[ANN] [XMG] MAGI | CPU mining | mPoW | mPoS | [MagiPay] - page 1246.

ajeef

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 251

Quote from: MrUnzO on September 16, 2014, 08:31:14 AM

Quote from: ajeef on September 16, 2014, 03:22:10 AM

64bit win minerd
https://mega.co.nz/#!4sExQTIb!2qnIHVaylsmUAsL7NDhvnSimgqSq-Xg0CVNQSpoBTQM
i7 and e3 work fine

e3 1230V3 use https://mega.co.nz/#!Mk1jHCaT!oSiR5sUXWv8i-OHS8PEeM3oMkcz-hfduaA1keLZNpjM

if your pc have 8threads,use 4 threads or open 2 bat use 4 threads

my i7 4930K can't run these minerds it open and close immediately ... any idea?

somepc don't work,i dont know why(Maybe it's because I recompile the GCC,gfortran very troublesome, recompile can be used directly
)
second link i complie in e3 1230v3 and find it dont work in i7
first link complie in i7 3770

RamiroGomare

full member

Activity: 124

Merit: 100

Quote from: salinas on September 16, 2014, 10:31:43 AM

Quote from: RamiroGomare on September 16, 2014, 10:28:37 AM

We have first sell order: https://cryptoine.com/trade/xmg_btc
Ready for first trade!

roughly 10 XMG for almost 1 BTC Shocked

good luck with that ^^

Total amount of XMG is only 25 million coins.
Such an opportunity may not come again

We also wish good luck with that.

MarcusDe

hero member

Activity: 796

Merit: 505

Quote from: salinas on September 16, 2014, 10:31:43 AM

Quote from: RamiroGomare on September 16, 2014, 10:28:37 AM

We have first sell order: https://cryptoine.com/trade/xmg_btc
Ready for first trade!

roughly 10 XMG for almost 1 BTC Shocked

good luck with that ^^

Be smart and dont go lower.

salinas

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

Quote from: RamiroGomare on September 16, 2014, 10:28:37 AM

We have first sell order: https://cryptoine.com/trade/xmg_btc
Ready for first trade!

roughly 10 XMG for almost 1 BTC Shocked

good luck with that ^^

RamiroGomare

full member

Activity: 124

Merit: 100

We have first sell order: https://cryptoine.com/trade/xmg_btc
Ready for first trade!

salinas

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

Quote from: lionheart78 on September 16, 2014, 10:04:40 AM

Quote from: salinas on September 16, 2014, 09:57:20 AM

Quote from: dida on September 16, 2014, 09:55:19 AM

Quote from: Bojcha on September 16, 2014, 09:50:31 AM

Quote from: joelao95 on September 16, 2014, 09:41:32 AM

[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]

......

....

.......

wtf dida ?

do u really think anybody is concerned about what u think?

lol don't step down at dida's level he clearly dont understand what he is saying, just ignore him

agreed

for what its worth:

i'm really looking forward to poolmining this sob coin

i really appreciate the work ur putting into this one! seriously!!

joelao95

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1009

Coin of the Magi!

Quote from: Bojcha on September 16, 2014, 10:02:30 AM

Quote from: joelao95 on September 16, 2014, 09:54:42 AM

Quote from: Bojcha on September 16, 2014, 09:50:31 AM

Quote from: joelao95 on September 16, 2014, 09:41:32 AM

[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]

It was unexpected to me that this coin has received so much attention since launch. While now I am very concerned about what's going on would disappoint followers, the real fact should be publicly noticed.

Short summary: coins minted so far are unexpectedly less than what expected, at least it was unexpected to initial big miners. So far only 363 blocks were mined, in average of 2.9 min/block, and about 3907 XMG minted. Though these numbers appear to be "normal" based on specs, people complained one should found a lot blocks when diff is very low at the beginning. The unexpected to me is the net diff doesn't rise high, because of that the mining rewards stay low (14 XMG/block at this time). Because of this, mining actually frustrates initial miners, particularly a lot the big miners. While I would argue what mined is out 'fairly', it was unfair to miners disproportional to mining rigs they have. One major concern is the many rejections we have noticed; yet I am unaware if this is corrected to the algo. I will keep you posted about what's going on.

You didnt prepare miner(s). Just before launch we found that linux miners are in big advantage over windows miners. Pools was not ready.
miner v3 has a malware call... etc.
So what's fair here?

I understand your concern about the miner. For your notice, 3907 XMG is mined so far, and I will expect at least 5 million deliver to miners in next 1~2 months, will issue fix to that. Hope that sounds 'fair' by the time.

Then you yhink that network will have more hashrate. I think it;s bad that guy with 24 cores didnt mine a single block. also i dint mine single block since start. So what with that?
Do you recommend me to relax and let CPUs mine this for month? Will you pay my bills if i mine nothing?

Allow us to issue a fix for that.

lionheart78

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1153

Quote from: salinas on September 16, 2014, 09:57:20 AM

Quote from: dida on September 16, 2014, 09:55:19 AM

Quote from: Bojcha on September 16, 2014, 09:50:31 AM

Quote from: joelao95 on September 16, 2014, 09:41:32 AM

[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]

......

....

.......

wtf dida ?

do u really think anybody is concerned about what u think?

lol don't step down at dida's level he clearly dont understand what he is saying, just ignore him

Bojcha

hero member

Activity: 848

Merit: 500

Quote from: joelao95 on September 16, 2014, 09:54:42 AM

Quote from: Bojcha on September 16, 2014, 09:50:31 AM

Quote from: joelao95 on September 16, 2014, 09:41:32 AM

[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]

It was unexpected to me that this coin has received so much attention since launch. While now I am very concerned about what's going on would disappoint followers, the real fact should be publicly noticed.

Short summary: coins minted so far are unexpectedly less than what expected, at least it was unexpected to initial big miners. So far only 363 blocks were mined, in average of 2.9 min/block, and about 3907 XMG minted. Though these numbers appear to be "normal" based on specs, people complained one should found a lot blocks when diff is very low at the beginning. The unexpected to me is the net diff doesn't rise high, because of that the mining rewards stay low (14 XMG/block at this time). Because of this, mining actually frustrates initial miners, particularly a lot the big miners. While I would argue what mined is out 'fairly', it was unfair to miners disproportional to mining rigs they have. One major concern is the many rejections we have noticed; yet I am unaware if this is corrected to the algo. I will keep you posted about what's going on.

You didnt prepare miner(s). Just before launch we found that linux miners are in big advantage over windows miners. Pools was not ready.
miner v3 has a malware call... etc.
So what's fair here?

I understand your concern about the miner. For your notice, 3907 XMG is mined so far, and I will expect at least 5 million deliver to miners in next 1~2 months, will issue fix to that. Hope that sounds 'fair' by the time.

Then you yhink that network will have more hashrate. I think it;s bad that guy with 24 cores didnt mine a single block. also i dint mine single block since start. So what with that?
Do you recommend me to relax and let CPUs mine this for month? Will you pay my bills if i mine nothing?

joelao95

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1009

Coin of the Magi!

Quote from: dida on September 16, 2014, 09:55:19 AM

..it is a bullshit coin ready to be instamined...that what it is...nothing fair about it

Hope you realize some numbers we're talking:

Quote

... 3907 XMG is mined so far, and I will expect at least 5 million deliver to miners in next 1~2 months...

salinas

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

Quote from: dida on September 16, 2014, 09:55:19 AM

Quote from: Bojcha on September 16, 2014, 09:50:31 AM

Quote from: joelao95 on September 16, 2014, 09:41:32 AM

[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]

It was unexpected to me that this coin has received so much attention since launch. While now I am very concerned about what's going on would disappoint followers, the real fact should be publicly noticed.

Short summary: coins minted so far are unexpectedly less than what expected, at least it was unexpected to initial big miners. So far only 363 blocks were mined, in average of 2.9 min/block, and about 3907 XMG minted. Though these numbers appear to be "normal" based on specs, people complained one should found a lot blocks when diff is very low at the beginning. The unexpected to me is the net diff doesn't rise high, because of that the mining rewards stay low (14 XMG/block at this time). Because of this, mining actually frustrates initial miners, particularly a lot the big miners. While I would argue what mined is out 'fairly', it was unfair to miners disproportional to mining rigs they have. One major concern is the many rejections we have noticed; yet I am unaware if this is corrected to the algo. I will keep you posted about what's going on.

You didnt prepare miner(s). Just before launch we found that linux miners are in big advantage over windows miners. Pools was not ready.
miner v3 has a malware call... etc.
So what's fair here?

..it is a bullshit coin ready to be instamined...that what it is...nothing fair about it

wtf dida ?

do u really think anybody is concerned about what u think?

dida

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

SoNiC BooM

Quote from: Bojcha on September 16, 2014, 09:50:31 AM

Quote from: joelao95 on September 16, 2014, 09:41:32 AM

[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]

It was unexpected to me that this coin has received so much attention since launch. While now I am very concerned about what's going on would disappoint followers, the real fact should be publicly noticed.

Short summary: coins minted so far are unexpectedly less than what expected, at least it was unexpected to initial big miners. So far only 363 blocks were mined, in average of 2.9 min/block, and about 3907 XMG minted. Though these numbers appear to be "normal" based on specs, people complained one should found a lot blocks when diff is very low at the beginning. The unexpected to me is the net diff doesn't rise high, because of that the mining rewards stay low (14 XMG/block at this time). Because of this, mining actually frustrates initial miners, particularly a lot the big miners. While I would argue what mined is out 'fairly', it was unfair to miners disproportional to mining rigs they have. One major concern is the many rejections we have noticed; yet I am unaware if this is corrected to the algo. I will keep you posted about what's going on.

You didnt prepare miner(s). Just before launch we found that linux miners are in big advantage over windows miners. Pools was not ready.
miner v3 has a malware call... etc.
So what's fair here?

..it is a bullshit coin ready to be instamined...that what it is...nothing fair about it

joelao95

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1009

Coin of the Magi!

Quote from: Bojcha on September 16, 2014, 09:50:31 AM

Quote from: joelao95 on September 16, 2014, 09:41:32 AM

[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]

It was unexpected to me that this coin has received so much attention since launch. While now I am very concerned about what's going on would disappoint followers, the real fact should be publicly noticed.

Short summary: coins minted so far are unexpectedly less than what expected, at least it was unexpected to initial big miners. So far only 363 blocks were mined, in average of 2.9 min/block, and about 3907 XMG minted. Though these numbers appear to be "normal" based on specs, people complained one should found a lot blocks when diff is very low at the beginning. The unexpected to me is the net diff doesn't rise high, because of that the mining rewards stay low (14 XMG/block at this time). Because of this, mining actually frustrates initial miners, particularly a lot the big miners. While I would argue what mined is out 'fairly', it was unfair to miners disproportional to mining rigs they have. One major concern is the many rejections we have noticed; yet I am unaware if this is corrected to the algo. I will keep you posted about what's going on.

You didnt prepare miner(s). Just before launch we found that linux miners are in big advantage over windows miners. Pools was not ready.
miner v3 has a malware call... etc.
So what's fair here?

I understand your concern about the miner. For your notice, 3907 XMG is mined so far, and I will expect at least 5 million deliver to miners in next 1~2 months, will issue fix to that. Hope that sounds 'fair' by the time.

don_ahmedt

newbie

Activity: 5

Merit: 0

i have good idea
create pool for small miners to 100khash Grin

Bojcha

hero member

Activity: 848

Merit: 500

Quote from: joelao95 on September 16, 2014, 09:41:32 AM

[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]

It was unexpected to me that this coin has received so much attention since launch. While now I am very concerned about what's going on would disappoint followers, the real fact should be publicly noticed.

Short summary: coins minted so far are unexpectedly less than what expected, at least it was unexpected to initial big miners. So far only 363 blocks were mined, in average of 2.9 min/block, and about 3907 XMG minted. Though these numbers appear to be "normal" based on specs, people complained one should found a lot blocks when diff is very low at the beginning. The unexpected to me is the net diff doesn't rise high, because of that the mining rewards stay low (14 XMG/block at this time). Because of this, mining actually frustrates initial miners, particularly a lot the big miners. While I would argue what mined is out 'fairly', it was unfair to miners disproportional to mining rigs they have. One major concern is the many rejections we have noticed; yet I am unaware if this is corrected to the algo. I will keep you posted about what's going on.

You didnt prepare miner(s). Just before launch we found that linux miners are in big advantage over windows miners. Pools was not ready.
miner v3 has a malware call... etc.
So what's fair here?

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: joelao95 on September 16, 2014, 09:41:32 AM

[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]

It was unexpected to me that this coin has received so much attention since launch. While now I am very concerned about what's going on would disappoint followers, the real fact should be publicly noticed.

Short summary: coins minted so far are unexpectedly less than what expected, at least it was unexpected to initial big miners. So far only 363 blocks were mined, in average of 2.9 min/block, and about 3907 XMG minted. Though these numbers appear to be "normal" based on specs, people complained one should found a lot blocks when diff is very low at the beginning. The unexpected to me is the net diff doesn't rise high, because of that the mining rewards stay low (14 XMG/block at this time). Because of this, mining actually frustrates initial miners, particularly a lot the big miners. While I would argue what mined is out 'fairly', it was unfair to miners disproportional to mining rigs they have. One major concern is the many rejections we have noticed; yet I am unaware if this is corrected to the algo. I will keep you posted about what's going on.

There is no decent/native stratum miner right now, but we're working on it.

joelao95

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1009

Coin of the Magi!

[A short summary and an issue to be resolved]

It was unexpected to me that this coin has received so much attention since launch. While now I am very concerned about what's going on would disappoint followers, the real fact should be publicly noticed.

Short summary: coins minted so far are unexpectedly less than what expected, at least it was unexpected to initial big miners. So far only 363 blocks were mined, in average of 2.9 min/block, and about 3907 XMG minted. Though these numbers appear to be "normal" based on specs, people complained one should found a lot blocks when diff is very low at the beginning. The unexpected to me is the net diff doesn't rise high, because of that the mining rewards stay low (14 XMG/block at this time). Because of this, mining actually frustrates initial miners, particularly a lot the big miners. While I would argue what mined is out 'fairly', it was unfair to miners disproportional to mining rigs they have. One major concern is the many rejections we have noticed; yet I am unaware if this is corrected to the algo. I will keep you posted about what's going on.

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: Bojcha on September 16, 2014, 09:03:06 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Bojcha on September 16, 2014, 08:46:55 AM

Quote from: ocminer on September 16, 2014, 07:56:25 AM

pool and stratum is ready - but no (stratum) miner yet

what's that pool?

look at my twitter for the url.. currently testing though

ah that pool. What's the point without stratum miner.
Also why your mail system does not work for ages?

You can still use the cpu miner and use stratum proxy - it works sort of.

It should be working as long as you are logged in, but I get too many mails - contact me here (PM), via IRC, Twitter or E-Mail directly

2cV5S3zAuz

newbie

Activity: 37

Merit: 0

Quote from: GoldMin.es on September 16, 2014, 05:55:09 AM

Quote from: ocminer on September 16, 2014, 05:41:15 AM

Quote from: GoldMin.es on September 16, 2014, 04:54:01 AM

well i think someone is testing a cpuminer that can connect to pools, because someone is connected right now and spitting a ton of rejected shares..

share rejected: error: ntime out of range

if that helps whoever it is.

Its me.. Got the same error on your pool than on mine.. Hmm strange

the fact that it connected shows you are getting closer at least. im pretty sure my stratum is configured correctly, so im guessing yours is too..

probably the miner =\

i will keep it live for you to test oc

Check your pool log, when you are awake please. I assume, I've successfully connected your pool with the release minerd over/through proxy_miner and done some jobs already (found block due to low diff??)
Please check any logging with the givin address: 95di6Qt3Ly9EhLTYoPuN7j6ehGLvqHY6cY
I've also droped you a msg in irc.

Nixss

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: MrUnzO on September 16, 2014, 08:49:24 AM

Quote from: Nixss on September 16, 2014, 08:43:53 AM

Quote from: MrUnzO on September 16, 2014, 08:31:14 AM

Quote from: ajeef on September 16, 2014, 03:22:10 AM

64bit win minerd
https://mega.co.nz/#!4sExQTIb!2qnIHVaylsmUAsL7NDhvnSimgqSq-Xg0CVNQSpoBTQM
i7 and e3 work fine

e3 1230V3 use https://mega.co.nz/#!Mk1jHCaT!oSiR5sUXWv8i-OHS8PEeM3oMkcz-hfduaA1keLZNpjM

if your pc have 8threads,use 4 threads or open 2 bat use 4 threads

my i7 4930K can't run these minerds it open and close immediately ... any idea?

What are your settings in the .bat file?

First 64bit win minerd work ok for me (but with no blocks found), and the second one (for e3 1230V3) not at all.
Your settings looks ok, but try with --threads 6.
I only found blocks when mining within wallet.
Nevertheless, it is obvious that Linux miners have a huge advantage over the windows miners.

Topic: [ANN] [XMG] MAGI | CPU mining | mPoW | mPoS | [MagiPay] - page 1246. (Read 2375926 times)