'that... would be illogical.'
does the Qt version reproduce the same results as the daemon?
also...have you tried it with cgminer 3.0.1 ?
The pool runs off a daemon.
The local mining test was QT client.
Same result. As seen above I am working with both cgminer 2.11.2 and 3.6.1.
Of course, NONE of these three things should be having this effect, this appears to be network wide
Look at the explorer (Yet a third, system and daemon)
81661 10-17 01:27:19 3 7.22295 0.00390625 805
81660 10-16 21:35:42 1 3.5 0.0273674298 267 -
THIS IS THE LAST POW BLOCK ON THE NETWORKA 5 hour gap between 81660 and 81661
81663 10-17 04:37:30 2 53.73399 0.00390625 492
81662 10-17 01:42:41 2 3.5 0.00390625 457
3 hour gap between 81662 and 81663
Just a reminder the explorer is at:
ked.cryptocoinexplorer.cominteresting...
the block explorer reports current block hieght of 81690 as the latest block as of this writing..
and:
81690 10-17 06:28:38 2 50.63136 0.00390625 492
81689 10-17 06:26:06 2 52.549 0.00390625 493
81688 10-17 06:15:29 2 51.61859 0.00390625 491
81687 10-17 06:06:59 2 54.79624 0.00390625 492
block times dont seem too big...
all i can think of is random luck or someone's pool was on the fritz hopping on and off.
also:
81690 10-17 06:28:38 2 50.63136 0.00390625 492
81689 10-17 06:26:06 2 52.549 0.00390625 493
81688 10-17 06:15:29 2 51.61859 0.00390625 491
81687 10-17 06:06:59 2 54.79624 0.00390625 492
81686 10-17 05:58:53 2 54.00486 0.00390625 492
81685 10-17 05:51:30 2 3.5 0.00390625 458
81684 10-17 05:48:45 2 53.44613 0.00390625 490
81683 10-17 05:45:46 2 3.5 0.00393525 458
81682 10-17 05:43:31 2 3.5 0.00390625 457
81681 10-17 05:43:22 2 51.39943 0.00390625 492
81680 10-17 05:41:04 2 55.29402 0.00390625 493
81679 10-17 05:34:19 2 56.059 0.00390625 491
81678 10-17 05:26:41 2 55.33135 0.0039199502 494
81677 10-17 05:20:42 2 52.549 0.00393066 490
81676 10-17 05:19:23 2 52.539 0.00393066 491
81675 10-17 05:18:23 2 51.44093 0.00390625 490
81674 10-17 05:18:06 2 52.539 0.00390625 492
81673 10-17 05:13:08 2 51.12446 0.00390625 492
81672 10-17 05:06:26 2 53.16146 0.00390625 492
81671 10-17 05:03:57 2 51.19803 0.00390625 491
81670 10-17 05:02:52 3 154.48503 0.00390625 3879
81669 10-17 04:59:33 2 50.96734 0.00390625 491
81668 10-17 04:57:54 2 51.24806 0.00390625 493
81667 10-17 04:54:04 2 51.93961 0.0039380998 492
81666 10-17 04:47:44 2 52.44701 0.00390625 490
81665 10-17 04:47:40 2 51.39916 0.00390625 492
81664 10-17 04:45:42 2 54.39031 0.00390625 493
81663 10-17 04:37:30 2 53.73399 0.00390625 492
81662 10-17 01:42:41 2 3.5 0.00390625 457
81661 10-17 01:27:19 3 7.22295 0.00390625 805
81660 10-16 21:35:42 1 3.5 0.0273674298 267
81659 10-16 23:31:58 1 3.5 0.0548651516 266
81658 10-16 21:34:55 1 3.5 0.0551264212 267
81657 10-16 21:33:22 1 3.5 0.0548082106 267
81656 10-16 21:33:02 1 3.5 0.0552669093 266
81655 10-16 21:31:04 1 3.5 0.0549398996 267
81654 10-16 21:30:45 1 3.5 0.0545434989 266
81653 10-16 21:30:35 1 3.5 0.0541342199 266
81652 10-16 21:30:27 1 3.5 0.0537202097 267
81651 10-16 21:30:20 1 3.5 0.0540380292 266
81650 10-16 21:28:39 1 3.5 0.053843081 265
81649 10-16 21:28:04 1 3.5 0.0556067489 266
81648 10-16 21:25:35 2 3.5 0.00390625 457
81647 10-16 21:23:17 1 3.5 0.0547438413 266
81646 10-16 21:23:05 1 3.5 0.0545937084 266
81645 10-16 21:22:24 1 3.5 0.0544282608 265
81644 10-16 21:21:45 1 3.5 0.0547031201 266
81643 10-16 21:20:10 1 3.5 0.0542926304 266
81642 10-16 21:20:02 1 3.5 0.0540105514 267
81641 10-16 21:19:38 1 3.5 0.0539637692 266
81640 10-16 21:18:44 1 3.5 0.0535899587 268
81639 10-16 21:18:32 1 3.5 0.0533192903 265
81638 10-16 21:18:07 1 3.5 0.0532192215 267
81637 10-16 21:18:00 2 3.5 0.00390625 456
81636 10-16 21:17:20 1 3.5 0.0523933806 265
81635 10-16 21:17:08 1 3.5 0.0521740988 266
81634 10-16 21:16:37 1 3.5 0.0518277511 265
81633 10-16 21:16:23 1 3.5 0.0517230406 267
81632 10-16 21:15:37 1 3.5 0.0513498187 266
81631 10-16 21:15:27 1 3.5 0.0518314391 267
the block sizes (last column) are starting to grow...maybe the network was choking on a few?