Topic: [ANN] Wyvern: what happened and why, a message from the original dev - page 28. (Read 47168 times)
March 30, 2017, 01:41:21 PM
coinexchange.io has a really low trade volume. I don't think it is used very much. We need to look into other exchanges.
March 30, 2017, 01:38:23 PM
Where is wallet, I can't download it from github??
You can, go to https://github.com/nukeling/Wyvern find the file called wyvern-qt.exe. download and install that. Don't forget to run it twice as it will throw an exception the first time.
March 30, 2017, 01:36:08 PM
Where is wallet, I can't download it from github??
March 30, 2017, 12:06:30 PM
We are now accepting Wyvern at a value of .05USD (subject to change upon market) Currently we are supporting games via steam. Please ensure games are playable in your country before ordering.
Visit https://www.projectwyvern.com/virtual-exchange/ for form.
Visit https://www.projectwyvern.com/virtual-exchange/ for form.
March 30, 2017, 11:52:51 AM
Hi to all, nice and fair project, but we need more exchanges for bigger success, cryptopia, bittrex, yobit...?
What about POS, is it working right now, or not?
How much gives an rx 470 and r7 370, does somebody know?
What about POS, is it working right now, or not?
How much gives an rx 470 and r7 370, does somebody know?
Yes POS is working now I see a good size network weight as of this morning. Just a reminder make sure your wallet is running and unlocked to stake coins. As for other exchanges that is simply up to community demand. If you want Wyvern there, request it. 6 years in the military taught me to always ask, the worst they can do is say no.
March 30, 2017, 11:21:35 AM
I have about the same hashrate:
gtx1070 - 37MH/s.
gtx970 - 23Mh/s.
24 hours: gtx1070+gtx970 ~ 150WYV = 0.0015BTC (at current price).
Not very profitable.
gtx1070 - 37MH/s.
gtx970 - 23Mh/s.
24 hours: gtx1070+gtx970 ~ 150WYV = 0.0015BTC (at current price).
Not very profitable.
March 30, 2017, 11:14:41 AM
Hi to all, nice and fair project, but we need more exchanges for bigger success, cryptopia, bittrex, yobit...?
What about POS, is it working right now, or not?
How much gives an rx 470 and r7 370, does somebody know?
What about POS, is it working right now, or not?
How much gives an rx 470 and r7 370, does somebody know?
March 30, 2017, 10:59:02 AM
GTX 980TI 44MH/s
GTX 970 29MH/s
GTX 750TI 12MH/s
GTX 970 29MH/s
GTX 750TI 12MH/s
March 30, 2017, 06:45:12 AM
36MH/s on 1070s Nvidia
55MH/s on 1080s.
55MH/s on 1080s.
I wonder what a 1080 Ti will do.
March 30, 2017, 06:43:05 AM
36MH/s on 1070s Nvidia
55MH/s on 1080s.
55MH/s on 1080s.
March 30, 2017, 05:49:54 AM
Please give link to compilated sgminer with nist5 for amd... Tnx
You will want to use sgminer for nist5. http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/talkcoin-sgminer/
That site is down dude.
Works for me.
mine is at the same, i think its normal, the power usage is quite low too, i love this algo
March 30, 2017, 04:24:45 AM
Like an hour of mining, 5 coins. maybe I'll stop for now until there's a better miner.
March 30, 2017, 03:28:25 AM
I would like to mine this!Any plan to launch to exchange?
Here you can trade!https://www.coinexchange.io/market/WYV/BTC
March 30, 2017, 03:19:55 AM
I would like to mine this!Any plan to launch to exchange?
March 30, 2017, 03:15:51 AM
13Mh/s on a R9 290, is it normal?
Try out the optimized miner here?
http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/nist5-algorithm/
That is normal, though.
Already using this one. can you report your hashrates guys?
Not AMD but Nvidia GTX 980 1350 core / 4005 memory using ccminer I am getting 31 MH/s.
That's really good, like two of my R9 290s. something is wrong I suppose?
Maybe, but don't be disappointed if there's nothing wrong and it is normal.
Although, I thought AMD outperformed NVIDIA highly in GPU mining. Maybe this 980's Maxwell architecture and the nist5 miner really get along, or something.
I hope someone comes along and explains why on a technical level.
AMD usually wins the mining battle, especially versus Maxwell. I will try to play with the settings, but I think the miner is unoptimized.
Did you try different commands?
Such as:
Quote
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
or adding -i 17 after username and pass in command line?
Yeah, nothing changed.
March 30, 2017, 03:09:17 AM
13Mh/s on a R9 290, is it normal?
Try out the optimized miner here?
http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/nist5-algorithm/
That is normal, though.
Already using this one. can you report your hashrates guys?
Not AMD but Nvidia GTX 980 1350 core / 4005 memory using ccminer I am getting 31 MH/s.
That's really good, like two of my R9 290s. something is wrong I suppose?
Maybe, but don't be disappointed if there's nothing wrong and it is normal.
Although, I thought AMD outperformed NVIDIA highly in GPU mining. Maybe this 980's Maxwell architecture and the nist5 miner really get along, or something.
I hope someone comes along and explains why on a technical level.
AMD usually wins the mining battle, especially versus Maxwell. I will try to play with the settings, but I think the miner is unoptimized.
Did you try different commands?
Such as:
Quote
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
or adding -i 17 after username and pass in command line?
March 30, 2017, 02:55:19 AM
13Mh/s on a R9 290, is it normal?
Try out the optimized miner here?
http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/nist5-algorithm/
That is normal, though.
Already using this one. can you report your hashrates guys?
Not AMD but Nvidia GTX 980 1350 core / 4005 memory using ccminer I am getting 31 MH/s.
That's really good, like two of my R9 290s. something is wrong I suppose?
Maybe, but don't be disappointed if there's nothing wrong and it is normal.
Although, I thought AMD outperformed NVIDIA highly in GPU mining. Maybe this 980's Maxwell architecture and the nist5 miner really get along, or something.
I hope someone comes along and explains why on a technical level.
AMD usually wins the mining battle, especially versus Maxwell. I will try to play with the settings, but I think the miner is unoptimized.
March 30, 2017, 02:52:37 AM
13Mh/s on a R9 290, is it normal?
Try out the optimized miner here?
http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/nist5-algorithm/
That is normal, though.
Already using this one. can you report your hashrates guys?
Not AMD but Nvidia GTX 980 1350 core / 4005 memory using ccminer I am getting 31 MH/s.
That's really good, like two of my R9 290s. something is wrong I suppose?
Maybe, but don't be disappointed if there's nothing wrong and it is normal.
Although, I thought AMD outperformed NVIDIA highly in GPU mining. Maybe this 980's Maxwell architecture and the nist5 miner really get along, or something.
I hope someone comes along and explains why on a technical level.
March 30, 2017, 02:44:24 AM
13Mh/s on a R9 290, is it normal?
Try out the optimized miner here?
http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/nist5-algorithm/
That is normal, though.
Already using this one. can you report your hashrates guys?
Not AMD but Nvidia GTX 980 1350 core / 4005 memory using ccminer I am getting 31 MH/s.
That's really good, like two of my R9 290s. something is wrong I suppose?
March 30, 2017, 02:43:25 AM
13Mh/s on a R9 290, is it normal?
Try out the optimized miner here?
http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/nist5-algorithm/
That is normal, though.
Already using this one. can you report your hashrates guys?
Not AMD but Nvidia GTX 980 1350 core / 4005 memory using ccminer I am getting 31 MH/s.
Jump to: