Topic: [ANN] xCrowd*US/UK*TH/s+ Units - page 25. (Read 49035 times)

Quote from: FCTaiChi on August 10, 2013, 10:48:54 AM

Quote from: xcrowd on August 10, 2013, 11:11:35 AM

Your calculations are still wrong Roll Eyes

I have the largest systems for each category, price being
10*1099=10990
16*999=15984

Maybe I'm being dense, I really am not seeing where I went wrong. Just want to make sure everything is in the right place.

In one of the xCrowd topics it was established that each blade is 75GH/s, which might not be the case, but it looks like it.
According to your calculations each blade is 150GH/s

Maybe you should wait until more information is presented and then include them in your table.
At the moment there are 2 sets of prices and it is unclear which one is for what.

But one this is sure: there is no way 2400GH/s would cost 16K USD Wink

All blades for our larger two models will hash at a minimum of 150GH/s per blade at stock clock rates. The past prices per GH is set by the market; not the actual production costs.

So an Olympus with 8 blades will hash at 1200Ghs and will cost 7992USD if paid upfront?

Yes, excluding shipping and PSU option prices; which will be announced on our launch and on our website.

And that launch is tomorrow?

We were hoping to launch it today (sat). However it has been delayed so that we would be able to get rid of all the vulnerabilities that some script kids were trying to exploit. We will be keeping everyone up to date through twitter and on this forum.

fiktionist

member

Activity: 72

Merit: 10

Quote from: CYPER on August 10, 2013, 11:08:26 AM

Quote from: FCTaiChi on August 10, 2013, 10:48:54 AM

Quote from: CYPER on August 10, 2013, 11:08:26 AM

Your calculations are still wrong Roll Eyes

I have the largest systems for each category, price being
10*1099=10990
16*999=15984

Maybe I'm being dense, I really am not seeing where I went wrong. Just want to make sure everything is in the right place.

In one of the xCrowd topics it was established that each blade is 75GH/s, which might not be the case, but it looks like it.
According to your calculations each blade is 150GH/s

Maybe you should wait until more information is presented and then include them in your table.
At the moment there are 2 sets of prices and it is unclear which one is for what.

But one this is sure: there is no way 2400GH/s would cost 16K USD Wink

All blades for our larger two models will hash at a minimum of 150GH/s per blade at stock clock rates. The past prices per GH is set by the market; not the actual production costs.

So an Olympus with 8 blades will hash at 1200Ghs and will cost 7992USD if paid upfront?

Yes, excluding shipping and PSU option prices; which will be announced on our launch and on our website.

And that launch is tomorrow?

xcrowd

full member

Activity: 166

Merit: 100

Quote from: FCTaiChi on August 10, 2013, 10:48:54 AM

Your calculations are still wrong Roll Eyes

I have the largest systems for each category, price being
10*1099=10990
16*999=15984

Maybe I'm being dense, I really am not seeing where I went wrong. Just want to make sure everything is in the right place.

In one of the xCrowd topics it was established that each blade is 75GH/s, which might not be the case, but it looks like it.
According to your calculations each blade is 150GH/s

Maybe you should wait until more information is presented and then include them in your table.
At the moment there are 2 sets of prices and it is unclear which one is for what.

But one this is sure: there is no way 2400GH/s would cost 16K USD Wink

All blades for our larger two models will hash at a minimum of 150GH/s per blade at stock clock rates. The past prices per GH is set by the market; not the actual production costs.

So an Olympus with 8 blades will hash at 1200Ghs and will cost 7992USD if paid upfront?

Yes, excluding shipping and PSU option prices; which will be announced on our launch and on our website.

CYPER

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 502

Quote from: FCTaiChi on August 10, 2013, 10:48:54 AM

Your calculations are still wrong Roll Eyes

I have the largest systems for each category, price being
10*1099=10990
16*999=15984

Maybe I'm being dense, I really am not seeing where I went wrong. Just want to make sure everything is in the right place.

In one of the xCrowd topics it was established that each blade is 75GH/s, which might not be the case, but it looks like it.
According to your calculations each blade is 150GH/s

Maybe you should wait until more information is presented and then include them in your table.
At the moment there are 2 sets of prices and it is unclear which one is for what.

But one this is sure: there is no way 2400GH/s would cost 16K USD Wink

All blades for our larger two models will hash at a minimum of 150GH/s per blade at stock clock rates. The past prices per GH is set by the market; not the actual production costs.

So an Olympus with 8 blades will hash at 1200Ghs and will cost 7992USD if paid upfront?

xcrowd

full member

Activity: 166

Merit: 100

Quote from: FCTaiChi on August 10, 2013, 10:48:54 AM

Quote from: xcrowd on August 10, 2013, 10:59:36 AM

Your calculations are still wrong Roll Eyes

I have the largest systems for each category, price being
10*1099=10990
16*999=15984

Maybe I'm being dense, I really am not seeing where I went wrong. Just want to make sure everything is in the right place.

In one of the xCrowd topics it was established that each blade is 75GH/s, which might not be the case, but it looks like it.
According to your calculations each blade is 150GH/s

Maybe you should wait until more information is presented and then include them in your table.
At the moment there are 2 sets of prices and it is unclear which one is for what.

But one this is sure: there is no way 2400GH/s would cost 16K USD Wink

All blades for our larger two models will hash at a minimum of 150GH/s per blade at stock clock rates. The past prices per GH is set by the market; not the actual production costs.

CYPER

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 502

Quote from: FCTaiChi on August 10, 2013, 10:48:54 AM

Quote from: FCTaiChi on August 10, 2013, 10:48:54 AM

Your calculations are still wrong Roll Eyes

I have the largest systems for each category, price being
10*1099=10990
16*999=15984

Maybe I'm being dense, I really am not seeing where I went wrong. Just want to make sure everything is in the right place.

Those prices are correct but you may want to mention that the 30% deposit option price will be slightly higher (~10%)

So you are saying that the 2400GH/s Olympus will have a price of 15984USD and will consist of 16 blades, each being 150GH/s?

xcrowd

full member

Activity: 166

Merit: 100

Quote from: FCTaiChi on August 10, 2013, 10:48:54 AM

Your calculations are still wrong Roll Eyes

I have the largest systems for each category, price being
10*1099=10990
16*999=15984

Maybe I'm being dense, I really am not seeing where I went wrong. Just want to make sure everything is in the right place.

Those prices are correct but you may want to mention that the 30% deposit option price will be slightly higher (~10%)

CYPER

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 502

Your calculations are still wrong Roll Eyes

I have the largest systems for each category, price being
10*1099=10990
16*999=15984

Maybe I'm being dense, I really am not seeing where I went wrong. Just want to make sure everything is in the right place.

In one of the xCrowd topics it was established that each blade is 75GH/s, which might not be the case, but it looks like it.
According to your calculations each blade is 150GH/s

Maybe you should wait until more information is presented and then include them in your table.
At the moment there are 2 sets of prices and it is unclear which one is for what.

But one this is sure: there is no way 2400GH/s would cost 16K USD Wink

FCTaiChi

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

decentralizedhashing.com