Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] XCloudcoin File hosting [Moved To New Thread] - page 5. (Read 36279 times)

newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0


You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

Yeah, just a another one the last day or so. ScamTrix is poison right now. No way I would list my project there.

And dev I did look at your beta, but I don't see what is here for 500 BTC that I can not already do for free elsewhere. No FUD, just truth. Perhaps you can explain what I am missing for $300,000 USD?

all the funds raised will be spent on expanding the business and developing new technology in relation to cloud technology and crypto technology. the funds will be used for development costs and the expansion of server farms so we can get more space available for our users and create additional features constantly for the service. the reason for the ico in the first place is so we can overcome the barrier to entry to this sort of services industry expansion and rapid growth is the main focus of it. currently we are also looking into cloud mining platforms this is just one of the examples of the services we want to bring which will both help cloud technology development and cryptocurrency development.

Okay, but again. Why don't I just use Mega for free and mine something else and completely eradicate any risk on my part at all? I understand that that way you won't get your $300,000 USD, so you might not like it, but I like keeping my BTCs safe in their offline storage until something with way more completed development comes along.

If you have a stunning ground breaking application, then I would say that you need to look into investment houses willing to take this huge risk on for a slice of your pie. Right now even with your beta you don't have anything even close to worth $300,000 USD and no matter what you say or do, ScamTrix will not stop you from running with the money. Your identity means nothing to me, especially if you are sitting in some country with no extradition treaty with the $300,000 USD.  Huh

Then you add on top of this ScamTrix's filthy reputation and I just have to shake my head and hope no one is silly enough for this.

But hey, good luck. There is a sucker born every minute.



thanks for the advice we understand your concerns and we will prove you wrong. we have more functionality than megaupload already. they don't provide streaming support, calender information, even the compression and passwording of files along with all the other features that are readily available. i think you should take another look at the software and analyze the extent of its usability, but again thanks for the information.

And I can at least respect that answer and that you are on your thread active and answering hard questions. Again, no FUD here. For that kind of money there are going to be much harder questions than these, and at least you are trying. But as you see from my post above you have an overwhelming obstacle to overcome if you continue forward.

I won't hit your thread up anymore and you have answered the only question I needed to know as an investor above. I won't put anything into any ICO from ScamTrix again, even if they clean up their game.

You should reconsider your listing if you want any chance of making any investments. Seriously.

But again I am done with my questions and wish you luck.
 

thanks for the questions and your advice Smiley
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10


You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

Yeah, just a another one the last day or so. ScamTrix is poison right now. No way I would list my project there.

And dev I did look at your beta, but I don't see what is here for 500 BTC that I can not already do for free elsewhere. No FUD, just truth. Perhaps you can explain what I am missing for $300,000 USD?

all the funds raised will be spent on expanding the business and developing new technology in relation to cloud technology and crypto technology. the funds will be used for development costs and the expansion of server farms so we can get more space available for our users and create additional features constantly for the service. the reason for the ico in the first place is so we can overcome the barrier to entry to this sort of services industry expansion and rapid growth is the main focus of it. currently we are also looking into cloud mining platforms this is just one of the examples of the services we want to bring which will both help cloud technology development and cryptocurrency development.

Okay, but again. Why don't I just use Mega for free and mine something else and completely eradicate any risk on my part at all? I understand that that way you won't get your $300,000 USD, so you might not like it, but I like keeping my BTCs safe in their offline storage until something with way more completed development comes along.

If you have a stunning ground breaking application, then I would say that you need to look into investment houses willing to take this huge risk on for a slice of your pie. Right now even with your beta you don't have anything even close to worth $300,000 USD and no matter what you say or do, ScamTrix will not stop you from running with the money. Your identity means nothing to me, especially if you are sitting in some country with no extradition treaty with the $300,000 USD.  Huh

Then you add on top of this ScamTrix's filthy reputation and I just have to shake my head and hope no one is silly enough for this.

But hey, good luck. There is a sucker born every minute.



thanks for the advice we understand your concerns and we will prove you wrong. we have more functionality than megaupload already. they don't provide streaming support, calender information, even the compression and passwording of files along with all the other features that are readily available. i think you should take another look at the software and analyze the extent of its usability, but again thanks for the information.

And I can at least respect that answer and that you are on your thread active and answering hard questions. Again, no FUD here. For that kind of money there are going to be much harder questions than these, and at least you are trying. But as you see from my post above you have an overwhelming obstacle to overcome if you continue forward.

I won't hit your thread up anymore and you have answered the only question I needed to know as an investor above. I won't put anything into any ICO from ScamTrix again, even if they clean up their game.

You should reconsider your listing if you want any chance of making any investments. Seriously.

But again I am done with my questions and wish you luck.
 
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0


You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

Yeah, just a another one the last day or so. ScamTrix is poison right now. No way I would list my project there.

And dev I did look at your beta, but I don't see what is here for 500 BTC that I can not already do for free elsewhere. No FUD, just truth. Perhaps you can explain what I am missing for $300,000 USD?

all the funds raised will be spent on expanding the business and developing new technology in relation to cloud technology and crypto technology. the funds will be used for development costs and the expansion of server farms so we can get more space available for our users and create additional features constantly for the service. the reason for the ico in the first place is so we can overcome the barrier to entry to this sort of services industry expansion and rapid growth is the main focus of it. currently we are also looking into cloud mining platforms this is just one of the examples of the services we want to bring which will both help cloud technology development and cryptocurrency development.

Okay, but again. Why don't I just use Mega for free and mine something else and completely eradicate any risk on my part at all? I understand that that way you won't get your $300,000 USD, so you might not like it, but I like keeping my BTCs safe in their offline storage until something with way more completed development comes along.

If you have a stunning ground breaking application, then I would say that you need to look into investment houses willing to take this huge risk on for a slice of your pie. Right now even with your beta you don't have anything even close to worth $300,000 USD and no matter what you say or do, ScamTrix will not stop you from running with the money. Your identity means nothing to me, especially if you are sitting in some country with no extradition treaty with the $300,000 USD.  Huh

Then you add on top of this ScamTrix's filthy reputation and I just have to shake my head and hope no one is silly enough for this.

But hey, good luck. There is a sucker born every minute.



thanks for the advice we understand your concerns and we will prove you wrong. we have more functionality than megaupload already. they don't provide streaming support, calender information, even the compression and passwording of files along with all the other features that are readily available. i think you should take another look at the software and analyze the extent of its usability, but again thanks for the information.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10


You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

Yeah, just a another one the last day or so. ScamTrix is poison right now. No way I would list my project there.

And dev I did look at your beta, but I don't see what is here for 500 BTC that I can not already do for free elsewhere. No FUD, just truth. Perhaps you can explain what I am missing for $300,000 USD?

all the funds raised will be spent on expanding the business and developing new technology in relation to cloud technology and crypto technology. the funds will be used for development costs and the expansion of server farms so we can get more space available for our users and create additional features constantly for the service. the reason for the ico in the first place is so we can overcome the barrier to entry to this sort of services industry expansion and rapid growth is the main focus of it. currently we are also looking into cloud mining platforms this is just one of the examples of the services we want to bring which will both help cloud technology development and cryptocurrency development.

#300,000 USD and we are just supposed to hope you stick around? Do you have a public profile or do you wish to stay anonymous?

Bittrex has personal information regarding us with the escrow agreement Smiley

Just like I am sure they had with all the scam coins they release Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

I think this there new terms and conditions for ICO's because at the start there were problems with some ICO's as you probably know

Okay, then why would you not be sure there are new terms? You would have had to undergone the closer scrutiny yourself, no? Or is your listing not going to be under the new rules as if there are any?

I think you just let us know exactly what we needed to know. Thanks.

Just one more question if you feel like being honest about it?

This isn't going to happen, so you can forget about it, but how much does ScamTrix take of the $300,000.00 USD if it were entirely sold? Please be honest and answer that one for the community.

You really have nothing to lose. You aren't going to get more than a handful of BTCs on this and that will likely get refunded.

full member
Activity: 191
Merit: 100
another storj..... what can i say? Huh
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10


You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

Yeah, just a another one the last day or so. ScamTrix is poison right now. No way I would list my project there.

And dev I did look at your beta, but I don't see what is here for 500 BTC that I can not already do for free elsewhere. No FUD, just truth. Perhaps you can explain what I am missing for $300,000 USD?

all the funds raised will be spent on expanding the business and developing new technology in relation to cloud technology and crypto technology. the funds will be used for development costs and the expansion of server farms so we can get more space available for our users and create additional features constantly for the service. the reason for the ico in the first place is so we can overcome the barrier to entry to this sort of services industry expansion and rapid growth is the main focus of it. currently we are also looking into cloud mining platforms this is just one of the examples of the services we want to bring which will both help cloud technology development and cryptocurrency development.

Okay, but again. Why don't I just use Mega for free and mine something else and completely eradicate any risk on my part at all? I understand that that way you won't get your $300,000 USD, so you might not like it, but I like keeping my BTCs safe in their offline storage until something with way more completed development comes along.

If you have a stunning ground breaking application, then I would say that you need to look into investment houses willing to take this huge risk on for a slice of your pie. Right now even with your beta you don't have anything even close to worth $300,000 USD and no matter what you say or do, ScamTrix will not stop you from running with the money. Your identity means nothing to me, especially if you are sitting in some country with no extradition treaty with the $300,000 USD.  Huh

Then you add on top of this ScamTrix's filthy reputation and I just have to shake my head and hope no one is silly enough for this.

But hey, good luck. There is a sucker born every minute.

hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 501
1000% ROI Masternode Coin
Please don't set the pre-sale price. You should leave it decided by market!

Are you trying to cheat the developer out of 300,000 USD???
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
Please don't set the pre-sale price. It's very risky! You should leave it decided by market!
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
This looks pretty cool... and they are offering more than most nowadays.

Check the first post and test the software.

thanks for your support, everyone please pm us if you want an invite and we will distribute it to you as quick as possible thanks.

or if you want to email us and ask for an invite please email: [email protected]
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
This looks pretty cool... and they are offering more than most nowadays.

Check the first post and test the software.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0


You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

Yeah, just a another one the last day or so. ScamTrix is poison right now. No way I would list my project there.

And dev I did look at your beta, but I don't see what is here for 500 BTC that I can not already do for free elsewhere. No FUD, just truth. Perhaps you can explain what I am missing for $300,000 USD?

all the funds raised will be spent on expanding the business and developing new technology in relation to cloud technology and crypto technology. the funds will be used for development costs and the expansion of server farms so we can get more space available for our users and create additional features constantly for the service. the reason for the ico in the first place is so we can overcome the barrier to entry to this sort of services industry expansion and rapid growth is the main focus of it. currently we are also looking into cloud mining platforms this is just one of the examples of the services we want to bring which will both help cloud technology development and cryptocurrency development.

#300,000 USD and we are just supposed to hope you stick around? Do you have a public profile or do you wish to stay anonymous?

Bittrex has personal information regarding us with the escrow agreement Smiley

Just like I am sure they had with all the scam coins they release Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

I think this there new terms and conditions for ICO's because at the start there were problems with some ICO's as you probably know
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Does someone have a tl;dr comparison between this and Storj and MaidSafe?
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 501
1000% ROI Masternode Coin


You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

Yeah, just a another one the last day or so. ScamTrix is poison right now. No way I would list my project there.

And dev I did look at your beta, but I don't see what is here for 500 BTC that I can not already do for free elsewhere. No FUD, just truth. Perhaps you can explain what I am missing for $300,000 USD?

all the funds raised will be spent on expanding the business and developing new technology in relation to cloud technology and crypto technology. the funds will be used for development costs and the expansion of server farms so we can get more space available for our users and create additional features constantly for the service. the reason for the ico in the first place is so we can overcome the barrier to entry to this sort of services industry expansion and rapid growth is the main focus of it. currently we are also looking into cloud mining platforms this is just one of the examples of the services we want to bring which will both help cloud technology development and cryptocurrency development.

#300,000 USD and we are just supposed to hope you stick around? Do you have a public profile or do you wish to stay anonymous?

Bittrex has personal information regarding us with the escrow agreement Smiley

Just like I am sure they had with all the scam coins they release Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0


You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

Yeah, just a another one the last day or so. ScamTrix is poison right now. No way I would list my project there.

And dev I did look at your beta, but I don't see what is here for 500 BTC that I can not already do for free elsewhere. No FUD, just truth. Perhaps you can explain what I am missing for $300,000 USD?

all the funds raised will be spent on expanding the business and developing new technology in relation to cloud technology and crypto technology. the funds will be used for development costs and the expansion of server farms so we can get more space available for our users and create additional features constantly for the service. the reason for the ico in the first place is so we can overcome the barrier to entry to this sort of services industry expansion and rapid growth is the main focus of it. currently we are also looking into cloud mining platforms this is just one of the examples of the services we want to bring which will both help cloud technology development and cryptocurrency development.

#300,000 USD and we are just supposed to hope you stick around? Do you have a public profile or do you wish to stay anonymous?

Bittrex has personal information regarding us with the escrow agreement Smiley
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0

unfortunately we have didn't receive a reply from poloniex otherwise we would have done a joint ICO, we chose bittrex because it is the most popular exchange at the moment. we have put alot of work into the software and everyone can get a beta invite to try it out and test before gaining any coins so the community will understand that the software is real, working and fullly functional.

I think it less an issue if the software is real, or even if it's a good coin. Perhaps you haven't kept track of Bittrex ICOs, but they have sort of gone like this:

XLC (dev never used ICO funds for coin, coin tanked)
DCM (dev team ran off with over 100 BTC, coin delisted)
Harmony (coin price tanked)
Iceberg (price tanked, no idea about devs, didn't keep track of that one)
Architect Coin (DOA, never was able to complete ICO, refund given)
Venture Coin (also appears DOA, current ICO)

Don't mistake volume for popularity, as a lot of people sort of despise Bittrex at the moment. It's just bad timing to try to run an ICO there right now, at least under their regular rules.

it's unfortunate that this happened to these coins but obviously some people will abuse systems like anything in life. this is the reason why we are providing software to the community which was funded by ourselves so everyone can try it and understand how many features we have already implemented. not all ICOS on bittrex forever can be bad, if they are always bad there is no opportunity for growth. also we are not trying to sound arrogant but the features that we have implemented are far beyond these coins at the current state anyway and we have proof of it which you can try right now. the aim is just to develop good technology and boost everyone involved.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 501
1000% ROI Masternode Coin


You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

Yeah, just a another one the last day or so. ScamTrix is poison right now. No way I would list my project there.

And dev I did look at your beta, but I don't see what is here for 500 BTC that I can not already do for free elsewhere. No FUD, just truth. Perhaps you can explain what I am missing for $300,000 USD?

all the funds raised will be spent on expanding the business and developing new technology in relation to cloud technology and crypto technology. the funds will be used for development costs and the expansion of server farms so we can get more space available for our users and create additional features constantly for the service. the reason for the ico in the first place is so we can overcome the barrier to entry to this sort of services industry expansion and rapid growth is the main focus of it. currently we are also looking into cloud mining platforms this is just one of the examples of the services we want to bring which will both help cloud technology development and cryptocurrency development.

#300,000 USD and we are just supposed to hope you stick around? Do you have a public profile or do you wish to stay anonymous?
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0


You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

Yeah, just a another one the last day or so. ScamTrix is poison right now. No way I would list my project there.

And dev I did look at your beta, but I don't see what is here for 500 BTC that I can not already do for free elsewhere. No FUD, just truth. Perhaps you can explain what I am missing for $300,000 USD?

all the funds raised will be spent on expanding the business and developing new technology in relation to cloud technology and crypto technology. the funds will be used for development costs and the expansion of server farms so we can get more space available for our users and create additional features constantly for the service. the reason for the ico in the first place is so we can overcome the barrier to entry to this sort of services industry expansion and rapid growth is the main focus of it. currently we are also looking into cloud mining platforms this is just one of the examples of the services we want to bring which will both help cloud technology development and cryptocurrency development.
hero member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 509

unfortunately we have didn't receive a reply from poloniex otherwise we would have done a joint ICO, we chose bittrex because it is the most popular exchange at the moment. we have put alot of work into the software and everyone can get a beta invite to try it out and test before gaining any coins so the community will understand that the software is real, working and fullly functional.

I think it less an issue if the software is real, or even if it's a good coin. Perhaps you haven't kept track of Bittrex ICOs, but they have sort of gone like this:

XLC (dev never used ICO funds for coin, coin tanked)
DCM (dev team ran off with over 100 BTC, coin delisted)
Harmony (coin price tanked)
Iceberg (price tanked, no idea about devs, didn't keep track of that one)
Architect Coin (DOA, never was able to complete ICO, refund given)
Venture Coin (also appears DOA, current ICO)

Don't mistake volume for popularity, as a lot of people sort of despise Bittrex at the moment. It's just bad timing to try to run an ICO there right now, at least under their regular rules.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10


You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

Yeah, just a another one the last day or so. ScamTrix is poison right now. No way I would list my project there.

And dev I did look at your beta, but I don't see what is here for 500 BTC that I can not already do for free elsewhere. No FUD, just truth. Perhaps you can explain what I am missing for $300,000 USD?
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0


You might be the most silly dev in the world. If your coin is worth a shit then you should really be looking to pull it from ScamTrix and submit it to Polo for their verification and approval, then list it there. ScamTrix right now has a reputation somewhere between a pile of dog shit and a pedophile.

Do you not read the scam threads? No one in their right minds if going to give you 0.00000001 sats for your coin if ScamTrix is pushing it. They are still butthurt from the last 5 scam coins that underwent ScamTrix's 'critical review'.

Just pull it down and wait 3 or 4 months guy, seriously.

That's what I find odd. Up until recently, we were given the impression that the coin was submitted to Bittrex and Polo, for perhaps a simultaneous ICO. Then the word was Bittrex changed their ICO rules, with the assumption that they were more stringent -- yet no updated rules were ever announced or posted.

So everyone will figure the ICO is the same as every other Bittrex ICO. If the dev is on the level and has a good coin, wouldn't there be much more to gain by waiting for Poloniex? If not, you also have Bter (they just pulled off a 750 btc ICO for Crypti), or worst case, just do it through regular escrow. Choosing Bittrex now for any ICO is probably the worst choice, as you'll get lumped in with a ton of bad coins just by association.

unfortunately we have didn't receive a reply from poloniex otherwise we would have done a joint ICO, we chose bittrex because it is the most popular exchange at the moment. we have put alot of work into the software and everyone can get a beta invite to try it out and test before gaining any coins so the community will understand that the software is real, working and fullly functional.
Pages:
Jump to: