Topic: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes - page 150. (Read 810098 times)
February 06, 2015, 08:43:11 AM
Is there any CPU miner for spreadcoin? Standalone version?
February 06, 2015, 08:34:33 AM
Where to post about it in Scam Accusations ?
Let spr fuck off bct !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Let spr fuck off bct !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Here is the latest from the SPR scam alert thread.
Talk about selective reading.
Hopefully this will help clarify things for you.
2/3rds of the coin supply + 100 addys = ponzi shitcoin
Hopefully this will help clarify things for you.
2/3rds of the coin supply + 100 addys = ponzi shitcoin
February 06, 2015, 07:31:06 AM
Where to post about it in Scam Accusations ?
Let spr fuck off bct !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Let spr fuck off bct !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
February 06, 2015, 03:40:38 AM
Spreadnodes = shoyaxt
New coin, new name, same fud.
New coin, new name, same fud.
Thanks for making me waste an hour reading shojayxt's posts
The reasons why you would pick shojayxt evaded me at first
After reading both shojayxt's posts and mrfarm's posts it looks like the two are in collusion with each other or are the same person and are manipulating the price
It also looks like they have done this same thing with other coins using a variety of different screen names
February 06, 2015, 12:57:06 AM
I just want to say thank you all and also offer my apologies to all for my burst of anger yesterday. i was having a bad day (really really bad day, one you'd call the worst day of your life) ... I'd normally only read and never post i guess i should do that more often now.
February 05, 2015, 11:47:42 PM
Still, approach aside, he was more right than wrong.
No. He wasn't.
You and he both continue to deliberately misinterpret a few guys mining to the same wallet daemon as a "pool". I have 3 cpu's, and a couple gpu's pointed at a common wallet as well. By your "new" definition of "pool" I suppose I am a "pool" too? Right? What a crock! I never thought so before, but...
Woohoo! I'm a "pool" now! Ummm, so how do I start collecting them "pool" fees? lol!
The proper definition and clear understanding of a "pool" by the VAST majority of this community is an open public "pool" such as GHash.io, Suprnova.cc, Yaamp, Coinking.io, TradeMyBit, etc. Before Spreadcoin came along and your ridiculous FUD campaigns, there was never any question about that.
It is abundantly clear that there are NO Spreadcoin "pools" like those mentioned above at this time, even with a 3500 SPR bounty to whoever can create one and and operate it successfully for 30 days. Therefore, by standard definition, your error is abundantly clear.
But as long as you people keep willfully and disingenuously trying to misrepresent a few guys sharing the minprivkey of a "communal wallet" as if they are anything remotely like one of the "standard" pools like I mentioned above, your argument simply has no foundation and can't be taken seriously...
February 05, 2015, 09:15:14 PM
Be sure to join the new thread!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-spreadcoin-true-decentralization-no-pools-testing-new-masternodes-945972
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-spreadcoin-true-decentralization-no-pools-testing-new-masternodes-945972
You can have this thread back.
I made my point.
I have better things to do than spend my time with a spreadcoin thread.
People will make their own decisions.
I would wish you luck with your endeavor. But I don't.
I will keep posting this question until one of you paranoid delusional freak's answer.
If i have two farms in the same building and point them both to the same miner... I'm i a pool operator?
LOL then I must be a pool operator too - how do I collect my percentage?
February 05, 2015, 07:30:29 PM
No Buy wall anymore ?
Price is going down, down..
Price is going down, down..
Topic: Spreadcoin Scam alert!!! (Read 388 times)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/spreadcoin-scam-alert-946841
February 05, 2015, 07:22:23 PM
No Buy wall anymore ?
Price is going down, down..
Price is going down, down..
Informative value of posts ITT is going down, down...
February 05, 2015, 05:36:10 PM
No Buy wall anymore ?
Price is going down, down..
Price is going down, down..
February 05, 2015, 05:10:32 PM
Hey,
I can make android wallet for SpreadCoin. Need?
If yes, have any bounties for this?
I already working on it...I can make android wallet for SpreadCoin. Need?
If yes, have any bounties for this?
Elbandi
February 05, 2015, 04:58:58 PM
Hey,
I can make android wallet for SpreadCoin. Need?
If yes, have any bounties for this?
I can make android wallet for SpreadCoin. Need?
If yes, have any bounties for this?
February 05, 2015, 03:43:45 PM
Spreadnodes = shoyaxt
New coin, new name, same fud.
New coin, new name, same fud.
I don't own any spreadcoin, just darkcoin, and I could see this a mile away as well. I'm working towards my phd in psychology (ALMOST THERE!) and am very concerned about their mental health status. There are plenty of trolls and jerks on this forum which doesn't concern me. But there are dozens of red flags when it comes to shoyaxt. I hope they get the help they so desperately need. At least they're no longer trolling darkcoin. If there's one good thing spreadcoin did, it took him from us. lol
Never ceased to be surprised by what crypto people do.
The answer to obesity lies within the works of Sapolsky.
Stress: Aging Brain and the Mechanisms of Neuron Death, 1992
I don't think he completely followed up on the connections he was starting to make in that work. He was too focused on stress and neuron death / atrophy and the like.
Something for phd nr.2
I actually think Darkcoin has reached a point where fud doesn't work. It's more about the technology working and its development status.
Spreadcoin is still too early for that phase as it doesn't have a strong enough support base. Going over to a self moderated thread is a bad idea.
Being in a state of perpetual agreement with each other is not healthy to developing a strong technological solution. Its closer to nepotism than developing a trustless financial system.
Holy shit, I think I'm actually shoyaxt
February 05, 2015, 03:29:34 PM
Spreadnodes = shoyaxt
New coin, new name, same fud.
New coin, new name, same fud.
Actually, I was coming to a similar conclusion.
But there are one or two other people that have a similar style and I couldn't choose between them. Then again, they may all be the same person
Still, approach aside, he was more right than wrong.
February 05, 2015, 03:12:37 PM
Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
The new fake spr topic-starter has just deleted my post above.You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
Quote
( Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes )
No comment.
No comment.
2 relavent pictures without any comment are deleted.
His irrelavent pic is still there.
Why?
It's time for me to open a new topic.
Here is the link : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/spreadcoin-scam-alert-946841
Would you mind giving it a rest? Just because there's a moderated thread now doesn't mean you should attempt to destroy the unmoderated one (though it'll probably be locked anyway).
We're discussing how to feasibly make a pool. Your posting is disingenuous and not relevant to the discussion.
February 05, 2015, 03:02:02 PM
Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
( Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes )
No comment.
The new fake spr topic-starter has just deleted my post above.You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
Quote
( Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes )
No comment.
2 relavent pictures without any comment are deleted.
His irrelavent pic is still there.
Why?
It's time for me to open a new topic.
Here is the link : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/spreadcoin-scam-alert-946841
February 05, 2015, 02:35:11 PM
That make's you a pool operator, using their logic. 
LMFTFY
Quote
That makes you a pool operator according to their deliberately disingenuous definition.
It's FUD. There's no logic involved, only wilful misinterpretation. You can make it up --- and they do ... the Daily Mail does it all the time.
Cheers
Graham
From what I can tell, The Daily Mail exaggerate the truth.
That's what's going on here.
From what I can tell:
Q. Can SPR be pool mined?
A. Yes.
Q. Would it be advisable to pool mine SPR?
A. No. The pool can steal your money.
Q. Would it be advisable to pool mine with a trusted pool operator?
A. Possibly.
So the OP should be qualified. Pool mining is possible [I don't actually know that for certain yet], but it is discouraged because the pool gets to see information you should not show them.
We've had this before. All the multiplools hold on to your money and then they dump coins onto exchanges. Then they payout. You are never in control of your money until you get paid, and then you don't really know how much you are due.
You can try and belittle the view, but there seems to be some element of truth in what is being discussed. You may not like they way people are going about it, but you can't simply call them out as liars.
edit
+1 Well said.
Until somebody comes up with a multisig solution to public pool mining that is.
Coins101, this isn't correct. It's not that the pool can see information it shouldn't (all pools see this information), it's that each miner sees information it "shouldn't". Therefore everyone "should" try to steal the block reward immediately, while still receiving payments for submitting shares for blocks they didn't find (though if everyone did that, there wouldn't be a reward left to distribute).
Stonehedge, I don't see how multisig would have any affect whatsoever on this situation.
However, I think a poster on spreadcointalk may have solved the dilemma: each miner mines to their own address (provided to them by the pool) while having a collateral in the pool's possession equal to block reward.
Thanks, luigi1111
That was my bad.
It happens when you argue with someone on the internet and you know they are wrong.
Woops, I thought the graphic was funny, didn't realize 'til just now that I was falling for the exact same thing.
February 05, 2015, 02:34:42 PM
Spreadnodes = shoyaxt
New coin, new name, same fud.
New coin, new name, same fud.
I don't own any spreadcoin, just darkcoin, and I could see this a mile away as well. I'm working towards my phd in psychology (ALMOST THERE!) and am very concerned about their mental health status. There are plenty of trolls and jerks on this forum which doesn't concern me. But there are dozens of red flags when it comes to shoyaxt. I hope they get the help they so desperately need. At least they're no longer trolling darkcoin. If there's one good thing spreadcoin did, it took him from us. lol
February 05, 2015, 02:30:58 PM
Spreadnodes = shoyaxt
New coin, new name, same fud.
New coin, new name, same fud.
February 05, 2015, 01:52:16 PM
X-posted from the other thread, by me...
Quote
So, for a pool, I think what you would do is just have people send the BTC equivalent of one block's reward to the pool (which isn't much), then if the miner's steal the reward, the pool still retains their deposit so net miner gain is 0. You would have the miners themselves mine to their own pubkeyhashes, and you'd submit partial solutions to these blocks to the pool itself. When the miner gets a block, they would be given n many blocks to get the coinbase from their block to the pool to redistribute to the other miners. If they didn't return the reward to the pool, the pool would then just take their deposit and ban them.
So, I don't think there's a big issue with pooling, just a slightly more complicated implementation. There's a small associated cost with joining a pool, but it's not really much.
So, I don't think there's a big issue with pooling, just a slightly more complicated implementation. There's a small associated cost with joining a pool, but it's not really much.
Quality, as always.
Cheers for that tacotime
Jump to: