches: one denser for the chip and one coarser for the board. What I intended to convey is using the same pad pitch on both chips and board.  The power traces are bundled in the way similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litz_wire .

The bundling and spacing is wider to so that simple faults like shorting two neighboring pads doesn't create board-level and circuit-level fault.

I'm not up to speed with the most recent digital EDA tools, but I don't believe that their low-power all-digital tools can properly model the skin-effect and long-transmission-line-effect for those types of pad and board layouts. To get accurate models one has to drop to the all-analog or nearly-all-analog modeling.

I'm sure they can sort this out on Skype, e-mail or PM when the sweet nectar of income is flowing. I'm guessing dogie isn't at the top of their list of creditors either.

Dogie was barking about some outstanding commissions, apparently.

How would I know? It is not for me to judge, I'm just an observer.

In the past, in the case I was sort-of-involved by being the company insider, it took around 7 years from the time certain executive made certain sales projections to that executive being sentenced for breach of the fiduciary duty. Of that 7 years the company was defunct/bankrupt for 5-6 years.

The difference between the sentenced executive and the other one who weren't charged was, as far as I could tell, only that he was the most secretive whereas the other always kept giving interviews and co-authoring published scientific papers.

The way the lawyers explained it to me is that there's wide gray area between investing and gambling. Obviously there's no such actual charge as "criminal optimism", but it is an useful shorthand to how the courts decide in similar cases.

No, I just wouldn't make the assumption in general.  Very few BGAs I've seen have had some thought put into ease of routing it out. Many of those are assumed to go onto 6+ layer boards with blind vias the norm, not the exception, and the internals instead designed to make life easier at the silicon level.

iirc, the RockerBox was similar in layout to the Minion chip I linked to - i.e. alternating gnd/pwr for most of the chip and i/o concentrated at one edge - just with fewer balls.  It's not entirely bad, but I can understand why e.g. sidehack would rather not go near it.  Still, that's a lot more 'intelligent' than some of the intel stuff that is a semi-random mess with two different ball pitches in die shadow / skirt .. at least for those needing to plunk it down on a board.

I sincerely hope so The world has been vastly improved by criminally optimistic Jews like Albert Einstein and Murray Rothbard..

Am I criminally optimistic Jew ?

This is very grim when we can't assume an intelligent designer even in the Spondoolies' thread.

I was sort of OK, when the Chinese mining chip vendors weren't able to hire or contract the actual design talent. China is undergoing a period of extra-fast growth and there are plenty of competing opportunities there.

But I'm getting scared if a Jewish company can't find an intelligent Jew to stay with them even part-time to tell the ins-and-outs of hardware engineering.

What does it mean for Bitcoin if the really intelligent Jews avoid it and the only Jews that deal with Bitcoin are the ones that skew towards being criminally optimistic?

Especially seeing as the picture is just 2 SP3Xs cropped on top of each other...

I would never make such an assumption.  I'd be reasonably comfortable with some BGAs ( e.g. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6240896 ) that don't adhere to a more logical design, but if they can be avoided at all, that has most designers' preference.
Unfortunately you haven't launched your TO-220-5/7 chip yet

---

At least since May; https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11412144
BTCS/SP aren't the only ones doing this either.  The terminology change makes sense in the long run on a technical level, and on a marketing level in the short run.

the price reduced badly ? but still is too damn high with very low electric specs...my bet...scam

That's no more efficient than their last gen gear, assuming it's even real.  Guessing it's not.

Interesting, real?

Hmmm... What is it?..

http://bitcoinminershop.be/product/sp50-yukon-bitcoin-miner/

Bulk sales?  Well of course... they are pretty bulky.
I've already ran extension cords from all my neighbors yards preparing for arrival. (just kidding)
I believe this and other soon to be released miners are going to create a drop in Btc price at Christmas time.
But good job thinking big but a beast like this needs to be posted on Ebay or some Fortune 500 site.