Topic: [ANN] [XEL] :: XEL - The Decentralized Supercomputer :: - page 179. (Read 253382 times)

Just guessing here (guess might contain incorrect information)... the one exists in working prototype form the other doesn't?

Also, because there is a constant team talk going on here: what would you prefer, a lady staying with you for an hourly payment, or one that really loves you even if you have nothing    I think we can be glad to have true enthusiasts and brilliant out of the box thinkers gathered around, and nor a highly paid PR team in pinstripe suits lol.

Hello, what's the difference between Elastic and SONM? Some people have told me that the differences are minimal and that practically Elastic is made up of a smaller team than SONM, is this true? I really like the concept worked, you are to be congratulated! A new thread is always welcome, good luck.

Hey guys, could someone please invite me to the slack channel? Or where are you organized?

Hello, what's the difference between Elastic and SONM? Some people have told me that the differences are minimal and that practically Elastic is made up of a smaller team than SONM, is this true?

The very short version:  A job requester would annotate an SSA form program (in a specific machine model resulting in a particularly structured (binary) flow graph)  with a simple liveness/reachability model so that miners could (quickly, and without running any example case inputs) verify the necessary complexity bound of the job's individual work task before selecting.  PoW solutions would operate a little differently (still using "per user" generated inputs incl nonce data, but basically hashing/checking "instruction by instruction" instead of at the end of each input run) so that PoW solution rates become uniform across jobs, being able to be found at any point mid-execution.  (PoW prize pool would probably also need to work a little differently, with any amount of proof-of-work certificates able to be submitted before a bounty is found, and the PoW pool being divided proportionally after.)  Bounty solutions would include an annotation of the original model with information about the eventual I/O relation, such that verifying the output submission can be reduced to an instance of a satisfiability problem.  Nodes (all of them) would validate solutions against this model. (They would still need to "re-run the program" by a symbolic interpretation, but could know that they are doing so in an optimally efficient way - effectively skipping any "unrelated loops" encountered.)  Jobs would always end after one bounty is found.

I'm summarizing a lot, but that is the basic idea.

Waiting for the mainnet.
It would be top coin.

Nice. We have a twitter btw. It's https://twitter.com/elastic_coin. I just don't remember who is in control of it.

I promise to catch up with all those nice and brilliant ideas regarding the payout model as well as all unanswered private messages this weekend. Starting tomorrow

want to buy .. PM me.

OK al clear   thx

So Is there some kind of swap from old xel to new xel?