FFS no body is concerned that the dev has been very active before the pump and that we havent a word since?
There was a great deal of coins sold around 2000. I sold 2/3 of my stash but i have still some coins left.
I M CONCERNED and you should be
Topic: [ANN][AC]AsiaCoin - Relaunch - page 123. (Read 401174 times)
Was that a way to pick up some cheap coins??
I'm sure (hopeful) it was a genuine concern, but FFS don't do something like that without fully comprehending the result of your actions. NOT GOOD!
I'm sure (hopeful) it was a genuine concern, but FFS don't do something like that without fully comprehending the result of your actions. NOT GOOD!
no! if you have a look on the charts you will recognize it's going up and not down...
the dev is online.
will he post something to confirm he is not running away?
will he post something to confirm he is not running away?
he is offline now!
Weirdest Dev. Just don't know why he hasn't posted anything at all.
Agreed.
You guys are fixated on the wrong thing. He was as active as he needed to be, when he needed to. Post launch, he wasn't hyper active hyping his coin, he posted when necessary. It was a smooth as hell launch, no issues like forks, POS works as stated.
Remember, this is zero premine, no IPO shit... so it's in the communities hand now, not the devs. I'm sure there are many, many people who probably have more AC than the dev does. Keep that in mind.
It wouldn't be AC in POS phase if there wasn't some sort of drama.
Goldmann, that was pretty fucking irresponsible of you.
Goldmann, that was pretty fucking irresponsible of you.
listen. we just found an potential issue and just informed the community about it.
some users posted some pages earlier that the amount in circulation wasn't the right one.
so we started investigating. we made it clear for everyone that the chain is okay and the first block legit.
so show some thank instead of blaming us. we are just trying to help.
sorry if somebody was scared.
Was that a way to pick up some cheap coins??
I'm sure (hopeful) it was a genuine concern, but FFS don't do something like that without fully comprehending the result of your actions. NOT GOOD!
I'm sure (hopeful) it was a genuine concern, but FFS don't do something like that without fully comprehending the result of your actions. NOT GOOD!
the dev is online.
will he post something to confirm he is not running away?
will he post something to confirm he is not running away?
he is offline now!
Weirdest Dev. Just don't know why he hasn't posted anything at all.
Agreed.
the dev is online.
will he post something to confirm he is not running away?
will he post something to confirm he is not running away?
he is offline now!
Weirdest Dev. Just don't know why he hasn't posted anything at all.
the dev is online.
will he post something to confirm he is not running away?
will he post something to confirm he is not running away?
he is offline now!
Weirdest Dev. Just don't know why he hasn't posted anything at all.
It wouldn't be AC in POS phase if there wasn't some sort of drama.
Goldmann, that was pretty fucking irresponsible of you.
Goldmann, that was pretty fucking irresponsible of you.
the dev is online.
will he post something to confirm he is not running away?
will he post something to confirm he is not running away?
he is offline now!
so blockexplorer is back online.
everything is working fine and it shows you the correct amounts on all wallets, tx ids, blockhashes, etc.
only the view on block Nr. 1 is buggy and we will fix this tonight.
have a nice day.
EXPLORER is showing wrong amount in circulation. NO WORRIES we will fix that bug shortly.
everything is working fine and it shows you the correct amounts on all wallets, tx ids, blockhashes, etc.
only the view on block Nr. 1 is buggy and we will fix this tonight.
have a nice day.
EXPLORER is showing wrong amount in circulation. NO WORRIES we will fix that bug shortly.
Hello,
Is unlocking the wallet enough to stake coins, or do you have to go in the command ?
Thanks
Is unlocking the wallet enough to stake coins, or do you have to go in the command ?
Thanks
Guys, if the DEV really wants to scam us then he could easily code the wallet that way, that the 'getinfo' command hides his premine. The only way to verify the total supply is from external sources or by inspecting the source code of the 'getinfo' command in the current wallet source.
+1
thas what i am trying to explain them...
and thats why we wanted to check everything and make sure 100% everything is fine.
but many ppl here are not thankful for things you provide and the stuff you do...
anyway you should not let out such a info if you're not 100% sure!
just my 2 cents
it would have been better to have researched it and then disclosed rather disclosed then researched. None the less I understand where you were coming from. No worries. Thanks for looking out...
okay we checked everything.
its fine. sorry guys. we didn't want to spread FUD.
we just wanted to make things clear and informed you all about that.
blockcrawler and "getblock / gethash" showed us everything is fine: 141273232.54352099 in circulation.
btw - if smbdy hides a 1st block premine than be sure that this one is also
able to edit rpcwallet.cpp in the sources and show you whatever he wants to show you.
thats no secure/safe research. "getinfo" was the first thing we tried. just for your information. but thats not enought. only
nontechnical / non-coder would rely on that..
its fine. sorry guys. we didn't want to spread FUD.
we just wanted to make things clear and informed you all about that.
blockcrawler and "getblock / gethash" showed us everything is fine: 141273232.54352099 in circulation.
btw - if smbdy hides a 1st block premine than be sure that this one is also
able to edit rpcwallet.cpp in the sources and show you whatever he wants to show you.
thats no secure/safe research. "getinfo" was the first thing we tried. just for your information. but thats not enought. only
nontechnical / non-coder would rely on that..
Phu! Thanks for investigating! Just to be clear:
Everything is ok, it was just a bug on the block explorer!
+1
Everything is Ok... So... we can go to the MOON
okay we checked everything.
its fine. sorry guys. we didn't want to spread FUD.
we just wanted to make things clear and informed you all about that.
its fine. sorry guys. we didn't want to spread FUD.
we just wanted to make things clear and informed you all about that.
Jezzush.... I missed a heartbeat. You don't know how close my finger was to pressing the " panic sell" button...
..I guess back to daily life again
okay we checked everything.
its fine. sorry guys. we didn't want to spread FUD.
we just wanted to make things clear and informed you all about that.
blockcrawler and "getblock / gethash" showed us everything is fine: 141273232.54352099 in circulation.
btw - if smbdy hides a 1st block premine than be sure that this one is also
able to edit rpcwallet.cpp in the sources and show you whatever he wants to show you.
thats no secure/safe research. "getinfo" was the first thing we tried. just for your information. but thats not enought. only
nontechnical / non-coder would rely on that..
its fine. sorry guys. we didn't want to spread FUD.
we just wanted to make things clear and informed you all about that.
blockcrawler and "getblock / gethash" showed us everything is fine: 141273232.54352099 in circulation.
btw - if smbdy hides a 1st block premine than be sure that this one is also
able to edit rpcwallet.cpp in the sources and show you whatever he wants to show you.
thats no secure/safe research. "getinfo" was the first thing we tried. just for your information. but thats not enought. only
nontechnical / non-coder would rely on that..
Phu! Thanks for investigating! Just to be clear:
Everything is ok, it was just a display bug on the block explorer!
Guys, if the DEV really wants to scam us then he could easily code the wallet that way, that the 'getinfo' command hides his premine. The only way to verify the total supply is from external sources or by inspecting the source code of the 'getinfo' command in the current wallet source.
+1
thas what i am trying to explain them...
and thats why we wanted to check everything and make sure 100% everything is fine.
but many ppl here are not thankful for things you provide and the stuff you do...
So why don't u explain like him, it is not a goodtime for something you r not sure about, and delete the redmark...
But thanks anyway for the hardwork
Guys, if the DEV really wants to scam us then he could easily code the wallet that way, that the 'getinfo' command hides his premine. The only way to verify the total supply is from external sources or by inspecting the source code of the 'getinfo' command in the current wallet source.
+1
thas what i am trying to explain them...
and thats why we wanted to check everything and make sure 100% everything is fine.
but many ppl here are not thankful for things you provide and the stuff you do...
okay we checked everything.
its fine. sorry guys. we didn't want to spread FUD.
we just wanted to make things clear and informed you all about that.
blockcrawler and "getblock / gethash" showed us everything is fine: 141273232.54352099 in circulation.
btw - if smbdy hides a 1st block premine than be sure that this one is also
able to edit rpcwallet.cpp in the sources and show you whatever he wants to show you.
thats no secure/safe research. "getinfo" was the first thing we tried. just for your information. but thats not enought. only
nontechnical / non-coder would rely on that..
its fine. sorry guys. we didn't want to spread FUD.
we just wanted to make things clear and informed you all about that.
blockcrawler and "getblock / gethash" showed us everything is fine: 141273232.54352099 in circulation.
btw - if smbdy hides a 1st block premine than be sure that this one is also
able to edit rpcwallet.cpp in the sources and show you whatever he wants to show you.
thats no secure/safe research. "getinfo" was the first thing we tried. just for your information. but thats not enought. only
nontechnical / non-coder would rely on that..
Jump to: