Hey thanks! I'll take a look at it.
There is nothing more awesome waiting in humanities future than
total decentralization.
Enough with all the kings, priests, politicians, bankers, etc.... the multi-headed hydra keeps popping out new heads in new forms, but it's always the same old same old centralized bullshit.
Will be nice to see how decentralization progresses in the future. I am rather interested in the economics of it. One of the advantages to having centralization is efficiency. Also, there are financial incentives to producing centralized systems. Whoever is in charge of that creation gets a lot of money from it. In instances where money isn't (supposed to be) the incentive, like politics, power is plenty of an incentive - power enables the acquisition / control of money flows. So of course, for decentralized solutions, the correct incentives must be put in place.
I can think of a few more things that are rather centralized that might benefit from a more decentralized approach. One of which is food production. The industrialization of food production / agriculture, at least in the states, has further centralized the industry and although it leads to more efficiency in production, it has zero redundancy. In the event that there was a threat to the monoculture, the majority of the food supply would be completely screwed. Now that I think about it, at its core, the "prepper" community seems to be a response to centralization and its central points of failure.
I haven't done much research, but it seems like the big push for decentralization is being led by the techies. There must be numerous, less obvious, areas that could use decentralized innovations. Maybe tech is the best way of implementing these solutions?
I also wonder what communities could benefit the most from it.