Access is a governance network that allows users to vote on tools and solutions they need developed so that teams of developers can build them for the ecosystem. It aims to help the unbanked obtain the basic financial tools they need to bypass the current infrastructure. Though, a lot of them only have dumb phones so they can delegate their votes (a function based on reputation and amount of tokens held) to agents from their community who can then vote on their behalf. Agents never obtain the tokens, they can juste wield their voting power but users can retract those rights at any time if agents don't vote like they would have wanted to.
Doesn't that open up possibilities for vote manipulation if one of the methods to be allowed to vote is how many tokens you have? Or did I get that wrong?