Topic: [ANN] [XMG] MAGI | CPU mining | mPoW | mPoS | [MagiPay] - page 1110. (Read 2375926 times)

just got my proof of mining coins ! thanks

weird that intel cpus are so much better than amd: I've got an intel dual core mining at 12 Khs and an amd dual core same frequency which makes barely 2 Khs. Maybe there is a trick to improve hashing on amd cpus?

Yea, spread the hashrate between pools! Look at http://poolinfo.coinmagi.org/ to see witch pool that needs more hashes. I'm currently mining on both suchpool and Magi Mining Pool.

Spreading the hashrate between the pools more evenly helps to secure the network

I love this coin and mine it from first day till now!

Another pool!
Thats nice.
XMG keeps going on and on with the way to the top!

Pool added to http://poolinfo.coinmagi.org/

Nonce-Pool



Suprnova



Suchpool



Fellow miners, please spread the hashrate.

A new pool - Becausepool:

https://www.becausepool.com/index.php?coin=xmg

Option to keep it local and enable staking.

I am not having a chance to set up a rig, but it should be pretty straightforward, click rent -> pay ->  setup pools (need pool user and worker). Anyone currently mining in miningrigrentals.com, please give a hand showing few screen shots will be of great help.

We've been discussing having the miningrigrentals.com page to show rental information.
Anyone else want to have other info?

I think the old version should be running quite ok.

What more info would you like to see on http://poolinfo.coinmagi.org/ ?

Keep voting folks!

Tell your friends too!

Passed iocoin!

Only three coins above Magi!
But now it will be harder!
Vericoin, Viacoin and Namecoin.
They have a lot of paid votes!

for me is very relevant updates 32 bit version - will be a new 32-bit version?

FYI

New giveaway for Magi (XMG) with small request
http://bitcoingarden.tk/forum/index.php?topic=1787.0

Thanks to Spexx and Digithusiast,  I'm now happily mining  

edit: i wonder if keeping XMG on an exchange like Poloniex implies to lose any POS gain?

edit2: an option to mine on Mininingrigrentals.com in the miner setup would be much appreciated.

Would this be on a machine with 8 cores?

You are probably seeing a near linear increase in total hashrate as you add single-threaded minerd instances up to 5 in number, then see a drop-off in the per-thread hashrate as you add further instances. The reason for this is that the processor load from each instance is spread across 3 cores in any event (given at least 3 cores to run on).

If you run up a single instance of minerd.exe with a single thread on a multi-core machine that is otherwise idle, this can be seen using Task Manager. Once you have 5 instances on an 8 core machine, you will start to get overlap - there is no core that will be 100 percent free for a sixth, seventh or eighth instance and the instances start to compete with each other for CPU time.

While this will cause a drop in the per-thread hashrate as you have observed, the total hashrate obtained is optimal when you have the number of instances/threads equal to the number of processors in the machine and the CPU utilization will be maxed-out 100 percent at this point.

Deliberately restricting an instance of minerd.exe to a single core on a multi-core machine is not the best way to do it. It is very inefficient.  Each instance of minerd.exe should be allocated a subset of 3 processors to run on for best performance. This applies to Intel processors as much as it does to AMD processors from what I have observed. This is why I wrote a shed load of code to handle it

Download from here: http://coinmagi.org/files/magi-release/

http://coinmagi.org/files/magi-release/win32_magi_v1.1.0.1.zip