Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] xxxxx - page 62. (Read 175984 times)

legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1113
There's no need to be upset
August 29, 2017, 11:37:48 AM
don't suffer so much dear friends.
let's at least wait for the release of the platform and then things will probably get more clear...
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
August 28, 2017, 01:55:44 PM

@wcxofficial Why have you deleted the reference to Fran Strajnar as your "lead escrow manager"? Fancy word, but can you back it up? Do you have a statement from him confirming that he will escrow for you? Where on your website does it actually state the rules for the escrow? Correct, nowhere.

Guys has anyone actually asked Strajnar if what they claim is true? Don't invest until we see the alpha (former beta). Don't let them fomo you with a "pre-sale" with limited spots and stuff like that! Be vigilant.

Yes,  I had multiple email exchanges with Strajnar before deciding to invest. However, it seems that some people will remain unconvinced. That is fine--wait for the test launch on Sep 1 and see how that goes. There will be plenty of time to get in on the ICO after that. I too would like more details regarding the team and how they will execute their plan, but am willing to take the risk at this point in spite of sparse details. By all means wait and gather the information you need before making any decisions.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 102
August 28, 2017, 11:25:26 AM
Bestchange - Exchange Ur Crypto Currency With Other Curruncy or cash

Easy Transfer / Easy Withdrow / Easy exchange

Register Now https:[--snip--]/?p=242493


Happy to help You

It's very obvious you only posted that because you're an affiliate. You really should try harder.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 102
August 28, 2017, 11:11:10 AM
I have, and I know one other person here says he has. Perhaps unsurprisingly, he doesn't have the nicest words about BCT as a whole.

Who do you mean with "he"? Fran Strajnar?
Did he respond, and what did he say?

Which other "he" was the focus of your post I was responding to? Satoshi? Vitalik? Huh Try reading the post again, and with comprehension this time. You've clearly shown yourself capable of throwing out questions just for the sake of it so channel that energy into reading.

Unless this 'Fran Strajnar' posts here or on another public channel confirming his ties to WCX this is completely worthless and not a proof at all. I have not seen any post by 'Fran Strajnar' about WCX whatsoever. Link me to it.

I've been interested in WCX from day 1 it was posted here. Not convinced about its ICO though for obvious reasons.

What exactly is stopping you from contacting him yourself, perhaps by email? If and when you get around to doing that, ask him his opinion about BCT as a whole, that may tell you why his post may be missing from here.

And ICYMI, whether or not you're convinced is totally irrelevant to me.

I don't see why I should be doing this, this is WCX job of course. You can't just post an escrow without any confirmation of that particular person, doesn't make any sene.

I'd be stunned if more than a few alt accounts of some people here wouldn't be screaming "Photoshopped!!!"/"Fake!!!" if WCX posted a statement from Fran confirming himself as an escrow.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
August 28, 2017, 11:08:05 AM
what else you want them to do? get you breakfast in bed?
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
August 28, 2017, 10:48:31 AM
I don't see why I should be doing this, this is WCX job of course. You can't just post an escrow without any confirmation of that particular person, doesn't make any sene.

So are you dumbass. You think they post in public and its fake escrow? So basicly anyone who email the escrow will find is fake? Are you an intelligent human or troll?

It is crazy how 2 people in this topic is declaring its scam without no proof, and keep doing it even after proof its legit project. maybe sock puppets paid by other exchanges? special interest?

WCX not speaking to these trolls is the best counter trolling... the trolls get even angrier nobody listening to them , and WCX get free publicity...

I couldn't care less about your insults, I've been here since day 1 and have referred many people to WCX through their ref campaign. Just can't keep up with people asking me if their operation and particularly their escrow is legit. This is their job to make it legit, it's their job to make the escrow post about his participation publicly. This is not even up for discussion.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
August 28, 2017, 10:42:46 AM
I don't see why I should be doing this, this is WCX job of course. You can't just post an escrow without any confirmation of that particular person, doesn't make any sene.

So are you dumbass. You think they post in public and its fake escrow? So basicly anyone who email the escrow will find is fake? Are you an intelligent human or troll?

It is crazy how 2 people in this topic is declaring its scam without no proof, and keep doing it even after proof its legit project. maybe sock puppets paid by other exchanges? special interest?

WCX not speaking to these trolls is the best counter trolling... the trolls get even angrier nobody listening to them , and WCX get free publicity...
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
August 28, 2017, 10:38:52 AM
I have, and I know one other person here says he has. Perhaps unsurprisingly, he doesn't have the nicest words about BCT as a whole.

Who do you mean with "he"? Fran Strajnar?
Did he respond, and what did he say?

Which other "he" was the focus of your post I was responding to? Satoshi? Vitalik? Huh Try reading the post again, and with comprehension this time. You've clearly shown yourself capable of throwing out questions just for the sake of it so channel that energy into reading.

Unless this 'Fran Strajnar' posts here or on another public channel confirming his ties to WCX this is completely worthless and not a proof at all. I have not seen any post by 'Fran Strajnar' about WCX whatsoever. Link me to it.

I've been interested in WCX from day 1 it was posted here. Not convinced about its ICO though for obvious reasons.

What exactly is stopping you from contacting him yourself, perhaps by email? If and when you get around to doing that, ask him his opinion about BCT as a whole, that may tell you why his post may be missing from here.

And ICYMI, whether or not you're convinced is totally irrelevant to me.

I don't see why I should be doing this, this is WCX job of course. You can't just post an escrow without any confirmation of that particular person, doesn't make any sene.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 102
August 28, 2017, 10:19:58 AM
I have, and I know one other person here says he has. Perhaps unsurprisingly, he doesn't have the nicest words about BCT as a whole.

Who do you mean with "he"? Fran Strajnar?
Did he respond, and what did he say?

Which other "he" was the focus of your post I was responding to? Satoshi? Vitalik? Huh Try reading the post again, and with comprehension this time. You've clearly shown yourself capable of throwing out questions just for the sake of it so channel that energy into reading.

Unless this 'Fran Strajnar' posts here or on another public channel confirming his ties to WCX this is completely worthless and not a proof at all. I have not seen any post by 'Fran Strajnar' about WCX whatsoever. Link me to it.

I've been interested in WCX from day 1 it was posted here. Not convinced about its ICO though for obvious reasons.

What exactly is stopping you from contacting him yourself, perhaps by email? If and when you get around to doing that, ask him his opinion about BCT as a whole, that may tell you why his post may be missing from here.

And ICYMI, whether or not you're convinced is totally irrelevant to me.
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
August 28, 2017, 10:06:03 AM
I have, and I know one other person here says he has. Perhaps unsurprisingly, he doesn't have the nicest words about BCT as a whole.

Who do you mean with "he"? Fran Strajnar?
Did he respond, and what did he say?

Which other "he" was the focus of your post I was responding to? Satoshi? Vitalik? Huh Try reading the post again, and with comprehension this time. You've clearly shown yourself capable of throwing out questions just for the sake of it so channel that energy into reading.

Unless this 'Fran Strajnar' posts here or on another public channel confirming his ties to WCX this is completely worthless and not a proof at all. I have not seen any post by 'Fran Strajnar' about WCX whatsoever. Link me to it.

I've been interested in WCX from day 1 it was posted here. Not convinced about its ICO though for obvious reasons.
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
August 28, 2017, 04:16:47 AM
Almost every exchange allows exchange of cryptocurrencies with no ID verification. Not sure why they wouldn't.
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
August 28, 2017, 03:27:35 AM
Clarification:

Account creation will be anonymous, and identity will only be required if using fiat?  True/False?

If identity is required when using fiat, is that only when buying coin with fiat (depositing) transferring fiat out (withdrawals to bank).   

What I really want to know is, presuming there will be fiat pairs, will identity be required if, for instance, selling btc for fiat, leaving that fiat in wcex, and then rebuying coin with a coin/fiat pair?
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 261
August 28, 2017, 01:35:29 AM
Friends project real or Scam? a lot of bad reviews

Imo absolute scam.

scam with escrow ? ok.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 102
August 27, 2017, 03:11:29 PM
Friends project real or Scam? a lot of bad reviews

Imo absolute scam.

Neither you nor anyone else here has managed to provide a sliver of evidence to back that claim. ICYMI, continuously flinging poop hoping one sticks is not evidence, at all.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 102
August 27, 2017, 03:05:47 PM
I have, and I know one other person here says he has. Perhaps unsurprisingly, he doesn't have the nicest words about BCT as a whole.

Who do you mean with "he"? Fran Strajnar?
Did he respond, and what did he say?

Which other "he" was the focus of your post I was responding to? Satoshi? Vitalik? Huh Try reading the post again, and with comprehension this time. You've clearly shown yourself capable of throwing out questions just for the sake of it so channel that energy into reading.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
August 27, 2017, 01:07:05 PM
Have not seen anyone calling scam except few dumbasses on this forum..
full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 101
I am the original miningteam23
August 27, 2017, 01:02:13 PM
Let's wait until the exchange actually launches before the scam terminology is used. Give these a guys a chance to launch. I am looking forward to the beta launch now.
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
August 27, 2017, 11:49:04 AM
I think that, regardless of whether it's true or false, they get free advertising Smiley
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
August 27, 2017, 11:31:50 AM
Lol is so funny all scam accusations and still 0 proof of scam. "oh yes I think its scam" "yea sure is scam", please provide proof? any thing?

in my opinion the more scam accusation, the better... look how many scam accusation poloniex , bitfinex, bittrex, get every day, -- and they making billions!

scam accusation + no proof = typical skeptical poor person way to think. make rational thinking, or dont say shit with no proof, that is just troll.

sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
August 27, 2017, 11:14:10 AM
Can there be two accounts with the same email?
Pages:
Jump to: