xmg.suprnova.cc DEAD?!
Too much forking going on currently, I've lost a lot of coins. I'll reopen once the forking is fixed
Topic: [ANN] [XMG] MAGI | CPU mining | mPoW | mPoS | [MagiPay] - page 432. (Read 2375636 times)
Too much forking going on currently, I've lost a lot of coins. I'll reopen once the forking is fixed
And potential delisting of XMG from Bittrex because of rollback? No, thanks.
Yup, Suprnova is dead, for a few days. ZPool also not working right now.
xmg.suprnova.cc DEAD?!
To ALL,
The fork takes place from one pool to another, and that I believe something fundamental needs a clarification as we haven't seen this before. This has messed around the mining. I suggest stop mining at this time until we firstly 1) get a keep-it-going solution, and 2) root cause finding and a solution to the fork. The mining just going on, unfortunately, doesn't make sense to me, and I would propose a rollover back to a fair point. Let me know if rollover sounds good to you, and where you want to startover.
The fork takes place from one pool to another, and that I believe something fundamental needs a clarification as we haven't seen this before. This has messed around the mining. I suggest stop mining at this time until we firstly 1) get a keep-it-going solution, and 2) root cause finding and a solution to the fork. The mining just going on, unfortunately, doesn't make sense to me, and I would propose a rollover back to a fair point. Let me know if rollover sounds good to you, and where you want to startover.
I think many would agree that our goal is to get Magi back to stable coin. If rollover back is necessary, so let's perform this. About point - if rollover purpose is to remove some unfair block(s) so let's choose the last fair block before first unfair one in straight chain in order to minimize the loss.
To ALL,
The fork takes place from one pool to another, and that I believe something fundamental needs a clarification as we haven't seen this before. This has messed around the mining. I suggest stop mining at this time until we firstly 1) get a keep-it-going solution, and 2) root cause finding and a solution to the fork. The mining just going on, unfortunately, doesn't make sense to me, and I would propose a rollover back to a fair point. Let me know if rollover sounds good to you, and where you want to startover.
The fork takes place from one pool to another, and that I believe something fundamental needs a clarification as we haven't seen this before. This has messed around the mining. I suggest stop mining at this time until we firstly 1) get a keep-it-going solution, and 2) root cause finding and a solution to the fork. The mining just going on, unfortunately, doesn't make sense to me, and I would propose a rollover back to a fair point. Let me know if rollover sounds good to you, and where you want to startover.
I think many would agree that our goal is to get Magi back to stable coin. If rollover back is necessary, so let's perform this. About point - if rollover purpose is to remove some unfair block(s) so let's choose the last fair block before first unfair one in straight chain in order to minimize the loss.
To ALL,
The fork takes place from one pool to another, and that I believe something fundamental needs a clarification as we haven't seen this before. This has messed around the mining. I suggest stop mining at this time until we firstly 1) get a keep-it-going solution, and 2) root cause finding and a solution to the fork. The mining just going on, unfortunately, doesn't make sense to me, and I would propose a rollover back to a fair point. Let me know if rollover sounds good to you, and where you want to startover.
The fork takes place from one pool to another, and that I believe something fundamental needs a clarification as we haven't seen this before. This has messed around the mining. I suggest stop mining at this time until we firstly 1) get a keep-it-going solution, and 2) root cause finding and a solution to the fork. The mining just going on, unfortunately, doesn't make sense to me, and I would propose a rollover back to a fair point. Let me know if rollover sounds good to you, and where you want to startover.
I think many would agree that our goal is to get Magi back to stable coin. If rollover back is necessary, so let's perform this. About point - if rollover purpose is to remove some unfair block(s) so let's choose the last fair block before first unfair one in straight chain in order to minimize the loss.
if you or the end user is not on the correct fork its not gonna go well. If you are on the right fork it will eventually appear when he gets on the right one but if its the case of an exchange that will be hard to check as i dont think that will appear on their automatic system i may b e wrong though
Send few thousands of XMG to Bittrex about 10 hours ago. They are visible as pending deposits but still 0 out of 6 confirmations. What to do to not lose this coins?
Just wait. Your transaction will go to the block, and then you will receive a confirmation. Your coins do not go anywhere.
How long should I wait? It's still 0/6 confirmations at Bittrex...
Nothing changed. Still 0/6 confirmations
Send few thousands of XMG to Bittrex about 10 hours ago. They are visible as pending deposits but still 0 out of 6 confirmations. What to do to not lose this coins?
Just wait. Your transaction will go to the block, and then you will receive a confirmation. Your coins do not go anywhere.
How long should I wait? It's still 0/6 confirmations at Bittrex...
Nothing changed. Still 0/6 confirmations
first tx value now seems to match your wallet
second transaction seems to be sending 11XMG to trex and 1000.2XMG to 97ZiPCtja772wTKHnfJu2FYNABpCqyuiZ5 under the same transaction, then sent by you to trex in block 1448730 - so looks like the missing 1000.2 was a payment to yourself, which was then sent to your trex wallet
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xmg/block.dws?1448730.htm
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xmg/block.dws?1448725.htm
second transaction seems to be sending 11XMG to trex and 1000.2XMG to 97ZiPCtja772wTKHnfJu2FYNABpCqyuiZ5 under the same transaction, then sent by you to trex in block 1448730 - so looks like the missing 1000.2 was a payment to yourself, which was then sent to your trex wallet
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xmg/block.dws?1448730.htm
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xmg/block.dws?1448725.htm
Thanks, you're right.
But ..... normally I have no "strange" addresses in my list, I always make blocks by coincontrol around 1000 XMG for staking.
Well, no problem, it can be explained.
first tx value now seems to match your wallet
second transaction seems to be sending 11XMG to trex and 1000.2XMG to 97ZiPCtja772wTKHnfJu2FYNABpCqyuiZ5 under the same transaction, then sent by you to trex in block 1448730 - so looks like the missing 1000.2 was a payment to yourself, which was then sent to your trex wallet
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xmg/block.dws?1448730.htm
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xmg/block.dws?1448725.htm
second transaction seems to be sending 11XMG to trex and 1000.2XMG to 97ZiPCtja772wTKHnfJu2FYNABpCqyuiZ5 under the same transaction, then sent by you to trex in block 1448730 - so looks like the missing 1000.2 was a payment to yourself, which was then sent to your trex wallet
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xmg/block.dws?1448730.htm
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xmg/block.dws?1448725.htm
Thanks, you're right.
But ..... normally I have no "strange" addresses in my list, I always make blocks by coincontrol around 1000 XMG for staking.
Well, no problem, it can be explained.
How is this possible?
On bittrex these coins are in the deposit, values 10063,93931596 and 11.0000.
Same in my wallet, on the blockchain explorer these values differ.
But sum is the same.
So for me after block 1448730.
The first not confirmed block in my wallet was 1448546.
On bittrex these coins are in the deposit, values 10063,93931596 and 11.0000.
Same in my wallet, on the blockchain explorer these values differ.
But sum is the same.
So for me after block 1448730.
The first not confirmed block in my wallet was 1448546.
See the links below
first tx value now seems to match your wallet
second transaction seems to be sending 11XMG to trex and 1000.2XMG to 97ZiPCtja772wTKHnfJu2FYNABpCqyuiZ5 under the same transaction, then sent by you to trex in block 1448730 - so looks like the missing 1000.2 was a payment to yourself, which was then sent to your trex wallet
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xmg/block.dws?1448730.htm
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xmg/block.dws?1448725.htm
v1.4.2 sync OK,last block is 1450205
any peers on testnet?
Did anyone receive coins from zpool?
Got some 3h ago
In this transaction
http://www.zpool.ca/explorer/XMG?txid=9b198afb821e51c9f705fdafb431abd2353d256c7476cabcb50f75a50a3f86e6
zpool:
https://www.mupload.nl/img/x5j3pbaowdtiz.jpg
These coins are never received in my wallet, even while my wallet is completely synched on right chain.
Did anyone receive coins from zpool?
https://www.mupload.nl/img/x5j3pbaowdtiz.jpg
These coins are never received in my wallet, even while my wallet is completely synched on right chain.
Did anyone receive coins from zpool?
I do not get coins from zpool
How is this possible?
On bittrex these coins are in the deposit, values 10063,93931596 and 11.0000.
Same in my wallet, on the blockchain explorer these values differ.
But sum is the same.
So for me after block 1448730.
The first not confirmed block in my wallet was 1448546.
On bittrex these coins are in the deposit, values 10063,93931596 and 11.0000.
Same in my wallet, on the blockchain explorer these values differ.
But sum is the same.
So for me after block 1448730.
The first not confirmed block in my wallet was 1448546.
zpool:
These coins are never received in my wallet, even while my wallet is completely synched on right chain.
Did anyone receive coins from zpool?
These coins are never received in my wallet, even while my wallet is completely synched on right chain.
Did anyone receive coins from zpool?
Hello,
a rollback will not reverse all the transactions and cost a lot of money to the exchanges and peoples and "duplicates" a lot of XMG ?
If I have sent 10k XMG to bittrex the 21 august, sold them and get my BTC in my wallet and the rollback is the 20 august, will I not just get my 10k XMG back in my wallet and bittrex or the person who bought my XMG -10K XMG in their wallet ?
a rollback will not reverse all the transactions and cost a lot of money to the exchanges and peoples and "duplicates" a lot of XMG ?
If I have sent 10k XMG to bittrex the 21 august, sold them and get my BTC in my wallet and the rollback is the 20 august, will I not just get my 10k XMG back in my wallet and bittrex or the person who bought my XMG -10K XMG in their wallet ?
Jump to: