Topic: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming) - page 149. (Read 790416 times)

Waiting for testnet before getting things moving around here:

As can be seen from our contributions on pushing Dash up the price charts, we can be pretty prolific when we want to be:

I will work on a historical visualization, like a time lapse animation, where you will see people appear and disapper, growing over time, stagnate (like tantestefana after the hack), etc...
maybe even visualize who quotes who, etc...

And ultimately: wordclouds.

*Giggity*

Ok, here it is, in all its beauty. Top 50 Posters, all fabulously awesome people.

It includes all 3133 pages, today.



..

If I had to guess the coin is in for another pump.  Lots of these guys go around and pump a coin for a couple of days and walk away with a small profit.  It looks like someone is pushing the price down, accumulating spread, and will pump it in a short while. :/

I did a bit of playing around with trex's tools and such and did a bit of analysis. Can anyone help decipher what's going on? 

I've been keeping very close tabs on crypto + torrent projects, details here

The technology is getting closer to being plug and play. This opens up the possibility of enabling ServiceNodes to run legal torrents with operators distributing (relay directly from movie houses) content locally and sharing in pay-per-view revenues paid by users to rights holders.

For example, Netflix is just one big ServiceNode. We could have thousands of nodes distributing content locally. So, why not?

Please vote:  here

Sorry , i was wrong the forum for this question! I mine two coins and my problem is with pepe wallet , no with spread .

But (and what I big butt), by making official currency crypto, they risk much easier accessibility to decentralized exchanges whose current limitation is interacting with fiat controlled by banks. So, once they get this and the risks it poses, they will look to clamp down on those running decentralized exchanges - even if its tens of thousands of nodes spread around the world. 

http://www.coindesk.com/bank-of-england-economist-digital-currency/

Bank of England crypto or 'Fedcoin' will cut out the banks. These are currently the policemen for governments.

because this is a decentralized 100% project, can the value be added on the wallet, and maybe a decentralized exchange built in the client itself, so we can trade directly there?

Georgem is good (wallet, vangen, nodes, website, blockex), i'll keep a small amount of spr because of this. But i'm also trading, i see the price dropping even more than it already has, so why not sell now and buy later?

My reasoning is the price is where its at because of speculation on service nodes being released soon. Its clearly not going to happen anytime soon. So i expect a small temp bounce in price and then a drop in price to around 6000-7000

Don't worry, I think people here are just brainstorming, so always take such unofficial ideas with a grain of salt.

One day we might have a vanitygen-competition, but only if it can run on top of a blockchain-based crowd-funding mechanism, where participants themselves decide the goal of the competition and the prize-collateral they are willing to bet. No middlemen whatsoever. And most importantly: people who don't want to participate, don't need to.
Such schemes must always work in a trustless, permissionless manner, where nobody has any control or liability: with only cryptography as the sole guardian needed.

As a libertarian I understand the principles of decentralization pretty well, so rest assured that everything I research and develop has the goal of increasing decentralization, or finding new ways of decentralization where it hasn't been tried before.
I am not here to please investors or fintech or my own or someone elses financial needs. But in the end, the world is in dire need of more decentralization so all the aforementioned parties will find value in truly decentralized systems.

That's why I'm building the decentralized blockexplorer.
That's also why I am building servicenodes that run with a competitive collateral. (decentralizing away the need for a "king" that decides the amount of collateral for everybody else)
Literally everything I will work on will have the name "decentralized" in front of it, or else I'm simply not going to touch it.

You get the idea: if it can't be done in a decentralized way, we shouldn't be doing it in the first place.

So with this in mind, I understand that not everybody here has the same mindset. Not even all of the core members.
But I am not here to police other people's "ideas".

But I'll do everything I can to not let conflicting agendas dissuade spreadcoin from achieving true decentralization.

---

So... I'm putting a few things together.

I understand that what people are most waiting to see is some sort of update about the work I've been doing. And not just once, but in a regular manner, maybe once a week?
It will take me a few days to put all the experiments I have done (and their results) in a digestible form that can be publicly presented.
I do have a promising format in mind that I can use to present updates, possibly in the form of a youtube podcast.

Please bare with me for a few more days, to get everything in order.

Thanks everybody!

If you want SpreadCoin SN to do so many things, you need to drastically increase the Dev capacity. No point keep adding features to the plan but no beta to show. Maybe you should work with multiple Coins, each realize one big feature.

If you want SpreadCoin SN to do so many things, you need to drastically increase the Dev capacity. No point keep adding features to the plan but no beta to show. Maybe you should work with multiple Coins, each realize one big feature.