Topic: [ANN] WOC - WarOfCoins -MAJOR ANN COMING SOON...FORK AT 45000!!! WALLET RELEASED - page 15. (Read 24623 times)
March 22, 2015, 05:47:00 AM
The source looks clean. I took the db down and rebuilt the explorer. It gives us the same conclusion with no definitive answer to the inconsistencies. I've taken it off the main page and will look into it further some other time when i am less occupied.
March 22, 2015, 05:33:50 AM
Where you been at the last 15 post, Im trying to see if its something on this end.
trying to understand many incongruencies
March 22, 2015, 05:27:01 AM
Where you been at the last 15 post, Im trying to see if its something on this end.
March 22, 2015, 05:17:14 AM
Quote
Thanks for the reply Placebo. Can the owner of the block explorer please explain the difference between its "version" of the the state of affairs based on the blcok chain and the wallet's "version" of the state of affairs based on the block chain? A block explorer is supposed to be an independent audit tool whereas a wallet is coded by a dev. Lets hope it is is the block explorer that is broken.
I looked at the source and it looks clean:
Quote
int64_t nSubsidy = 5 * COIN;
if (nHeight == 1)
{
nSubsidy = 250000 * COIN; // ICO
The block explorers daemon gives me:if (nHeight == 1)
{
nSubsidy = 250000 * COIN; // ICO
Quote
"moneysupply" : 253800.00000000,
It may be a syncing issue. I will clear the database and re-sync it.
Blockexplorer down?
http://cryptoplorer.com:3036/
ERROR 404
It seems this have no sense....
http://i.imgur.com/aU1bgx6.png
http://i.imgur.com/zC3Hzii.png
March 22, 2015, 04:58:38 AM
Quote
Thanks for the reply Placebo. Can the owner of the block explorer please explain the difference between its "version" of the the state of affairs based on the blcok chain and the wallet's "version" of the state of affairs based on the block chain? A block explorer is supposed to be an independent audit tool whereas a wallet is coded by a dev. Lets hope it is is the block explorer that is broken.
I looked at the source and it looks clean:
Quote
int64_t nSubsidy = 5 * COIN;
if (nHeight == 1)
{
nSubsidy = 250000 * COIN; // ICO
The block explorers daemon gives me:if (nHeight == 1)
{
nSubsidy = 250000 * COIN; // ICO
Quote
"moneysupply" : 253800.00000000,
It may be a syncing issue. I will clear the database and re-sync it.
Blockexplorer down?
http://cryptoplorer.com:3036/
ERROR 404
March 22, 2015, 04:51:27 AM
Quote
Thanks for the reply Placebo. Can the owner of the block explorer please explain the difference between its "version" of the the state of affairs based on the blcok chain and the wallet's "version" of the state of affairs based on the block chain? A block explorer is supposed to be an independent audit tool whereas a wallet is coded by a dev. Lets hope it is is the block explorer that is broken.
I looked at the source and it looks clean:
Quote
int64_t nSubsidy = 5 * COIN;
if (nHeight == 1)
{
nSubsidy = 250000 * COIN; // ICO
The block explorers daemon gives me:if (nHeight == 1)
{
nSubsidy = 250000 * COIN; // ICO
Quote
"moneysupply" : 253800.00000000,
It may be a syncing issue. I will clear the database and re-sync it.
http://cryptoplorer.com:3036/
ERROR 404
March 22, 2015, 03:50:07 AM
waiting by to point my miners. So considering the coin doesn't make it on exchange for a while, how will that affect your plans Placebo?
ICO money will stay locked and people that join ICO will be able to refunds their coins. But i believe that it will hit a exchange, but indeed in the worst case scenario if there is no exchange then DEV failed to deliver one of the points that are needed in the escrow deals, and people will be able to ask their ICO money back in return of their coins of course..
As told before, ICO based Coins launch are changed....
thanks to placebo including one of the most important rules of mine escrowing ICOs. Escrow directly set-up buywall.
Even price based on mining cost.
Rules nr. 2) Fund managment, direct control by escrow
nr. 3) Buywall price variable. It is important to understand if price is down BEP, no miner will dump his own coins
good job, i like the way escrow is going
thanks
ICO amount : 2.58641393 BTC
Escrow payment : 0.40 BTC
Total Net ICO amount : 2.18641393 BTC
Twitter follow giveaway : 0.35 BTC
ICO amount left : 1,8318641393 BTC
Buy order on C-CEX : 0.65 BTC (should come soon)
If some people are willing to donate some WOC for giveaways etc then please donate at below WOC address. I'm looking at the people that join the ICO at a massive discount, please use some of your coins so spread the love.
Donation WOC address : Wb1jKGTptghuAnjX53pF7qngdYVbiGEKUF
Escrow payment : 0.40 BTC
Total Net ICO amount : 2.18641393 BTC
Twitter follow giveaway : 0.35 BTC
ICO amount left : 1,8318641393 BTC
Buy order on C-CEX : 0.65 BTC (should come soon)
If some people are willing to donate some WOC for giveaways etc then please donate at below WOC address. I'm looking at the people that join the ICO at a massive discount, please use some of your coins so spread the love.
Donation WOC address : Wb1jKGTptghuAnjX53pF7qngdYVbiGEKUF
It is nof mentioned in OP Escrowing rules any Twitter giveway.
it is not fair taking giveway from buywall, best for early investor if you take it from rest and leave 35% of ICO amount to buywall (as in OP). Either Escrow fee
@PLACEBO
GREAT NEWS!!!
DEV have launched a giveaway that will be controlled by me:
https://twitter.com/freedom190000/status/578271429726208001
1. Join WarOfcoins
2. Post your BTC address under https://twitter.com/freedom190000/status/578271429726208001
3. Winner will be selected at the end of the month if there are 100 people joining WarOfcoins
PS: I will check the twitter accounts to make sure that there are no scammers.
DEV have launched a giveaway that will be controlled by me:
https://twitter.com/freedom190000/status/578271429726208001
1. Join WarOfcoins
2. Post your BTC address under https://twitter.com/freedom190000/status/578271429726208001
3. Winner will be selected at the end of the month if there are 100 people joining WarOfcoins
PS: I will check the twitter accounts to make sure that there are no scammers.
Must be better if you clear with dev about these giveaway rules.
Prize of 0.35 btc should be taken from 65% ICO amount
What will you do if ICO has to be refunded? who will be charged to fund prize? Dev? Escrow? who?
thanks
March 22, 2015, 03:23:30 AM
ICO amount : 2.58641393 BTC
Escrow payment : 0.40 BTC
Total Net ICO amount : 2.18641393 BTC
Twitter follow giveaway : 0.35 BTC
ICO amount left : 1,8318641393 BTC
Buy order on C-CEX : 0.65 BTC (should come soon)
If some people are willing to donate some WOC for giveaways etc then please donate at below WOC address. I'm looking at the people that join the ICO at a massive discount, please use some of your coins so spread the love.
Donation WOC address : Wb1jKGTptghuAnjX53pF7qngdYVbiGEKUF
Escrow payment : 0.40 BTC
Total Net ICO amount : 2.18641393 BTC
Twitter follow giveaway : 0.35 BTC
ICO amount left : 1,8318641393 BTC
Buy order on C-CEX : 0.65 BTC (should come soon)
If some people are willing to donate some WOC for giveaways etc then please donate at below WOC address. I'm looking at the people that join the ICO at a massive discount, please use some of your coins so spread the love.
Donation WOC address : Wb1jKGTptghuAnjX53pF7qngdYVbiGEKUF
March 22, 2015, 03:21:20 AM
Quote
Thanks for the reply Placebo. Can the owner of the block explorer please explain the difference between its "version" of the the state of affairs based on the blcok chain and the wallet's "version" of the state of affairs based on the block chain? A block explorer is supposed to be an independent audit tool whereas a wallet is coded by a dev. Lets hope it is is the block explorer that is broken.
I looked at the source and it looks clean:
Quote
int64_t nSubsidy = 5 * COIN;
if (nHeight == 1)
{
nSubsidy = 250000 * COIN; // ICO
The block explorers daemon gives me:if (nHeight == 1)
{
nSubsidy = 250000 * COIN; // ICO
Quote
"moneysupply" : 253800.00000000,
It may be a syncing issue. I will clear the database and re-sync it.
March 22, 2015, 02:49:41 AM
Net Hashrate: 288.69 TH/s
and WOC is even not on Bittrex yet. very interesting.
and WOC is even not on Bittrex yet. very interesting.
March 22, 2015, 02:31:42 AM
I'm pretty sure that this block explorer is a little wrong 
Run getinfo in your wallet:
"moneysupply" : 253645.00000000,
Yesterday i already start paying out ICO investors. They ask me to pay in small blocks and not directly in one payment, so maybe that is why above screenshot looks strange. I'm currently not behind my ICO laptop, just want to react on the message. All ICO coins will be paid later today, as i'm currently at a biking race, so no worries. I'll be home in 10 hours.
Run getinfo in your wallet:
"moneysupply" : 253645.00000000,
Yesterday i already start paying out ICO investors. They ask me to pay in small blocks and not directly in one payment, so maybe that is why above screenshot looks strange. I'm currently not behind my ICO laptop, just want to react on the message. All ICO coins will be paid later today, as i'm currently at a biking race, so no worries. I'll be home in 10 hours.
Thanks for the reply Placebo. Can the owner of the block explorer please explain the difference between its "version" of the the state of affairs based on the blcok chain and the wallet's "version" of the state of affairs based on the block chain? A block explorer is supposed to be an independent audit tool whereas a wallet is coded by a dev. Lets hope it is is the block explorer that is broken.
March 22, 2015, 02:28:11 AM
Dev, can you just quickly explain a small technicality before proceedings go on. I am sure there is a good reason for it or maybe just a technical error or just me that don't understand the ICO and launch properly. In the top wallets on the block explorer the total coin supply seems to be double the 250k of the ICO approximately 477k. I was under the impression the ICO was just 250k as per the OP and that total coin supply by now must be 250k plus the few mined since launch. I went through the thread to determine if there was another allocation for some reason e.g. additional coins for a 2nd phase ICO etc. but I couldnt see any. Who controls the other addresses? Apologies if it is just me that is misinterpreting this particular block explorer. If it is adequately explained I will delete this post so that it is not fud and unfounded.
I'm pretty sure that this block explorer is a little wrong
Run getinfo in your wallet:
"moneysupply" : 253645.00000000,
Yesterday i already start paying out ICO investors. They ask me to pay in small blocks and not directly in one payment, so maybe that is why above screenshot looks strange. I'm currently not behind my ICO laptop, just want to react on the message. All ICO coins will be paid later today, as i'm currently at a biking race, so no worries. I'll be home in 10 hours.
Thank you
Block explorer are having sometimes those issues. When you move coins to another wallet that it still say that the coins are still in the original wallet and the other wallet looks ok, so double the amount. Always run 'Getinfo' in wallet to be 100% sure
March 22, 2015, 02:26:16 AM
Dev, can you just quickly explain a small technicality before proceedings go on. I am sure there is a good reason for it or maybe just a technical error or just me that don't understand the ICO and launch properly. In the top wallets on the block explorer the total coin supply seems to be double the 250k of the ICO approximately 477k. I was under the impression the ICO was just 250k as per the OP and that total coin supply by now must be 250k plus the few mined since launch. I went through the thread to determine if there was another allocation for some reason e.g. additional coins for a 2nd phase ICO etc. but I couldnt see any. Who controls the other addresses? Apologies if it is just me that is misinterpreting this particular block explorer. If it is adequately explained I will delete this post so that it is not fud and unfounded.
I'm pretty sure that this block explorer is a little wrong
Run getinfo in your wallet:
"moneysupply" : 253645.00000000,
Yesterday i already start paying out ICO investors. They ask me to pay in small blocks and not directly in one payment, so maybe that is why above screenshot looks strange. I'm currently not behind my ICO laptop, just want to react on the message. All ICO coins will be paid later today, as i'm currently at a biking race, so no worries. I'll be home in 10 hours.
Thank you
March 22, 2015, 02:23:44 AM
Dev, can you just quickly explain a small technicality before proceedings go on. I am sure there is a good reason for it or maybe just a technical error or just me that don't understand the ICO and launch properly. In the top wallets on the block explorer the total coin supply seems to be double the 250k of the ICO approximately 477k. I was under the impression the ICO was just 250k as per the OP and that total coin supply by now must be 250k plus the few mined since launch. I went through the thread to determine if there was another allocation for some reason e.g. additional coins for a 2nd phase ICO etc. but I couldnt see any. Who controls the other addresses? Apologies if it is just me that is misinterpreting this particular block explorer. If it is adequately explained I will delete this post so that it is not fud and unfounded.
I'm pretty sure that this block explorer is a little wrong
Run getinfo in your wallet:
"moneysupply" : 253645.00000000,
Yesterday i already start paying out ICO investors. They ask me to pay in small blocks and not directly in one payment, so maybe that is why above screenshot looks strange. I'm currently not behind my ICO laptop, just want to react on the message. All ICO coins will be paid later today, as i'm currently at a biking race, so no worries. I'll be home in 10 hours.
March 22, 2015, 12:32:06 AM
Wallet is not sync. Can you write some nodes?
45.55.165.71
It works. Thanks.
Any other nodes? I can't connect:
trying connection 45.55.165.71:24455 lastseen=110.6hrs
connection timeout
March 21, 2015, 11:04:53 PM
Yeah that top 100 richlist needs some explaining OP.
March 21, 2015, 10:43:00 PM
Wallet is not sync. Can you write some nodes?
45.55.165.71
It works. Thanks.
March 21, 2015, 08:44:11 PM
Dev, can you just quickly explain a small technicality before proceedings go on. I am sure there is a good reason for it or maybe just a technical error or just me that don't understand the ICO and launch properly. In the top wallets on the block explorer the total coin supply seems to be double the 250k of the ICO approximately 477k. I was under the impression the ICO was just 250k as per the OP and that total coin supply by now must be 250k plus the few mined since launch. I went through the thread to determine if there was another allocation for some reason e.g. additional coins for a 2nd phase ICO etc. but I couldnt see any. Who controls the other addresses? Apologies if it is just me that is misinterpreting this particular block explorer. If it is adequately explained I will delete this post so that it is not fud and unfounded.
March 21, 2015, 08:26:59 PM
Bye Bye 100T hashrate. Welcome 200T hashrate.... When it hit Bittrex then it will be Welcome 500T hashrate. 
Having a block reward of 5 and a 250k coin ICO that priced out at 0.00001120 btc per coin makes it pretty unappealing for miners unfortunately...
March 21, 2015, 08:20:38 PM
Do we already have a block explorer?
Now that there is a exchange, we need a block explorer to get it on coinmarkercap.
Now that there is a exchange, we need a block explorer to get it on coinmarkercap.
I just added WOC to http://cryptoplorer.com
Donations Accepted
WOC Address: WS653G1us6mgB9soumRYendN1cUJnsPWS9
Please Add to the OP
Jump to: