Hi everyone,
I'm new to this thread, and am a very recent participant in the cryptocurrency space.
I have one question, what is the difference between Elastic and Sonm? Since they both of them are projects that aim to give a decentralized super computer network?
Thanks
Topic: [ANN] [XEL] :: XEL - The Decentralized Supercomputer :: - page 164. (Read 253621 times)
sad to see that obvious trolling posts are preferred here above those of true supporters.
I will not post where I am not welcomed.
@mr.coinzy - We're a good, respectful community here, of which you are a very active part. IMI is just asking that we continue in that manner when dealing with such things as trolling, especially on launch day.I will not post where I am not welcomed.
Of course, humour is the best way to deal with trolls. ;-)
sad to see that obvious trolling posts are preferred here above those of true supporters.
I will not post where I am not welcomed.
I will not post where I am not welcomed.
General advise: Keep it civil. Especially at launchday.
About the unknown devs:
One dev who occasionally works on elastic found the biggest bug during the NXT bug hunt program. His name is EK.
And there r more of that kind... who cares who they r in rl.
One dev who occasionally works on elastic found the biggest bug during the NXT bug hunt program. His name is EK.
And there r more of that kind... who cares who they r in rl.
it doesn't give any proper information. Oh well i just keep this project in sight looks interesting and has potential. But it looks like the devs are some unknowns, would like to hear what the expected market cap will be during release.
There will be no MarketCap during release until we reach any exchanges, that may not be available right after release.
Total coins supply 100 Millions, at 1000 sats that would be 1000 BTC (as example) after count yourself, I don't think anyone know what the price will be at the moment, market will decide later.
there will always some kind of mean price. Its just simpler with exchanges
it doesn't give any proper information. Oh well i just keep this project in sight looks interesting and has potential. But it looks like the devs are some unknowns, would like to hear what the expected market cap will be during release.
There will be no MarketCap during release until we reach any exchanges, that may not be available right after release.
Total coins supply 100 Millions, at 1000 sats that would be 1000 BTC (as example) after count yourself, I don't think anyone know what the price will be at the moment, market will decide later.
Who're these devs and why should we trust them?
Also a question, what's the expected market cap during release?
Also a question, what's the expected market cap during release?
The devs are listed in OP - read it first.
They devoted more a year of their time for development, and were given (almost) nothing for their work, so I think you can trust them.
Also, the devs have no control over any funds in this project - it's completely voluntary work, and anyone can get involved or leave.
it doesn't give any proper information. Oh well i just keep this project in sight looks interesting and has potential. But it looks like the devs are some unknowns, would like to hear what the expected market cap will be during release.
i would rather have 1 of the "unknown" devs than 100 of the pseudo advisor ones
Who're these devs and why should we trust them?
Also a question, what's the expected market cap during release?
Also a question, what's the expected market cap during release?
The devs are listed in OP - read it first.
They devoted more a year of their time for development, and were given (almost) nothing for their work, so I think you can trust them.
Also, the devs have no control over any funds in this project - it's completely voluntary work, and anyone can get involved or leave.
it doesn't give any proper information. Oh well i just keep this project in sight looks interesting and has potential. But it looks like the devs are some unknowns, would like to hear what the expected market cap will be during release.
Who're these devs and why should we trust them?
Also a question, what's the expected market cap during release?
Also a question, what's the expected market cap during release?
The devs are listed in OP - read it first.
They devoted more a year of their time for development, and were given (almost) nothing for their work, so I think you can trust them.
Also, the devs have no control over any funds in this project - it's completely voluntary work, and anyone can get involved or leave.
If you still need XEL on TestNet, pm with your address and I will send some, so you can test.
Who're these devs and why should we trust them?
Also a question, what's the expected market cap during release?
Also a question, what's the expected market cap during release?
For how long it will be possible to redeem XEL?
Quote
710 BTC is too little for this project, developers should have another one, or it's NOT fair for developers, if developers stop to do development, price will drop to Zero.
Likelihood of developers stopping increases proportionally with all this annoying fund talk.
Other than that: I do not want to play any role in anything that goes beyond coding, but from what I read occasionally I would really suggest to improve the quality of the communication which goes outside of the project. If I didn't know better, I think I would get a pretty bad image of Elastic quickly.
Just a suggestion from someone who observes
EK, you are right, discuss the technical aspects of this project is the core thing
Can someone make a video showing the process of signing a transaction?
Not a video, but here is a picture. The signing process may be different depending on what donation wallet you used. In this example, I am using Electrum. You can Google search how to sign in your particular wallet.
Nice work!Thank you
Quote
710 BTC is too little for this project, developers should have another one, or it's NOT fair for developers, if developers stop to do development, price will drop to Zero.
Likelihood of developers stopping increases proportionally with all this annoying fund talk.
Other than that: I do not want to play any role in anything that goes beyond coding, but from what I read occasionally I would really suggest to improve the quality of the communication which goes outside of the project. If I didn't know better, I think I would get a pretty bad image of Elastic quickly.
Just a suggestion from someone who observes
EK, I fail to comprehend, why is it that people(you included) tend to give such weight and importance to the fraction who make negative/annoying/FUD like noise, where as the vast majority here, who are supportive/decent/positive do not really get the same attention/importance?
You, and the rest of the devs, and the project in general, are so highly valued by so many people here in the community (the vast vast majority), why not focus on them instead of the negative ones who are not worth the time/attention?
Please keep on seeing the good and positive in this community/project
Thank you
It looks like it works
wow this project is happening now.
i think Golem and IEX are scared now
i think Golem and IEX are scared now
I still holding iEx
Quote
710 BTC is too little for this project, developers should have another one, or it's NOT fair for developers, if developers stop to do development, price will drop to Zero.
Likelihood of developers stopping increases proportionally with all this annoying fund talk.
Other than that: I do not want to play any role in anything that goes beyond coding, but from what I read occasionally I would really suggest to improve the quality of the communication which goes outside of the project. If I didn't know better, I think I would get a pretty bad image of Elastic quickly.
Just a suggestion from someone who observes
Jump to: