Bottomline is: coin was not working properly on the launch day, according to INITIAL agreement refund should follow. I don't believe that it will happen though. They will find a reason not to do this.
Yes, it was.
A large quantity of people had no issues in importing their keypair, moving funds, and buying/selling. Shortly after launch, issues occurred - and this is when we moved in to an arbitration/mediation period from our inspection window.
Had nobody been able to do a damn thing, then Syscoin would have failed completely in their obligations.
Well, there goes your credibility, right out the window.
You have Zero Point Zero credibility units left.
At launch, could you import a private key and then send/receive funds? Yes, you could. This is a fact. There would have been zero coin movement otherwise. We would not have even been able to distribute. Shortly after launch however, a number of issues popped up that led to the coin being in an almost unusable state, which led to our review period.
Sorry Boss, it's over. You're done here. No credibility left. Please move along.
This, Moolah is done.
Do you even know how to read? Alex keeps posting cold hard facts and all you do is repeat yourself like a broken record, and mantis too. You guys are so childish, grow up.
Here's a cold hard fact-
Mintpal had to shut down its wallet because.... it didn't work. They couldn't leave it up without losing money for themselves and their customers.
How's that for a cold hard fact?
Furthermore, they get that 0.1 BTC by burning parents electricity with GPUs in firts place 
