Topic: [ANN] xxxxx - page 44. (Read 175984 times)
I can not find the information about the humanness and total coin supply.
Is something fishy here or is everything great or a bit of both? 
I'm confused. what is it really all about? I can't see the Apple team yet.
I'm confused. what is it really all about? I can't see the Apple team yet.
lol , nobody know, but at the moment, we have no names at all , only a nice interface and good exchange to test
Is something fishy here or is everything great or a bit of both?
I'm confused. what is it really all about? I can't see the Apple team yet.
I'm confused. what is it really all about? I can't see the Apple team yet.
nice find , but im affraid the forum manager have lost hist faith in Bitcointalk lol, he is not posting anymore
I think the developer is busy with more important matters than to quarrel here with those who do not believe in project WCX 
you right, but people who trust WCX need also attention from DEV's , we are supporting the project ..
nice find , but im affraid the forum manager have lost hist faith in Bitcointalk lol, he is not posting anymore
I think the developer is busy with more important matters than to quarrel here with those who do not believe in project WCX
nice find , but im affraid the forum manager have lost hist faith in Bitcointalk lol, he is not posting anymore
Does anyone know the total number of wcx?
1 Billion
If the project collects $ 50 million at the ICO, it means there will be only 500 million coins.
Less coins, more profitability for investors.
Today I saw that the WCX appeared on Icoalert - this is a good sign.
Does anyone know the total number of wcx?
1 Billion
Does anyone know the total number of wcx?
@Morguk probably shilling another exchange ICO, like the couple other dummies who came in here screaming scam with nothing to back claims.
Coiner, I find it incredibly interesting how defensive you are about this project.
Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!
If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.
Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!
If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.
An ad hominem is not a valid argument. Wash your face and come back when you have a rebuttal.
Why would I post a rebuttal to the following..
"they're just anonymous... with names".
"So?".
"That's funny".
Then I take it that you accept your "evidence" - "No team", "hiding contact information on domain" and having a beta bypassed - is nonsense. Got it.
Quote
Out of interest, you say there is a team, how do you know that?
I know it because I've spent more time on this thread than the (claimed) 1 hour you needed to post your drive-through scam accusation. You really didn't think about that, huh?
Quote
Please provide evidence.
Apart from the fact that it is you who needs to provide evidence for your list of supposed evidence, I'm not going to spoon-feed you since you clearly don't deserve it. The pagination facility provided by BCT is open to everyone and very easy to use so help yourself out. Start around page 50 and you might just stumble on the post with an email screenshot that had a name and another post that had another name when they decided to lock the thread. Also, use your eyes to view the Trello board you found so interesting and you'll see yet another name.
So you're saying I need evidence for saying there is no team, no tos, hidden domain info etc? If so I'll stick with my ad hominem and call you a retard.
And seeing as that is not a valid argument, you fail yet again at helping your case. But seeing as you had none to begin with I guess WCX should be thankful you're bumping their thread for free.
Quote
Funny how you will take the time to reply, but not show any proof of a team because you don't want to spoon-feed me? Not a fan of Vitalik but his signalling theory quote works well here.
I've seen better attempts at reverse psychology. This is pathetic at best.
Coiner, I find it incredibly interesting how defensive you are about this project.
Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!
If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.
Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!
If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.
An ad hominem is not a valid argument. Wash your face and come back when you have a rebuttal.
Why would I post a rebuttal to the following..
"they're just anonymous... with names".
"So?".
"That's funny".
Then I take it that you accept your "evidence" - "No team", "hiding contact information on domain" and having a beta bypassed - is nonsense. Got it.
Quote
Out of interest, you say there is a team, how do you know that?
I know it because I've spent more time on this thread than the (claimed) 1 hour you needed to post your drive-through scam accusation. You really didn't think about that, huh?
Quote
Please provide evidence.
Apart from the fact that it is you who needs to provide evidence for your list of supposed evidence, I'm not going to spoon-feed you since you clearly don't deserve it. The pagination facility provided by BCT is open to everyone and very easy to use so help yourself out. Start around page 50 and you might just stumble on the post with an email screenshot that had a name and another post that had another name when they decided to lock the thread. Also, use your eyes to view the Trello board you found so interesting and you'll see yet another name.
So you're saying I need evidence for saying there is no team, no tos, hidden domain info etc? If so I'll stick with my ad hominem and call you a retard.
Funny how you will take the time to reply, but not show any proof of a team because you don't want to spoon-feed me? Not a fan of Vitalik but his signalling theory quote works well here.
Coiner, I find it incredibly interesting how defensive you are about this project.
Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!
If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.
Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!
If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.
An ad hominem is not a valid argument. Wash your face and come back when you have a rebuttal.
Why would I post a rebuttal to the following..
"they're just anonymous... with names".
"So?".
"That's funny".
Then I take it that you accept your "evidence" - "No team", "hiding contact information on domain" and having a beta bypassed - is nonsense. Got it.
Quote
Out of interest, you say there is a team, how do you know that?
I know it because I've spent more time on this thread than the (claimed) 1 hour you needed to post your drive-through scam accusation. You really didn't think about that, huh?
Quote
Please provide evidence.
Apart from the fact that it is you who needs to provide evidence for your list of supposed evidence, I'm not going to spoon-feed you since you clearly don't deserve it. The pagination facility provided by BCT is open to everyone and very easy to use so help yourself out. Start around page 50 and you might just stumble on the post with an email screenshot that had a name and another post that had another name when they decided to lock the thread. Also, use your eyes to view the Trello board you found so interesting and you'll see yet another name.
Coiner, I find it incredibly interesting how defensive you are about this project.
Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!
If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.
Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!
If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.
An ad hominem is not a valid argument. Wash your face and come back when you have a rebuttal.
Why would I post a rebuttal to the following..
"they're just anonymous... with names".
"So?".
"That's funny".
Out of interest, you say there is a team, how do you know that? Please provide evidence.
Coiner, I find it incredibly interesting how defensive you are about this project.
Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!
If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.
Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!
If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.
An ad hominem is not a valid argument. Wash your face and come back when you have a rebuttal.
Coiner, I find it incredibly interesting how defensive you are about this project.
Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!
If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.
Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!
If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.
Guys, all indicators say this is a scam.
What is your indicators? Explain in detailNo team.
Not quite. There is a team, they're just anonymous (which isn't exclusive)... with names.
Quote
No terms of service.
Um, ToS for what exactly? An exchange in beta?
Quote
Only name on the entire project (the escrow) pulled out because WCX wouldn't give any contact information.
On the contrary, there have been quite a few names mentioned especially when the thread was locked and they were given -ve trust. And there's one on the "public Trello board".
Quote
Hiding contact information on domain.
So?
Quote
Forum member bypasses beta login with ease, indicating poor coding practises.
That's funny.
Quote
Lots of newbie accounts standing up for them (look below).
True, however, there are even more newbie accounts and alts of more mature members here who drive through with their one sentence scam accusations much like yours. One such alt is gintrux.
Quote
Their Trello which has bugs to fix is public (why?!), yet only goes back to 1st Sep.
Aren't you scraping the bottom of the barrel here?
Quote
This is what I've discovered in less than an hour.
Mhmm, save for the last one, your "discovery" has been plastered throughout the pages of this thread.
Guys, all indicators say this is a scam.
What is your indicators? Explain in detailNo team.
No terms of service.
Only name on the entire project (the escrow) pulled out because WCX wouldn't give any contact information.
Hiding contact information on domain.
Forum member bypasses beta login with ease, indicating poor coding practises.
Lots of newbie accounts standing up for them (look below).
Their Trello which has bugs to fix is public (why?!), yet only goes back to 1st Sep.
Also appear to be preventing archive.org/wayback machine from saving website.
This is what I've discovered in less than an hour.
@Morguk lol you're a little late FUD muffin. WCX already delivered their exchange it is live
Little newbie account muffin, go and get a job instead of shilling crap.
@Morguk lol you're a little late FUD muffin. WCX already delivered their exchange it is live
Guys, all indicators say this is a scam.
What is your indicators? Explain in detail Jump to: