Topic: [ANN] xxxxx - page 43. (Read 175984 times)

Where'd you pull that quote from?  WCX said they don't deal with banks?

If they deal with fiat (and they said they will be), then they deal with banks.

"there is no team" !== "there's no info on [the] team".

And at some recent past, there was at least one known "member" of the "team".


Works both ways.


Or 30. If it is one guy behind this, props to him for his versatility and speed.

Haven't seen any hate against WCX except a couple people on this forum. Everyone else is crazy about it, have you seen Twitter. Senseless FUDding on this forum by a few folks. Also probably why the devs arent too active here or care to answer FUD. if we estimated by first announced figures theyve prob already raised ~$25 million in pre-ICO.

Look like so many peoples hate this ICO.
Your team need to reveal some of your team faces ,and add more transparency elements in this project.

Dear sir I had applied for bounty. When we are going to receive our bounty token?

How's it going with the beta testing?

So you argue with me when I say there is no team, but you agree there's no info on team? Anonymous names isn't reliable enough to say they have a team, can easily be one guy.

Then why don't you man up and post from your main account rather than a freshly created alt like a coward?



Argument from personal incredulity. You have literally no evidence for this and are missing, on purpose or genuinely ignorant, the "duh?" explanation.



Someone should inform GDAX then since WCX's UI is a clone of that and far from generic. ICYMI, you're reaching here.


Can't argue with this.

In case the dense one before still didn't get it (and assuming you're not him), this is what I meant by had names but still anonymous.



Shouldn't that be left to those oh so willing to let go of $25K? They've refunded, in full, someone here that paid earlier so other than envy of missing out, there's not much substance to this.


Then the corollary must also be true:

"Everyone [attack]ing WCX on this thread like it is their [mortal e]n[emy] is obviously involved with [a competitor product] somehow".

And in your case, we can add cowardice to it.

is there any bounty?

Been watching this for quite a while and can't understand how people can be so blinded.

- 450,000 sign ups? My ass. Top world exchanges have barely 40,000 users daily.
- Referral programs and faking sign up numbers are generally linked together in pyramid schemes.
- I have access to beta and it seems very generic and just a gimmick to steal large deposits.
- No info on team? There needs to be, especially if claiming the team is from Apple and Wall St.  Random names are being thrown around; John, Pierre, etc. No info on these people anywhere.
- Whitepaper is a blatant advertisement with no real information.
- They want to wait until the 'product is launched' to do the ICO, so they shouldn't be offering a pre-sale. Also another red flag is lowering the minimum amount to $100 from $25,000 even after issues arose and delaying the ICO date.
- Everyone defending WCX on this thread like it is their religion is obviously involved with them somehow.


A good find. WCX coin is linked with WCI (World Cryptocurrency Investment), another likely ponzi scheme. They have a functioning wallet, and an Android App (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.WCXcoin.creditpay) The company that is listed on the app is "WCX.IO" which is not WCEX.IO, but these could be linked somehow. Also the app was updated a few weeks ago, which means they are relevant.

Whaleclub, may or may not be linked with WCX. They have the same site layout and probably the same name (Whale Club Exchange). I have reached out to WC and they have not responded on associtation with WCX. Honestly, if they were affiliated they would have been more open about it. They are also based in HK.


There are more red flags than green flags on this project, and would just advise everyone to be careful and not put any money into this.

*However, I could be totally wrong, and this is just my opinion as well as many others.

This will allow much more people to participate! Good news, thank you sir

Here it is https://ico.wcex.co

I find this webisite. Is it WCX?
http://wcxcoin.com/

@WCXofficial

(new) Escrow information please.

We can confirm that the ICO will be capped at 1 Billion tokens. Any unsold tokens will be burned and the remaining tokens will make up the final supply of WCXT.

---

Updates

→ The ICO has been pushed back to Oct 31, 2017 (from Oct 1). This allows everyone to use WCX prior to investing in the public ICO and allows us to focus on delivering a great product on launch day on October 10, 2017.

→ We've lowered the minimum for WCXT presales to 1,000 WCXT (100 USD) from 250,000 WCXT. Accepted currencies are BTC, LTC, and DASH, and we're working on ETH support.

→ New users are being let in every day to the WCX Beta Program. If you still haven't received an invitation code, please be patient - we're unfortunately not able to respond to the hundreds of queries we've received asking us for invitation codes. You can check our Twitter for an official screenshot as well as our public product development roadmap for a sneak peek at what features are coming up.

→ Recent legislation proposals in China have no effect on WCX or the ICO.

→ If you've sent us or our support channel an email and we still haven't responded, please don't resend the same email. We'll get to and respond to your query as soon as possible!

but what about info regarding WCXT?
what is the total supply of WCXT?
what is the timeline regarding the lowering of the minimum WCXT contribution during pre-sale? (right now you need to buy a minimum of 85 ETH worth of WCXT)
ty

If you're daft enough to think you can shift the BoP then let me make clear enough for your remaining brain cells: not gonna happen.

And if you're even dafter to think I'm doing this for my sig camp, you should read up on the campaign manager before further embarrassing yourself.

I think I understand.

Suppose WCX AVERAGE DAILY VOLUME = 1 billion USD

Transaction Fee = 0.1% -> 1 month gross profit = 1 billion x 0.1% x 30 = 30 million ($)

Profit divided by WCX owners = 20% x 30 million = 6 million ($)

Look at the estimated table: When WCX AVERAGE DAILY VOLUME = 1B

100 000 WCX --> 600 $
  WCX  --> 6 million $

-> = 6 million x 100 000/600 = 1 billion (WCX)

So we are discussing investment with hidden partners for a 1 billion WCX (EQUIVALENT $ 100 million) project. Am I wrong here?

Again you're providing no proof, just arguing. At least your sig post count is going up though!

While looking other coins in there, i am not sure if it is any kind of sign.