Topic: [ANN][AUR] Auroracoin - a cryptocurrency for Iceland - page 121. (Read 506425 times)
1% fee pool - http://aur.scrypthp.com - MPOS on superfast secure servers.
AuroraCoin Mining Pool.
Features
• PROP reward system.
• Stratum.
• Round earnings credited after 120 confirms.
• Payouts are processed every 5 minutes.
The pool has no transaction fees only a mining fee of 1%.
http://aur.cloudminers.net
Over the past week we experienced some issues mainly caused by DDOS attacks towards our pool.
The initial thought was to give up and close the pool down but that didn't seem fair to those who spent time and electricity to mine on our pool and for our initial commitment to the AuroraCoin project.
While we reassessed the situation our main worry was to keep the miners able to withdraw their funds
We therefore decided to re-build from scratch, ditch the old server, change mail provider, add stratum servers while still processing payouts.
We are now back and with some improvements!
Key features:
0.00001 TX fee
Minimum payout: 0.0001 AUR
2 stratum servers (1 for US, 1 for EU)
For problems you can contact us via PM here or using the contact us form on the pool.
http://aur.pool.mineabit.com/
The initial thought was to give up and close the pool down but that didn't seem fair to those who spent time and electricity to mine on our pool and for our initial commitment to the AuroraCoin project.
While we reassessed the situation our main worry was to keep the miners able to withdraw their funds
We therefore decided to re-build from scratch, ditch the old server, change mail provider, add stratum servers while still processing payouts.
We are now back and with some improvements!
Key features:
0.00001 TX fee
Minimum payout: 0.0001 AUR
2 stratum servers (1 for US, 1 for EU)
For problems you can contact us via PM here or using the contact us form on the pool.
http://aur.pool.mineabit.com/
Welcome back! I'm really glad you solved the problems
Over the past week we experienced some issues mainly caused by DDOS attacks towards our pool.
The initial thought was to give up and close the pool down but that didn't seem fair to those who spent time and electricity to mine on our pool and for our initial commitment to the AuroraCoin project.
While we reassessed the situation our main worry was to keep the miners able to withdraw their funds
We therefore decided to re-build from scratch, ditch the old server, change mail provider, add stratum servers while still processing payouts.
We are now back and with some improvements!
Key features:
0.00001 TX fee
Minimum payout: 0.0001 AUR
2 stratum servers (1 for US, 1 for EU)
For problems you can contact us via PM here or using the contact us form on the pool.
http://aur.pool.mineabit.com/
The initial thought was to give up and close the pool down but that didn't seem fair to those who spent time and electricity to mine on our pool and for our initial commitment to the AuroraCoin project.
While we reassessed the situation our main worry was to keep the miners able to withdraw their funds
We therefore decided to re-build from scratch, ditch the old server, change mail provider, add stratum servers while still processing payouts.
We are now back and with some improvements!
Key features:
0.00001 TX fee
Minimum payout: 0.0001 AUR
2 stratum servers (1 for US, 1 for EU)
For problems you can contact us via PM here or using the contact us form on the pool.
http://aur.pool.mineabit.com/
nice news 
new bottom 0.05?
new bottom 0.05? The trouble with this discussion is that most participants can't see the difference between facts and assumptions.
Let me demonstrate:
fact 1: The coin is 50% pre mined
I think we can all agree that this is indeed a fact. Now comes the transition:
Assumtion 1 (By the opposers): It's a scam because, the coin is 50% pre mined
Assumtion 1 (By the supporters): Dev is honest because he directly confessed the coin is 50% pre mined
You see what happens? The fact remains in place, but there has been put an addition to it. It's this addition that disqualifies the frase as a fact.
Funny part is, you can use this neat trick also the other way around and turn an assumption into a fact, again a demonstration:
Assumtion A: "BitcoinEXpress is the most genius member of this forum!"
Again I think we can all agree that we could fill pages of discussions between supporters and opponents.
Now we do our little trick:
Fact A: "If all other members would leave, BitcoinEXpress is the most genius member of this forum!"
So.... Lets try to keep this in mind next time when we waste valuable time on opposing each others "facts".
Theres no shame if one disagrees, as long as we can agree to disagree agreeably!
CHEERS
Let me demonstrate:
fact 1: The coin is 50% pre mined
I think we can all agree that this is indeed a fact. Now comes the transition:
Assumtion 1 (By the opposers): It's a scam because, the coin is 50% pre mined
Assumtion 1 (By the supporters): Dev is honest because he directly confessed the coin is 50% pre mined
You see what happens? The fact remains in place, but there has been put an addition to it. It's this addition that disqualifies the frase as a fact.
Funny part is, you can use this neat trick also the other way around and turn an assumption into a fact, again a demonstration:
Assumtion A: "BitcoinEXpress is the most genius member of this forum!"
Again I think we can all agree that we could fill pages of discussions between supporters and opponents.
Now we do our little trick:
Fact A: "If all other members would leave, BitcoinEXpress is the most genius member of this forum!"
So.... Lets try to keep this in mind next time when we waste valuable time on opposing each others "facts".
Theres no shame if one disagrees, as long as we can agree to disagree agreeably!
CHEERS
Nicely said Sir!!!
Totally agree! I just hope the dev sees the real impact he can make with this coin and do the airdrop successful!
My offer to help him spread the coins still stands! I can travel to Iceland on my own money and help him!
WHY? Because I want to be part of history!
or you want to kidnap him ...
looks like the coin is being pumped again !!! whales & sardines co.
tight your belts
tight your belts
nice earnings again
looks like the coin is being pumped again !!! whales & sardines co.
tight your belts
tight your belts
We have started new campaign on www.Coins2TheMoon.com:
Every Second Day is a 0% Fee Day You can trade for 0% trading fees on every other day.
When you login on header will be displayed "Today is a 0% Fee Day" or "Tomorrow is a 0% Fee Day".
Just to remind you: We have 72 Market Pairs and 22 Coins (AuroraCoin is in the list) to Trade!
Please note that it does not applies to withdrawal fees.
Happy tradings
Sincerely,
C2M Team
Every Second Day is a 0% Fee Day You can trade for 0% trading fees on every other day.
When you login on header will be displayed "Today is a 0% Fee Day" or "Tomorrow is a 0% Fee Day".
Just to remind you: We have 72 Market Pairs and 22 Coins (AuroraCoin is in the list) to Trade!
Please note that it does not applies to withdrawal fees.
Happy tradings
Sincerely,
C2M Team
Really interesting speach from the CEO of CCP (The company behind EVE Online) about the Icelandic krona and what (bad) effects it's had on the company. The speach is in Icelandic but at 25:10 he says this:
Icelandic:
English:
Icelandic:
Quote
Ég hélt að planið væri að ganga í Evrópusambandið og taka upp evru, það er eitthvað bakslag í því og nú á annaðhvort að taka upp danska krónu, kanadískan dollara eða Bitcoin? Ekki ætlum við að nota krónu? Er það? Er það planið?“
English:
Quote
I though the plan was to join the European Union and start using the Euro coin, now there is a backslash in that plan and now were supposed start using the danish krona, Canadian dollar or Bitcoin? We arent going to use the Icelandic króna? Are we? Is that the plan?
This is strange as the CCP pays its employees in Euro
I know, hes talking about Iceland. What will Iceland use in the future as he has no belief in the Icelandic krona. He also mentions in the video that the EVE Online currency is named ISK. They named it that in memory of the Icelandic krona (ISK) as they never expected Iceland to hold on to it for this long.
Price increasing a bit as BTC price decreases...
would love for my pool coins to confirm
Really interesting speach from the CEO of CCP (The company behind EVE Online) about the Icelandic krona and what (bad) effects it's had on the company. The speach is in Icelandic but at 25:10 he says this:
Icelandic:
English:
Icelandic:
Quote
Ég hélt að planið væri að ganga í Evrópusambandið og taka upp evru, það er eitthvað bakslag í því og nú á annaðhvort að taka upp danska krónu, kanadískan dollara eða Bitcoin? Ekki ætlum við að nota krónu? Er það? Er það planið?“
English:
Quote
I though the plan was to join the European Union and start using the Euro coin, now there is a backslash in that plan and now were supposed start using the danish krona, Canadian dollar or Bitcoin? We arent going to use the Icelandic króna? Are we? Is that the plan?
This is strange as the CCP pays its employees in Euro
Really interesting speach from the CEO of CCP (The company behind EVE Online) about the Icelandic krona and what (bad) effects it's had on the company. The speach is in Icelandic but at 25:10 he says this:
Icelandic:
English:
Icelandic:
Quote
Ég hélt að planið væri að ganga í Evrópusambandið og taka upp evru, það er eitthvað bakslag í því og nú á annaðhvort að taka upp danska krónu, kanadískan dollara eða Bitcoin? Ekki ætlum við að nota krónu? Er það? Er það planið?“
English:
Quote
I though the plan was to join the European Union and start using the Euro coin, now there is a backslash in that plan and now were supposed start using the danish krona, Canadian dollar or Bitcoin? We arent going to use the Icelandic króna? Are we? Is that the plan?
1% fee pool - http://aur.scrypthp.com - MPOS on superfast secure servers.
The trouble with this discussion is that most participants can't see the difference between facts and assumptions.
Let me demonstrate:
fact 1: The coin is 50% pre mined
I think we can all agree that this is indeed a fact. Now comes the transition:
Assumtion 1 (By the opposers): It's a scam because, the coin is 50% pre mined
Assumtion 1 (By the supporters): Dev is honest because he directly confessed the coin is 50% pre mined
You see what happens? The fact remains in place, but there has been put an addition to it. It's this addition that disqualifies the frase as a fact.
Funny part is, you can use this neat trick also the other way around and turn an assumption into a fact, again a demonstration:
Assumtion A: "BitcoinEXpress is the most genius member of this forum!"
Again I think we can all agree that we could fill pages of discussions between supporters and opponents.
Now we do our little trick:
Fact A: "If all other members would leave, BitcoinEXpress is the most genius member of this forum!"
So.... Lets try to keep this in mind next time when we waste valuable time on opposing each others "facts".
Theres no shame if one disagrees, as long as we can agree to disagree agreeably!
CHEERS
Let me demonstrate:
fact 1: The coin is 50% pre mined
I think we can all agree that this is indeed a fact. Now comes the transition:
Assumtion 1 (By the opposers): It's a scam because, the coin is 50% pre mined
Assumtion 1 (By the supporters): Dev is honest because he directly confessed the coin is 50% pre mined
You see what happens? The fact remains in place, but there has been put an addition to it. It's this addition that disqualifies the frase as a fact.
Funny part is, you can use this neat trick also the other way around and turn an assumption into a fact, again a demonstration:
Assumtion A: "BitcoinEXpress is the most genius member of this forum!"
Again I think we can all agree that we could fill pages of discussions between supporters and opponents.
Now we do our little trick:
Fact A: "If all other members would leave, BitcoinEXpress is the most genius member of this forum!"
So.... Lets try to keep this in mind next time when we waste valuable time on opposing each others "facts".
Theres no shame if one disagrees, as long as we can agree to disagree agreeably!
CHEERS
Ummm.... if I put the word "not" at the appropriate place in a sentence, it will kinda mean the opposite. So what? English is designed like that. I dont understand what you are trying to say. 50% premine is a fact, and all the people know that... those following this forum atleast. Are you saying people are trying to change that "fact" into an "assumption" by adding another line to it? What does that even mean?
Hi,
I'm sorry for not explaining why I posted this. It is not to give a lesson on how to use English, also not to prove posters saying it's a scam wrong. I just felt that so many people seem to scream out that others are retarded because they don't see the facts and then start rallying up all kinds of assumptions as if they were the facts, hence my examples...
I like how this thread is pretty chill and civilized, people are actually supporting the cause.
I've also been following the Mazacoin thread and people there are always talking about making huge profits and pumping it up (or wishing for whales to do so), too many people there don't seem to care at all about why the coin was made, only to make a profit.
I've also been following the Mazacoin thread and people there are always talking about making huge profits and pumping it up (or wishing for whales to do so), too many people there don't seem to care at all about why the coin was made, only to make a profit.
Native American Tribe Launches MazaCoin Cryptocurrency As Official Currency | http://[Suspicious link removed]/1ihU2Ce | Ecopreneurist Report | #MazaCoin
Lakota Indians Adopt New Digital Currency MazaCoin As Legal Tender | [Suspicious link removed]j.com/1kCOXc7 | Wall Street Journal Report | #MazaCoin
MZC GO TO moon!!!
Lakota Indians Adopt New Digital Currency MazaCoin As Legal Tender | [Suspicious link removed]j.com/1kCOXc7 | Wall Street Journal Report | #MazaCoin
MZC GO TO moon!!!
The trouble with this discussion is that most participants can't see the difference between facts and assumptions.
Let me demonstrate:
fact 1: The coin is 50% pre mined
I think we can all agree that this is indeed a fact. Now comes the transition:
Assumtion 1 (By the opposers): It's a scam because, the coin is 50% pre mined
Assumtion 1 (By the supporters): Dev is honest because he directly confessed the coin is 50% pre mined
You see what happens? The fact remains in place, but there has been put an addition to it. It's this addition that disqualifies the frase as a fact.
Funny part is, you can use this neat trick also the other way around and turn an assumption into a fact, again a demonstration:
Assumtion A: "BitcoinEXpress is the most genius member of this forum!"
Again I think we can all agree that we could fill pages of discussions between supporters and opponents.
Now we do our little trick:
Fact A: "If all other members would leave, BitcoinEXpress is the most genius member of this forum!"
So.... Lets try to keep this in mind next time when we waste valuable time on opposing each others "facts".
Theres no shame if one disagrees, as long as we can agree to disagree agreeably!
CHEERS
Let me demonstrate:
fact 1: The coin is 50% pre mined
I think we can all agree that this is indeed a fact. Now comes the transition:
Assumtion 1 (By the opposers): It's a scam because, the coin is 50% pre mined
Assumtion 1 (By the supporters): Dev is honest because he directly confessed the coin is 50% pre mined
You see what happens? The fact remains in place, but there has been put an addition to it. It's this addition that disqualifies the frase as a fact.
Funny part is, you can use this neat trick also the other way around and turn an assumption into a fact, again a demonstration:
Assumtion A: "BitcoinEXpress is the most genius member of this forum!"
Again I think we can all agree that we could fill pages of discussions between supporters and opponents.
Now we do our little trick:
Fact A: "If all other members would leave, BitcoinEXpress is the most genius member of this forum!"
So.... Lets try to keep this in mind next time when we waste valuable time on opposing each others "facts".
Theres no shame if one disagrees, as long as we can agree to disagree agreeably!
CHEERS
Ummm.... if I put the word "not" at the appropriate place in a sentence, it will kinda mean the opposite. So what? English is designed like that. I dont understand what you are trying to say. 50% premine is a fact, and all the people know that... those following this forum atleast. Are you saying people are trying to change that "fact" into an "assumption" by adding another line to it? What does that even mean?
Jump to: