Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] xxxxx - page 50. (Read 175984 times)

full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 102
September 06, 2017, 07:10:42 PM
Fran (our former escrow) recently asked to obtain residence information of our directors who are private key holders, as well as KYC information for investors in our ICO and presales. This requirement was not in the contract we had signed with him and we were assured we would not need to provide such information to him. For that reason we were obliged to terminate the escrow arrangement.

Is that so? I will of course be confirming this just to ensure it's accurate.
full member
Activity: 207
Merit: 100
September 06, 2017, 07:03:13 PM
Fran (our former escrow) recently asked to obtain residence information of our directors who are private key holders, as well as KYC information for investors in our ICO and presales. This requirement was not in the contract we had signed with him and we were assured we would not need to provide such information to him. For that reason we were obliged to terminate the escrow arrangement.

If the email posted above is true, we're unhappy with Fran's behavior and tone after his termination as escrow, since he had confidential access to WCX's product development and knew of our legitimacy well ahead of the public.

Moving forward we're likely to be focused on the product development (WCX) rather than the ICO for the next week or so. Presales are currently closed but we expect to announce new escrow managers and re-open them soon.
sr. member
Activity: 325
Merit: 250
lets get high!
September 06, 2017, 06:22:26 PM
I just received this email from Fran Strajnar:



Take from it what you will. In case you think this is just FUD, feel free to contact him personally to confirm.

this is not good, they are hiding something. im not trusting this one then. thanks for sharing
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 102
September 06, 2017, 06:20:40 PM

I think it's worth waiting for the official answer before making any conclusions.

I just added 'presumedly' while you were writing this.

I'm curious about official answers for:

1.  Why wouldn't wcex identify themselves to their escrow??

2. Was there an escrow established before the presale?  

3.  If so, who.

4.  Wcex stated that Fran Strajnar was/would be the escrow, went through pre-sale, never stated he wasn't/wouldn't be working with them.  What's up with that?


The email was sent some minutes prior to when I posted the screenshot here but I posted an earlier screenshot where he confirmed he was their lead escrow so yes, he was (past-tense) briefly working with them but as the screenshot above shows, isn't anymore (and would love it if he isn't associated with them henceforth).

I get wanting to be anonymous (certainly from a different perspective from WCX) which is why their anonymity was hardly ever an issue for me but this, this isn't right.
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
September 06, 2017, 06:03:02 PM

I think it's worth waiting for the official answer before making any conclusions.

I just added 'presumedly' while you were writing this.

I'm curious about official answers for:

1.  Why wouldn't wcex identify themselves to their escrow??

2. Was there an escrow established before the presale? 

3.  If so, who.

4.  Wcex stated that Fran Strajnar was/would be the escrow, went through pre-sale, never stated he wasn't/wouldn't be working with them.  What's up with that?
full member
Activity: 546
Merit: 110
September 06, 2017, 05:55:43 PM
I just received this email from Fran Strajnar:



Take from it what you will. In case you think this is just FUD, feel free to contact him personally to confirm.

That sucks.

That also means all the presale money is not in escrow as wcex claimed.

Thanks for sharing.

I think it's worth waiting for the official answer before making any conclusions.
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
September 06, 2017, 05:48:42 PM
I just received this email from Fran Strajnar:



Take from it what you will. In case you think this is just FUD, feel free to contact him personally to confirm.

That sucks.

That presumedly also means all the presale money is not in escrow as wcex claimed...and that there was no escrow established despite claims thereof.

Thanks for sharing.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
September 06, 2017, 05:28:30 PM
Got invite for WCX. Beta is working quite good!
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 102
September 06, 2017, 04:56:38 PM
I just received this email from Fran Strajnar:



Take from it what you will. In case you think this is just FUD, feel free to contact him personally to confirm.
full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 101
I am the original miningteam23
September 06, 2017, 03:34:16 PM
Thanks for the post MrLitex
full member
Activity: 546
Merit: 110
September 06, 2017, 02:43:43 PM
What do the invitation emails look like? I don't want to miss the email amongst all the crap spam emails I receive. What is the Subject line and who is the Sender?
full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 101
I am the original miningteam23
September 06, 2017, 02:40:59 PM
What do the invitation emails look like? I don't want to miss the email amongst all the crap spam emails I receive. What is the Subject line and who is the Sender?
full member
Activity: 546
Merit: 110
September 06, 2017, 02:36:38 PM
Anyone who tested the beta think that it feels and looks like GDAX but with better (tradingview like) charts? I think it is dangerously similar.

Very good.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
September 06, 2017, 02:31:33 PM
Anyone who tested the beta think that it feels and looks like GDAX but with better (tradingview like) charts? I think it is dangerously similar.

That's great if better than GDAX already. Dont have invite yet.
sud
sr. member
Activity: 826
Merit: 301
September 06, 2017, 02:23:05 PM
Anyone who tested the beta think that it feels and looks like GDAX but with better (tradingview like) charts? I think it is dangerously similar.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
September 06, 2017, 01:24:22 PM
I just tried to login to see how many referrals I have gotten so far and it says my account does not exist. wtf?

the same shit...(( did they answer?
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
September 06, 2017, 10:27:48 AM


My intentions for applying has already been met with your video so whether I got in or not has little to no effect.


Glad I could help.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 102
September 06, 2017, 10:16:29 AM


Oh I don't know, perhaps because virtually all your posts in the last month on this thread had a "more likely a scam than not" vibe to it yet you get invited and end up using said "most likely a scam" product while, AFAIK, polkacoin whose posts had a "this is definitely legit" vibe didn't.

Although the biggest irony would be mangaroooo who seems to call everything that doesn't fit him exactly a scam, getting invited to use it.

LOL.  I call bullshit on that.  Again.   For the hundredth time.  

Did you even read my post?


Yes I read your post.

Not quite.



For the second time, did you even read my post?

My apologies, you never said whether you got in or not.

I take it back, it doesn't suck that you didn't get in, as either you did, or you deny that I think it sucks that you didn't get in.

My intentions for applying has already been met with your video so whether I got in or not has little to no effect.
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
September 06, 2017, 09:48:40 AM


For the second time, did you even read my post?

My apologies, you never said whether you got in or not.

I take it back, it doesn't suck that you didn't get in, as either you did, or you deny that I think it sucks that you didn't get in.
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
September 06, 2017, 09:45:48 AM


Oh I don't know, perhaps because virtually all your posts in the last month on this thread had a "more likely a scam than not" vibe to it yet you get invited and end up using said "most likely a scam" product while, AFAIK, polkacoin whose posts had a "this is definitely legit" vibe didn't.

Although the biggest irony would be mangaroooo who seems to call everything that doesn't fit him exactly a scam, getting invited to use it.

LOL.  I call bullshit on that.  Again.   For the hundredth time.  

Did you even read my post?


Yes I read your post.  Thus I responded as I responded.  I'm calling bullshit on you thinking all my posts the last month had a 'more like a scam than not" vibe.

That is what you said, isn't it? 

I'm obviously not calling bullshit on that I got in and Polkacoin didn't (on the assumption that you're correct that she didn't).

Did I miss something?  Please elaborate.



Pages:
Jump to: