Topic: [ANN] [TRON] Positron Technologies - Upcoming Project Direction Change - page 52. (Read 324002 times)
May 09, 2015, 05:30:36 PM
Definitely this coin has potential for long term.
May 09, 2015, 05:13:58 PM
with masternodes release i say ~500k $ marketcap at this coin
May 09, 2015, 02:15:10 PM
Bought at very high price. hope someday i will recover my loss and even i get profit from the coin
just watching the movement each and everyday & just waiting good time May 09, 2015, 01:03:27 PM
http://i.gyazo.com/be286acb317546c8bc476ae2a985f51c.png
The Positron Technologies Headquarters forum is starting to warm up, come join! 5,000 views in a day or two isn't bad
https://forum.positroncrypto.com
The Positron Technologies Headquarters forum is starting to warm up, come join! 5,000 views in a day or two isn't bad
https://forum.positroncrypto.com
The graph says 0 are unique though..
its impossible 0 are unique it actually says 1 on the graph probably a glitch still good to see a few hundred visitors using the site have a lot of directors in the slack room also
May 09, 2015, 12:51:37 PM
The Positron Technologies Headquarters forum is starting to warm up, come join! 5,000 views in a day or two isn't bad
https://forum.positroncrypto.com
The graph says 0 are unique though..
May 09, 2015, 09:58:50 AM
Email invite sent out to all Directors (holders of 6720 or more TRON) for the Slack join
https://positrontechnologies.slack.com/
Next step will be @positroncrypto.com email address for any Director that would like one.
https://positrontechnologies.slack.com/
Next step will be @positroncrypto.com email address for any Director that would like one.
May 09, 2015, 07:42:23 AM
VPOS
VariablePOS
-tb-
VariablePOS
-tb-
May 09, 2015, 07:37:59 AM
Ah OK, I see. Thanks for the quick reply.
After re-reading the post, I can see AllCryptoAllDay was probably describing how PoS works in general and I thought he was claiming that it was something specific to this particular variant of PoS.
So what was the determinant of staking probability during this time if it wasn't no. of coins? Was it no. of inputs? No. of addresses?
After re-reading the post, I can see AllCryptoAllDay was probably describing how PoS works in general and I thought he was claiming that it was something specific to this particular variant of PoS.
So what was the determinant of staking probability during this time if it wasn't no. of coins? Was it no. of inputs? No. of addresses?
It was still coin count / stake weight, but users realized if they staked large amounts, like 10-20k, they would only "win" a stake block once, then their entire chunk would leave active staking for many hours. By breaking them up to many 50-1000 TRON sized chunks they were able to keep winning stake blocks over and over. It was pretty interesting to watch, and they talked about it for many pages of the ANN. Same POS tech, but different reward scheme and users tried new ways to manipulate it.
I see, thanks for the explanation.
The question was pretty much born out of this thread. I always try to keep up with the latest developments in PoS so I become curious whenever I see a new implementation of the idea.
Ahh... I see, I used "DPOS" but it's already been used. I'll come up with a rename. Thanks
May 09, 2015, 06:22:02 AM
Ah OK, I see. Thanks for the quick reply.
After re-reading the post, I can see AllCryptoAllDay was probably describing how PoS works in general and I thought he was claiming that it was something specific to this particular variant of PoS.
So what was the determinant of staking probability during this time if it wasn't no. of coins? Was it no. of inputs? No. of addresses?
After re-reading the post, I can see AllCryptoAllDay was probably describing how PoS works in general and I thought he was claiming that it was something specific to this particular variant of PoS.
So what was the determinant of staking probability during this time if it wasn't no. of coins? Was it no. of inputs? No. of addresses?
It was still coin count / stake weight, but users realized if they staked large amounts, like 10-20k, they would only "win" a stake block once, then their entire chunk would leave active staking for many hours. By breaking them up to many 50-1000 TRON sized chunks they were able to keep winning stake blocks over and over. It was pretty interesting to watch, and they talked about it for many pages of the ANN. Same POS tech, but different reward scheme and users tried new ways to manipulate it.
I see, thanks for the explanation.
The question was pretty much born out of this thread. I always try to keep up with the latest developments in PoS so I become curious whenever I see a new implementation of the idea.
May 09, 2015, 06:11:07 AM
Ah OK, I see. Thanks for the quick reply.
After re-reading the post, I can see AllCryptoAllDay was probably describing how PoS works in general and I thought he was claiming that it was something specific to this particular variant of PoS.
So what was the determinant of staking probability during this time if it wasn't no. of coins? Was it no. of inputs? No. of addresses?
After re-reading the post, I can see AllCryptoAllDay was probably describing how PoS works in general and I thought he was claiming that it was something specific to this particular variant of PoS.
So what was the determinant of staking probability during this time if it wasn't no. of coins? Was it no. of inputs? No. of addresses?
It was still coin count / stake weight, but users realized if they staked large amounts, like 10-20k, they would only "win" a stake block once, then their entire chunk would leave active staking for many hours. By breaking them up to many 50-1000 TRON sized chunks they were able to keep winning stake blocks over and over. It was pretty interesting to watch, and they talked about it for many pages of the ANN. Same POS tech, but different reward scheme and users tried new ways to manipulate it.
May 09, 2015, 05:57:30 AM
Themultipool.com now supports The Truly Visionary Positron . Keep up that buy pressure !
profit switching 1% fee
profit switching 1% fee
May 09, 2015, 05:35:17 AM
Can you explain your dynamic proof of stake?
The way it stands looks like i could hold 1 coin in my wallet and stake like someone else who holds many...
It like mining, you coins you have like more hash you get.The way it stands looks like i could hold 1 coin in my wallet and stake like someone else who holds many...
If you have 1 coin your chance to mine a block is lower than the guys have like 100, or 1000 coins.
How is this different from traditional proof of stake systems though? In most proof of stake systems, someone who holds 1 coin has 1/100th the chance of generating a block vs. someone who holds 100 coins. In almost all PoS coins (e.g NXT, Peercoin, Qora, etc.), your chances of generating a block scale linearly with the total number of coins you stake at any given moment.
It's the same traditional POS system. It was just the name we came up with for distributing coins in blocks 4100-21000. In those blocks, instead of getting a percent reward, winning a POS block gave 20 to 200 coins, depending on the schedule (see ANN), but now its 9% solid, with a 2% lowering per year until 3% final.
During the high POS distro phase, which was 3 weeks, users came up with novel ways to win more stake blocks, splitting up their inputs into smaller chunks, because instead of getting a % of the size of that block, they got a static reward.
Ah OK, I see. Thanks for the quick reply.
After re-reading the post, I can see AllCryptoAllDay was probably describing how PoS works in general and I thought he was claiming that it was something specific to this particular variant of PoS.
So what was the determinant of staking probability during this time if it wasn't no. of coins? Was it no. of inputs? No. of addresses?
May 09, 2015, 05:32:18 AM
The Positron Technologies Headquarters forum is starting to warm up, come join! 5,000 views in a day or two isn't bad
https://forum.positroncrypto.com
May 09, 2015, 05:18:24 AM
Can you explain your dynamic proof of stake?
The way it stands looks like i could hold 1 coin in my wallet and stake like someone else who holds many...
It like mining, you coins you have like more hash you get.The way it stands looks like i could hold 1 coin in my wallet and stake like someone else who holds many...
If you have 1 coin your chance to mine a block is lower than the guys have like 100, or 1000 coins.
How is this different from traditional proof of stake systems though? In most proof of stake systems, someone who holds 1 coin has 1/100th the chance of generating a block vs. someone who holds 100 coins. In almost all PoS coins (e.g NXT, Peercoin, Qora, etc.), your chances of generating a block scale linearly with the total number of coins you stake at any given moment.
It's the same traditional POS system. It was just the name we came up with for distributing coins in blocks 4100-21000. In those blocks, instead of getting a percent reward, winning a POS block gave 20 to 200 coins, depending on the schedule (see ANN), but now its 9% solid, with a 2% lowering per year until 3% final.
During the high POS distro phase, which was 3 weeks, users came up with novel ways to win more stake blocks, splitting up their inputs into smaller chunks, because instead of getting a % of the size of that block, they got a static reward.
May 09, 2015, 04:54:26 AM
Can you explain your dynamic proof of stake?
The way it stands looks like i could hold 1 coin in my wallet and stake like someone else who holds many...
It like mining, you coins you have like more hash you get.The way it stands looks like i could hold 1 coin in my wallet and stake like someone else who holds many...
If you have 1 coin your chance to mine a block is lower than the guys have like 100, or 1000 coins.
How is this different from traditional proof of stake systems though? In most proof of stake systems, someone who holds 1 coin has 1/100th the chance of generating a block vs. someone who holds 100 coins. In almost all PoS coins (e.g NXT, Peercoin, Qora, etc.), your chances of generating a block scale linearly with the total number of coins you stake at any given moment.
May 09, 2015, 12:55:25 AM
Directors board updated with new information and new directors added. If you already on the google forums Director sign up, use the same email at:
https://forum.positroncrypto.com and send a message to Cryptowest.
There's another live document editing, explaining our coming funding rounds and next projects. When the document is completed, we'll release it on the public forum and here on bitcointalk.
Thanks!
Edit: if youre a director and not added yet, please PM me and ill add you ASAP.
https://forum.positroncrypto.com and send a message to Cryptowest.
There's another live document editing, explaining our coming funding rounds and next projects. When the document is completed, we'll release it on the public forum and here on bitcointalk.
Thanks!
Edit: if youre a director and not added yet, please PM me and ill add you ASAP.
May 09, 2015, 12:50:59 AM
ha love the song! & shoutout - holla mainstream presence
May 08, 2015, 10:52:24 PM
what happened with TRON
price getting down and down
no buy support
price getting down and down
no buy support
Im on big loss al my live savigs gone 65 dollars
Don't worry! Your money is not gone. It only belongs to Prometheus & Cryptowest now
haha piss off Sofu. TRON is the real deal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mo62yr2HA_4
May 08, 2015, 09:26:28 PM
Please send me some tron my money gone i need 900 tron
May 08, 2015, 09:10:48 PM
what happened with TRON
price getting down and down
no buy support
price getting down and down
no buy support
Im on big loss al my live savigs gone 65 dollars
Don't worry! Your money is not gone. It only belongs to Prometheus & Cryptowest now
haha piss off Sofu. TRON is the real deal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mo62yr2HA_4
Jump to: